Wednesday, 2017-08-09

*** wanghao has joined #openstack-mogan00:43
*** litao__ has joined #openstack-mogan01:01
zhenguomorning mogan!01:02
litao__morning01:02
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Fix the config sample generation  https://review.openstack.org/49174201:10
zhenguoliusheng, shaohe_feng, wanghao, litao__, Xinran, luyao, zhangyang: please have a look at the Mogan PTL candidacy mail and help to cast your +1/-1 vote there, and if you also want to do self nominations, it should be done by tomorrow, thanks!01:22
liushengzhenguo: ok01:23
litao__zhenguo: OK01:23
litao__zhenguo: The destack gateway failed?01:39
zhenguolitao__: no01:40
litao__zhenguo: okļ¼Œ I recheck01:41
zhenguolitao__: ok01:41
openstackgerritZhenguo Niu proposed openstack/mogan master: Add aggregates filters when do scheduling  https://review.openstack.org/49169501:46
zhenguoliusheng: do you know how to handle default az on scheduling in nova?01:47
liushengzhenguo: seems a config option, let me ask01:48
zhenguoliusheng: yes, there's a config option, but how do consider it when scheduling01:49
liushengzhenguo: there is a az filter to ckeck that. and will use the default value if didn't set01:50
zhenguoliusheng: not sure how can we achieve that01:51
zhenguoliusheng: as we need to pass member_of filter to list rps, not default az aggregate there01:51
zhenguoliusheng: I am a bit confused with default az, and find it may bring more  confusion to users, how about just getting rid of it01:53
liushengzhenguo: I am just thinking about that01:53
zhenguoliusheng: if cloud operators don't set az, it should be None01:53
liushengzhenguo: I think it due to what's the meaning we want to give to az01:54
zhenguoliusheng: yes01:55
liushengzhenguo: do you think if Nova will move az implemenation to placement based on rp traits ?01:56
liushengzhenguo: once placement get nature01:56
zhenguoliusheng: seems not01:56
zhenguoliusheng: maybe take years, hah01:56
liushengzhenguo: hah, because I think az is actually a tag of a host01:57
zhenguoliusheng: nova moves to use aggregate metadata to represent that01:58
liushengzhenguo: if we want to keep az support, what's the relationship between aggregate and az will be ?01:58
zhenguoliusheng: az is just a metadata of aggregate01:59
zhenguoliusheng: not special for us,01:59
zhenguoliusheng: the only difference with other aggs is that common users can get it02:00
liushengzhenguo: oh, got it02:00
zhenguoliusheng: everything related to group in mogan will be based on aggregate02:00
zhenguozhangyang: will it affect you if we get rid of defautl az02:01
liushengzhenguo: so aggregate seems is the smallest unit ?02:01
zhenguoliusheng: yes02:01
liushengzhenguo: no, just discuss its necessity. hah02:01
liushengzhenguo: not sure if it has use case in the future02:02
zhenguoliusheng: you mean default az?02:02
zhenguoliusheng: yes, aggregate is the samllest uinit02:03
liushengzhenguo: not only02:03
liushengzhenguo: I mean the az support feature02:03
liushengzhenguo: you mean get rid of defaut az, or whole az feature ?02:03
zhenguoliusheng: default az02:03
liushengzhenguo: oh, sorry, hah02:04
zhenguoliusheng: hah02:04
liushengzhenguo: seems it is no effect02:05
zhenguoliusheng: AZ is needed, at least our portal will let users choose which az they want to put the server in02:05
liushengzhenguo: yes02:05
litao__zhenguo: I recheck my patch and no trigger Jenkins02:05
zhenguolitao__: you can find it on zuul.openstack.org?02:06
zhenguoliusheng: ok, let me get rid of it, lol02:06
liushengzhenguo: ok02:06
zhangyangzhenguo: actually we are still using a older version of mogan... cause we tend to do the scheduling part on our own for now... and maybe we shall put these things together after our deadline and we'll catch up with you guys...02:09
zhenguozhangyang: hah, ok, we will finsih the aggregates and server group tasks soon, then you can consider to update your deployment02:10
litao__zhenguo: ok02:11
zhangyangzhenguo: ok, now busy copying bdm from nova šŸ˜µ02:12
zhenguozhangyang: we just registered a bp for that :D02:12
zhangyangzhenguo: hah, no too much difference from nova this part as far as i can see02:15
zhenguozhangyang: if so, we can also start to copy that hah02:15
zhangyangzhenguo: ah...then it's so sad that we have to copy it twice šŸ˜­02:16
zhenguozhangyang: yes, that's because we are not based on the same code :( but it will be better later02:17
zhangyangzhenguo: too low efficency before... if i had finished these code earlier maybe things can get better...02:21
zhenguozhangyang: yes, we need to improve the current situation, maybe you can do an upgrade after mogan pike release. then you can report bugs and backport patches to your branch02:23
zhangyangzhenguo: yes, hope things will move on nicely02:24
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Add ServerGroup object  https://review.openstack.org/48890902:24
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Add server groups db models and api  https://review.openstack.org/48829802:24
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Add API tests for server group  https://review.openstack.org/49032802:24
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Add ServerGroup API interfaces  https://review.openstack.org/48985002:24
zhenguozhangyang: let's try to get there02:25
openstackgerritZhenguo Niu proposed openstack/mogan master: Get rid of default availability zone  https://review.openstack.org/49196802:35
openstackgerritXinran WANG proposed openstack/mogan master: Specify image when do rebuilding  https://review.openstack.org/49042102:58
* litao__ zhenguo: This patch needs your adviceļ¼š https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481544/02:59
* litao__ zhenguo: This patch needs your adviceļ¼š https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481544/03:00
litao__test03:01
litao__zhenguo: This patch needs your adviceļ¼š https://review.openstack.org/#/c/481544/03:01
zhenguolitao__: ok, will check it soon :D03:02
zhenguolitao__: hi, I just left some comments on your patch03:40
zhenguolitao__:  why we need to go through the workflow of creating a new server?03:41
zhenguolitao__: for managing servers, we just need to check the specified flavor, networks available, and create a db entry, it's very simple as my understand03:42
openstackgerritZhenguo Niu proposed openstack/mogan master: Get rid of default availability zone  https://review.openstack.org/49196803:50
litao__zhenguo: see my reply06:15
zhenguolitao__: it's weird06:15
zhenguolitao__: why we need the workflow06:15
zhenguolitao__: just because call ironic driver api?06:15
litao__zhenguo: Mainly I think it is also creating a new server actully06:16
zhenguolitao__: just db entry06:16
litao__zhenguo: Also parameter checkļ¼Œ quota check. etc06:17
zhenguolitao__: yes, you need to check the parameters, but need to check the whether it's available, different with creating server06:17
zhenguolitao__: like you need to check the network port existing instead of creating a new port06:17
zhenguolitao__: and it should be a rpc call instead of cast, as we don't have long time proces running06:19
* litao__ zhenguo: Yes , like what you said, It is also be a standalone worklow06:19
litao__zhenguo:  Yes ,  like what you said, It is also be a standalone worklow06:20
litao__zhenguo: Maybe it is more clear06:20
litao__zhenguo: I will try to refactor the codes06:28
zhenguolitao__: ok, thanks!06:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack/mogan master: [Trivialfix]Fix typos in mogan  https://review.openstack.org/49177006:31
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/python-moganclient master: Add node aggregate commands support  https://review.openstack.org/49200206:50
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/python-moganclient master: Add node aggregate commands support  https://review.openstack.org/49200207:00
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Add ServerGroup object  https://review.openstack.org/48890908:41
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Add server groups db models and api  https://review.openstack.org/48829808:41
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Add API tests for server group  https://review.openstack.org/49032808:41
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/mogan master: Add ServerGroup API interfaces  https://review.openstack.org/48985008:41
*** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-mogan08:44
*** wanghao has quit IRC08:46
*** zhuli has quit IRC08:47
*** kong has quit IRC08:47
*** dims has quit IRC08:47
*** Xinran has quit IRC08:47
*** luyao has quit IRC08:47
*** zhangyang has quit IRC08:47
*** liusheng has quit IRC08:47
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC08:47
*** RuiChen has quit IRC08:47
*** lin_yang has quit IRC08:47
*** litao__ has quit IRC08:47
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC08:47
*** wxy has quit IRC08:47
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC08:47
*** wanghao_ has quit IRC08:47
*** ChanServ has quit IRC08:47
*** Kevin_Zheng has quit IRC08:47
*** zhenguo has quit IRC08:47
*** openstack has joined #openstack-mogan13:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!