*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:01 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 00:02 | |
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC | 00:05 | |
*** mattw4 has quit IRC | 00:09 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 00:09 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:11 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:12 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 00:16 | |
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:22 | |
*** igordc has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 00:24 | |
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:27 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 00:30 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 00:51 | |
*** tetsuro has quit IRC | 00:57 | |
*** tetsuro has joined #openstack-meeting | 00:57 | |
*** masahito has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:10 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:11 | |
*** masahito has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 01:16 | |
*** masahito has joined #openstack-meeting | 01:21 | |
*** gyee has quit IRC | 01:52 | |
*** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:04 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:11 | |
*** jiaopengju1 has quit IRC | 02:12 | |
*** jiaopengju1 has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:12 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 02:16 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:22 | |
*** efried has quit IRC | 02:34 | |
*** efried has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:34 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:45 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:47 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 02:53 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 03:04 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:11 | |
*** apetrich has quit IRC | 03:11 | |
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:15 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 03:22 | |
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 03:25 | |
*** masahito has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:36 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 03:58 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 04:07 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:08 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:11 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 04:16 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:38 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 04:55 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 04:57 | |
*** rh-jelabarre has quit IRC | 05:08 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:11 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 05:15 | |
*** roman_g has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC | 05:38 | |
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:39 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 05:39 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 05:39 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 05:46 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 05:59 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:00 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:11 | |
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:15 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:15 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 06:16 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 06:20 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 06:39 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 06:47 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 06:52 | |
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:08 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:11 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 07:16 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:19 | |
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:20 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 07:23 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:30 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:36 | |
*** masahito has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:46 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:49 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:51 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 07:55 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 07:58 | |
*** psachin has quit IRC | 08:00 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 08:03 | |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:05 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:06 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:07 | |
*** apdibbo has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:07 | |
*** apdibbo_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:07 | |
*** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:10 | |
*** lajoskatona has left #openstack-meeting | 08:11 | |
*** apdibbo has quit IRC | 08:11 | |
*** JieLi has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:21 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:22 | |
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 08:22 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 08:26 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 08:29 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:29 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 08:30 | |
*** masahito_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:36 | |
*** masahito has quit IRC | 08:36 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 08:42 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 08:45 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk is now known as maciejjozefczyk| | 08:48 | |
*** masahito_ has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
*** tetsuro has quit IRC | 08:55 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 08:56 | |
*** lucasagomes has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:10 | |
*** alecuyer has left #openstack-meeting | 09:13 | |
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:15 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:24 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 09:28 | |
*** jraju__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:42 | |
*** jraju__ has quit IRC | 09:42 | |
*** links has quit IRC | 09:42 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 09:52 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 09:53 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 10:01 | |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 10:11 | |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:12 | |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:16 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:19 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:27 | |
*** trident has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 10:32 | |
*** trident has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:34 | |
*** manuvakery has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:38 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 10:40 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 10:58 | |
*** stephenfin has quit IRC | 10:59 | |
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:00 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
*** stephenfin has quit IRC | 11:15 | |
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:16 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:30 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 11:34 | |
*** stephenfin has quit IRC | 11:52 | |
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting | 11:52 | |
*** dmacpher has quit IRC | 11:57 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:01 | |
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:01 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:05 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 12:06 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:09 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 12:17 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:24 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:32 | |
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:34 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 12:37 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 12:59 | |
*** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting | 12:59 | |
*** rh-jelabarre has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:00 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:04 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:09 | |
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC | 13:11 | |
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:14 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:20 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:21 | |
*** Lucas_Gray has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:26 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:31 | |
*** Lucas_Gray has quit IRC | 13:32 | |
*** Liang__ has quit IRC | 13:35 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:35 | |
*** Liang__ has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:36 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
*** zaneb has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:37 | |
*** toabctl has quit IRC | 13:38 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 13:39 | |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 13:40 | |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:42 | |
*** hjensas has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:42 | |
*** bbowen has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:43 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away | 13:48 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 13:53 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:55 | |
*** stephen-ma has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:56 | |
*** stephenfin has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting | 13:57 | |
*** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:00 | |
mlavalle | o/ | 14:00 |
---|---|---|
slaweq | #startmeeting neutron_drivers | 14:01 |
openstack | Meeting started Fri Feb 28 14:01:12 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)" | 14:01 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers' | 14:01 |
slaweq | hi | 14:01 |
njohnston | o/ | 14:01 |
haleyb | o/ | 14:01 |
slaweq | sorry for being late | 14:01 |
slaweq | ok, we already have quorum but lets wait few more minutes for amotoki and yamamoto | 14:01 |
njohnston | I believe yamamoto said he couldn't make it | 14:02 |
ralonsoh | ji | 14:02 |
ralonsoh | hi | 14:02 |
mlavalle | we won't attend | 14:02 |
mlavalle | he^^^ | 14:02 |
amotoki | hi | 14:02 |
slaweq | ok, right | 14:02 |
slaweq | so we can start | 14:02 |
slaweq | #topic RFEs | 14:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "RFEs (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)" | 14:03 | |
slaweq | we have 2 RFEs for today | 14:03 |
slaweq | first one is continuation from last week | 14:03 |
slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861529 | 14:03 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1861529 in neutron "[RFE] A port's network should be changable" [Wishlist,New] | 14:03 |
slaweq | last week I proposed 2 possible ways to go with this: | 14:04 |
slaweq | 1. we will continue discussion about that in review of spec where more details will be shared with us, | 14:04 |
slaweq | 2. we don't accept this RFE | 14:04 |
slaweq | so I would like to ask You which option of those 2 You would vote for | 14:05 |
slaweq | or maybe there is some 3rd possible option? | 14:05 |
njohnston | link to the previous conversation: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2020/neutron_drivers.2020-02-21-14.00.log.html#l-119 | 14:05 |
slaweq | thx njohnston | 14:05 |
njohnston | I'll restate my previous opinion: I would vote for 2 unless we have a very clear user story that means this will have a real benefit for today's cloud customer, with modern guest OSes that notice PCI plug/unplug events | 14:06 |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:07 | |
*** stephenfin has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
njohnston | stephen-ma gave MS-DOS as an example of a guest OS that would need this feature, for example | 14:07 |
slaweq | njohnston: I would also be for option 2) as I said last week | 14:07 |
amotoki | I am leaning to option 2 to deny it. per discussion on the background last week, it is to support older OSes before PCI hot plug era. | 14:07 |
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:08 | |
slaweq | yes, and I don't think that making many complicated changes in the code is worth to do only to support e.g MS-DOS and other older systems | 14:08 |
njohnston | I am open to being persuaded otherwise but I think we have to focus ourselves on serving code that has been created since the turn of the century or so | 14:08 |
slaweq | mlavalle: haleyb: any thoughts? | 14:09 |
amotoki | Even if we allow to change network for a port if it has no L3 address, what happens for applications on such OS like MS-DOS? Do such apps take into account a case where IP address is not assigned? | 14:10 |
haleyb | I would go with option 2 for the same reasons, i don't think the use case has been fully explained, and unplug/plug works for most today | 14:10 |
mlavalle | 2 unless we have a convincingly explained use case | 14:10 |
slaweq | thx | 14:11 |
slaweq | I think we all agreed here | 14:11 |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 14:11 | |
mlavalle | I was looking for a spec in Gerrit | 14:11 |
mlavalle | and didn't find any | 14:11 |
stephen-ma | The user will need to use the VM's console to have the new IP take effect. I | 14:11 |
slaweq | I will update RFE after the meeting | 14:11 |
stephen-ma | The user needs to set a new fixed-ip after changing the network. | 14:11 |
amotoki | stephen-ma: welcome :) | 14:12 |
slaweq | stephen-ma: hi, so do You have user story for that, as njohnston asked? | 14:13 |
amotoki | stephen-ma: but releasing IP address means the service is stopped during a VM has no IP. What is the difference from a case where you deploy a new instance for a new network. | 14:13 |
amotoki | ? | 14:13 |
*** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:13 | |
slaweq | stephen-ma: or e.g. stop vm, unplug port, plug new port and start vm again | 14:13 |
amotoki | The only difference is that you can continue to use a SAME server instance. If this is the only difference, the RFE doesn't convince me. | 14:14 |
stephen-ma | The VM's is owned by a customer with a Cloud service provider. The cloud service provider cannot shut doen the customer VM. | 14:15 |
slaweq | still this use case don't convince me to approve this rfe as it would mean changes in our basic concepts which we have in neutron for years | 14:16 |
amotoki | it is a balance among users and consumers in various level. there is no reason that a cloud provider needs to consider all cases. | 14:16 |
slaweq | and probably it will not be trivial change | 14:16 |
stephen-ma | yes it will end up being a big change. | 14:17 |
slaweq | stephen-ma: exactly :/ | 14:17 |
slaweq | so I'm still voting for not approving this rfe | 14:18 |
slaweq | and I think we all agreed on that, right? | 14:18 |
ralonsoh | slaweq, I agree too in not approving it | 14:18 |
mlavalle | yes | 14:18 |
njohnston | yes | 14:18 |
amotoki | slaweq: yes | 14:18 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:18 | |
slaweq | haleyb: You're also still for not approving it, right? | 14:19 |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:19 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
haleyb | slaweq: yes, -1 | 14:20 |
slaweq | thx all | 14:20 |
slaweq | I will write a comment in this rfe | 14:20 |
amotoki | stephen-ma: we are not rejecting you. if you need to explain the situation we can help. | 14:20 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
stephen-ma | @slaweq can this RFE be rediscussed if there are new use cases? | 14:20 |
slaweq | stephen-ma: ofcourse | 14:20 |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:21 | |
amotoki | stephen-ma: yes, the motivations and backgrounds are important | 14:21 |
slaweq | feel free to update it if You will have any "more modern" use cases for that | 14:21 |
mlavalle | if more information about the use case / s surfaces, why don't we start with a spec? | 14:21 |
stephen-ma | good idea. | 14:21 |
slaweq | mlavalle: it can be given in spec also | 14:21 |
slaweq | both would work for me | 14:21 |
njohnston | agreed | 14:22 |
slaweq | ok, lets move on to the next one now | 14:22 |
slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1858610 | 14:22 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1858610 in neutron "[RFE] Qos policy not supporting sharing bandwidth between several nics of the same vm." [Undecided,New] | 14:22 |
slaweq | JieLi: hi, it's Your RFE, right? | 14:22 |
JieLi | yes | 14:23 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 14:24 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:24 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:24 | |
njohnston | Interesting idea. I would think that we'd only want to aggregate bandwidth for nics that are on the same network, right? In other words if a VM has a port on an administrative network and a port on an application network, they shouldn't share bandwidth limitations. | 14:25 |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
ralonsoh | JieLi, can you explain a bit the backend implementation? | 14:25 |
*** stephenfin has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:25 | |
ralonsoh | njohnston, not only the same network but also you need to consider if you want to limit this only to bound ports to the same VM or host | 14:26 |
ralonsoh | but this is server logic, how to decide to share the BW | 14:27 |
JieLi | njohnston we want to limit the total bandwidth of vm, for restricting system resource usage. | 14:27 |
ralonsoh | my concern is how this is going to be implemented in any backend | 14:27 |
slaweq | yes, backend implementation is very interesting thing in this case as limiting bw isn't trivial thing :) | 14:28 |
amotoki | ralonsoh's point is really good and important to me too. | 14:28 |
njohnston | in reality. confining bandwidth to a collection of ports could have many uses, not necessarily restricting just to a single host. For example if you have 5 app servers you could use such a shared policy to say "Don't exceed X bandwidth for these 5 ports" and limit the whole app server farm together, | 14:28 |
JieLi | ralonsoh currently, we'd like to use linux tc stack to redirect nic's traffic to an ifb interface, and limit the bandwidth on the ifb interface | 14:29 |
slaweq | njohnston: but that would be far more complicated as such ports could be on different hosts :) | 14:29 |
ralonsoh | JieLi, so this is limited, for now, to LB backend | 14:29 |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 14:29 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:30 | |
ralonsoh | and another question: direction?? ingress? egress? both? | 14:30 |
JieLi | ralonsoh you mean loadbalancer? | 14:30 |
ralonsoh | JieLi, ? | 14:30 |
ralonsoh | no no Linux Bridge | 14:30 |
ralonsoh | there are 4 backends in the neutron repo | 14:30 |
JieLi | direction: both | 14:30 |
ralonsoh | sriov, LB, ovs and OVN | 14:30 |
ralonsoh | ok | 14:31 |
JieLi | backends: we want to support ovs and LB | 14:31 |
ralonsoh | with an IFB block? | 14:31 |
ralonsoh | that means you need to setup an hybrid deployment | 14:32 |
ralonsoh | implications: no DPDK support, maybe no HW offload support | 14:32 |
JieLi | yes, no DPDK support, maybe no HW offload support | 14:32 |
ralonsoh | and the OVS firewall could be affected | 14:33 |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 14:33 | |
ralonsoh | because you are redirecting all those ports to a unique IFB | 14:33 |
mlavalle | is there a non IFB alternative? | 14:33 |
* mlavalle will have to leave 15 minutes before the hour | 14:34 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:34 | |
ralonsoh | so far in OVS we don't have something like this, a shared qos policy | 14:34 |
JieLi | traffic will be send back to tapXXX interface from ifb after netwroking shaping, firewall need to be tested, i can't be sure now | 14:34 |
ralonsoh | so there is no native support | 14:34 |
njohnston | what kind of a performance impact would such an architecture have? | 14:34 |
JieLi | @mla | 14:35 |
ralonsoh | let me be frank: the OVS present too many possible incompatibilities | 14:36 |
JieLi | mlavalle,at present, we have no non IFB alternative | 14:36 |
ralonsoh | and the architecture could be quite complex | 14:36 |
mlavalle | I say let's do a PoC | 14:36 |
ralonsoh | perfect for me | 14:36 |
mlavalle | and explore the idea | 14:36 |
ralonsoh | (btw, trunk plugin could help on this, just an idea) | 14:37 |
slaweq | IMO idea of this is interesting but there is many things to clarify so maybe PoC and spec would be needed first | 14:37 |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:38 | |
slaweq | but as for rfe I tend to approve it | 14:38 |
ralonsoh | +1 | 14:38 |
mlavalle | +1 | 14:39 |
haleyb | +1 | 14:39 |
amotoki | when we visit the possibility of the proposed idea after approving it? | 14:39 |
amotoki | I tend to +1 but it hits me | 14:39 |
njohnston | yes I would like to see what the PoC results are | 14:40 |
slaweq | amotoki: I was thinking to work out all possibilities during spec review | 14:40 |
slaweq | and maybe PoC too | 14:40 |
amotoki | sounds good | 14:40 |
njohnston | +1 | 14:40 |
slaweq | with QoS we already have situation that not all backends supports every rule types | 14:40 |
slaweq | so this one can also be supported only by some backends, not all of them | 14:41 |
ralonsoh | exactly | 14:41 |
amotoki | it is interesting enoguh and it is worth exploring impls. | 14:41 |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
slaweq | to sum up: we all agreed to approve RFE as the idea and continue exploring details of it in spec and poc patches | 14:42 |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 14:42 | |
slaweq | JieLi: is it fine for You? | 14:42 |
JieLi | yes | 14:43 |
slaweq | ok | 14:43 |
slaweq | thx for proposing it | 14:43 |
slaweq | we are done with RFEs for today | 14:43 |
slaweq | #topic On demand agenda | 14:43 |
*** openstack changes topic to "On demand agenda (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)" | 14:44 | |
slaweq | I have one more topic from ralonsoh | 14:44 |
slaweq | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1863423. The service plugin network_segment_ranges has some implementation issues: users can create networks outside the project segment ranges and those segmentation IDs can belong to other project segment ranges. | 14:44 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1863423 in neutron "Method "build_segment_queries_for_tenant_and_shared_ranges" returning empty query" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez) | 14:44 |
slaweq | It's described in details in http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-February/012736.html | 14:44 |
ralonsoh | oh yes | 14:44 |
ralonsoh | one sec | 14:44 |
ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/710090/ | 14:44 |
* mlavalle leaves now, see you next week | 14:44 | |
slaweq | but maybe we can use this couple of minutes to discuss it here | 14:44 |
ralonsoh | discussed in the ML | 14:44 |
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting | 14:44 | |
slaweq | mlavalle: see You | 14:44 |
ralonsoh | this is the possible architecture solution | 14:44 |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 14:44 | |
ralonsoh | as commented in the mail | 14:44 |
ralonsoh | 1) a user (in a project) has network segment ranges | 14:45 |
ralonsoh | --> will retrieve the seg_id from those ranges first | 14:45 |
ralonsoh | and then from the shared one | 14:45 |
ralonsoh | never from other project ranges | 14:45 |
ralonsoh | 2) if the project does not have ranges, directly from the shared pool | 14:45 |
ralonsoh | that's all | 14:46 |
slaweq | I replied to Your email some time ago | 14:46 |
slaweq | IMHO 2) would be better to backport to stable branches | 14:46 |
ralonsoh | yes, that's why I implemented this solution | 14:46 |
slaweq | as API behaviour wouldn't change too much | 14:46 |
ralonsoh | no, no API change | 14:47 |
ralonsoh | just fix the queries | 14:47 |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:47 | |
ralonsoh | (and a couple of extra things) | 14:47 |
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC | 14:48 | |
ralonsoh | (for reviewers: the core of the patch is here https://review.opendev.org/#/c/710090/4/neutron/objects/network_segment_range.py) | 14:49 |
slaweq | ralonsoh: sure, I will review it ASAP | 14:50 |
ralonsoh | thanks! | 14:50 |
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:53 | |
amotoki | is still reading the thread | 14:53 |
amotoki | 1 and 2 above here look exclusive so I am a bit confused. | 14:54 |
ralonsoh | no sorry, not the same | 14:54 |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 14:54 | |
ralonsoh | in the ML 1) and 2) are different options | 14:54 |
amotoki | ralonsoh: I don't mean 1 and 2 in your email | 14:54 |
ralonsoh | here 1) and 2) are just possible situations | 14:55 |
amotoki | ralonsoh: I see | 14:55 |
ralonsoh | in the patch, I implemented option (2) of the mail | 14:55 |
amotoki | atm option 2 of the mail sounds good to me (but I am still trying to understand the situation more) | 14:57 |
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC | 14:57 | |
slaweq | ok, we are almost out of the time, amotoki please reply to the email if You will have anything to add regarding this topic | 14:58 |
ralonsoh | amotoki, sure, ping me via IRC or mail if you have questions | 14:58 |
slaweq | and also others :) | 14:58 |
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC | 14:58 | |
amotoki | slaweq: ralonsoh: sure | 14:58 |
slaweq | thx for attending the meeting | 14:58 |
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-meeting | 14:58 | |
slaweq | and have a great weekend | 14:58 |
ralonsoh | bye! | 14:58 |
slaweq | o/ | 14:58 |
amotoki | o/ | 14:58 |
slaweq | #endmeeting | 14:58 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/" | 14:58 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Fri Feb 28 14:58:39 2020 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:58 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2020/neutron_drivers.2020-02-28-14.01.html | 14:58 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2020/neutron_drivers.2020-02-28-14.01.txt | 14:58 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2020/neutron_drivers.2020-02-28-14.01.log.html | 14:58 |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:01 | |
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:01 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk| has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:03 | |
*** JieLi has quit IRC | 15:03 | |
*** lajoskatona has left #openstack-meeting | 15:04 | |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
*** zaneb has quit IRC | 15:06 | |
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:06 | |
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:07 | |
*** stephen-ma has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:09 | |
*** njohnston has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
*** njohnston_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:15 | |
*** bnemec is now known as beekneemech | 15:16 | |
*** zaneb has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:31 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:38 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:40 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 15:41 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 15:44 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:52 | |
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting | 15:57 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:01 | |
*** yamamoto has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
*** patrick05 has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:10 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:11 | |
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:16 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 16:16 | |
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:16 | |
*** tesseract has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:19 | |
*** mattw4 has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:20 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 16:23 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:25 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:26 | |
*** roman_g has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:38 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:43 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 16:47 | |
*** patrick05 has quit IRC | 16:48 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
*** lucasagomes has quit IRC | 16:53 | |
*** apdibbo has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:53 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 16:54 | |
*** apdibbo_ has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
*** apdibbo_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:01 | |
*** apdibbo has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
*** apdibbo_ has quit IRC | 17:05 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:07 | |
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 17:09 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:19 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:32 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 17:35 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:36 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 17:38 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:39 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:41 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 17:42 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 17:44 | |
*** roman_g has quit IRC | 17:48 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:03 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 18:06 | |
*** kozhukalov has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:20 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:34 | |
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:34 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:38 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 18:39 | |
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 18:44 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:49 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:50 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
*** mattw4 has quit IRC | 18:54 | |
*** dasp_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:55 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:56 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 18:56 | |
*** dasp has quit IRC | 18:57 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:11 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
*** ijw has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
*** mattw4 has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:22 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:26 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:26 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 19:30 | |
*** EmilienM is now known as EvilienM | 19:30 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC | 19:33 | |
*** lyarwood has quit IRC | 19:40 | |
*** mattw4 has quit IRC | 19:44 | |
*** mattw4 has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:46 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:48 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:58 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 19:59 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 20:03 | |
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:06 | |
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC | 20:10 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC | 20:18 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:19 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:20 | |
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting | 20:48 | |
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC | 20:52 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:05 | |
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC | 21:09 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:10 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:11 | |
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:31 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 21:33 | |
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:44 | |
*** mattw4 has quit IRC | 21:46 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting | 21:51 | |
*** sfernand has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:23 | |
*** kozhukalov has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
*** mattw4 has joined #openstack-meeting | 22:54 | |
*** EvilienM is now known as EmilienM | 22:56 | |
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:18 | |
*** kozhukalov has quit IRC | 23:28 | |
*** mattw4 has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
*** ykatabam has quit IRC | 23:31 | |
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting | 23:34 | |
*** macz_ has quit IRC | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!