*** dolphm has quit IRC | 00:03 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:03 | |
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:05 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 00:07 | |
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec | 00:07 | |
*** Mandell_ has quit IRC | 00:22 | |
*** huats has quit IRC | 00:24 | |
*** lcheng has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** AlanClark has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** hggdh has quit IRC | 00:27 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:29 | |
*** huats has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:29 | |
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:29 | |
*** ncode has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
*** johnpur has left #openstack-meeting | 00:34 | |
*** lloydde_ has quit IRC | 00:38 | |
*** s0mik has quit IRC | 00:44 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC | 00:46 | |
*** oubiwann1 has quit IRC | 00:47 | |
*** ayoung has quit IRC | 00:49 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 00:53 | |
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:54 | |
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:58 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 01:01 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:02 | |
*** zhuadl has quit IRC | 01:02 | |
*** Gordonz has quit IRC | 01:05 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:10 | |
*** ncode has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:15 | |
*** johnpostlethwait has quit IRC | 01:25 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:37 | |
*** jog0 has left #openstack-meeting | 01:38 | |
*** PotHix has quit IRC | 01:42 | |
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:49 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 01:57 | |
*** zhuadl has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:00 | |
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:21 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:21 | |
*** tongli has quit IRC | 02:25 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:25 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
*** dolphm has quit IRC | 02:36 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 02:38 | |
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman | 02:49 | |
*** jdurgin has quit IRC | 02:55 | |
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:03 | |
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:05 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
*** littleidea_ is now known as littleidea | 03:07 | |
*** Gordonz has quit IRC | 03:10 | |
*** kindaopsdevy has quit IRC | 03:11 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 03:24 | |
*** ncode has quit IRC | 03:35 | |
*** zhuadl has quit IRC | 03:39 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:53 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 03:59 | |
*** thingee is now known as thingee_zz | 04:10 | |
*** thingee_zz has left #openstack-meeting | 04:11 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:13 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 04:19 | |
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:25 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 04:28 | |
*** littleidea_ is now known as littleidea | 04:28 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 04:33 | |
*** garyk has quit IRC | 04:42 | |
*** zhuadl has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:49 | |
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away | 04:57 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:02 | |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:05 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:07 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 05:17 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:17 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 05:23 | |
*** rohitk has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:25 | |
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:35 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:43 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
*** adjohn has quit IRC | 06:19 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 06:22 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 06:25 | |
*** rafaduran has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:46 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:47 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 07:06 | |
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:09 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 07:14 | |
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov | 07:20 | |
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:02 | |
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:03 | |
*** blamar has quit IRC | 08:42 | |
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 09:13 | |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 09:17 | |
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:46 | |
*** zhuadl has quit IRC | 09:55 | |
*** asalkeld has quit IRC | 09:58 | |
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:53 | |
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC | 11:30 | |
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:06 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:07 | |
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:16 | |
*** jrd-redhat has quit IRC | 12:20 | |
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:20 | |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 12:20 | |
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann | 12:20 | |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
*** dolphm_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:36 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:39 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:07 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 13:08 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:08 | |
*** dolphm_ has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
*** jrd-redhat has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:15 | |
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:15 | |
*** dolphm has quit IRC | 13:15 | |
*** rohitk_1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:25 | |
*** rohitk has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
*** ncode has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:34 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:36 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:43 | |
*** dolphm_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:51 | |
*** milner_ has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 13:54 | |
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:03 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:04 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 14:04 | |
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:06 | |
*** milner_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:08 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:12 | |
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-meeting | 14:12 | |
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:12 | |
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:18 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 14:21 | |
*** eltayeb has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:22 | |
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:23 | |
*** blamar has quit IRC | 14:23 | |
eltayeb | best tests for pass solaris 10 certificate ??? | 14:27 |
---|---|---|
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 14:31 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:33 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:35 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 14:37 | |
*** eltayeb has left #openstack-meeting | 14:39 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:43 | |
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:44 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 14:46 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:02 | |
*** derekh has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:07 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:07 | |
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:07 | |
*** dprince_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:25 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 15:26 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 15:29 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 15:30 | |
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:31 | |
*** jrd-redhat has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 15:49 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
*** rafaduran has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:59 | |
*** mrevell has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
nijaba | #startmeeting | 16:00 |
nijaba | #meetingtopic Ceilometer | 16:00 |
nijaba | #chair nijaba | 16:00 |
nijaba | #link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda | 16:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Thu Aug 9 16:00:02 2012 UTC. The chair is nijaba. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:00 | |
openstack | Current chairs: nijaba | 16:00 |
nijaba | Hello everyone! Show of hands, who is around for the ceilometer meeting? | 16:00 |
nijaba | o/ | 16:00 |
mrevell | o/ | 16:00 |
*** DanD has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:00 | |
*** ppetit has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:01 | |
nijaba | dhellmann: around? | 16:01 |
gmb | 0/ | 16:01 |
nijaba | ok, let's start | 16:01 |
*** glauaguiar has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:01 | |
nijaba | #topic actions from previous meeting | 16:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "actions from previous meeting (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:01 | |
nijaba | #topic jaypipes to create ceilometer cookbook | 16:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "jaypipes to create ceilometer cookbook (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:01 | |
nijaba | jaypipes: any progress on this? | 16:02 |
jaypipes | nijaba: no, sorry man | 16:02 |
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-afk | 16:02 | |
nijaba | should I forward the action? | 16:03 |
jaypipes | nijaba: might be able to get to it over weekend or monday | 16:03 |
jaypipes | nijaba: sure | 16:03 |
nijaba | #action jaypipes to create ceilometer cookbook | 16:03 |
nijaba | #topic jtran to open a ticket for the DB access work | 16:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "jtran to open a ticket for the DB access work (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:03 | |
nijaba | jtran informed us that he won't be able to join us this week, but did open the bug: | 16:03 |
nijaba | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1034666 | 16:03 |
uvirtbot | Launchpad bug 1034666 in ceilometer "Remove nova db access for all ceilometer code" [Undecided,New] | 16:03 |
nijaba | #topic nijaba to create a diagram of ceilometer architecture | 16:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "nijaba to create a diagram of ceilometer architecture (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:04 | |
nijaba | I have prepared a first version of this diagram that you can see here: | 16:04 |
nijaba | #link https://docs.google.com/drawings/pub?id=1_cIFir6HS6jSkPw7chrmyu8DGE2ZgXk79Kbj8nw-Hqo&w=960&h=720 | 16:04 |
nijaba | Comments are welcome. | 16:04 |
nijaba | I can share the google doc with anyone who wants to modify it | 16:04 |
DanD | is there a description of component responsiblitiy? | 16:05 |
nijaba | DanD: not at the moment, but could be a nice addition | 16:05 |
nijaba | if anyone wants to comment later, ping me... | 16:06 |
nijaba | #action nijaba to write description of componet responsibility | 16:06 |
nijaba | let's move on | 16:07 |
nijaba | #topic Discuss dhellmann's API change proposal | 16:07 |
nijaba | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2012-August/000389.html | 16:07 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Discuss dhellmann's API change proposal (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:07 | |
nijaba | not sure if dhellmann has joined us... | 16:07 |
dhellmann | sorry, running late | 16:08 |
nijaba | np | 16:08 |
nijaba | so the proposal seemed very reasonable | 16:08 |
nijaba | and jaypipes' comment made it even better | 16:08 |
dhellmann | jd___ approved the changeset, but we can make adjustments as needed | 16:08 |
dhellmann | yes, thanks jaypipes | 16:08 |
nijaba | any other comment before we formally approve it? | 16:09 |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
nijaba | if not, then I propose that we skip voting and just mark this as agreed | 16:09 |
nijaba | going once | 16:10 |
nijaba | twice | 16:10 |
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:10 | |
dhellmann | it would help if someone had a few minutes to go through the URL list in comments in the v1.py file now and make sure all of the endpoints from the original list are included | 16:10 |
dhellmann | I double checked, but a second set of eyes is always good | 16:10 |
nijaba | dhellmann: i did this summarilly this morning. I can take the action to do a better match | 16:11 |
dhellmann | ok, thanks! | 16:11 |
nijaba | #agreed new api proposal from dhellmann provide a second check that all case are covered | 16:11 |
nijaba | #action nijaba to do a second thouroughness check on API and report next week | 16:12 |
nijaba | #topic Discuss priority of maintaining Essex support and find contributor to work on it if we are going to do it | 16:12 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Discuss priority of maintaining Essex support and find contributor to work on it if we are going to do it (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:12 | |
jd___ | lo | 16:12 |
jd___ | sorry i'm late :) | 16:12 |
nijaba | hey jd___! | 16:12 |
jd___ | (i'm on holidays so my schedule is a bit chaotic :) | 16:13 |
nijaba | so, it seemed last week that jtran wanted this to happen, but was not sure to be able to do it alone, correct? | 16:13 |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 16:13 | |
jd___ | seems so | 16:13 |
dhellmann | that's how I remember it | 16:13 |
nijaba | is anyone here that care about this and wants to second him? | 16:13 |
nijaba | it seems that most of us really care about folsom support | 16:14 |
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:14 | |
dhellmann | I thought loic wanted it, too? | 16:14 |
nijaba | dhellmann: yep, but he does not seem to be around | 16:14 |
dhellmann | ok | 16:14 |
jd___ | i though too but it's away for a while now so maybe he doesn't care about it now | 16:15 |
jd___ | s/it/he | 16:15 |
nijaba | so I propose that we postpone this until someone proposes himself? | 16:15 |
dhellmann | +1 | 16:15 |
jd___ | I agree | 16:15 |
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:16 | |
jd___ | i'm all for do-ocracy on this :) | 16:16 |
dhellmann | there has been some progress on moving the service and manager bits out of nova into common, which will help us | 16:16 |
dhellmann | we want that anyway, even for folsom | 16:16 |
jd___ | yup | 16:16 |
nijaba | #agreed essex support postponed until someone that cares about it signals himself and want to work on it | 16:16 |
nijaba | moving on... | 16:17 |
*** Gordonz has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
nijaba | #topic Discuss integration with Heat | 16:17 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Discuss integration with Heat (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:17 | |
nijaba | so their are 2 subtopics here | 16:17 |
nijaba | 1/ instrumenting heat so that ceilometer can meter it | 16:17 |
* dhellmann doesn't know what heat is | 16:17 | |
nijaba | 2/ the "cloudwatch" proposal | 16:18 |
nijaba | dhellmann: heat is a project to mimick AWS cloudformation in openstack | 16:18 |
nijaba | it has just been submited for incubation | 16:18 |
nijaba | like use, the response was postoned | 16:18 |
ppetit | Don't want to speak for Heat representative but heat is more than that. Its an attempt to support CloudFormation for OpenStack | 16:18 |
dhellmann | ok, thanks for the background | 16:19 |
nijaba | ppetit: any better definition is welcome | 16:19 |
jd___ | hi ppetit | 16:19 |
ppetit | As per the support of CloudFormation's service semantic, support of CloudWatch is desirable. | 16:19 |
ppetit | Hi! | 16:20 |
nijaba | so, regarding 1/, I think we would welcome to see heat instrumented too, right? | 16:20 |
ppetit | But also auto-scaling, ... and other integrated cloud services that are part of AWS | 16:20 |
nijaba | question being, how and who... | 16:21 |
ppetit | Not sure this is heat we'd like to instrument. | 16:21 |
dhellmann | yeah, I was just reaching that conclusion: what would we meter in heat? | 16:21 |
jd___ | cloudwatch is part of heat too actually, no? | 16:21 |
ppetit | I think the propoal was more about having one point of support for CloudWatch-like functionality | 16:21 |
dhellmann | and CloudWatch is monitoring? | 16:21 |
ppetit | And that would be under Ceilometer project instead of Heat | 16:22 |
nijaba | so that's point #2 | 16:22 |
nijaba | for which, as I said on the ml, I think we need to discuss this at ODS in october | 16:22 |
dhellmann | agreed | 16:22 |
ppetit | Yes, I think it makes sense because the subject is complexe | 16:23 |
ppetit | We are speaking of an ecosystem of components | 16:23 |
nijaba | exactly | 16:23 |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:24 | |
*** garyk has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
dhellmann | it may be appropriate for the monitoring tool to listen for metering events, but as nijaba pointed out they are likely not to come frequently enough | 16:24 |
*** danwent has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
nijaba | so I propose the following agreement: "propose a joint session with heat at ODS regarding cloudwatch" | 16:24 |
dhellmann | +1 | 16:25 |
ppetit | One neat thing about CloudWatch-like functionality is the support of a monitoring service above ceilometer with stuffs like policies, recovery action, threshold monitoring and so forth.... | 16:25 |
jd___ | dhellmann: sure but they can write their own metering tools too | 16:25 |
dhellmann | jd___: sure | 16:25 |
nijaba | ppetit: I fully agree on the usefulness | 16:25 |
*** donaldngo has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:25 | |
nijaba | any one against the above proposal? | 16:26 |
nijaba | ... | 16:26 |
nijaba | #agreed propose a joint session with heat at ODS regarding cloudwatch | 16:26 |
nijaba | ok, so let's dig a bit into #1 | 16:27 |
dhellmann | what would we meter in heat? | 16:27 |
nijaba | ppetit: there is nothing in heat/cloudformation that could be billed to customers? | 16:27 |
nijaba | I am not familiar enough with this to have an opinion | 16:28 |
ppetit | Hmm... on the top of my head no, not really. | 16:28 |
nijaba | ok, so moot point, then | 16:28 |
nijaba | let's move on | 16:28 |
ppetit | Perhaps stuffs like how fast or how slow a cloudformation stack can be deployed | 16:28 |
nijaba | #topic Open Discusssion | 16:28 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discusssion (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)" | 16:28 | |
jd___ | yeah i though #2 was actually the main point for heat | 16:29 |
ppetit | that's my understanding 2 | 16:29 |
dhellmann | ok | 16:29 |
ppetit | Is there any heat developer around? | 16:29 |
jd___ | doesn't seems so unfortunately | 16:30 |
ppetit | :-( | 16:30 |
nijaba | well, I don't think there is any hurry and we can bring back the subject in a later meeting | 16:30 |
nijaba | any other topics? | 16:31 |
ppetit | jd__: that's a relatively important subject regarding project XLcloud. I'd like we keep a close look at it | 16:31 |
jd___ | sure | 16:31 |
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:32 | |
nijaba | ppetit: XLcloud? | 16:32 |
ppetit | check xlcloud.org | 16:32 |
* nijaba checks | 16:32 | |
ppetit | Collaborative project around HPC cloud based on OpenStack | 16:32 |
nijaba | hahh! neat! | 16:32 |
jd___ | nijaba: xlcloud is planning to use ceilometer, i did a talk about ceilometer, i talked about it when you were on holidays :) | 16:33 |
* nijaba admits to have only read summaries | 16:33 | |
jd___ | :D | 16:33 |
ppetit | And Heat to help with virtual cluster post-install config | 16:33 |
nijaba | ok | 16:34 |
nijaba | that sounds exciting | 16:34 |
ppetit | yes indeed! | 16:34 |
nijaba | should we move on? | 16:35 |
nijaba | any other topics for today? | 16:35 |
dhellmann | nothing here | 16:35 |
jd___ | here neither | 16:36 |
nijaba | I personally wanted to thank everyone for the vote of confidence! | 16:36 |
dhellmann | oh, I will mention that we're working on integration ceilometer with our billing system this sprint | 16:36 |
ppetit | just let us know about follow of Heat and Ceilometer please | 16:36 |
nijaba | ppetit: noted! | 16:36 |
jd___ | dhellmann: that's neat | 16:36 |
nijaba | dhellmann: yeah! | 16:36 |
*** EmilienM has quit IRC | 16:36 | |
dhellmann | congratulations, nijaba! | 16:36 |
nijaba | dhellmann: thanks | 16:37 |
nijaba | dhellmann: are you going to use the API? | 16:37 |
* nijaba thinks so... | 16:37 | |
dhellmann | nijaba: yes | 16:37 |
nijaba | very cool | 16:38 |
jd___ | he'd better does! | 16:38 |
jd___ | :) | 16:38 |
nijaba | can't wait for the feedback | 16:38 |
dhellmann | our sprint is 2 more weeks, so I should have more feedback at next week's meeting | 16:38 |
jd___ | ok | 16:38 |
nijaba | so, if anyone is going to cloudopen, note that I'll be there in 3 weeks | 16:38 |
jd___ | i'll try to be present at next meetings, but excuse me in advance if I don't make it :) | 16:39 |
nijaba | it runs in parallel with linuxcon | 16:39 |
nijaba | jd___: hey, enjoy your vacation time! | 16:39 |
jd___ | thanks! | 16:40 |
nijaba | I guess that's a wrap for today! | 16:40 |
nijaba | thanks everyone | 16:40 |
mrevell | Thanks nijaba | 16:40 |
ppetit | Okay thanks ! Bye | 16:40 |
nijaba | #endmeeting | 16:40 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meeting channel. See http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings for schedule and http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/ for meeting logs" | 16:40 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Thu Aug 9 16:40:44 2012 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:40 |
jd___ | thanks, bye! | 16:40 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-08-09-16.00.html | 16:40 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-08-09-16.00.txt | 16:40 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-08-09-16.00.log.html | 16:40 |
*** mrevell has left #openstack-meeting | 16:40 | |
dhellmann | thanks! | 16:41 |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:42 | |
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:43 | |
*** rnirmal has quit IRC | 16:46 | |
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:46 | |
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:47 | |
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:50 | |
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:51 | |
*** rohitk_1 has quit IRC | 16:55 | |
*** ppetit has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
*** inteq has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:57 | |
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:58 | |
*** anand_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:58 | |
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:59 | |
*** anand_ has quit IRC | 16:59 | |
*** rohitk has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:00 | |
*** Ravikumar_hp has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:02 | |
*** JoseSwiftQE has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:03 | |
*** dolphm_ has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** JoseSwiftQA has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:06 | |
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:06 | |
*** ecarlin_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:06 | |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
*** ecarlin_ is now known as ecarlin | 17:06 | |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 17:07 | |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:07 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 17:08 | |
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec | 17:08 | |
*** PotHix has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:12 | |
*** JoseSwiftQA has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:15 | |
*** Ravikumar_hp has quit IRC | 17:16 | |
JoseSwiftQE | are we still having a meeting? | 17:17 |
*** DuncanT has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
*** DuncanT has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:19 | |
*** dprince_ has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:19 | |
*** donaldngo has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
*** glauaguiar has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
*** oubiwann has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
*** JoseSwiftQE has quit IRC | 17:22 | |
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:22 | |
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:23 | |
*** rohitk has left #openstack-meeting | 17:24 | |
*** rohitk has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
*** johnpur has left #openstack-meeting | 17:24 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
*** caaakeeey has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:26 | |
*** ayoung-afk is now known as ayoung | 17:31 | |
*** darraghb has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
*** jrd-redhat has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:33 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:34 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:36 | |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:38 | |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 17:39 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:45 | |
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-afk | 17:50 | |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:02 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 18:04 | |
*** pem has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:05 | |
*** pem is now known as Guest3513 | 18:06 | |
*** Guest3513 has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
*** pem2 has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:09 | |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 18:24 | |
*** sdake has quit IRC | 18:28 | |
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:28 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:32 | |
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:35 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 18:36 | |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 18:37 | |
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:51 | |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:53 | |
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:58 | |
*** ryanpetr_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:58 | |
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:58 | |
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:00 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 19:01 | |
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann | 19:01 | |
*** jsavak has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
*** koolhead17 is now known as koolhead17|zzZZ | 19:06 | |
*** jkff has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:09 | |
jkff | Hello. It's now time for the LBaaS meeting. Anyone here for it? | 19:09 |
jkff | I'm Eugene Kirpichev from Mirantis | 19:09 |
jkff | Our current progress is as follows: | 19:10 |
jkff | The team has almost finished the core code and is about to start working on the F5 driver. | 19:10 |
jkff | Most of the external API is implemented, and it's planned to polish the driver/core interaction logic while working on F5 | 19:10 |
jkff | Also, filtering of LB's by their capabilities is almost ready in a separate branch, will be merged to master in the nearest few days | 19:11 |
jkff | We've been also talking with a few LB vendors and they seem very excited. | 19:11 |
*** matiu has quit IRC | 19:12 | |
jkff | The dominating topic is Quantum integration, on which we'll have more news in the next days. | 19:12 |
*** johnpostlethwait has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:15 | |
*** ExxonValdeez has left #openstack-meeting | 19:16 | |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 19:20 | |
*** ayoung-afk is now known as ayoung | 19:21 | |
*** markmc has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:25 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:27 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 19:27 | |
*** adiantum_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:27 | |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:29 | |
*** adiantum has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 19:31 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:33 | |
*** johnpostlethwait has quit IRC | 19:38 | |
*** jkff has quit IRC | 19:43 | |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 19:45 | |
*** koolhead17|zzZZ has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
*** mnewby has quit IRC | 19:49 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:52 | |
*** cdub has quit IRC | 19:57 | |
*** ayoung_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:58 | |
*** dolphm has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:58 | |
*** ayoung has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:59 | |
*** adiantum_ has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
*** pem2 has quit IRC | 20:02 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 20:02 | |
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:02 | |
n0ano | anyone here for the orchestration meeting? | 20:04 |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:05 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:05 | |
*** jsavak has quit IRC | 20:07 | |
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:08 | |
*** belliott has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:09 | |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:13 | |
*** jsavak has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 20:22 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 20:23 | |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 20:29 | |
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:37 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec | 20:40 | |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:41 | |
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:49 | |
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC | 20:49 | |
*** file has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:51 | |
*** clarkb has quit IRC | 20:51 | |
*** clarkb1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:51 | |
*** jk0 has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:52 | |
*** clarkb1 is now known as clarkb | 20:52 | |
*** sacharya has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:55 | |
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:58 | |
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:59 | |
vishy | #startmeeting | 21:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Thu Aug 9 21:00:41 2012 UTC. The chair is vishy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 21:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 21:00 |
*** Ravikumar_hp has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:00 | |
markmc | yo! | 21:01 |
russellb | hi. | 21:01 |
vishy | #link Agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/Nova | 21:01 |
mikal | Oh hai | 21:01 |
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 21:01 | |
* markmc clicks 'Subscribe' on that page, keep forgetting about it | 21:02 | |
jk0 | hi | 21:02 |
vishy | #topic XML Support in Nova | 21:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "XML Support in Nova" | 21:03 | |
vishy | so lzyeval was looking into the current support for xml | 21:03 |
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
* vishy digs up the email | 21:03 | |
*** matwood has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:03 | |
vishy | #link http://etherpad.openstack.org/NovaAPIXMLSupport | 21:04 |
vishy | so a whole bunch of the extensions don't support XML serialization right now | 21:04 |
vishy | * deserialization | 21:04 |
vishy | and because we have no end-to-end xml tests it is likely that the ones that do are broken | 21:05 |
vishy | he also mentioned that some have deserializers but no serializers, so if any post requests take nested data they are likely broken as well | 21:05 |
vishy | so the question is: what do we do about it. | 21:05 |
vishy | option 1) announce in the release notes that xml is not going to be maintained | 21:06 |
vishy | option 2) is file bugs against all the serializers and get those fixed and put together some end-to-end xml testing | 21:06 |
vishy | option 3) ???? | 21:07 |
vishy | any ideas? | 21:07 |
markmc | well, (2) requires a volunteer | 21:07 |
markmc | even to just file the bugs etc. | 21:07 |
vishy | is there another option that I'm not considering? | 21:07 |
russellb | so, put out a call for volunteers to do 2, and in the absence of that getting done, 1? | 21:08 |
*** mjfork has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:08 | |
vishy | i guess there is a middle ground of checking the most important extensions | 21:08 |
russellb | i guess that's some variation of 2 ... | 21:08 |
markmc | (3) mark it as "experimental" somehow, maybe require a flag to be set for it to be enabled | 21:08 |
vishy | and making sure that basic funcionality works. Saying hey, the cloudpipe controller is json only etc. | 21:08 |
*** dolphm_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:08 | |
vishy | here is the real question: there are a lot of bugs that can be worked on | 21:09 |
vishy | how do we prioritize xml vs the other set of bugs? | 21:09 |
*** matwood has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:09 | |
vishy | and do we lose community support if we say we don't care about xml | 21:09 |
vishy | doesn't sound like we have the answer to that here | 21:10 |
markmc | the main thing is to make the current state clear to everyone | 21:10 |
markmc | you can't force folks to fix it | 21:10 |
markmc | and you're right, it's not like nova-core should drop everything and just fix it | 21:10 |
markmc | and it's not a great option to just remove it either | 21:10 |
vishy | #action vishy to email the list about current state of xml and ask for bug reports and volunteers to fix it. | 21:11 |
eglynn | have many or even any bugs been filed against the current incomplete XML support? | 21:11 |
_0x44 | Especially when you consider that the one person who ostensibly cares the most about xml has publicly asked us to kill it. | 21:11 |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
vishy | eglynn: the only person i know who filed bugs against it was justinsb | 21:11 |
eglynn | (an indication of whether the community really cares about XML support) | 21:11 |
markmc | _0x44, that's obtuse for any of us who don't know the history | 21:11 |
* markmc thinks xml is a nice feature, if it worked | 21:11 | |
eglynn | yep agreed, but incomplete/broken is worse in a way ... | 21:12 |
vishy | justinsb was a big java advocate, likes xml, but specifically stated he prefers a working json implementation to a buggy xml implementation | 21:12 |
markmc | heh, ok | 21:12 |
vishy | that is the history :) | 21:12 |
_0x44 | markmc: Sorry, justinsb was writing a client for Java and wanted to use the XML apis but couldn't because they're shit. | 21:12 |
markmc | _0x44, cool, thanks | 21:12 |
vishy | ok next topic, we will see if we get any help from the ml. | 21:12 |
vishy | #topic Blueprint / Review Updates | 21:13 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprint / Review Updates" | 21:13 | |
vishy | mikal: need anything for Config Drive / Metadata? | 21:13 |
vishy | seems to be going well | 21:13 |
mikal | I'm replying to people's reviews now | 21:13 |
markmc | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/general-host-aggregates | 21:13 |
mikal | I think the only hard bit left is nailing down the format for file inject | 21:13 |
mikal | I don't much care what we do | 21:14 |
mikal | I just want the adults to stop fighting | 21:14 |
vishy | mikal: yes any format seems fine | 21:14 |
vishy | mikal: we need a format for network data as well | 21:14 |
mikal | Padraig pointed out a vulnerability in the way its done now | 21:14 |
mikal | So that will need to be tweaked a little at the least | 21:14 |
mikal | At the moment you just get the network data in the format that the inject code gets it | 21:15 |
vishy | mikal: I would say lets just use a simple json/yaml representation | 21:15 |
mikal | (Which I think is what original inject did too) | 21:15 |
russellb | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10934/ | 21:15 |
mikal | Yeah, it would be nice if we could also iterate -- get this code in todayish, and then do another review with tweaks | 21:15 |
vishy | mikal: yeah i suppose that is fine for now, if someone wants to convert it to some standard format for the next version that is fine | 21:15 |
mikal | I'll change to a json flavoured inject this morning, cause it fixes Padraig's concerns too | 21:16 |
* vishy put the blueprints out of order on the agenda | 21:16 | |
vishy | let me go back to the right order | 21:16 |
vishy | mikal: sounds good | 21:16 |
vishy | back to general host aggregates | 21:16 |
russellb | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10256/ | 21:17 |
vishy | does someone else want to review part 2? | 21:17 |
markmc | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/general-host-aggregates | 21:17 |
russellb | i can review it tomorrow | 21:17 |
vishy | #info we are probably fine pushing this one to grizzly: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10826/ | 21:17 |
vishy | but we definitely need part 2 in | 21:18 |
* comstud is here | 21:18 | |
vishy | the above one would be cool, but i won't cry too loudly if it misses | 21:18 |
vishy | still great to review it if someone wants to. Just me so far | 21:18 |
vishy | ok if we get reviews that one is fine | 21:19 |
vishy | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11009/ | 21:19 |
vishy | needs review | 21:19 |
vishy | mtaylor: ^^ | 21:19 |
vishy | status on that fix? | 21:19 |
markmc | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/integrate-python-glanceclient | 21:20 |
*** lzyeval has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:20 | |
vishy | lzyeval: hi | 21:20 |
vishy | lzyeval: we can discuss xml again in a minute | 21:20 |
lzyeval | vishy: sure | 21:21 |
vishy | so reviews on glanceclient are important as well | 21:21 |
*** bcwaldon has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:21 | |
vishy | looks like yun mao isn't here | 21:21 |
vishy | i was going to ask if there is more to be done for: | 21:22 |
dprince | vishy: I can look at glanceclient... | 21:22 |
vishy | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/task-management | 21:22 |
vishy | dprince: awesome thanks | 21:22 |
vishy | the server extension blueprint is well underway. The reviews should be easy | 21:22 |
dansmith | vishy: I know of at least one review that seems to be stalled on the state management stuff | 21:22 |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:23 | |
vishy | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/disable-server-extensions,n,z | 21:23 |
markmc | dansmith, yeah, this I presume - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10774/ | 21:23 |
vishy | dansmith: that last delete in any state review? | 21:23 |
dansmith | it's his set-task-state-to-none-after-any-failure one, which is similar to what I almost got done earlier | 21:23 |
markmc | dansmith, haven't gotten around to compare that with your @revert_state patch | 21:23 |
dansmith | markmc: yep | 21:23 |
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:23 | |
vishy | yes yun seems to be away for the bast few days | 21:23 |
markmc | dansmith, I was pretty happy with yours fwiw | 21:23 |
dansmith | markmc: well, I asked if I should resurrect mine in the face of Johannes' concerns | 21:23 |
dansmith | markmc: if you think I should just do it, then I will. it's gonna be fairly small now | 21:24 |
vishy | dansmith: might as well reprop it | 21:24 |
markmc | yeah, agree | 21:24 |
dansmith | t'was trying to be polite when I asked, which is so unlike me :) | 21:24 |
dansmith | vishy: a'ight | 21:24 |
vishy | #action dansmith to repropose is revert_state decorator | 21:24 |
vishy | so delete in any state is going well | 21:25 |
vishy | but it will need some approvals | 21:25 |
vishy | there are 4 or 5 more patches to go in but they should all be really simple like the last few | 21:25 |
vishy | sdague: are you still doing the two you have assigned | 21:25 |
vishy | nati_uen_: ditto | 21:25 |
vishy | jk0: are you still planning on helping? | 21:25 |
jk0 | yessir | 21:26 |
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:26 | |
nati_uen_ | vishy: Not started yet. But I'll finish this in this week | 21:26 |
vishy | i did a bunch, so there are only a few left, but helping with reviews would also be awesome | 21:26 |
*** sacharya has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
sdague | vishy: yes, I'll redo the one that I've got already after the rebase confusion tonight, and get to the other one in the morning | 21:26 |
jk0 | vishy: had some things come up this week so I wasn't able to help as much as I would have liked | 21:26 |
vishy | jk0: the last few should be pretty easy | 21:27 |
jk0 | vishy: but toss reviews my way and I will make time for them | 21:27 |
jk0 | ok | 21:27 |
vishy | if you guys don't take them I will probably just bang them out :) | 21:27 |
sdague | it would be nice if https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10816/ landed, because I'd do some refactoring on the tests after that | 21:27 |
vishy | jk0: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/disable-server-extensions,n,z | 21:27 |
sdague | so nova core reviews on that patch by vishy are appreciated | 21:28 |
vishy | sdague: don't know if you saw, but I put three more reviews into the series | 21:28 |
sdague | vishy: I guess I didn't notice that yet, I'll go look | 21:28 |
vishy | still not sure about the plugin framework | 21:28 |
vishy | comstud: can you have someone review this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9879/ | 21:29 |
vishy | i think it is good to go, but you guys are the xen users | 21:29 |
_0x44 | sdague: I just reviewed it | 21:29 |
vishy | looks like it needs a rebase though | 21:30 |
comstud | sure | 21:30 |
vishy | i will ping renuka | 21:30 |
vishy | but review for content would be good | 21:30 |
vishy | and we can slam it in after rebase | 21:30 |
dansmith | git slam | 21:30 |
dansmith | git: 'slam' is not a git command. See 'git --help'. | 21:30 |
dansmith | hmm | 21:30 |
vishy | hehe | 21:31 |
vishy | so last few | 21:31 |
vishy | bare metal | 21:31 |
vishy | they are splitting it into five patches to make reviewing easier | 21:31 |
vishy | but eyes on those reviews would be awesome | 21:31 |
markmc | oh, awesome | 21:31 |
vishy | they have the first couple up | 21:32 |
vishy | 1 for db 1 for docs | 21:32 |
*** ryanpetr_ has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
mikal | The db one is still quite big | 21:32 |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 21:32 | |
vishy | #action nova-core to help review bare-metal patches | 21:32 |
sdague | vishy: once we get to the end of blueprint round up, I had some questions about additional driver reviews (powervm and storwize) | 21:33 |
vishy | my initial thought is to delay both the ServiceGroup patch and the Cells stuff to post Folsom | 21:33 |
markmc | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/general-bare-metal-provisioning-framework | 21:33 |
vishy | thoughts? | 21:33 |
vishy | #link https://review.openstack.org/10903 | 21:33 |
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:33 | |
ewindisch | vishy: it might be wishful thinking, but I wanted to use that to supplement the matchmaker. | 21:33 |
markmc | think delaying cells makes sense | 21:33 |
comstud | when is the deadline ? | 21:34 |
ewindisch | (re: ServiceGroup) | 21:34 |
vishy | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10707/ | 21:34 |
markmc | did my best to dig into it, but it's slow going - gnarly (but awesome) stuff | 21:34 |
vishy | Tuesday | 21:34 |
comstud | ya | 21:34 |
*** johnpostlethwait has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:34 | |
markmc | grizzly isn't far away :) | 21:34 |
comstud | i don't have a strong opinion | 21:35 |
markmc | and it's always cool to have some nice big features lined up ready to merge when a new cycle opens | 21:35 |
comstud | i'm not upset if it won't merge for folsom | 21:35 |
vishy | ewindisch: i think the service_group stuff is correct | 21:35 |
vishy | i'm just worried about potentially breaking things | 21:35 |
dansmith | last I checked no-db-compute was still listed for folsom.. assume that should be changed now? | 21:35 |
vishy | it doesn't really give us any value until the other backends are done, so putting it in right now seems a little risky | 21:35 |
vishy | dansmith: i untargetted it for f-3 | 21:36 |
russellb | dansmith: correct | 21:36 |
vishy | but grizzly hadn't been created yet so i didn't move it to grizzly | 21:36 |
*** jakedahn_zz is now known as jakedahn | 21:36 | |
russellb | ton more work to do, unfortunately | 21:36 |
vishy | #link: https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/folsom-3 | 21:36 |
vishy | that is the current stuff | 21:36 |
*** johnpostlethwait has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
sdague | out of curiosity, when will the grizzly tree open up? | 21:36 |
ewindisch | vishy: The plan is to hopefully move service group into common, by the way. | 21:36 |
dansmith | vishy: ah, okay, I see. still says accepted for folsom, but not targetted.. gotcha | 21:36 |
russellb | dansmith: i think once we cut RCs for folsom ... | 21:37 |
dansmith | russellb: cool | 21:37 |
ewindisch | it might be a good candidate for grizzly -- besides the matchmaker requirements, I think everything else that NEEDS this can/will/should wait for Grizzly. | 21:37 |
vishy | ewindisch: yes that is my thought | 21:37 |
vishy | sdague: I'm not sure last time we opened it after the first rc | 21:38 |
vishy | but it made backporting extremely painful | 21:38 |
vishy | so we might delay it a bit longer | 21:38 |
ewindisch | vishy: by the way, what is the policy on merging from common after Tuesday? | 21:38 |
sdague | ok, no worries. Is there already a grizzly-1 tag in launchpad, so we can target cells and service groups for that? | 21:38 |
russellb | should be no different than any other nova patches ... bug fixes should be fine, features require an exception, right? | 21:39 |
vishy | ewindisch: for bug fixes its fine | 21:39 |
markmc | ewindisch, I'll be locking down common for folsom too | 21:39 |
russellb | markmc: good call | 21:39 |
markmc | russellb, why thank you :) | 21:39 |
sdague | that's actually a very interesting question, should there be an attempt to do a broad common -> nova sync before then. I think a number of things are out of sync atm. | 21:39 |
russellb | i know you just desperately wanted my validation | 21:39 |
markmc | sdague, yep, we should | 21:39 |
markmc | sdague, I'll make sure that happens | 21:40 |
sdague | cool | 21:40 |
markmc | russellb, validate my sad and lonely patch too, then : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10598/ :) | 21:40 |
russellb | ha, k | 21:40 |
vishy | ok any other reviews that i missed? | 21:40 |
markmc | yes, approx 50 others :) | 21:41 |
markmc | we're up around 60 now | 21:41 |
sdague | heh | 21:41 |
markmc | we had it down to 40 last week | 21:41 |
vishy | :( | 21:41 |
markmc | and we can't even blame it on a slew of no-db-messaging patches | 21:41 |
russellb | :-p | 21:41 |
dprince | lots of +2's so assuming those are looking good it should go down quick. | 21:41 |
dansmith | but we can still blame it on russellb without any justification, right? | 21:42 |
vishy | ok well maybe we need to discuss that in the next topic | 21:42 |
russellb | sure | 21:42 |
comstud | lol | 21:42 |
vishy | #topic Core Work Planning | 21:42 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Core Work Planning" | 21:42 | |
vishy | review days have fallen off the map along with soren | 21:42 |
vishy | are they valuable, should we restart them? | 21:42 |
russellb | not IMO ... i think everyone should be trying to do it along the way | 21:43 |
comstud | i usually cannot follow the review days | 21:43 |
mikal | I don't know about others, but having a day assigned to me is awkward because I have to work it around work commitments | 21:43 |
markmc | it used to kick me into action, but I'm trying to keep more regular about it now | 21:43 |
jk0 | I'd like to not continue them | 21:43 |
comstud | so I review randomly | 21:43 |
vishy | #link http://173.203.107.207/~soren/stats/nova-30days.json | 21:43 |
vishy | mikal: has been reviewing like a beast | 21:43 |
dprince | review days almost always conflict with schedules... I like the continual model. | 21:43 |
vishy | russellb and markmc as well | 21:43 |
jk0 | reason being, I feel like everyone on the core team is responsible enough to do the job w/o being told | 21:43 |
russellb | \o/ | 21:44 |
markmc | smokestack is kicking ass! | 21:44 |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
mikal | russellb: hi five! | 21:44 |
*** ayoung_ is now known as ayoung | 21:44 | |
vishy | I've never been a fan of review days myself | 21:44 |
comstud | jenkins has been doing its share of reviewing, too | 21:44 |
russellb | i've actually been more slack than usually lately because of no-db-messaging, should be able to pick it back up soon | 21:44 |
comstud | that's good to see | 21:44 |
vishy | but every day is a review day for me | 21:44 |
eglynn | one prob with the review day concept is that the original reviewer may not follow up on revised patch sets that aren't proposed til the next day | 21:44 |
vishy | so we just all have to buckle down and review as much as possible by tuesday | 21:44 |
markmc | eglynn, point | 21:45 |
jk0 | yeah, we should just try to get 1 or more done per day minimal, and we'll be in good shape | 21:45 |
vishy | after that it is bugfix reviews which will hopefully be easier | 21:45 |
vishy | so what about bug triaging? | 21:45 |
russellb | markmc: good point or bad point? you just acknowledged that it was a point. | 21:45 |
markmc | one more thing on reviews | 21:45 |
vishy | maybe we just apply the same principle to bugs as soon as f-3 is done? | 21:45 |
markmc | we should try and share tips for keeping on top of reviews | 21:45 |
markmc | e.g. | 21:45 |
markmc | 1) try using 'git review list' rather than the web UI, also 'git review open' and 'git review download' | 21:45 |
markmc | 2) set up a mail filter to put mail notifications for reviews your subscribed to in a special folder, so you follow up | 21:46 |
markmc | etc. | 21:46 |
sdague | markmc: that sounds like it would be an excellent blog post :) | 21:46 |
mikal | I've been using this: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+-reviewer:mikalstill+-owner:mikalstill,n,z | 21:46 |
markmc | sdague, hmm, point | 21:46 |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:46 | |
markmc | mikal, that's a "nova stuff I haven't looked at" query? | 21:47 |
mikal | Yeah, "review targets" is what its called in the bookmark | 21:47 |
mikal | For stuff I've looked at, that's in my personal dashboard already | 21:47 |
dprince | markmc: nice pointers. I still use http://reviewday.ohthree.com/ to try and go after *the important stuff* first. | 21:47 |
markmc | dprince, indeed, reviewday is another one | 21:47 |
mikal | Is there a way to have reviewday show me _only_ nova reviews? | 21:48 |
dprince | sounds like I need to rename now that 'review days' are out of style though :( | 21:48 |
* markmc ponders having 'git review list' sort by reviewday score | 21:48 | |
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
markmc | and include test results | 21:48 |
dprince | mikal: I could add tabs for that. | 21:48 |
vishy | mikal: scroll down? | 21:48 |
vishy | mikal: low tech solution :) | 21:48 |
mikal | Yeah, I've been practising my scrolling skills | 21:48 |
markmc | oh, another tip | 21:49 |
markmc | learn gerrit's shortcut keys | 21:49 |
markmc | handy | 21:49 |
markmc | just hit '?' in a review | 21:49 |
jk0 | my secret sauce is maintaining inbox 0, so I immediately see and handle new mail | 21:49 |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 21:49 | |
russellb | i maintain inbox 0 using mail filters. works great. | 21:50 |
* jk0 uses no filters | 21:50 | |
jk0 | just command + a, delete! | 21:50 |
*** dhellmann has quit IRC | 21:50 | |
jk0 | jk :) | 21:50 |
vishy | do we have a place for handy review tips? | 21:50 |
vishy | in the wiki | 21:50 |
russellb | to the wiki! | 21:50 |
* markmc has subscribed to all nova reviews, filters them into a separate folder from "my reviews" | 21:50 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 21:51 | |
vishy | #action nova-core to do lots of reviews by Tuesday | 21:51 |
markmc | heh, nice | 21:51 |
sdague | honestly, a blog post on the planet would probably get more attention than the wiki | 21:51 |
vishy | #action nova-core to switch to bug-fixing after F-3 | 21:51 |
markmc | vishy, sorry, you moved onto bug triage | 21:51 |
lzyeval | sdague: But everyone should first tip in the wiki | 21:52 |
vishy | sdague: agreed, although I was thinking put stuff in the wiki and email about it | 21:52 |
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates | 21:52 | |
lzyeval | sdague: and then post it on planet | 21:52 |
vishy | #topic XML redux | 21:52 |
*** openstack changes topic to "XML redux" | 21:52 | |
sdague | sure, fair | 21:52 |
vishy | lzyeval: so I shared the etherpad earlier | 21:52 |
vishy | do you have any new information? | 21:52 |
markmc | #action markmc start a ReviewerTips wiki page | 21:52 |
lzyeval | vishy: Well that etherpad is about how many handlers each controllers have xml support | 21:53 |
vishy | we decided to send out an email asking for some help bug reporting and fixing if people care about xml support | 21:53 |
lzyeval | vishy: yeah and so I tried to find a method to do end to end tests | 21:53 |
lzyeval | and it seems only writing unittest would be the answer | 21:54 |
lzyeval | like | 21:54 |
lzyeval | nova/tests/api/openstack/compute/test_images.py | 21:54 |
vishy | lzyeval: my thinking was hack novaclient to do xml in addition to json and run exercises.sh | 21:54 |
vishy | :) | 21:54 |
lzyeval | vishy: then do we write the request format manually? | 21:55 |
lzyeval | vishy: I've seen api.openstack.org for the request and responses for XML | 21:55 |
vishy | well yes we would have to serialize into xml as well as json | 21:56 |
lzyeval | vishy: but suspicious of it being out of date | 21:56 |
vishy | kind of annoying but it would at least give us basic functionality | 21:56 |
*** ayoung has quit IRC | 21:56 | |
lzyeval | vishy: So it would be a form of a smoketest? | 21:56 |
vishy | lzyeval: There are some with xml tests included like: nova/tests/api/openstack/compute/contrib/test_extended_status.py | 21:57 |
vishy | so that helps a bit, but without a little bit of devstack/exercises.sh testing i really have no confidence | 21:57 |
lzyeval | vishy: one last thing is "is it worth the effort"? | 21:59 |
lzyeval | I think we are all thinking of dropping xml | 21:59 |
lzyeval | quantum team also. | 21:59 |
vishy | lzyeval: yes that was the conclusion we came to but I don't think we can just arbitrarily drop it in the current version of the api | 22:00 |
vishy | lzyeval: we just need to give people reasonable expectations about what works | 22:00 |
vishy | i will go to the mailing list with a request for help. If we get none, then we will just have to assume that it doesn't matter and we will tell people not to use it. | 22:01 |
lzyeval | Ok then, but I'll need some help. I'll devise a plan and start post on ML | 22:01 |
lzyeval | vishy: ok | 22:01 |
sdague | vishy: before we wrap up (give time), I'd like to ask about driver reviews. There is a powervm (nova.virt) and storwize (nova.volume) driver out for review, and it would be nice to get some non-ibm eyes on them. | 22:01 |
vishy | sdague: ok | 22:02 |
sdague | the storwize one is in cinder, but it's a cross port to nova-volume in case nova-volume is only deprecated for folsom (not removed) | 22:02 |
vishy | I'm really hoping that we can start keeping those out of tree | 22:02 |
vishy | sdague: if it is in cinder already then we can merge it | 22:02 |
sdague | #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10535/ | 22:03 |
vishy | I'd prefer to keep them aligned as possible before the s3 release | 22:03 |
markmc | another thing worth mentioning is the thread about the default for rpc_backend | 22:03 |
markmc | more nova-core opinions needed | 22:03 |
markmc | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2012-August/000445.html | 22:03 |
sdague | vishy: yes, the storwize team is cross syncing | 22:03 |
vishy | sdague: the powervm one i will try to look at tomorrow | 22:03 |
sdague | vishy: so is the intent to start removing virt drivers entirely? | 22:04 |
sdague | just trying to understand the comment about out of tree | 22:04 |
vishy | separate packages for drivers seems like a really good way to do it | 22:04 |
russellb | though that's certainly not happening for folsom at this point ... | 22:04 |
vishy | sdague: I don't know why nova-core needs to review a bugfix to the storwise driver for example | 22:05 |
sdague | ok, fair, as long as it's consistent. just don't want to make 2 classes of drivers, in and out of tree. | 22:05 |
vishy | russellb: clearly, but we should revisit at the summit | 22:05 |
russellb | fair enough | 22:05 |
sdague | vishy: right, definitely fair | 22:05 |
vishy | for grizzly I'd like to have drivers be packages | 22:05 |
dansmith | packages == separate trees, or ? | 22:05 |
vishy | dansmith: separate trees would probably be easier | 22:05 |
sdague | vishy: that means making a much stronger driver api contract | 22:05 |
markmc | heh, talk about a can of worms for the end of the meeting :) | 22:05 |
dansmith | because they can all be in nova.git and pacakged separately by distros, right? | 22:05 |
markmc | sdague, right | 22:06 |
vishy | dansmith: that might be step one | 22:06 |
vishy | dansmith: if we could get a way to give +2 rights to subtrees that would be amazing | 22:06 |
vishy | so a person could own an approval if it only touched files under a certain tree. | 22:06 |
russellb | so, action: vishy to review new driver for folsom consideration? | 22:06 |
dansmith | I suppose there'd also need to be some CI work done so that all the drivers are checked, even those outside nova.git | 22:07 |
sdague | yeh, ok, so we'll take that one to summit then. I think this gets into the extension points ideas as well | 22:07 |
vishy | russellb: sure | 22:07 |
russellb | before we get too far into the weeds when we're already past the hour :) | 22:07 |
markmc | vishy, yeah, something like that makes good sense | 22:07 |
dansmith | vishy: yeah, that's a good goal, but definitely takes some orchestration to make sure that it doesn't get out of hand | 22:07 |
vishy | #action vishy to review power_vm driver | 22:07 |
russellb | if it's self contained enough, seems like a good candidate for a FFE after the freeze | 22:07 |
sdague | #link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9666/ | 22:07 |
russellb | if it doesn't happen in the next few days | 22:07 |
vishy | anything else? | 22:07 |
russellb | you guys all rock. <3 nova. that is all. | 22:08 |
markmc | we appear to have a lot of things going on | 22:08 |
sdague | russellb: +! | 22:08 |
sdague | russellb: +1 | 22:08 |
vishy | ok | 22:09 |
vishy | letus continue with reviews then | 22:09 |
vishy | #endmeeting | 22:09 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meeting channel. See http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings for schedule and http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/ for meeting logs" | 22:09 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Thu Aug 9 22:09:54 2012 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 22:09 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-08-09-21.00.html | 22:09 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-08-09-21.00.txt | 22:09 |
vishy | thanks everyone! | 22:10 |
*** lzyeval has quit IRC | 22:10 | |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-08-09-21.00.log.html | 22:10 |
russellb | thanks vishy | 22:10 |
mikal | Yeah, thanks guys | 22:10 |
sdague | thanks vishy, et al | 22:10 |
markmc | good night! | 22:10 |
*** jgriffith has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:12 | |
*** jk0 has left #openstack-meeting | 22:12 | |
*** markmc has left #openstack-meeting | 22:12 | |
dprince | later guys. | 22:12 |
*** dprince has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
*** Ravikumar_hp has quit IRC | 22:17 | |
*** ecarlin has quit IRC | 22:20 | |
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk | 22:28 | |
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
*** tongli has quit IRC | 22:29 | |
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:47 | |
*** mattray has quit IRC | 22:53 | |
*** amotoki has left #openstack-meeting | 22:53 | |
*** ewindisch has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC | 23:01 | |
*** jgriffith has quit IRC | 23:02 | |
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:05 | |
*** jog0_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:06 | |
*** jog0 has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
*** jog0_ is now known as jog0 | 23:09 | |
*** lloydde has quit IRC | 23:14 | |
*** belliott has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
*** jog0 has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:16 | |
*** dolphm_ has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
*** anniec has quit IRC | 23:20 | |
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:20 | |
*** johnpostlethwait has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:23 | |
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away | 23:33 | |
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net | 23:33 | |
*** ohnoimdead has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:35 | |
*** ohnoimdead has quit IRC | 23:35 | |
*** littleidea has quit IRC | 23:37 | |
*** ncode has quit IRC | 23:38 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:38 | |
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:39 | |
*** eglynn has quit IRC | 23:42 | |
*** ecarlin has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:42 | |
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:49 | |
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:51 | |
*** markmcclain has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:52 | |
*** joesavak has quit IRC | 23:54 | |
*** Mandell_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:58 | |
*** Mandell has quit IRC | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!