*** longkb has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:27 | |
*** dklyle has quit IRC | 00:32 | |
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:32 | |
*** markvoelker has quit IRC | 00:35 | |
*** slagle has quit IRC | 00:36 | |
*** Nel1x has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:44 | |
*** mtreinish has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:46 | |
*** mriedem has quit IRC | 00:52 | |
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:00 | |
*** mtreinish has quit IRC | 01:06 | |
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:08 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:10 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:10 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:11 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:12 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
*** longkb has quit IRC | 01:20 | |
*** longkb has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:21 | |
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:23 | |
*** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:29 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 01:32 | |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
*** iyamahat_ has quit IRC | 01:36 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:38 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:48 | |
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:53 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 01:53 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:55 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 02:00 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:01 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:03 | |
*** annp has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:05 | |
*** markstur has quit IRC | 02:06 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 02:06 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:16 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 02:18 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 02:18 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:22 | |
*** zhurong has quit IRC | 02:23 | |
*** akhil_jain has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:25 | |
*** ekcs has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:28 | |
ekcs | #startmeeting congressteammeeting | 02:31 |
---|---|---|
openstack | Meeting started Fri Aug 10 02:31:30 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ekcs. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 02:31 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 02:31 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)" | 02:31 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'congressteammeeting' | 02:31 |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:31 | |
ekcs | hello all. topics kept here as usual: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-meeting-topics | 02:38 |
akhil_jain | ekcs: hi | 02:39 |
ekcs | hi akhil_jain ! | 02:40 |
ekcs | how’s it been? | 02:40 |
akhil_jain | everything fine. how about you? | 02:41 |
ekcs | pretty good! | 02:42 |
ekcs | I see that you got the monasca notification patch through! I was thinking it’d have to be next cycle. good stuff there! | 02:42 |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
akhil_jain | Yes thats the initial version. They want keystone trust to be added. | 02:44 |
akhil_jain | But with present code congress driver is working fine | 02:44 |
ekcs | that’s awesome. | 02:45 |
ekcs | well let’s dive in to the topics then. | 02:45 |
ekcs | #topic announcements | 02:45 |
akhil_jain | ok! | 02:45 |
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)" | 02:45 | |
ekcs | #topic RC1 | 02:45 |
*** openstack changes topic to "RC1 (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)" | 02:45 | |
ekcs | RC1 tagged for both congress and congress-dashboard. | 02:46 |
ekcs | we got quite a lot done this cycle. some of the main completed tasks are listed in this etherpad under the section Completed in Rocky | 02:46 |
ekcs | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-task-priority | 02:46 |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:47 | |
ekcs | monasca webhook, vitrage webhook, type system, and z3 engine are the big features. plus lots of helpful improvements and fixes. | 02:48 |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:48 | |
ekcs | if we don’t find any release blocker bugs prior to final release, RC1 will become our final release. | 02:48 |
ekcs | any questions or comments on RC1? | 02:49 |
akhil_jain | none from my side | 02:49 |
ekcs | ok! | 02:49 |
ekcs | #topic stein | 02:49 |
*** openstack changes topic to "stein (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)" | 02:49 | |
ekcs | #topic RC1 | 02:50 |
*** openstack changes topic to "RC1 (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)" | 02:50 | |
ekcs | one more comment on that. | 02:50 |
ekcs | the stable/rocky branch has been created too. which means the master branch is again open for all changes without release restriction. | 02:51 |
ekcs | #topic stein | 02:51 |
*** openstack changes topic to "stein (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)" | 02:51 | |
ekcs | next cycle is stein of course. still early, but we can definitely feel free to start thinking about what we’d like to see in stein. | 02:51 |
ekcs | I’ve just put down a brain-storming etherpad here: | 02:52 |
ekcs | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-stein-brainstorm | 02:52 |
ekcs | if things come to mind feel free to jot them down in the etherpad. we can discuss and organize them in the next few weeks. | 02:53 |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:54 | |
ekcs | that’s all from me for today = ) | 02:54 |
*** Nel1x has quit IRC | 03:04 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 03:04 | |
*** armax has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
ekcs | ok let’s end meeting then if nothing else for today = ) | 03:07 |
ekcs | have a great weekend! | 03:08 |
akhil_jain | Bye! have a great weekend. | 03:08 |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:09 | |
ekcs | bye! | 03:09 |
ekcs | #endmeeting | 03:09 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 03:09 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Fri Aug 10 03:09:34 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 03:09 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2018/congressteammeeting.2018-08-10-02.31.html | 03:09 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2018/congressteammeeting.2018-08-10-02.31.txt | 03:09 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2018/congressteammeeting.2018-08-10-02.31.log.html | 03:09 |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:09 | |
*** akhil_jain has left #openstack-meeting | 03:10 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:11 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 03:15 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
*** hongbin has quit IRC | 03:19 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 03:26 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:30 | |
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:48 | |
*** hoangcx has left #openstack-meeting | 03:48 | |
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:56 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:05 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:17 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 04:22 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:25 | |
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:25 | |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:37 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 04:42 | |
*** artom has quit IRC | 04:50 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:51 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:11 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:11 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 05:19 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 05:20 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:22 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:28 | |
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:41 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 05:42 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:46 | |
*** nguyenhai has quit IRC | 05:48 | |
*** nguyenhai has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:48 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 05:50 | |
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC | 05:50 | |
*** hyunsikyang has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:50 | |
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:51 | |
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC | 05:54 | |
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:58 | |
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:04 | |
*** iyamahat has quit IRC | 06:05 | |
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC | 06:09 | |
*** kopecmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:11 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 06:15 | |
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:17 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 06:23 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:24 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 06:32 | |
*** larainema has quit IRC | 06:38 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 06:41 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:43 | |
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC | 06:51 | |
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:55 | |
*** hadai has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:59 | |
*** hadai has quit IRC | 06:59 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:05 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 07:06 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:06 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:07 | |
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:27 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:31 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 07:35 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:38 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:41 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 07:42 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 07:45 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:46 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:59 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 08:08 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:09 | |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 08:13 | |
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:15 | |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:27 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 08:32 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:41 | |
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:43 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
*** ssbarnea has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
*** radeks has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:06 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:14 | |
*** tssurya has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:20 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 09:27 | |
*** ssbarnea has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:31 | |
*** nguyenhai_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:32 | |
*** nguyenhai has quit IRC | 09:35 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:37 | |
*** gibi is now known as giblet | 09:56 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 10:21 | |
*** ricolin has quit IRC | 10:28 | |
*** browny has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:46 | |
*** erlon has quit IRC | 11:06 | |
*** longkb has quit IRC | 11:23 | |
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:05 | |
*** gary_perkins has quit IRC | 12:10 | |
*** mriedem has quit IRC | 12:17 | |
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:25 | |
*** giblet is now known as giblet_ofr | 12:34 | |
*** giblet_ofr is now known as giblet_off | 12:34 | |
*** janki has quit IRC | 12:35 | |
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:39 | |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 12:39 | |
*** tpsilva has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:44 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:47 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:56 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 13:14 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:14 | |
*** dustins has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:19 | |
*** jaypipes is now known as leakypipes | 13:21 | |
*** radeks has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
*** dansmith is now known as SteelyDan | 13:31 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:32 | |
*** efried is now known as fried_rice | 13:35 | |
*** larainema has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:43 | |
*** awaugama has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:50 | |
*** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:55 | |
*** apetrich has quit IRC | 14:00 | |
*** hongbin_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:03 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:11 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:20 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:26 | |
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:29 | |
*** gagehugo has left #openstack-meeting | 14:37 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 14:39 | |
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:40 | |
*** hongbin has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:42 | |
*** hongbin has quit IRC | 14:42 | |
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:43 | |
*** jgriffith has quit IRC | 14:46 | |
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:48 | |
*** markstur has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
*** bobh has quit IRC | 14:49 | |
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:51 | |
*** tssurya has quit IRC | 14:52 | |
*** njohnston has left #openstack-meeting | 14:53 | |
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:55 | |
smcginnis | #startmeeting releaseteam | 15:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Fri Aug 10 15:01:56 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is smcginnis. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:01 |
ttx | o/ | 15:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 15:01 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 15:02 |
evrardjp | o/ | 15:02 |
smcginnis | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/rocky-relmgt-tracking Agenda | 15:02 |
smcginnis | Currently around line 503 | 15:02 |
smcginnis | I won't do the ping list, but hopefully get by just mentioning ttx and dhellmann | 15:02 |
dhellmann | o/ | 15:03 |
annabelleB | o/ (late to the party) | 15:03 |
armstrong | O/ | 15:03 |
ttx | I was there already, see above :) | 15:03 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:03 | |
*** prometheanfire has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:04 | |
prometheanfire | o/ | 15:04 |
smcginnis | Good, the gangs all here. | 15:04 |
smcginnis | #topic RC status | 15:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "RC status (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 15:04 | |
smcginnis | We have some details in the etherpad for various deliverables. | 15:05 |
smcginnis | prometheanfire: That near the bottom of https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/rocky-relmgt-tracking | 15:05 |
smcginnis | I think we have an update on RC1 deliverables except for cyborg. | 15:05 |
* fungi is around, just having too many discussions at once | 15:05 | |
prometheanfire | same, two meetings at once :P | 15:06 |
* dhellmann is having 2 conversations with fungi | 15:06 | |
smcginnis | :) | 15:06 |
smcginnis | Barbican - they thought deadline was today. | 15:06 |
prometheanfire | smcginnis: so the question I have is the same as all the FFE things, UC only? probably fine | 15:06 |
smcginnis | prometheanfire: We have a few client libraries in the list on the etherpad. | 15:07 |
smcginnis | Looks like all should just be u-c only. | 15:07 |
prometheanfire | ya, I see them, looks like 3 | 15:07 |
smcginnis | prometheanfire: Do you want us to direct them to send a FFE? | 15:08 |
prometheanfire | iirc I think karborclient had a release already, but ya, UC only is fine | 15:08 |
ttx | smcginnis: Looks like only cyborg might need to be cat-herded? | 15:08 |
prometheanfire | if only to name and shame | 15:08 |
smcginnis | prometheanfire: We have a python-designateclient patch up. | 15:08 |
ttx | (in the cycle-with-milestones ones) | 15:09 |
smcginnis | mugsie: Can you send an FFE to openstack-dev for the python-designateclient? Then we can link to that for the release patch. | 15:09 |
smcginnis | ttx: Yeah, that is the only one I haven't seen activity from. | 15:09 |
prometheanfire | they could be batched into one request to cut the spam too | 15:09 |
ttx | smcginnis: + karbor and tricircle for their client ? | 15:10 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
smcginnis | So sticking with the RC list so we don't scatter all over - we are waiting for barbican, we may need to force cyborg, the rest have patches up. | 15:10 |
smcginnis | ttx: Karbor is separate. | 15:10 |
smcginnis | ttx: Oh, sorry, I see what you're saying now. | 15:11 |
ttx | I'd just cut a release for both | 15:11 |
ttx | if that's just CI/reqs changes | 15:11 |
smcginnis | I can send the FFE for those two at least as a way to announce the release team is following through with what we had said we would do and are forcing a release of them. | 15:11 |
ttx | ++ | 15:11 |
prometheanfire | wfm | 15:12 |
ttx | and then if karbor fails to release an intermediary release we'd remove both | 15:12 |
*** ade_lee has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:12 | |
ttx | (karbor and karborclient) | 15:12 |
smcginnis | Good point. I will note that as well. | 15:12 |
smcginnis | #action smcginnis to send FFE for karbor and tricircle clients noting release is being forced. Also noting karbor will be removed if service release is not requested. | 15:13 |
ttx | (tricircle ahs a relatively recent release and is branched) | 15:13 |
smcginnis | So maybe just some late patches for the client. | 15:14 |
ttx | ok next cycle-with-intermediary services | 15:14 |
ttx | we heard for cloudkitty earlier this week, they should send in something | 15:14 |
ttx | not sure we heard anything from karbor or magnum | 15:14 |
smcginnis | I have not. | 15:14 |
* ttx checks his ping list | 15:14 | |
dhellmann | nor i | 15:14 |
ttx | strigazi: ? | 15:15 |
smcginnis | And not sure how cloudkitty missed RC when they had been in touch prior to it. | 15:15 |
ttx | I think he said he might be one or two days late ? | 15:15 |
ttx | which for intermediary-released stuff is not so big | 15:15 |
prometheanfire | ya, triple-o is in that camp | 15:16 |
ttx | zhipeng is not on this channe; | 15:16 |
ttx | l | 15:16 |
dhellmann | the intermediary server projects aren't technically late, right? | 15:17 |
ttx | dhellmann: no they aren't | 15:17 |
dhellmann | we just set the deadline for them to the final deadline, according to the schedule page | 15:17 |
smcginnis | According to the clarification last week, they have until RC final. | 15:17 |
dhellmann | right | 15:17 |
dhellmann | that's what I meant | 15:17 |
ttx | we'd still prefer it earlier so we can cut stabel/rocky | 15:17 |
evrardjp | agreed | 15:17 |
smcginnis | Cuts it close for some of these that have not done any releases yet, but that is what we published. | 15:17 |
dhellmann | right, but it's their problem if they run into issues when we go ahead with the other branches | 15:18 |
smcginnis | True | 15:18 |
dhellmann | that's what we've communicated in the past | 15:18 |
*** kopecmartin has quit IRC | 15:18 | |
smcginnis | So cloudkitty - we know they are working on it, karbor - will warn in client FFE that they need to do a release or risk being removed, magnum - no word yet. | 15:19 |
dhellmann | and since we're not syncing requirements any more, we shouldn't have any issues with versions going up on master then back down after the branch | 15:19 |
smcginnis | Clients: designate - patch is up, karbor and tricircle - will send FFE and force releases. | 15:20 |
dhellmann | should we warn them about the impending deadline and missing being included in rocky? | 15:20 |
dhellmann | (them == magnum) | 15:20 |
fungi | the castellan ffe e-mail just hot the -dev list too | 15:20 |
fungi | er, just hit | 15:21 |
smcginnis | We probably should warn magnum, though we have stated in multiple posts and it is documented. | 15:21 |
*** ekcs has quit IRC | 15:22 | |
smcginnis | Horizon plugins? | 15:23 |
smcginnis | Cloudkitty is known. | 15:23 |
dhellmann | I'm trying to put the notes into the etherpad, and I missed the client ones. are those all warnings? | 15:23 |
smcginnis | Hopefully mugsie can send FFE for designate. I will send one for karbor and tricircle ones. | 15:24 |
smcginnis | With the warning that they will be removed if no service release by RC final. | 15:24 |
*** kopecmartin has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:24 | |
mugsie | smcginnis: I will do that now, before I forget | 15:24 |
smcginnis | mugsie: Thanks! | 15:24 |
dhellmann | ok, I think I'm caught up | 15:25 |
smcginnis | Not sure about tacker-horizon and zun-ui. | 15:25 |
smcginnis | zun-ui looks to be the bigger concern. | 15:25 |
dhellmann | those looked like there were enough changes to need a warning | 15:26 |
smcginnis | But they do still have until RC final. | 15:26 |
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:26 | |
smcginnis | OK, "others"? | 15:27 |
ttx | TheJulia might know the bifrost situation | 15:27 |
dhellmann | the monasca-kibana-plugin had no real changes except the readme file format | 15:28 |
smcginnis | kuryr-* ones have some, but again have until RC final. | 15:28 |
dhellmann | I guess that means it's stable? it would be good to have confirmation that it's maintained. | 15:28 |
dhellmann | the tempest tag is called out in our process somewhere I think | 15:28 |
dhellmann | oh, just for the branching | 15:29 |
dhellmann | I do seem to remember that we wait to tag tempest as long as possible though | 15:30 |
smcginnis | I have not seen anything for networking-hyperv, and given the recent election results for the Win team, they might need a reminder. | 15:30 |
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:30 | |
dhellmann | seems likely | 15:30 |
ttx | I feel like we should (in the future) mandate that intermediary-released stuff has one release and branch done by R-2 | 15:30 |
*** jgriffith has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
dhellmann | that's early for a branch, but a release makes sense | 15:31 |
evrardjp | dhellmann: it would be nice to document the why | 15:31 |
dhellmann | we used to have that rule, iirc | 15:31 |
ttx | since the turnaround for removing that deliverable (and update release messaging) is REALLY short | 15:31 |
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:31 | |
dhellmann | evrardjp : yes, definitely | 15:31 |
smcginnis | ttx: RC2 or RC3? It would be nice to make sure something is being done before the end. | 15:31 |
dhellmann | smcginnis : rc2 is the inclusion deadline for milestone projects, so that sort of makes sense. although rc3 would be ok, too. | 15:32 |
ttx | smcginnis: I'd either add a deadline at R-2, or require that anything that is past R-3 requires an exception | 15:32 |
ttx | Basically I'm fine cutting slack to people that are keeping up and reaching out | 15:32 |
ttx | I'm worried about peolpe we haven't heard from | 15:32 |
smcginnis | Me too. | 15:33 |
dhellmann | we don't really do negative messaging, right? so even if we remove the project at r2 folks who aren't checking until the end of the cycle won't notice until then. | 15:33 |
TheJulia | re bifrost, I know it needs to be released, but it is mainly geared on tooling to deploy ironic, so I just haven't gotten to that yet since there has a minor breakage | 15:33 |
smcginnis | TheJulia: OK, thanks. | 15:34 |
smcginnis | TheJulia: It is cycle-with-intermediary, so there's a little time yet. | 15:34 |
TheJulia | yeah, my perception was next week | 15:34 |
ttx | The original idea behind MembershipFreeze and requiring somethign is in by milestone-2 was to have those discussions about what is in the release a lot earlier in the cycle | 15:35 |
dhellmann | yeah, that's why I would support an rc2 deadline for intermediary projects | 15:35 |
ttx | removing stuff the week before release is not making us look good | 15:35 |
dhellmann | just make them all the same deadline | 15:35 |
smcginnis | That makes sense. | 15:35 |
ttx | and makes it very difficult to work on release messaging | 15:35 |
annabelleB | +1 | 15:35 |
smcginnis | We really should not have questions about what is in or out this late. | 15:35 |
ttx | Also... intermediary-released was for things that do multiple releases | 15:36 |
ttx | things that can't make a release need the cycle-with-milestone baby-wheels | 15:36 |
evrardjp | I agree on the idea of having the "same deadline" as message, but it's far from possible due to a chain of dependencies | 15:36 |
ttx | I'm just ranting out loud | 15:37 |
dhellmann | evrardjp : ? | 15:37 |
smcginnis | ttx: No, it's all very valid. | 15:37 |
evrardjp | maybe it was out of context, continue :) | 15:37 |
evrardjp | "them all" was not clear to | 15:38 |
evrardjp | me | 15:38 |
annabelleB | (I see cyborg rc1 just appeared) | 15:38 |
dhellmann | evrardjp : ah, I meant "all cycle-with-intermediary and cycle-with-milestones projects" | 15:38 |
armstrong | thx: thx for the clarification on release models, it’s clear now to me. | 15:38 |
evrardjp | dhellmann: I realised that afterwards. | 15:38 |
smcginnis | OK, c-w-i outdated releases. | 15:39 |
smcginnis | Swift we know is coming. | 15:39 |
smcginnis | Not sure about heat. | 15:39 |
dhellmann | smcginnis , ttx: perhaps we should change the models for some of these projects that aren't really following the intermediary model expections | 15:39 |
smcginnis | We may just need to force a branch from the last release. | 15:39 |
ttx | The RC dance was so that we have a fallback release on R-3. intermediary-released did not have to go with the RC dance because we were supposed to have a fallback release (the last intermediary) already | 15:39 |
ttx | And now people use it to release a single thing at the end... and we lose our fallback | 15:39 |
smcginnis | dhellmann: I think I'd rather prod them to require an earlier intermediary release. | 15:40 |
dhellmann | right | 15:40 |
evrardjp | ttx: that's good to clarify this. | 15:40 |
dhellmann | smcginnis : well, like ttx said, if they're not actually producing intermediary releases... | 15:40 |
ttx | I think we should reach out to all those who did a single release and being intermediary | 15:40 |
ttx | and ask them about going with-milestones again | 15:40 |
evrardjp | or independant? | 15:41 |
ttx | The trick being, of course, that with-milestones is inferior as it's less semver | 15:41 |
dhellmann | perhaps we should suggest more strongly than we did in the past when we had those conversations | 15:41 |
smcginnis | I'm saying I'd rather force (stronly encourage) them to do intermediary releases like they should or miss being part of the coordinated release. | 15:41 |
ttx | evrardjp: we want "openstack" main components to be released on the cycle | 15:41 |
smcginnis | evrardjp: Yep, good point. If they can't do intermediary, then they probably should be independent. | 15:41 |
ttx | so that independent option is not open to all | 15:41 |
dhellmann | smcginnis : ok, I guess presenting the choice that way works for me. Either actually do intermediary releases, switch to milestones, or switch to independent. | 15:41 |
armstrong | ttx: how many RC should a release have? | 15:41 |
smcginnis | It would depend on what it is. | 15:41 |
evrardjp | ttx: that was a joke initially -- what I meant behind that is that maybe they are not using the right model | 15:41 |
smcginnis | armstrong: As close to 1 as possible. | 15:42 |
dhellmann | armstrong : for milestone-based projects we require 1 and often have a second for final translations. | 15:42 |
smcginnis | evrardjp: Could be. | 15:42 |
* TheJulia finds this entire discussion really frustrating from a contribution standpoint. | 15:42 | |
ttx | dhellmann: in theory, we /could/ fallback to the last release they did. The previous cycle. | 15:42 |
armstrong | ok thx | 15:42 |
dhellmann | but yeah, we don't want a lot of them | 15:42 |
dhellmann | TheJulia : what about it frustrates you? | 15:42 |
smcginnis | TheJulia: Can you share your frustrations? | 15:42 |
TheJulia | dhellmann: eating food real quick to make sure it is not low blood sugar | 15:42 |
smcginnis | :) | 15:43 |
evrardjp | TheJulia: that's why I am saying this: If your project doesn't meet certain procedure,maybe the procedure isn't the right one? | 15:43 |
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:43 | |
evrardjp | TheJulia: I smiled on blood sugar. | 15:43 |
dhellmann | TheJulia : ack. I'm interested in your perspective. I'm probably too close to the other side of the question. | 15:43 |
smcginnis | All of this should be around helping teams make sure they are progressing along and able to be released together as a good, quality whole. If it's not encouraging that, then we should reevaluate. | 15:43 |
TheJulia | nomming | 15:44 |
dhellmann | evrardjp : right, a big purpose of the models is to describe what process the project uses for releases, so if the project isn't actually doing what the model says then the model is wrong | 15:44 |
ttx | basically I'd prefer not to remove anything from the release after milestone-2 | 15:44 |
*** rajinir has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:44 | |
evrardjp | dhellmann: I don't want to look oversimplifying though :) | 15:44 |
dhellmann | evrardjp : I think the models are defined well, so what I mean is that they are not matched correctly to what the teams need. | 15:45 |
dhellmann | we're using the wrong models, not defining the models incorrectly | 15:45 |
evrardjp | that's what I meant. | 15:45 |
evrardjp | precisely! | 15:45 |
dhellmann | huzzah, we agree! | 15:45 |
smcginnis | We have a long list of ones missing stable branches. Some appear to have merged a lot since their last release, but I think we will just have to force the stable branch for those that do not have anything before final. | 15:45 |
dhellmann | what is the effect of not forcing stable branches now for projects that are not milestone-based? | 15:46 |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:46 | |
smcginnis | These are cycle-with-intermediary, so I don't think we should force until the RC final deadline. | 15:46 |
*** longkb has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:46 | |
dhellmann | ah, right, I misread what you said | 15:46 |
smcginnis | Otherwise if they are planning to release more, they would end up needing to backport potentally a lot. | 15:47 |
* dhellmann may need some of TheJulia's noms | 15:47 | |
ttx | dumping a few more thoughts in #openstack-release to avoid disrupting meeting further | 15:47 |
smcginnis | Release team brunch. | 15:47 |
smcginnis | :) | 15:47 |
dhellmann | there's a plan | 15:47 |
annabelleB | here for this! | 15:47 |
dhellmann | does denver do brunch? | 15:47 |
evrardjp | will there be wine? | 15:48 |
smcginnis | I'm sure we can find somewhere. | 15:48 |
dhellmann | of course! | 15:48 |
smcginnis | Mimosas? | 15:48 |
dhellmann | bingo | 15:48 |
TheJulia | I see it as kind of two fold. We want fallbacks for messaging, but as pointed out we don't get them... because projects have the ability to break eachother kind of hard at times by minor actions or changes. I get the desire for messaging, but if you can't get to something to milestone-3 that is unrelated, then your essentially penalizing in my mind. We're essentially trying to drive things to move in lock-step, but | 15:48 |
TheJulia | it is really unreasonable imho. I think we can only really 'release' what we know works together too. | 15:48 |
smcginnis | Funny how several channels have all gravitated towards food lately. | 15:48 |
dhellmann | smcginnis : the memes own us | 15:48 |
*** longkb has quit IRC | 15:49 | |
* fungi plans to go find food as soon as the meeting ends | 15:49 | |
smcginnis | TheJulia: We want to make sure a release is done earlier in the cycle, but it would not be their final release. | 15:49 |
evrardjp | smcginnis: I am not at fault, but yeah that's my main hobby. | 15:49 |
smcginnis | TheJulia: Or maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying. | 15:49 |
dhellmann | TheJulia : I guess the point is to release early and often, or to use the milestone model which is strictly date-based and tests the release process without producing something that claims to be production ready | 15:49 |
TheJulia | smcginnis: so then we force number/release model, stable branch backporting for the final release? | 15:50 |
dhellmann | projects using the intermediary model claim to be stable, well tested, and well maintained. If that's not the case, then that's the wrong model for the project. | 15:50 |
TheJulia | but that feels like it fragments the deliverable product | 15:50 |
fungi | put another way, if the project is only creating one release per cycle, then it ought to be cycle-with-milestone? | 15:50 |
smcginnis | We don't force release model. That is something the team chooses. We just try to enforce that they follow their chosen model. | 15:50 |
*** longkb has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:51 | |
ttx | fungi: well, yes. | 15:51 |
dhellmann | smcginnis : right. we want them to accurately describe how they manage releases. | 15:51 |
ttx | it's called cycle-with-intermediary, not cycle-with-one-single-release-that-if-you-miss-it-you-are-out | 15:51 |
smcginnis | We don't want to impose anything on the teams other than to follow through with what they've declared they would do. | 15:51 |
dhellmann | that's spelled "independent" | 15:51 |
fungi | heh | 15:52 |
evrardjp | smcginnis: should we? | 15:52 |
ttx | ok if we are having that discussion now... I'll paste from #opensatck-release | 15:52 |
ttx | 17:48 <ttx> In the name of giving teams control over their deliverables, we created a machine that removes components from OpenStack if someone misses a couple of checkboxes. | 15:52 |
* dhellmann waits for the paste before responding | 15:52 | |
ttx | 17:48 <ttx> I wonder if the process should not, by default, do releases for people | 15:52 |
ttx | 17:49 <ttx> and then those who want the extra control can assert it | 15:52 |
evrardjp | I agree. | 15:53 |
TheJulia | smcginnis: I think that is a good delineation, the conundrum is I think the milestone model is unsustainable without automated point in time "we're releasing this" which is out of control of contributiors aside from trying to get things in early, because we do get the gates bogged down at the end of the cycle, but I also think we have many smaller minor things that just don't have the resources to release any other | 15:53 |
TheJulia | way except as "hey, got this thing", but then compatibility is completely unknown to everything else. | 15:53 |
evrardjp | it simplifies the model, and doesn't have a bad message. | 15:53 |
dhellmann | ttx: we have the split between servers and libraries to consider, too. I would support "milestone by default" for servers, but that doesn't work for libs. :-/ | 15:53 |
* TheJulia hits the same idea as ttx | 15:54 | |
ttx | dhellmann: we could do regular library releases too ? | 15:54 |
TheJulia | if there have been changes landed, sure | 15:54 |
dhellmann | ttx: we could, but when something breaks as the result then that's on us instead of the team that owns the library | 15:54 |
dhellmann | we've had a few times where we knew and oslo release would break something, so we waited | 15:54 |
ttx | hmm | 15:54 |
smcginnis | "why did you release that - it's not ready and we've been trying to fix this bug!" | 15:55 |
dhellmann | right | 15:55 |
TheJulia | This also goes back to the earlier discussion where releasing libraries without a reason felt like the wrong thing to be doing | 15:55 |
dhellmann | that's less likely with servers, except the break would happen downstream of us where someone is automatically packaging based on tags | 15:55 |
TheJulia | smcginnis: "tough"? | 15:55 |
ttx | if you don't want your thing to be released, you can flag it | 15:55 |
smcginnis | :) | 15:55 |
fungi | releasing libraries when there are changes is the right thing to be doing. making unnecessary changes to libraries is the wrong thing to be doing | 15:55 |
dhellmann | when did we do unnecessary library releases? | 15:56 |
TheJulia | dhellmann: we were talking about forcing releases of libraries with no changes | 15:56 |
ttx | If you don;t flag it as "safe to release anytime", then it's on you to fix it if it breaks ? | 15:56 |
fungi | i assume it's conflated with releasing libs with just requirements bumps in them in the past | 15:56 |
fungi | and the idea that we should let our stable libs actually remain stable | 15:56 |
dhellmann | TheJulia : ah, maybe because there were CI changes and so if we create the branch without including them it would be broken immediately and require backports? | 15:57 |
evrardjp | ttx: isn't that what a PTL of a project can do? Like reviewing things is probably easier than remembering the deadlines in a busy world. | 15:57 |
dhellmann | yeah, we still need to talk about what to do with those. I think I'm leaning towards just making stable libraries independent. | 15:57 |
TheJulia | dhellmann: That is the risk with any branch or any release. Ironic has had to create its branch in a broken state because it was broken by things outside of our influence or control. We had to backport everything to get things going again | 15:58 |
ttx | Anyway, that won't apply to rocky, but i think we should spend a few minutes on that in Denver | 15:58 |
fungi | what was the resolution on branching when there were no changes? did we decide to preemptively branch? | 15:58 |
dhellmann | TheJulia : sure. We're trying to reduce the number of times that happens, though. | 15:58 |
smcginnis | With 2 minutes left, this does seem like a good thing for the PTG. | 15:58 |
fungi | agreed | 15:59 |
TheJulia | dhellmann: agreed and I believe we should attempt that | 15:59 |
TheJulia | agreed | 15:59 |
*** kopecmartin has quit IRC | 15:59 | |
evrardjp | +1 | 15:59 |
smcginnis | I'll add a topic to our PTG etherpad. | 15:59 |
smcginnis | Anyting else in the last few seconds? | 16:00 |
dhellmann | fungi : I don't remember, but we should make sure it's written down somewhere | 16:00 |
ttx | cyborg request is now in | 16:00 |
ttx | and Barbican's | 16:00 |
*** longkb has quit IRC | 16:00 | |
smcginnis | Great! | 16:00 |
ttx | so we are good as far as Rocky process goes :) | 16:00 |
smcginnis | OK, we're at time. Thanks everyone. | 16:00 |
fungi | thanks smcginnis! | 16:00 |
smcginnis | #endmeeting | 16:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 16:00 | |
evrardjp | thanks | 16:00 |
dhellmann | thanks! | 16:00 |
openstack | Meeting ended Fri Aug 10 16:00:58 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:00 |
annabelleB | thanks smcginnis! | 16:01 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2018/releaseteam.2018-08-10-15.01.html | 16:01 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2018/releaseteam.2018-08-10-15.01.txt | 16:01 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2018/releaseteam.2018-08-10-15.01.log.html | 16:01 |
* fungi goes to find friday nourishment | 16:01 | |
smcginnis | fungi: Is "friday nourishment" code for beer? | 16:01 |
fungi | it could be, you never know ;) | 16:02 |
TheJulia | smcginnis: fungi: This sounds wise | 16:02 |
fungi | but mostly code for errands and a fish sandwich | 16:02 |
*** prometheanfire has left #openstack-meeting | 16:03 | |
*** longkb has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:06 | |
*** fried_rice is now known as fried_rolls | 16:08 | |
*** mriedem has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:35 | |
*** annabelleB has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:42 | |
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:43 | |
*** rmcall has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
*** mjturek has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:04 | |
*** davidsha has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:11 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
*** longkb has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:21 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:22 | |
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:24 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
*** eharney_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:30 | |
*** erlon has quit IRC | 17:33 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 17:33 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:42 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:47 | |
*** ricolin has quit IRC | 17:48 | |
*** ekcs has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:52 | |
*** priteau has quit IRC | 17:52 | |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:58 | |
*** yamahata has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:03 | |
*** armstrong has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
*** ianychoi has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
*** dustins has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
*** raildo_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:10 | |
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:11 | |
*** raildo has quit IRC | 18:14 | |
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:14 | |
*** erlon has quit IRC | 18:24 | |
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:29 | |
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:39 | |
*** apetrich has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
*** fried_rolls is now known as fried_rice | 18:47 | |
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 18:50 | |
*** tssurya has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:51 | |
*** annabelleB has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
*** eharney_ is now known as eharney | 18:52 | |
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:55 | |
*** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:55 | |
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:59 | |
*** dustins has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:01 | |
*** annabelleB has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
*** mjturek has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
*** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:15 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 19:18 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:31 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:33 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:40 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 19:45 | |
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:47 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:51 | |
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:57 | |
*** mjturek has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:00 | |
*** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:11 | |
*** priteau has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:13 | |
*** mjturek has quit IRC | 20:21 | |
*** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:23 | |
*** ade_lee has quit IRC | 20:25 | |
*** mjturek has quit IRC | 20:29 | |
*** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:30 | |
*** raildo_ has quit IRC | 20:41 | |
*** eharney has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
*** annabelleB has quit IRC | 20:48 | |
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:51 | |
*** dustins has quit IRC | 20:54 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 20:55 | |
*** awaugama has quit IRC | 20:58 | |
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 21:02 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:09 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
*** annabelleB has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:01 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:02 | |
*** annabelleB has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
*** imacdonn has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
*** imacdonn has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:12 | |
*** tssurya has quit IRC | 22:21 | |
*** leakypipes has quit IRC | 22:31 | |
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:35 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:37 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
*** hongbin_ has quit IRC | 23:00 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 23:05 | |
*** mjturek has quit IRC | 23:12 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:38 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:39 | |
*** dtrainor has quit IRC | 23:40 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!