| *** vthapar has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 05:54 | |
| *** tmorin has joined #openstack-net-bgpvpn | 07:12 | |
| vthapar | tmorin, ping! | 08:36 |
|---|---|---|
| tmorin | hi vthapar! | 08:38 |
| tmorin | how are you ? had a safe trip back from Amsterdam ? | 08:38 |
| vthapar | tmorin, yes, got back last week. how about you? | 08:48 |
| tmorin | yes, fine :) | 08:48 |
| vthapar | tmorin, wanted to check with you on quagga discussion and mail from vivek. | 08:49 |
| vthapar | we're considering FRR over quagga as that has a more active opensrouce community, but requires some more work to get features we need for ODL use cases that are in quagga fork. | 08:50 |
| vthapar | wanted to check your interest and if you want to be part of discussions/contributions to it. | 08:50 |
| vthapar | tmorin, I missed your discussions with vivek so not fully familiar with your requirements for quagga fork. | 08:50 |
| tmorin | vthapar: I was essentially curious to see what were the plans to make the ODL BGPVPN setup viable | 09:00 |
| tmorin | quagga, given the status of the community, being hard to consider as a viable option | 09:01 |
| vthapar | tmorin, viable as in? for net-bgpvpn CI or as a product/solution for customers? | 09:01 |
| vthapar | okay, yes. that is a concern and that is why want to consider FRR. | 09:01 |
| tmorin | and the quagga thirft stuff even less, given that its in a separate repo | 09:01 |
| tmorin | yes, that makes sense | 09:01 |
| vthapar | want me to add you to any meetings/discussions we have with Ericsson team on FRR vs Quagga? | 09:02 |
| tmorin | I won't have time myself to dedicate on contributing to that | 09:02 |
| vthapar | okay, but would be good to have your opinion on this. | 09:03 |
| tmorin | I'm interested in knowing about the outcomes, so why not | 09:03 |
| tmorin | ok | 09:03 |
| vthapar | is good to have everyone's concerns and come up with a solution that addresses most of them. | 09:03 |
| tmorin | I guess the other part of the discussion that some people seem to be calling for, is whether or not to transform the bgpvpn netvirt parts to use the ODL native BGP implementation | 09:04 |
| tmorin | yep | 09:04 |
| tmorin | vthapar: sorry, didn't see your question above: "viable" as in "longterm viable as an opensource solution", ie. easily deployed by end-users from upstream, based on distro packages of maintained code | 09:08 |
| *** vthapar has quit IRC | 09:31 | |
| *** tmorin has quit IRC | 13:49 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!