Wednesday, 2025-04-30

*** mhen_ is now known as mhen01:12
jbernard#startmeeting cinder14:09
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Apr 30 14:09:06 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jbernard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:09
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:09
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'cinder'14:09
jbernard#topic roll call14:09
jbernardo/14:09
simondodsleyo/14:09
Saio/14:09
agalicao/14:09
hvlcchao1o/14:09
sfernandhi14:09
rosmaitao/14:09
VrindaDhakadhi14:10
jbernardhello everyone, welcome14:14
jbernardone sec and we'll get started14:14
jbernard#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/cinder-flamingo-meetings14:15
jbernard^ here's our etherpad14:15
agamboao/14:15
jbernardwe do not have any particular topics for today14:16
jbernardi know we had some gate issues yesterday, simondodsley, rosmaita: how are things looks from your perspective?14:16
rosmaitanot good14:16
rosmaitai will be more specific14:17
jbernardwonderful, lets get into it :)14:17
rosmaitasimondodsley noticed that there had been a requirements change that broke our py39 based jobs14:18
rosmaitaso i put up a patch for that14:18
rosmaita#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/94834814:18
rosmaitaand that fixed the functional-py39 failures, but there are 2 other jobs failing 14:18
rosmaitacinder-plugin-ceph-tempest started failing on master on 25 april:14:19
rosmaitahttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=cinder-plugin-ceph-tempest&project=openstack/cinder14:19
gireesho/14:19
rosmaitacinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican started failing monday on master:14:19
rosmaitahttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=cinder-tempest-plugin-lvm-lio-barbican&project=openstack/cinder14:19
simondodsleyare other barbican jobs failing, or just ours?14:21
rosmaitagood question14:21
rosmaitahttps://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=barbican-tempest-plugin-simple-crypto14:23
simondodsleylooks like octavia as well, but there aren't may barbican jobs. I do see more upper-constraints changes in requirements due to osc-lib release... 14:23
jbernardi thought they tested requirements changes prior to help predict these sorts of failures14:24
jbernardi guess maybe not14:24
rosmaitathey mostly run unit tests and possibly functional tests14:25
simondodsleyyes - it looks like barbican is generally failing now as well https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=*barbican*&project=openstack%2Fbarbican&skip=014:25
jbernarddo we know specicically which requirement package/version is causing the failures?14:25
rosmaitano14:25
rosmaitaat least, i don't14:25
rosmaitaand i don't think we're seeing these fail in the stable branches14:26
simondodsleyit seems to have been around the 29th something changed14:26
rosmaita(although maybe that's because there's not much new stuff proposed for backport)14:26
simondodsleycorrect - only seem to be in master14:26
jbernardok, that's a lot to process14:30
jbernardwill look at this today14:30
jbernardi wonder if we can roll back a requirments change and just have the cinder functional tests run14:31
rosmaitathis is probably independent of requirements change14:32
rosmaitaand looking at the barbican repo, looks like theyh merged a shitload of stuff since RC114:32
jbernardok14:35
jbernardany good news? any at all?14:35
simondodsleyi got a ticket to the Miami Grand Prix!!14:36
rosmaitawe may need to ask them to run some cinder tests in their gate14:36
rosmaitahttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican/+/937752?tab=change-view-tab-header-zuul-results-summary14:36
jbernardsimondodsley: nice!14:36
jbernardrosmaita: ok, im happy to reach out to them today14:36
rosmaitatheir latest run of barbican-tempest-plugin-simple-crypto is showing the internal server errors that i think are responsible for us not being able to get a response from the key manager in our cinder-tempest-plugin tests14:38
rosmaitahttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/3f511fa396694e64a565a9ca63feb8eb14:38
rosmaitaha! that's on this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican/+/94839114:39
rosmaitalooks like gibi has noticed that the nova job is having issues14:40
jbernardok, so they may be aware of the problem14:41
jbernardill followup to be sure14:41
jbernardthanks for all of the investigation14:41
rosmaitaok, if you follow up on that one, i will continue to look at the cinder-plugin-ceph-tempest job14:42
jbernarddeal14:43
jbernard#topic open discussion14:44
simondodsleyas an aside - Red Hat team - enjoy your trip to Brno14:45
rosmaitawow, word really gets around ... thanks!14:45
simondodsleyi have kindly provided y'all with a nice new array to play with14:46
jbernardoh dang! new toys!14:46
rosmaitabtw, bobcat was tagged EOL and the branch will be deleted sometime within the next week or so14:47
jbernardok, nice work on all of that14:48
VrindaDhakadRegarding patch- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/925450 I've updated the release notes mentioning removal of config option. Let me know if it looks okay. Thankyou!14:50
jbernardoy, we need to get these gate issues sorted14:50
jbernardVrindaDhakad: thanks, ive added it to the review request list as well14:51
agamboaFor issue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/90131814:53
agamboaagilica and I are from Hitachi and working on Hitachi driver. For this issue, we also believe it will cause a bug. We’re working with Japan and Golden Week has prevented us from getting clarity on whether or not it requires fixing (ie is the feature being used upstream yet), so we need to rescind the review request for now.  Hopefully we will have clarity next week.14:53
jbernardagamboa: that's completely fine, you can mark it as work-in-progress if you'd like, or just leave brian's -1 as it is and update it once you know how to proceed14:54
kpdevsorry being late, I joined 15 minutes ago. The PR from Storpool export support of iSCSI needs review/ This has being already discussed here couple of months ago.. and updated as per discussion. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/84753614:55
rosmaitaagamboa: if you click on the three vertical dots way over on the top right of the gerrit review, you get an option to "Mark as work in progress"14:56
rosmaitai think you have to be the patch owner, though, or that option doesn't appear14:56
agamboathanks! will mark it as in progress or update14:57
jbernardkpdev: ack, added to the list14:57
kpdevthanks, its already added at line 714:58
jbernardkpdev: ok, i see14:59
jbernardkpdev: will address gate issues first and come back for those after15:00
kpdevok, ack.15:00
jbernardanything else? last call15:00
jbernard#endmeeing15:01
jbernardhmm15:02
jbernard#endmeeting15:02
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Apr 30 15:02:06 2025 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:02
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-04-30-14.09.html15:02
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-04-30-14.09.txt15:02
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2025/cinder.2025-04-30-14.09.log.html15:02
jbernardthere we go :)15:02
jbernardthank you everyone15:02

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!