Thursday, 2025-10-09

*** mhen_ is now known as mhen01:59
*** vhari_ is now known as vhari14:57
carloss#startmeeting manila15:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Thu Oct  9 15:00:10 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is carloss. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'manila'15:00
carlosscourtesy ping: dviroel vhari gouthamr Sai ashrodri gireesh15:00
vharihi15:00
Saio/15:00
zgoggino/15:02
kpdevhi15:02
carlosso/ hello everyone and welcome15:05
carlossthanks for joining15:05
carlossand let's get started15:05
carlossour meeting agenda for today:15:05
carloss#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Meetings#Next_meeting (Meeting agenda)15:05
carlosslet's start with our first topic:15:06
carloss#topic Announcements15:06
carlossSchedule and Deadlines15:07
carloss#link https://releases.openstack.org/gazpacho/schedule.html (Gazpacho Schedule)15:07
carlossthis is the second week of the Gazpacho cycle15:07
carlossand we're two weeks away from the PTG15:08
carlosss/two weeks/ ~20 days15:08
carlossI've already booked some slots for the PTG week, as you can see in the official PTG schedule:15:08
carloss#link https://ptg.opendev.org/ptg.html (PTG schedule)15:08
carlossbut we might see some changes for the Monday slot15:09
* gouthamr logs in, marks himself tardy15:09
* carloss waves at gouthamr o/15:10
carlossI'll update you as soon as possible on any change I make to the schedule15:10
carlossbut we can use the current allocated time slots as a starting point15:10
Anoop_ShuklaHi15:11
gireeshhi15:11
carlossgireesh Anoop_Shukla o/15:11
carlossthat's all I had in terms of announcements15:12
carlossdo you have an announcement to share today?15:12
* carloss taking silence as no15:12
carlossI have a late addition to this meeting15:13
carloss#topic Collab review follow-up15:13
carlosskpdev: thanks for walking us through the encryption testing changes15:13
carlossthe video is now available in:15:13
carloss#link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEidfpE7isk (Encryption testing collab review video)15:13
carlossmy apologies for how long it took for me to post the video15:14
kpdevI have updated as per suggestion but seems the way it is used in another example there is no presence of secret_v115:14
carlosskpdev: ack, thanks for updating the change15:15
kpdev@goutham can you please check PR and reply. So either that support needs to add in tempest or new REST client support needs to add in manila-tempest-pugin for secret/barbican15:15
carlossgireesh Anoop_Shukla Sai: I have something to ask as a follow-up of the collab review: could you please check the video and share your thoughts on the change? we need your thoughts on the change as noted in the collab review15:16
Anoop_ShuklaSure @carloss 15:17
SaiSure carloss15:17
gouthamrhey kpdev ack, I couldn’t find an elegant solution myself, but, it’s possible the client import like the way you’re doing is broken in tempest15:18
carlossand apologies for the timing that meeting was scheduled. It was a holiday in India making it difficult for you to join. If I suggest a meeting in a day that's a holiday (and this is for anyone interested on participating in the community) please let me know and we can accommodate it to the most suitable time for you to participate15:18
gouthamrkpdev: could be a bug, let’s seek reviews from the tempest cores copied15:18
kpdevthe support exist for nova, cinder, neutron.. not for key-manager15:19
carloss> kpdev: could be a bug, let’s seek reviews from the tempest cores copied15:19
carloss++15:19
kpdevok15:21
carlosskpdev gouthamr: thank you for the updates15:23
carlossanything else you'd like to add to $topic?15:23
kpdev@gotham: can you please also reply on PR for tempest cores suggestion ?15:24
kpdev*@gouthamr: can you please also reply on PR for tempest cores suggestion ?15:25
gouthamrsure15:25
carlossgouthamr++ kpdev++15:26
carlosslet's switch to the next topic15:26
carloss#topic Review focus15:26
carloss#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/manila-gazpacho-review-focus (Gazpacho review focus)15:26
carlossI've created the gazpacho review etherpad15:27
carlossand added updates to the changes15:27
carloss+ added a couple of changes to the bottom15:27
carlossplease add changes you'd like some attention to the list15:27
carlossat the top I kept the specs that we carried over from the previous cycle15:30
carlossthe status are also updated for every single change15:32
gouthamr++ think we ought to do a review jam before PTG to clean out this list15:33
carlossyeah, that is a good idea15:33
carlossalso can help with topics for the PTG in case we need it15:33
unluckyt[m]Will it be necessary to add the schemas to this etherpad to get reviewed?15:34
carlossunluckyt[m]: not necessary but nice to raise awareness :)15:35
carlosswe can group all of the schemas change under a topic15:35
unluckyt[m]sounds good 👍️15:36
carlossis there any change you'd like some attention at the moment? I looked at the list and can spot some things that can be a bit pressing at this time of the cycle (i.e. not RFEs, mostly bugs)15:36
carlossif not, we can switch topics :)15:37
carlossand we'll touch base on those pressing changes in the bug triage part15:37
carloss#topic Bug Triage (vhari)15:38
vharity carloss 15:38
carloss#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/manila-bug-triage-pad-new (Bug Triage etherpad)15:38
carlosso/ vhari 15:38
vhari\o15:38
vhariwe don't have any new bugs on the triage agenda 15:38
vhariwould like to revisit #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/205463715:38
vhariper gouthamr request 15:39
vharigouthamr, floor is yours :)15:39
gouthamrhey just wanted an update here15:40
gouthamrfrom the NetApp folks; we began his15:40
gouthamrHitting this in customer environments and we’d like to know if there’s a workaround or a timeline for a fix15:41
gireeshsure, we will look into this 15:42
vharity gireesh 15:42
vharipls have a look at #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2122737 as well15:42
vharilooking for any updates on both 15:43
vhariany considerations wrt either bug today?15:43
vharik, moving on 15:44
vhari#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2109376  15:44
carlossat the end this is a python-manilaclient issue15:44
vharicarloss, want to share a fix for this bug https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/95892115:44
carlossyep15:44
carlossI've got gouthamr's blessing (ty) - gireesh kpdev could you please take a look?15:45
gireeshsure 15:45
carlossI've also found another bug that the ensure shares change introduced/surfaced. Proposed a fix for it as well: 15:46
carloss#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/963465 (Ensure shares is not properly executed when the driver does not implement it)15:46
carlossthis can impact all backends that don't implement ensure_shares, and rely on ensure_share15:46
carlossi can backport both when they merge15:46
carlossbut would be nice to get them in and get rid of those two bugs15:47
vharibig catch ty carloss15:47
vharithat's it for bugs today folks 15:48
gireeshRegarding bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/2054637, @kpdev added some logic to set the retention period by setting netapp_delete_retention_hours parm in manila.conf 15:48
carlossvhari++ ty15:48
vharity for the update gireesh , will have a look15:49
carloss#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/manila/+/932912 ([Netapp] make deleted volume retention period configurable)15:49
carlossthis one gireesh?15:49
carlossI see it is defaulting to 12 hours at the moment15:51
carlossgouthamr: maybe this backport can help a bit?15:51
gireeshbut when we set netapp_delete_retention_hours value to "0", it is not updating on vserver. @kpdev any idea ..? 15:51
* carloss is remembering this change now15:52
kpdevfor 0, its not updating on vserver15:52
gireeshmin value is 1 in that case 15:53
kpdevdefault is 12. so it will not change default behavior15:53
kpdevthe bug filed at 02-2024 PR is merged at 12-2024. check if we can still reproduce this15:54
carlosskpdev: thanks for checking15:56
gouthamrmy problem is really with DHSS=False15:57
gouthamralthough interested in the other mode as well15:57
gouthamrbut, ideally, if some new settings are needed, maybe document it in the NetApp Guide?15:58
gireeshfor dhss_false customer can modify this value on ONTAP, vserver modify -vserver vs_test -volume-delete-retention-hours 015:58
gireeshcustomer need to use diag mode to apply this change 15:59
* carloss checks time15:59
gouthamroh, who thought that’s a great idea15:59
gouthamrdiag mode iirc is something only NetApp folks can use :/16:00
gouthamrty gireesh; we’ll see if this works in our case16:00
carlossthanks, let's continue in #openstack-manila16:00
carlossthank you for participating16:01
carlosshave a great day!16:01
carlossand let's wrap up :)16:01
carloss#endmeeting16:01
opendevmeetMeeting ended Thu Oct  9 16:01:17 2025 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:01
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/manila/2025/manila.2025-10-09-15.00.html16:01
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/manila/2025/manila.2025-10-09-15.00.txt16:01
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/manila/2025/manila.2025-10-09-15.00.log.html16:01

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!