Thursday, 2025-05-29

*** mhen_ is now known as mhen01:24
carloss#startmeeting manila15:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Thu May 29 15:00:07 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carloss. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:00
gouthamro/15:00
carlosscourtesy ping: dviroel  vhari carthaca msaravan Sai ashrodri gireesh15:00
Saio/15:00
haixin:)15:02
carlosso/ hello zorillas15:03
carlossour meeting agenda for today:15:03
carloss#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_meeting15:04
carlossso this is still the bugsquash week15:04
carlosswe'll get to that in a bit15:04
carlossbut first15:04
carloss#topic Announcements15:04
carlossSchedule and Deadlines15:05
carloss#link https://releases.openstack.org/flamingo/schedule.html (Flamingo Schedule)15:05
carlosswe're now two weeks away from our hackathon, which in the initial idea of the PTG targeted functional tests for the python-manilaclient repo15:05
carlosstargeting OSC, I mean15:06
carlosswe wanted to do that before we remove the manilaclient15:06
kpdevhi15:06
* carloss o/15:06
carlossdo you have any concerns with regards to the hackathon date? as in: are you okay with it being in two weeks from now?15:06
gouthamrsounds good; however we may need a bunch of pre-work to determine the gaps15:08
carlossgouthamr: yep, I can work on that15:09
gouthamrwait, you said two weeks from now15:09
gouthamrbut, on the schedule it is R-1315:09
gouthamrJun 30 - Jul 0415:09
carlossargh, yes15:09
carlosssomething wrong with my eyes today15:10
carlossgouthamr: thanks15:10
carlossnext deadline is spec freeze, 3 weeks from now15:10
carlossmy bad15:11
carlossthat's all I had for $topic15:12
carlossdo you have any other announcements you'd like to share with the zorillas today?15:12
gouthamrnot an announcement, per se.. but a word on availability - mine is going to be iffy over the next couple of months.. i'd probably engage more async than usual15:13
gouthamrhoping to still keep up with reviews, and will need some notice to have sync conversations15:13
carlossgouthamr: ack, thanks for the heads-up15:16
carlossand also for offering time in case we need :)15:17
carlosslet's switch to Bug triaging, and then we can talk bugsquash15:17
carloss#topic Bug Triage15:18
carloss#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug triage etherpad)15:18
carlossa bunch of new bugs15:18
carloss#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2111813 ([NetApp] enable aes-encryption for cifs)15:19
carlosswe seem to have a fix proposed:15:19
carloss#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/951087 ([NetApp] Enable aes-encryption for cifs)15:19
kpdevyes, assigned to self15:19
carlosskpdev: thank you15:19
carlosskpdev: is it breaking any workflows?15:20
kpdevits was fix of some error during cifs share creation15:20
kpdevmentioned in commit15:20
carlossyep15:20
carlossI think we can make it medium importance15:21
gouthamris this really a bug?15:21
gouthamrsounds like a missing feature.. what's failing without this?15:21
kpdevkind of bug or small feature.  was getting error during share creation KRB5KDC_ERR_ETYPE_NOSUPP.. mentioned in commit15:22
kpdevbut PR is small, I created bug and fixed via it.15:22
gouthamrsounds fine, some bugs are really RFEs15:22
gouthamrbut, did something change in ONTAP to require it?15:22
kpdevalso.. manila-grenade-skip-level-always still failing for recheck of all patches I retried since yesterday.15:22
carloss> also.. manila-grenade-skip-level-always still failing for recheck of all patches I retried since yesterday.15:23
carlossyep, that's one of the topics I wanted to mention, as I also noticed it when I was looking at changes from the bugsquash and rebasing them15:23
gouthamrhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/f9beac99a25043229c93ad2605d85e9d/log/job-output.txt#15713-1573615:24
gouthamr^ i haven't checked the chatter to see if neutron folks know about this15:24
gouthamrhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/f9beac99a25043229c93ad2605d85e9d/log/controller/logs/screen-neutron-api.txt looks fine to me15:28
carlossyes15:29
kpdev>but, did something change in ONTAP to require it?   ... No, nothing changed. it was downstreamed since last 2-3 years, upstreaming it now.15:29
gouthamrkpdev: sounds like some ONTAP configuration in your cloud requires this15:30
carloss++ - maybe we should tag as an RFE15:31
gouthamrSai/gireesh: please take a look.. i'd be concerned if this is not available/expected to be turned on my default.. because i've not seen an issue creating cifs shares/access rules without AES encryption enabled.. 15:31
kpdevI dont see any special config did for this feature. but yes netapp internal testing and review would be better to confirm.15:32
carloss++15:32
gouthamrhttps://kb.netapp.com/on-prem/ontap/da/NAS/NAS-KBs/Can_we_enable_AES_encryption_on_CIFS_server15:32
SaiI will dissolve with Gireesh on this. Will update him. Thanks. 15:32
SaiDiscuss*15:32
carlossSai: thanks15:33
gouthamralso this: https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/ontap/smb-admin/enable-disable-aes-encryption-kerberos-task.html15:33
gouthamr"Whether AES encryption is enabled by default and whether you have the option to specify encryption types depends on your ONTAP version." - maybe the driver will need to do this based on the ONTAP versions15:34
gouthamralso, the option is changing with newer versions 15:35
gouthamrwith newer versions of ONTAP, you can specify the encryption type 15:35
kpdevhmm. so this will be 9.11.1 and earlier15:35
kpdevI will update fix to consider versions15:36
carlosskpdev++15:37
carlossthanks15:38
carlossI think we have time for another untriaged bug15:38
carloss#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2111905 (NetApp - Need to provide the option to override the “is-shared” field value for qos policy created during share creation)15:39
carlosssounds like an RFE15:40
gouthamryeah15:40
carlossi see gireesh already added himself to assignee15:40
carlosslikely low prio15:40
gouthamr+115:41
carlossSai: are you aware if gireesh is planning to work on this?15:41
gireeshyes, these are kind of RFE, one of the customer is requesting for these. We will work on these 15:41
carlossgireesh: ack, thank you!15:42
carlosswe have another untriaged bug that seems a bit high prio15:43
* carloss is hijacking all the time of bugsquash to bug triaging :/15:43
carlossthis is the last one I'll bring up today, I promise15:43
carloss#link #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2111918 ([Manila][NetApp][REST]Share deletion is failing at NetApp volume creation saying: Field "retention_period" cannot be set in this operation")15:43
carlossSai thank for reporting this bug!15:44
carlossI've set kpdev as an assignee mostly for an investigation reason, as I think he might have the most context on this change15:44
SaiNp, Thank you carloss !! 15:44
carlossapparently, share deletion is failing in REST15:44
carlosskpdev: could you please take a look?15:44
carlossthis might be a regression15:45
carlossif it is, we'll need to have an owner to this fix15:45
kpdevNo, I had added fix there based on documentation. but this time we need correct soluton from netapp15:45
kpdevsince the field I mentioned no longer present in REST documentation.15:45
kpdevso need to find another way to provide retention_period. NetApp needs to update on bug how to do it and then I will raise PR.15:46
carlossso might be something varying from one ontap version to another?15:46
carlossso, this is one of those issues the NetApp CI would easily catch :/ 15:46
Saikpdev: Meanwhile, can you please update the documentation you referred earlier in the bug. Thanks 15:47
kpdevnot sure about version, we are not using REST yet.15:47
gireeshretention_period need to set in patch call not in post call. Once vserver is created after that we have to set this parameter - kpdev15:47
kpdevThe documentation redirect to new pages now, I had shared with you earlier15:47
kpdev@gireesh: got it, can anyone from netapp update that on bug ?15:48
gireeshok, I'll do this 15:48
carlossack, thank you15:48
carlossplease update the bug as well15:48
carlossalright, let's move to the next topic15:49
carloss#topic Bugsquash - Review-a-thon15:50
carlosshttps://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-flamingo-m1-bugsquash (Flamingo m-1 bugsquash)15:50
carloss#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-flamingo-m1-bugsquash (Flamingo m-1 bugsquash)15:50
carlossso we had the kick-off call on Tuesday and I am posting the video to the YouTube channel15:50
carlosswe've got review assignments, so I'd like to ask reviewers to take a look at the changes15:51
carlosswe have the CI situation at the moment, but there are some easy wins for us that are not relying on the CI being working rn15:51
carlossI'm talking about documentation bugs15:52
carloss#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/945891 (Add mount snapshot support to user guide)15:53
carloss#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/934462 (Updates the share extend and shrink documentation)15:53
carloss#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/946505 (use os cli for shared-file-crud-share.rst)15:53
carlosstwo of these already have +2s/+1 from cores15:54
carlosscan I get more eyes on them?15:54
gouthamryep15:54
haixini will check this15:54
carlossgouthamr haixin thank you very much!15:54
carlossnow for the other changes, which are being impacted by the CI situation15:55
carlossI've looked at the job history and apparently it is failing for a while15:55
carlossI tried correlating to the changes that were merged to openstack/neutron on a given date but these don't seem to be a problem15:56
carlossand as gouthamr also mentioned, neutron API seems to be working just fine15:56
carlossI posted some review comments to a bunch of changes, some are being resolved, but CI won't let these changes merges even if we have agreement from reviewers15:57
carlossI'll investigate the failures15:57
carlossin the meantime15:57
carlossnot a very good timing for the CI being broken15:59
carlossbut I think we are getting reviews in some changes15:59
carlossand when CI issues are fixed, we can go ahead and merge the changes that are blocked by it15:59
carlossquestions? suggestions?16:00
carlossalright, let's wrap up16:01
carlossand get back to #openstack-manila16:01
carlossthanks for participating16:01
carlossand have a great day16:01
carloss#endmeeting16:01
opendevmeetMeeting ended Thu May 29 16:01:29 2025 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:01
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/manila/2025/manila.2025-05-29-15.00.html16:01
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/manila/2025/manila.2025-05-29-15.00.txt16:01
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/manila/2025/manila.2025-05-29-15.00.log.html16:01

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!