| whoami-rajat | #startmeeting cinder | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed May 3 14:00:04 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is whoami-rajat. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:00 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic roll call | 14:00 |
| jungleboyj | o/ | 14:00 |
| rosmaita | o/ | 14:00 |
| simondodsley | o/ | 14:00 |
| nahimsouza[m] | o/ | 14:00 |
| felipe_rodrigues | o/ | 14:00 |
| thiagoalvoravel | o/ | 14:00 |
| caiquemello[m] | 0/ | 14:00 |
| zaitcev | o/ | 14:00 |
| MatheusAndrade[m] | o/ | 14:00 |
| enriquetaso | o/ | 14:00 |
| luizsantos[m] | o/ | 14:01 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bobcat-meetings | 14:01 |
| eharney | hi | 14:01 |
| lucasmoliveira059 | \o | 14:01 |
| whoami-rajat | hello | 14:03 |
| keerthivasansuresh | o/ | 14:03 |
| whoami-rajat | always happy to see good number of people joining | 14:04 |
| whoami-rajat | let's get started | 14:04 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic announcements | 14:04 |
| whoami-rajat | Cinder 2023.2 Bobcat Midcycle-1 | 14:04 |
| whoami-rajat | the first midcycle of 2023.2 cycle will be held on 02nd June | 14:05 |
| whoami-rajat | on wednesday between 1400-1600 UTC (our usual meeting time + 1 hour extra) | 14:05 |
| helenadantas[m] | hello | 14:05 |
| whoami-rajat | I've prepared an etherpad to gather the topics, we still have a month but good to add them early since we only have 2 hours | 14:06 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-bobcat-midcycles | 14:06 |
| jungleboyj | June 2nd is a Friday ... | 14:06 |
| whoami-rajat | wow, it should be 31st may ... | 14:06 |
| rosmaita | by 02 June, do you mean 31 May ? | 14:06 |
| * whoami-rajat checking again | 14:07 | |
| jungleboyj | :-) Cool. | 14:07 |
| whoami-rajat | it's correct on the release schedule but somehow in my personal notes the date is wrong | 14:07 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks for correcting it jungleboyj and rosmaita | 14:07 |
| whoami-rajat | it's actually 31st May | 14:08 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://releases.openstack.org/bobcat/schedule.html#b-cinder-mid-cycle-ptg-1 | 14:08 |
| whoami-rajat | so reiterating, we will be having our first midcycle of bobcat on 31st May (wednesday) 1400-1600 UTC | 14:08 |
| jungleboyj | ++ | 14:08 |
| whoami-rajat | please add your topics to the etherpad | 14:08 |
| whoami-rajat | next, Cinderlib 2023.1 (cycle trailing) release | 14:09 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-May/033536.html | 14:09 |
| whoami-rajat | there was an email from release team regarding the cycle trailing release | 14:10 |
| whoami-rajat | and we've the cinderlib project which is cycle trailing | 14:10 |
| whoami-rajat | i checked the open patches in cinderlib master and nothing seemed urgent or in a merge-able state so i proposed the release early | 14:11 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/882132 | 14:11 |
| whoami-rajat | if anyone has a urgent/required change in cinderlib that they want to include in 2023.1 release, they can propose it and let me know | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | but if there are no concerns, we will go ahead with releasing cinderlib 2023.1 (Antelope) | 14:12 |
| whoami-rajat | next, Stable releases | 14:13 |
| whoami-rajat | we recently released all active stable branches i.e. 2023.1, Zed, Yoga and Xena (final) | 14:14 |
| whoami-rajat | we also moved Xena to EM so there will be no more releases of xena | 14:14 |
| whoami-rajat | for the list of projects that are released with the recent stable releases, please go through the etherpad on L#101 | 14:15 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks to jbernard for carrying out all the releases! | 14:16 |
| jbernard | \o/ | 14:16 |
| zaitcev | Yeah. | 14:17 |
| enriquetaso | == | 14:17 |
| enriquetaso | ++ | 14:17 |
| jungleboyj | ++ | 14:17 |
| whoami-rajat | that's all the announcements i had, anyone has anything else that the team should be aware about? | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | rocky and stein were tagged EOL about an hour ago | 14:19 |
| rosmaita | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:cinder-eol | 14:19 |
| whoami-rajat | oh yes, forgot to provide an update on that | 14:20 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks rosmaita | 14:20 |
| whoami-rajat | so rocky and stein branches are not active anymore for cinder so we can't backport/propose patches to those branches now | 14:21 |
| whoami-rajat | i guess that's all for announcements, let's move to topics | 14:23 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic Cinder-Backup very slow / inefficient when using chunked drivers, e.g. S3 | 14:23 |
| whoami-rajat | crohmann doesn't seem to be around ... | 14:23 |
| * whoami-rajat going through the topic | 14:24 | |
| whoami-rajat | ok, so there are multiple things here | 14:27 |
| *** dviroel_ is now known as dviroel | 14:28 | |
| whoami-rajat | 1. chunked backup driver is slow during backup of large volumes as it processes each chunk | 14:28 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1918119 | 14:28 |
| whoami-rajat | there was an attempt to perform parallel read/write of the chunks | 14:28 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/779233 | 14:29 |
| whoami-rajat | Gorka has a comment on it saying we already have config options to do the same thing the patch is trying to do (though i haven't gone through the implementation) | 14:29 |
| whoami-rajat | backup_native_threads_pool_size | 14:30 |
| whoami-rajat | backup_max_operations | 14:30 |
| eharney | the existing options probably parallelize across multiple backups instead of one backup? | 14:30 |
| eharney | so not really the same thing | 14:30 |
| whoami-rajat | that's a good question, I'm not sure but i think you're right | 14:31 |
| whoami-rajat | backup_max_operations is for the number of worker processes | 14:31 |
| whoami-rajat | backup_native_threads_pool_size is for native thread in a particular worker | 14:31 |
| whoami-rajat | but i guess they take different backup operations and don't do parallel read/write of a single backup as eharney said | 14:32 |
| zaitcev | In theory I was going to look into the performance of backup/restore, but I got sidetracked with Keystone. | 14:32 |
| zaitcev | Also, people seem to assume that backup is infinitely parallel, but it's not true, because we compress a whole segment. Even if your network performance is infinite, and the back-end has millions of drives, you have to consume blocks as they are compressed. | 14:33 |
| whoami-rajat | looks like backup discussions are more frequent than ever, but maybe it's from the same author | 14:34 |
| whoami-rajat | yeah, backup is a combination of steps so anything during the whole operation can become a bottleneck | 14:35 |
| whoami-rajat | s/anything/any step | 14:35 |
| whoami-rajat | anyway, not an expert on backups | 14:36 |
| whoami-rajat | the second point in this was regarding NFS backup driver | 14:37 |
| whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/611079 | 14:37 |
| simondodsley | maybe fix the merge conflict first... | 14:37 |
| eharney | i haven't worked on this one in a while | 14:37 |
| eharney | it fixed an issue where the c-bak service would be blocked by i/o operations iirc | 14:38 |
| whoami-rajat | there is a comment on it by Christian today, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/611079/5#message-3fc554786126198652ed152f52de89d5237d5368 | 14:39 |
| whoami-rajat | anyway, that's all i could discuss about this from the agenda | 14:41 |
| whoami-rajat | anything else on this topic? | 14:41 |
| whoami-rajat | ok, let's move to open discussion | 14:43 |
| whoami-rajat | #topic open discussion | 14:43 |
| simondodsley | Just another call to get some reviews done by cores | 14:43 |
| whoami-rajat | we've 3 reviews in review request | 14:43 |
| raghavendrat | Requesting some feedback on below patch (HPE 3PAR). Thanks. | 14:43 |
| rosmaita | 4, i'm about to add another one | 14:43 |
| raghavendrat | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/879836 | 14:44 |
| enriquetaso | Requesting some feedback on the ceph backup restore fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/880965 . Thanks! | 14:45 |
| simondodsley | The Pure patch has been hanging around for 4 weeks. I'd really like to get this merged | 14:45 |
| eharney | test-requirements bump here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/879961 - have been trying to bump our mypy version up since March | 14:46 |
| keerthivasansuresh | O 9 | 14:49 |
| whoami-rajat | started reviewing the pure patch, lost track of time | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | I think that's all for today | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | thanks everyone for joining | 14:56 |
| whoami-rajat | #endmeeting | 14:56 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed May 3 14:56:58 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:56 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2023/cinder.2023-05-03-14.00.html | 14:56 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2023/cinder.2023-05-03-14.00.txt | 14:56 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2023/cinder.2023-05-03-14.00.log.html | 14:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!