*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 12:01 | |
*** dviroel_ is now known as dviroel | 12:27 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 13:07 | |
whoami-rajat | #startmeeting cinder | 14:01 |
---|---|---|
opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Sep 6 14:01:04 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is whoami-rajat. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'cinder' | 14:01 |
Saikumar | o/ | 14:01 |
whoami-rajat | #topic roll call | 14:01 |
jungleboyj | o/ | 14:01 |
eharney | hi | 14:01 |
rosmaita | o/ | 14:01 |
msaravan | hi | 14:01 |
felipe_rodrigues | o/ | 14:01 |
akawai | o/ | 14:01 |
toheeb | o/ | 14:02 |
jbernard | o/ | 14:02 |
thiagoalvoravel | o/ | 14:02 |
caiquemello[m] | o/ | 14:03 |
jayaanand | hi | 14:03 |
Dessira_ | o/ | 14:04 |
geguileo | o/ | 14:04 |
simondodsley | o/ | 14:04 |
whoami-rajat | hello everyone | 14:05 |
whoami-rajat | let's get started | 14:05 |
whoami-rajat | #topic announcements | 14:06 |
whoami-rajat | first, Midcycle -2 Summary | 14:06 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-September/034946.html | 14:06 |
whoami-rajat | Midcycle 2 summary is available at the Cinder wiki | 14:06 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBobcatMidCycleSummary | 14:06 |
whoami-rajat | next, TC Election Results | 14:06 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://civs1.civs.us/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_41d42603087bcf58 | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | following are the 4 candidates that got selected as TC this time | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | Ghanshyam Mann (gmann) | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | Dan Smith (dansmith) | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | Jay Faulkner (JayF) | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | Dmitriy Rabotyagov (noonedeadpunk) | 14:07 |
whoami-rajat | next, Recheck state (past week) | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | last week we had 2 bare rechecks out of 22 total rechecks | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | | Team | Bare rechecks | All Rechecks | Bare rechecks [%] | | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | | cinder | 2 | 22 | 9.09 | | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | which is a good number | 14:08 |
whoami-rajat | just to reiterate, if gate fails, it's always good to check the reason even if it's a random failure and put a recheck comment with that particular reason | 14:09 |
whoami-rajat | example, recheck cinder-barbican-lvm-lio job failed because of X test failure SSH Timeout | 14:10 |
whoami-rajat | another thing is the 90 days number | 14:10 |
whoami-rajat | | Team | Bare rechecks | All Rechecks | Bare rechecks [%] | | 14:10 |
whoami-rajat | | cinder | 112 | 356 | 31.46 | | 14:10 |
whoami-rajat | 112 bare rechecks out of 356 total | 14:10 |
whoami-rajat | which isn't bad percentage wise (31.46) but still good to improve upon it | 14:11 |
eharney | are we finding any particular patterns in the rechecks? | 14:11 |
rosmaita | no, i don't think anyone is analyzing that | 14:11 |
whoami-rajat | for my patches, cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican fails with SSHTimeout in some test | 14:12 |
whoami-rajat | the test is random | 14:12 |
whoami-rajat | but I haven't dug much deeper into it | 14:12 |
happystacker | I have issues with cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican and devstack-plugin-nfs-tempest-full from time to time | 14:13 |
whoami-rajat | it's better if we follow up on the recommendations discussed during midcycle | 14:14 |
whoami-rajat | and see if it makes any difference | 14:14 |
whoami-rajat | i see this patch from rosmaita where the ceph tempest job is passing after applying the mysql thing, but need more evidence to be certain https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/893798 | 14:18 |
rosmaita | yeah, there was some discussion that the mysql-reduce-memory thing was turned on by default, so that patch may be unnecessary | 14:19 |
whoami-rajat | oh ok | 14:19 |
whoami-rajat | we can check on that | 14:19 |
rosmaita | but i don't think it's on by default for the parents of those jobs | 14:19 |
whoami-rajat | ok | 14:21 |
whoami-rajat | i remember it was enabled in some tempest/devstack base jobs but good to check | 14:22 |
whoami-rajat | last announcement, Devstack dropped support for Focal | 14:23 |
rosmaita | (only in master, though) | 14:23 |
whoami-rajat | good correction | 14:23 |
whoami-rajat | the mail says, it was planned for Caracal but nova bumped the libvirt version | 14:24 |
whoami-rajat | so they had to remove the job | 14:24 |
whoami-rajat | even tempest did remove it's focal job | 14:24 |
rosmaita | i haven't looked, i don't think we had any focal jobs? except maybe rbd-iscsi-client? | 14:24 |
whoami-rajat | with a quick search i couldn't find any usage of those jobs | 14:24 |
whoami-rajat | devstack-platform-ubuntu-focal or tempest-full-ubuntu-focal jobs | 14:24 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, i couldn't find us using those jobs anywhere ^ | 14:25 |
rosmaita | sometimes we define a nodeset for our jobs, though | 14:25 |
rosmaita | ok, no nodeset specified in rbd-iscsi-client .zuul.yaml | 14:26 |
whoami-rajat | i can see that (nodeset openstack-single-node-focal) used in cinder-tempest-plugin for stable branch jobs so we should be good? | 14:27 |
whoami-rajat | https://opendev.org/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml | 14:27 |
rosmaita | yes, i think the problem is only if you use devstack master with focal | 14:27 |
whoami-rajat | because the libvirt version bump is only in master, so we are good | 14:28 |
whoami-rajat | thanks for confirming | 14:28 |
whoami-rajat | so, that's all for the announcements | 14:29 |
whoami-rajat | and i made a mistake in one of the announcement | 14:29 |
whoami-rajat | regarding TC elections | 14:29 |
whoami-rajat | rosmaita, can correct and better tell the details | 14:30 |
rosmaita | well, what is happening is that the election is *starting* now | 14:30 |
rosmaita | but something has changed with the way you register to vote | 14:30 |
rosmaita | #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-September/034981.html | 14:31 |
rosmaita | it used to be that the election coordinator gave a list to the voting website | 14:31 |
rosmaita | now, it's a list + you personally have to opt in to be able to vote | 14:31 |
rosmaita | so, you only have 9 hours to do that | 14:31 |
rosmaita | just to be clear | 14:32 |
rosmaita | you won't be able to vote unless you follow the instructions in the email | 14:32 |
rosmaita | before 23:45 UTC *today* | 14:32 |
whoami-rajat | thanks rosmaita ! | 14:33 |
whoami-rajat | so please do the registration and vote for the TC member of your choice | 14:34 |
whoami-rajat | now that's ACTUALLY all for the announcements | 14:35 |
whoami-rajat | let's move to topics | 14:35 |
whoami-rajat | #topic Feature Reviews | 14:35 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-September/034948.html | 14:36 |
whoami-rajat | FFE was granted for 6 features out of which None have merged till now | 14:36 |
whoami-rajat | some features have dependency on other patches which needs to be reviewed first | 14:37 |
whoami-rajat | let's go through it one by one | 14:37 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-2023.2-bobcat-features | 14:37 |
whoami-rajat | first, Fujitsu Driver: Add QoS support | 14:37 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/847730 | 14:37 |
inori | Here I am, | 14:37 |
whoami-rajat | reviews on this feature have been requested from time to time, I've taken a look twice and it looks good | 14:37 |
whoami-rajat | I would like another core to volunteer to take a look at it | 14:38 |
whoami-rajat | inori, hey | 14:38 |
inori | Thanks for your code-review +2 and review-priority, rajat. | 14:38 |
whoami-rajat | np, it's a review priority since we won't merge any feature after this week! | 14:39 |
inori | This feature is crucial for us, so we need another core reviewer to review it. | 14:39 |
rosmaita | ok, i will sign up | 14:39 |
jbernard | ive finished my stable stuffs, will try to help out on some of these now | 14:39 |
inori | Thank you rosmaita | 14:40 |
whoami-rajat | great, thanks rosmaita | 14:40 |
whoami-rajat | jbernard, thanks, we've more features that can benefit from reviews | 14:40 |
whoami-rajat | ok next, NetApp ONTAP: Added support to Active/Active mode in NFS driver | 14:41 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/889826 | 14:41 |
whoami-rajat | there were 3 patches for this feature | 14:41 |
whoami-rajat | 1 is merged and another already has 2 +2s | 14:41 |
whoami-rajat | this one requires another review and we are good to go here | 14:41 |
jungleboyj | Looking. | 14:42 |
whoami-rajat | again, require a volunteer to sign up for this review https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-2023.2-bobcat-features#L22 | 14:43 |
whoami-rajat | it's a small change actually | 14:43 |
whoami-rajat | jungleboyj, thanks! | 14:43 |
whoami-rajat | next, [NetApp] LUN space-allocation support for iSCSI | 14:44 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/893106 | 14:44 |
whoami-rajat | as per my last discussion with geguileo , the support they are trying to add still comes under thin provisioning | 14:45 |
whoami-rajat | specifically this part: It enables ONTAP to reclaim space automatically when host deletes data. | 14:45 |
geguileo | in my opinion that's thin provisioning | 14:45 |
whoami-rajat | when host reads/deletes data and it supports thin provisioning, then NetApp should be able to allocate or reclaim space based on that | 14:45 |
geguileo | without the possibility of reclaiming space with the trim/discard/unmap commands, then it's not really thin | 14:46 |
geguileo | what I don't know is if they should do that automatically when the pool is thin | 14:46 |
whoami-rajat | i think this feature can use some more discussion and is a good topic for PTG, for now it doesn't seem straightforward to include it in the release | 14:48 |
whoami-rajat | jayaanand, thanks for your efforts but the cinder team is still not convinced if the *proposed* way is the correct way for implementing this feature | 14:49 |
whoami-rajat | let's continue discussion on it and try to target it for the Caracal release | 14:50 |
whoami-rajat | ok moving on | 14:50 |
whoami-rajat | next, [Pure Storage] Replication-Enabled and Snapshot Consistency Groups | 14:50 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/891234 | 14:50 |
whoami-rajat | so the feature looks good, the problem is i couldn't find UTs for the new code added | 14:51 |
jayaanand | ok, thank you! we will take up in PTG | 14:51 |
whoami-rajat | i talked to simondodsley but he said the dev who works on UTs is out this week | 14:51 |
simondodsley | yep - sorry my mock-fu is not good | 14:52 |
whoami-rajat | so should we allow this feature and agree to do the UTs in a followup or block the feature due to the UTs? | 14:52 |
whoami-rajat | I'm assuming the code path is properly tested but in case a syntax error anywhere can break the operation (past experience) | 14:53 |
whoami-rajat | so wanted to know the team's opinion on it | 14:53 |
* whoami-rajat hears crickets | 14:56 | |
jbernard | i think (personally) since simon has been with us for quite some time, that it's okay | 14:57 |
whoami-rajat | jbernard, cool, thanks for your input | 14:58 |
whoami-rajat | I'm OK then to +2 it if simondodsley can reply to my comment saying UTs will be added as a followup (just to keep a record of it) | 14:58 |
whoami-rajat | jbernard, would you be OK being a second reviewer on that patch? | 14:59 |
jbernard | whoami-rajat: can do | 14:59 |
whoami-rajat | thanks! | 14:59 |
whoami-rajat | finally this is the last feature | 14:59 |
whoami-rajat | but we have no time left for this discussion | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | [HPE XP] Support HA and data deduplication | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/892608 | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | I've left a comment that 2 features shouldn't be part of the same patch | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | we can continue discussion on the patch itself | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | it's dependent patches all have +2 | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | need another reviewer to take a look | 15:00 |
whoami-rajat | we're out of time | 15:01 |
whoami-rajat | i will move the other topics for next meeting | 15:01 |
whoami-rajat | thanks everyone for joining! | 15:01 |
whoami-rajat | #endmeeting | 15:01 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Sep 6 15:01:14 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:01 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2023/cinder.2023-09-06-14.01.html | 15:01 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2023/cinder.2023-09-06-14.01.txt | 15:01 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2023/cinder.2023-09-06-14.01.log.html | 15:01 |
jungleboyj | ++ Thanks! | 15:01 |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 17:09 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 19:12 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 19:36 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 20:23 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 21:16 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 21:24 | |
*** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 23:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!