Friday, 2020-02-28

*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting00:01
*** macz_ has quit IRC00:02
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC00:05
*** mattw4 has quit IRC00:09
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC00:09
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting00:11
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting00:12
*** slaweq has quit IRC00:16
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting00:22
*** igordc has quit IRC00:23
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC00:24
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC00:26
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting00:27
*** brinzhang has quit IRC00:28
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC00:30
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC00:51
*** tetsuro has quit IRC00:57
*** tetsuro has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** masahito has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** masahito has quit IRC01:12
*** slaweq has quit IRC01:16
*** masahito has joined #openstack-meeting01:21
*** gyee has quit IRC01:52
*** vishalmanchanda has joined #openstack-meeting02:04
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting02:11
*** jiaopengju1 has quit IRC02:12
*** jiaopengju1 has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** slaweq has quit IRC02:16
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting02:22
*** efried has quit IRC02:34
*** efried has joined #openstack-meeting02:34
*** yamamoto has quit IRC02:45
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting02:47
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** yamamoto has quit IRC03:04
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting03:11
*** apetrich has quit IRC03:11
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting03:15
*** slaweq has quit IRC03:16
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:22
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC03:25
*** masahito has quit IRC03:30
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting03:36
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting03:58
*** yamamoto has quit IRC04:07
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting04:08
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting04:11
*** slaweq has quit IRC04:16
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting04:38
*** yamamoto has quit IRC04:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting04:57
*** rh-jelabarre has quit IRC05:08
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting05:11
*** slaweq has quit IRC05:15
*** roman_g has quit IRC05:16
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC05:38
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-meeting05:39
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:39
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting05:39
*** ijw has quit IRC05:46
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:59
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting06:00
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting06:11
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting06:15
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting06:15
*** slaweq has quit IRC06:16
*** ijw has quit IRC06:20
*** ykatabam has quit IRC06:39
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting06:47
*** ijw has quit IRC06:52
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting07:08
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting07:11
*** slaweq has quit IRC07:16
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting07:19
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting07:20
*** ijw has quit IRC07:23
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting07:30
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting07:36
*** masahito has joined #openstack-meeting07:46
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting07:49
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting07:51
*** ijw has quit IRC07:55
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** psachin has quit IRC08:00
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:03
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting08:05
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting08:06
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** apdibbo has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** apdibbo_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting08:10
*** lajoskatona has left #openstack-meeting08:11
*** apdibbo has quit IRC08:11
*** JieLi has joined #openstack-meeting08:21
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting08:22
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau08:22
*** ijw has quit IRC08:26
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC08:29
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting08:29
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:30
*** masahito_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:36
*** masahito has quit IRC08:36
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC08:38
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** links has quit IRC08:45
*** maciejjozefczyk is now known as maciejjozefczyk|08:48
*** masahito_ has quit IRC08:50
*** tetsuro has quit IRC08:55
*** rcernin has quit IRC08:56
*** lucasagomes has joined #openstack-meeting09:10
*** alecuyer has left #openstack-meeting09:13
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting09:15
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting09:24
*** ijw has quit IRC09:28
*** jraju__ has joined #openstack-meeting09:42
*** jraju__ has quit IRC09:42
*** links has quit IRC09:42
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:48
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** ykatabam has quit IRC09:53
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:01
*** tesseract has quit IRC10:11
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting10:12
*** tesseract has quit IRC10:16
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting10:16
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting10:27
*** trident has quit IRC10:31
*** ijw has quit IRC10:32
*** trident has joined #openstack-meeting10:34
*** manuvakery has joined #openstack-meeting10:38
*** ykatabam has quit IRC10:40
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting10:58
*** stephenfin has quit IRC10:59
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting11:00
*** ijw has quit IRC11:03
*** stephenfin has quit IRC11:15
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting11:16
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting11:30
*** ijw has quit IRC11:34
*** stephenfin has quit IRC11:52
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting11:52
*** dmacpher has quit IRC11:57
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting12:01
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting12:01
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting12:05
*** ijw has quit IRC12:06
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:09
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:17
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting12:24
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting12:32
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-meeting12:34
*** ijw has quit IRC12:37
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:59
*** enriquetaso has joined #openstack-meeting12:59
*** rh-jelabarre has joined #openstack-meeting13:00
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** ijw has quit IRC13:09
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC13:11
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-meeting13:14
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC13:18
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-meeting13:20
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting13:21
*** Lucas_Gray has joined #openstack-meeting13:26
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
*** Lucas_Gray has quit IRC13:32
*** Liang__ has quit IRC13:35
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** Liang__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC13:36
*** zaneb has quit IRC13:36
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** toabctl has quit IRC13:38
*** ijw has quit IRC13:39
*** tesseract has quit IRC13:40
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** hjensas has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** bbowen has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away13:48
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC13:53
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** stephen-ma has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** stephenfin has quit IRC13:56
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
*** vishalmanchanda has quit IRC13:59
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
slaweq#startmeeting neutron_drivers14:01
openstackMeeting started Fri Feb 28 14:01:12 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is slaweq. Information about MeetBot at
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)"14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers'14:01
slaweqsorry for being late14:01
slaweqok, we already have quorum but lets wait few more minutes for amotoki and yamamoto14:01
njohnstonI believe yamamoto said he couldn't make it14:02
mlavallewe won't attend14:02
slaweqok, right14:02
slaweqso we can start14:02
slaweq#topic RFEs14:03
*** openstack changes topic to "RFEs (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)"14:03
slaweqwe have 2 RFEs for today14:03
slaweqfirst one is continuation from last week14:03
openstackLaunchpad bug 1861529 in neutron "[RFE] A port's network should be changable" [Wishlist,New]14:03
slaweqlast week I proposed 2 possible ways to go with this:14:04
slaweq1. we will continue discussion about that in review of spec where more details will be shared with us,14:04
slaweq2. we don't  accept this RFE14:04
slaweqso I would like to ask You which option of those 2 You would vote for14:05
slaweqor maybe there is some 3rd possible option?14:05
njohnstonlink to the previous conversation:
slaweqthx njohnston14:05
njohnstonI'll restate my previous opinion: I would vote for 2 unless we have a very clear user story that means this will have a real benefit for today's cloud customer, with modern guest OSes that notice PCI plug/unplug events14:06
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
*** stephenfin has quit IRC14:07
njohnstonstephen-ma gave MS-DOS as an example of a guest OS that would need this feature, for example14:07
slaweqnjohnston: I would also be for option 2) as I said last week14:07
amotokiI am leaning to option 2 to deny it. per discussion on the background last week, it is to support older OSes before PCI hot plug era.14:07
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting14:08
slaweqyes, and I don't think that making many complicated changes in the code is worth to do only to support e.g MS-DOS and other older systems14:08
njohnstonI am open to being persuaded otherwise but I think we have to focus ourselves on serving code that has been created since the turn of the century or so14:08
slaweqmlavalle: haleyb: any thoughts?14:09
amotokiEven if we allow to change network for a port if it has no L3 address, what happens for applications on such OS like MS-DOS? Do such apps take into account a case where IP address is not assigned?14:10
haleybI would go with option 2 for the same reasons, i don't think the use case has been fully explained, and unplug/plug works for most today14:10
mlavalle2 unless we have a convincingly explained use case14:10
slaweqI think we all agreed here14:11
*** ijw has quit IRC14:11
mlavalleI was looking for a spec in Gerrit14:11
mlavalleand didn't find any14:11
stephen-maThe user will need to use the VM's console to have the new IP take effect.  I14:11
slaweqI will update RFE after the meeting14:11
stephen-maThe user needs to set a new fixed-ip after changing the network.14:11
amotokistephen-ma: welcome :)14:12
slaweqstephen-ma: hi, so do You have user story for that, as njohnston asked?14:13
amotokistephen-ma: but releasing IP address means the service is stopped during a VM has no IP. What is the difference from a case where you deploy a new instance for a new network.14:13
*** lajoskatona has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
slaweqstephen-ma: or e.g. stop vm, unplug port, plug new port and start vm again14:13
amotokiThe only difference is that you can continue to use a SAME server instance. If this is the only difference, the RFE doesn't convince me.14:14
stephen-maThe VM's is owned by a customer with a Cloud service provider.  The cloud service provider cannot shut doen the customer VM.14:15
slaweqstill this use case don't convince me to approve this rfe as it would mean changes in our basic concepts which we have in neutron for years14:16
amotokiit is a balance among users and consumers in various level. there is no reason that a cloud provider needs to consider all cases.14:16
slaweqand probably it will not be trivial change14:16
stephen-mayes it will end up being a big change.14:17
slaweqstephen-ma: exactly :/14:17
slaweqso I'm still voting for not approving this rfe14:18
slaweqand I think we all agreed on that, right?14:18
ralonsohslaweq, I agree too in not approving it14:18
amotokislaweq: yes14:18
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
slaweqhaleyb: You're also still for not approving it, right?14:19
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** e0ne has quit IRC14:20
haleybslaweq: yes, -114:20
slaweqthx all14:20
slaweqI will write a comment in this rfe14:20
amotokistephen-ma: we are not rejecting you. if you need to explain the situation we can help.14:20
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC14:20
stephen-ma@slaweq can this RFE be rediscussed if there are new use cases?14:20
slaweqstephen-ma: ofcourse14:20
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
amotokistephen-ma: yes, the motivations and backgrounds are important14:21
slaweqfeel free to update it if You will have any "more modern" use cases for that14:21
mlavalleif more information about the use case / s surfaces, why don't we start with a spec?14:21
stephen-magood idea.14:21
slaweqmlavalle: it can be given in spec also14:21
slaweqboth would work for me14:21
slaweqok, lets move on to the next one now14:22
openstackLaunchpad bug 1858610 in neutron "[RFE] Qos policy not supporting sharing bandwidth between several nics of the same vm." [Undecided,New]14:22
slaweqJieLi: hi, it's Your RFE, right?14:22
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC14:24
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
njohnstonInteresting idea.  I would think that we'd only want to aggregate bandwidth for nics that are on the same network, right?  In other words if a VM has a port on an administrative network and a port on an application network, they shouldn't share bandwidth limitations.14:25
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:25
ralonsohJieLi, can you explain a bit the backend implementation?14:25
*** stephenfin has quit IRC14:25
*** stephenfin has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
ralonsohnjohnston, not only the same network but also you need to consider if you want to limit this only to bound ports to the same VM or host14:26
ralonsohbut this is server logic, how to decide to share the BW14:27
JieLinjohnston we want to limit the total bandwidth of vm, for restricting system resource usage.14:27
ralonsohmy concern is how this is going to be implemented in any backend14:27
slaweqyes, backend implementation is very interesting thing in this case as limiting bw isn't trivial thing :)14:28
amotokiralonsoh's point is really good and important to me too.14:28
njohnstonin reality. confining bandwidth to a collection of ports could have many uses, not necessarily restricting just to a single host.  For example if you have 5 app servers you could use such a shared policy to say "Don't exceed X bandwidth for these 5 ports" and limit the whole app server farm together,14:28
JieLiralonsoh currently, we'd like to use linux tc stack to redirect nic's traffic to an ifb interface, and limit the bandwidth on the ifb interface14:29
slaweqnjohnston: but that would be far more complicated as such ports could be on different hosts :)14:29
ralonsohJieLi, so this is limited, for now, to LB backend14:29
*** ykatabam has quit IRC14:29
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
ralonsohand another question: direction?? ingress? egress? both?14:30
JieLiralonsoh you mean loadbalancer?14:30
ralonsohJieLi, ?14:30
ralonsohno no Linux Bridge14:30
ralonsohthere are 4 backends in the neutron repo14:30
JieLidirection: both14:30
ralonsohsriov, LB, ovs and OVN14:30
JieLibackends: we want to support ovs and LB14:31
ralonsohwith an IFB block?14:31
ralonsohthat means you need to setup an hybrid deployment14:32
ralonsohimplications: no DPDK support, maybe no HW offload support14:32
JieLiyes,  no DPDK support, maybe no HW offload support14:32
ralonsohand the OVS firewall could be affected14:33
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:33
ralonsohbecause you are redirecting all those ports to a unique IFB14:33
mlavalleis there a non IFB alternative?14:33
* mlavalle will have to leave 15 minutes before the hour14:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
ralonsohso far in OVS we don't have something like this, a shared qos policy14:34
JieLitraffic will be send back to tapXXX  interface from ifb after netwroking shaping, firewall need to be tested, i can't be sure now14:34
ralonsohso there is no native support14:34
njohnstonwhat kind of a performance impact would such an architecture have?14:34
ralonsohlet me be frank: the OVS present too many possible incompatibilities14:36
JieLimlavalle,at present, we have no non IFB alternative14:36
ralonsohand the architecture could be quite complex14:36
mlavalleI say let's do a PoC14:36
ralonsohperfect for me14:36
mlavalleand explore the idea14:36
ralonsoh(btw, trunk plugin could help on this, just an idea)14:37
slaweqIMO idea of this is interesting but there is many things to clarify so maybe PoC and spec would be needed first14:37
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
slaweqbut as for rfe I tend to approve it14:38
amotokiwhen we visit the possibility of the proposed idea after approving it?14:39
amotokiI tend to +1 but it hits me14:39
njohnstonyes I would like to see what the PoC results are14:40
slaweqamotoki: I was thinking to work out all possibilities during spec review14:40
slaweqand maybe PoC too14:40
amotokisounds good14:40
slaweqwith QoS we already have situation that not all backends supports every rule types14:40
slaweqso this one can also be supported only by some backends, not all of them14:41
amotokiit is interesting enoguh and it is worth exploring impls.14:41
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC14:41
slaweqto sum up: we all agreed to approve RFE as the idea and continue exploring details of it in spec and poc patches14:42
*** ijw has quit IRC14:42
slaweqJieLi: is it fine for You?14:42
slaweqthx for proposing it14:43
slaweqwe are done with RFEs for today14:43
slaweq#topic On demand agenda14:43
*** openstack changes topic to "On demand agenda (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)"14:44
slaweqI have one more topic from ralonsoh14:44
slaweq The service plugin network_segment_ranges has some implementation issues: users can create networks outside the project segment ranges and those segmentation IDs can belong to other project segment ranges.14:44
openstackLaunchpad bug 1863423 in neutron "Method "build_segment_queries_for_tenant_and_shared_ranges" returning empty query" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez)14:44
slaweqIt's described in details in
ralonsohoh yes14:44
ralonsohone sec14:44
* mlavalle leaves now, see you next week14:44
slaweqbut maybe we can use this couple of minutes to discuss it here14:44
ralonsohdiscussed in the ML14:44
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting14:44
slaweqmlavalle: see You14:44
ralonsohthis is the possible architecture solution14:44
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:44
ralonsohas commented in the mail14:44
ralonsoh1) a user (in a project) has network segment ranges14:45
ralonsoh--> will retrieve the seg_id from those ranges first14:45
ralonsohand then from the shared one14:45
ralonsohnever from other project ranges14:45
ralonsoh2) if the project does not have ranges, directly from the shared pool14:45
ralonsohthat's all14:46
slaweqI replied to Your email some time ago14:46
slaweqIMHO 2) would be better to backport to stable branches14:46
ralonsohyes, that's why I implemented this solution14:46
slaweqas API behaviour wouldn't change too much14:46
ralonsohno, no API change14:47
ralonsohjust fix the queries14:47
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
ralonsoh(and a couple of extra things)14:47
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC14:48
ralonsoh(for reviewers: the core of the patch is here
slaweqralonsoh: sure, I will review it ASAP14:50
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
amotokiis still reading the thread14:53
amotoki1 and 2 above here look exclusive so I am a bit confused.14:54
ralonsohno sorry, not the same14:54
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC14:54
ralonsohin the ML 1) and 2) are different options14:54
amotokiralonsoh: I don't mean 1 and 2 in your email14:54
ralonsohhere 1) and 2) are just possible situations14:55
amotokiralonsoh: I see14:55
ralonsohin the patch, I implemented option (2) of the mail14:55
amotokiatm option 2 of the mail sounds good to me (but I am still trying to understand the situation more)14:57
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC14:57
slaweqok, we are almost out of the time, amotoki please reply to the email if You will have anything to add regarding this topic14:58
ralonsohamotoki, sure, ping me via IRC or mail if you have questions14:58
slaweqand also others :)14:58
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC14:58
amotokislaweq: ralonsoh: sure14:58
slaweqthx for attending the meeting14:58
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
slaweqand have a great weekend14:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings ||"14:58
openstackMeeting ended Fri Feb 28 14:58:39 2020 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at . (v 0.1.4)14:58
openstackMinutes (text):
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** maciejjozefczyk| has quit IRC15:02
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** JieLi has quit IRC15:03
*** lajoskatona has left #openstack-meeting15:04
*** tesseract has quit IRC15:05
*** zaneb has quit IRC15:06
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
*** stephen-ma has quit IRC15:07
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting15:09
*** njohnston has quit IRC15:12
*** ijw has quit IRC15:13
*** njohnston_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
*** bnemec is now known as beekneemech15:16
*** zaneb has quit IRC15:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:30
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting15:31
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC15:31
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC15:41
*** ijw has quit IRC15:44
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting15:52
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC15:57
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:01
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC16:05
*** patrick05 has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** macz_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** ijw has quit IRC16:16
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** tesseract has quit IRC16:17
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** mattw4 has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** slaweq has quit IRC16:23
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting16:25
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
*** roman_g has joined #openstack-meeting16:38
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:41
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting16:43
*** ijw has quit IRC16:47
*** patrick05 has quit IRC16:48
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC16:49
*** lucasagomes has quit IRC16:53
*** apdibbo has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting16:54
*** apdibbo_ has quit IRC16:57
*** apdibbo_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** apdibbo has quit IRC17:02
*** apdibbo_ has quit IRC17:05
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk17:09
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC17:13
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC17:35
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting17:36
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC17:38
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:41
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting17:42
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC17:44
*** roman_g has quit IRC17:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:03
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:06
*** kozhukalov has quit IRC18:10
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting18:20
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC18:39
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC18:44
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting18:49
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:52
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC18:54
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC18:54
*** mattw4 has quit IRC18:54
*** dasp_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
*** dasp has quit IRC18:57
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC19:00
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting19:11
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC19:19
*** ijw has quit IRC19:19
*** mattw4 has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting19:26
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:26
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC19:30
*** EmilienM is now known as EvilienM19:30
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC19:33
*** lyarwood has quit IRC19:40
*** mattw4 has quit IRC19:44
*** mattw4 has joined #openstack-meeting19:46
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting19:48
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:59
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:03
*** jawad_axd has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
*** jawad_axd has quit IRC20:10
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC20:18
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC20:24
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC20:38
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC20:52
*** slaweq has quit IRC20:53
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC21:03
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC21:07
*** enriquetaso has quit IRC21:09
*** slaweq has quit IRC21:10
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
*** jmasud has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC21:33
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:33
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
*** mattw4 has quit IRC21:46
*** maciejjozefczyk has joined #openstack-meeting21:51
*** sfernand has quit IRC22:11
*** maciejjozefczyk has quit IRC22:11
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting22:23
*** kozhukalov has quit IRC22:28
*** mattw4 has joined #openstack-meeting22:54
*** EvilienM is now known as EmilienM22:56
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** kozhukalov has quit IRC23:28
*** mattw4 has quit IRC23:29
*** ykatabam has quit IRC23:31
*** kozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting23:34
*** macz_ has quit IRC23:44

Generated by 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at!