| opendevreview | Terry Wilson proposed openstack/neutron master: Move OVN agent health monitoring to maintenance worker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997924 | 01:49 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Terry Wilson proposed openstack/neutron master: Move OVN agent health monitoring to maintenance worker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997924 | 04:07 |
| opendevreview | Terry Wilson proposed openstack/neutron master: Move OVN agent health monitoring to maintenance worker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997924 | 05:17 |
| opendevreview | Mohsen Sepandar proposed openstack/neutron-fwaas master: Enable fwaas_v2 driver in DVR mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-fwaas/+/989857 | 06:53 |
| opendevreview | Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/neutron stable/2026.1: ovn: Ignore network HCGs in ``HAChassisGroupRouterEvent`` https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998088 | 07:52 |
| opendevreview | Mohsen Sepandar proposed openstack/neutron-fwaas master: Enable fwaas_v2 driver in DVR mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-fwaas/+/989857 | 08:09 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: db: Bump alembic minimum version to 1.18.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997989 | 08:15 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: Fix typo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997904 | 08:15 |
| opendevreview | Felix Moebius proposed openstack/neutron-lib master: Revert "Set confirm_deleted_rows=False to StandardAttribute obj" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/996435 | 08:22 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider master: Add SOURCE_IP lb-algorithm support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/998093 | 08:49 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: ovn: Ignore network HCGs in ``HAChassisGroupRouterEvent`` https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997867 | 08:58 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: ovn: Allow ``get_datapath_type`` to look up Chassis by UUID https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/995296 | 08:59 |
| opendevreview | Mohsen Sepandar proposed openstack/neutron-fwaas master: Enable fwaas_v2 driver in DVR mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-fwaas/+/989857 | 09:04 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron master: DNM - Run BGP and EVPN multinode jobs to test advanced server ops https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997729 | 09:37 |
| ralonsoh | Folks, this is the patch for the openstacksdk issue discussed yesterday: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/934762 | 09:51 |
| ralonsoh | if you have a couple of mins, please review it. Thanks in advance | 09:52 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-lib master: Remove disabling the scope enforcement https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/998059 | 09:55 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron master: DNM - Run BGP and EVPN multinode jobs to test advanced server ops https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997729 | 10:05 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider master: Remove python-neutronclient dependency from unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/998110 | 10:38 |
| ralonsoh | haleyb, ^^ hello! this is related to the neutronclient deprecation | 11:18 |
| ralonsoh | ovn-octiva-provider is failing since https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/987007 | 11:18 |
| ralonsoh | so "two birds with one stone": remove neutronclient and fix the CI right now | 11:19 |
| haleyb_ | ralonsoh: ack, lgtm, i just don't have +W there | 12:56 |
| *** haleyb_ is now known as haleyb | 12:56 | |
| haleyb | oh, and i was looking at the quota change, will look at the other one too | 12:57 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Add EVPN network advanced server operations tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/997727 | 12:58 |
| ralonsoh | nice! thanks | 12:58 |
| haleyb | #startmeeting networking | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jul 21 13:00:32 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'networking' | 13:00 |
| haleyb | Ping list: bcafarel, elvira, frickler, mlavalle, mtomaska, slaweq, ykarel, lajoskatona, jlibosva, haleyb, ralonsoh | 13:00 |
| jlibosva | o/ | 13:00 |
| * fungi is around for his agenda topic | 13:00 | |
| elvira1 | o/ | 13:01 |
| ralonsoh | hello | 13:01 |
| ykarel | o/ | 13:01 |
| cbuggy | o/ | 13:01 |
| *** elvira1 is now known as elvira | 13:01 | |
| haleyb | ok, we can get started, some still out on PTO | 13:01 |
| mlavalle | \o | 13:01 |
| haleyb | #topic announcements | 13:01 |
| haleyb | first announcement is regarding one of our cores, Bence, who has decided to step down due to a new role | 13:02 |
| ralonsoh | sad for reading this | 13:03 |
| haleyb | just wanted to thank him for all his work over many years, 11 if i'm counting correctly | 13:03 |
| haleyb | rubasov: good luck in your new role! | 13:03 |
| ralonsoh | all the best rubasov! | 13:03 |
| rubasov | thank you all! | 13:03 |
| jlibosva | rubasov: good luck! | 13:03 |
| ykarel | Thanks and all the best rubasov \o/ | 13:03 |
| rubasov | was great to work with you! | 13:04 |
| fungi | don't be a stranger, come back and visit sometime! | 13:04 |
| haleyb | i will change the bug deputy weeks accordingly after the meeting | 13:04 |
| haleyb | ok, what else | 13:05 |
| mlavalle | good luck rubasov. your thoroughness will be missed here | 13:05 |
| haleyb | We are in week R-10 of Hibiscus | 13:05 |
| haleyb | #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html | 13:05 |
| haleyb | H-3 milestone is week of August 24th, about a month | 13:06 |
| haleyb | that is week R-5 on the schedule | 13:06 |
| haleyb | and that is feature freeze week as well | 13:06 |
| haleyb | the Indri PTG date was announced - October 12-16, 2026 | 13:07 |
| haleyb | #link https://openinfra.org/ptg/ | 13:07 |
| haleyb | it's virtual, but please register, i will sign-up the team | 13:08 |
| haleyb | next | 13:08 |
| haleyb | Reminder to please use the priority dashboard for anything neutron/networking related | 13:08 |
| haleyb | #link https://tinyurl.com/59z278km | 13:09 |
| haleyb | RP +1 for "ready to merge" changes, RP +2 for gate blockers and similar | 13:09 |
| haleyb | there were a couple of gate issues, and i see one RP+2 in the list, will look later | 13:09 |
| ralonsoh | I have a topic for this patch | 13:10 |
| haleyb | sure, i'm guessing the mod_wsgi changes? | 13:11 |
| ralonsoh | no, this patch (RP +2) | 13:11 |
| ralonsoh | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/996435 | 13:11 |
| haleyb | ralonsoh: ah, yes, i saw that and noticed the gate broken, looks like that change was merged | 13:11 |
| ralonsoh | right | 13:12 |
| haleyb | leftover config for enforce_scope | 13:12 |
| ralonsoh | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/998059 merged | 13:12 |
| haleyb | ralonsoh: there is a question from mike bayer there | 13:13 |
| ralonsoh | we can discuss it later | 13:13 |
| haleyb | sure | 13:13 |
| haleyb | that was all i had for announcements, is there anything else? | 13:14 |
| haleyb | #topic bugs | 13:14 |
| haleyb | ichen was the bug deputy last week, her report is at | 13:14 |
| haleyb | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/ZIIVLPSRWF4EIRBIF43LM76DACGM7JC5/ | 13:14 |
| ichen | Most bugs have proposed patches. Some are even merged. | 13:15 |
| ichen | I didn’t know how to handle this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2161076 | 13:15 |
| * haleyb is looking | 13:16 | |
| ichen | It’s reported in 2024.1, which is now unmaintained, at least according to this: https://releases.openstack.org/ | 13:16 |
| haleyb | right, and it's a very long description to try and digest in this meeting | 13:17 |
| ichen | Separately, I didn’t see inconsistency in the output. The ordering is different, but the output seems consistent. But maybe I swapped it myself. | 13:17 |
| ichen | The important output is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2161076/comments/2 | 13:17 |
| ralonsoh | so you mean the IP/MAC are swapped?? | 13:18 |
| ralonsoh | or the port/MAC | 13:19 |
| ichen | Port/MAC | 13:19 |
| opendevreview | Mohsen Sepandar proposed openstack/neutron-fwaas master: Enable fwaas_v2 driver in DVR mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-fwaas/+/989857 | 13:19 |
| ralonsoh | so you think the bug is legit, right? I can check it but after this meeting | 13:20 |
| ichen | I might have misunderstood, but I don’t see the problem actually. | 13:21 |
| haleyb | right, we'd need to actually verify traffic is not flowing correctly, it's hard for me to tell from the bug that's the issue, and not just a lot of inspection into the OVN entries | 13:23 |
| haleyb | it's very AI-generated-ish | 13:23 |
| ralonsoh | (we don't do this here...) | 13:24 |
| haleyb | no, not in the meeting, can you look later? or have Claude look? | 13:24 |
| ralonsoh | I'm actually doing that | 13:24 |
| haleyb | perfect, thanks | 13:25 |
| ralonsoh | and Claude says this is not legit | 13:25 |
| haleyb | ack | 13:25 |
| haleyb | the last bug is assigned but needs more info | 13:26 |
| haleyb | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2160992 | 13:26 |
| haleyb | jlibosva: i'm assuming since you took it you're good to go? | 13:26 |
| jlibosva | I looked at that one but not sure if I got the report right | 13:26 |
| jlibosva | and if so - what do we do with it. The EVPN API is generic and should not be tied to any specific implementation, like OVN - but the plugin is :) I thought perhaps we should introduce a "driver" for the EVPN plugin that aligns with router flavors | 13:27 |
| jlibosva | or just simply check if the flavor was defined and if it's not OVN then fail | 13:28 |
| haleyb | that seems like a valid option | 13:29 |
| jlibosva | the driver might be an overkill as unlikely we'll implement a different driver than OVN | 13:29 |
| haleyb | i will have to defer to your knowledge on the subject if this was a grey area in the spec | 13:29 |
| jlibosva | the check would be a simple fix and in case a new driver is needed, we can do that based on the demand | 13:30 |
| jlibosva | I'll take that bug then and will do the flavor check | 13:30 |
| haleyb | sounds good, thanks kuba | 13:30 |
| jlibosva | ah, it's already assigned | 13:30 |
| haleyb | any other bugs to discuss? | 13:31 |
| haleyb | #topic specs | 13:31 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/neutron-specs+status:open | 13:31 |
| haleyb | jlibosva: i see a new one from you | 13:32 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/998046 | 13:32 |
| haleyb | Add spec for BGP route leaking from geneve tenant networks | 13:32 |
| jlibosva | yes, it's a followup for the core OVN BGP, I also opened a LP RFE | 13:32 |
| haleyb | ack, we can discuss at drivers meeting | 13:33 |
| haleyb | i'm just not sure of when as we are light this week, not sure about next | 13:34 |
| haleyb | i am actually out both this and next friday | 13:34 |
| haleyb | but we can put on the agenda once i triage | 13:34 |
| jlibosva | ack, thanks | 13:35 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Fix advanced image config on multinode devstack jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/998149 | 13:35 |
| jlibosva | I have already started working on the code | 13:35 |
| haleyb | great, thanks | 13:35 |
| haleyb | there is one other spec on the list from slaweq that might just need reviews | 13:36 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/996269 | 13:36 |
| haleyb | i realize he is out this week | 13:36 |
| haleyb | ok, moving on | 13:37 |
| haleyb | #topic community goals | 13:37 |
| haleyb | without lajos here, and with myself traveling last week not sure we made any progress, but i will link the topics for the logs | 13:37 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22sdk_for_neutron%22 | 13:37 |
| haleyb | this is the set of nova patches to move to the sdk | 13:38 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron master: DNM - Run BGP and EVPN multinode jobs to test advanced server ops https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997729 | 13:38 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522neutron_openstacksdk%2522 | 13:38 |
| haleyb | series using sdk in heat | 13:38 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22migrate_stadium_osc%22 | 13:38 |
| haleyb | OSC changes for neutronclient migration | 13:38 |
| haleyb | and lastly | 13:39 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22neutron-project-id-migration%22 | 13:39 |
| haleyb | this is my tenant_id removal series | 13:39 |
| haleyb | i made no progress last week | 13:39 |
| haleyb | ok, we can move on | 13:39 |
| haleyb | #topic on-demand | 13:40 |
| haleyb | we do have a couple of things here, but i forgot something in announcements | 13:40 |
| haleyb | i am going to be out this friday and also next week | 13:40 |
| haleyb | too much traveling this year, and i have to take the PTO this month | 13:41 |
| ralonsoh | do we skip next friday's meeting? | 13:41 |
| haleyb | not convenient for neutron i know | 13:41 |
| haleyb | ralonsoh: maybe there will be quorom? there will be you, slawek, lajos and miguel around? | 13:42 |
| ralonsoh | this friday slawek won't be here | 13:42 |
| ralonsoh | so it will be lajos, miguel and I | 13:42 |
| ralonsoh | I think the only topic is jlibosva RFE | 13:43 |
| haleyb | i think we agreed 3 is quorum and that does look like the only RFE | 13:43 |
| ralonsoh | so let's discuss this Friday jlibosva's RFE | 13:43 |
| jlibosva | \o/ | 13:43 |
| jlibosva | thanks! | 13:43 |
| haleyb | if you can run it i'd appreciate it | 13:43 |
| ralonsoh | I'll do | 13:43 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron master: DNM - Run BGP and EVPN multinode jobs to test advanced server ops https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997729 | 13:43 |
| haleyb | ralonsoh: will you be here next week? and if so can you run this meeting? | 13:44 |
| haleyb | it should be my last full week off for the H cycle | 13:44 |
| ralonsoh | yes, I'll be here | 13:45 |
| haleyb | sorry to give you more work, maybe we need to have Claude run these weeklies :) | 13:45 |
| ralonsoh | no problem at all | 13:46 |
| haleyb | thanks! | 13:46 |
| haleyb | ok, we can finally get to the on-demand topics | 13:46 |
| haleyb | fungi: you had the first one | 13:46 |
| fungi | i'll be quick... bunch of info today, then we can revisit at an upcoming meeting once people have time to think it over | 13:46 |
| fungi | Bridging the Gap Gazpacho Cycle Survey and Metrics Analysis | 13:46 |
| fungi | ildiko posted openstack-wide 2026.1 (gazpacho) cycle retrospective contributor/maintainer survey results and metrics to openstack-discuss recently: | 13:46 |
| fungi | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/3POML6PYPDWQNYM5IFB54O4ASXEPK4Z5/ Bridging the Gap Gazpacho Cycle Retrospective Survey Results | 13:46 |
| fungi | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/CVLQIFEVNNJJ7BJSFZJ4RNZZA7ELQKDS/ Bridging the Gap Gazpacho Cycle Retrospective Metrics Analysis | 13:47 |
| fungi | i and the other community managers on the openinfra foundation staff have also been digging into team-specific details and i'm doing a round of outreach similar to past cycles, to go over how things may have changed | 13:47 |
| fungi | neutron had 3 contributors and 1 maintainer fill out surveys; additional participants for the next round would, as always, help us draw even more accurate conclusions | 13:47 |
| fungi | most contributors indicated they were relatively new to the project, though respondents had experience in at least 2 other open source projects each | 13:47 |
| fungi | ratings on the contributor survey questions averaged around 3 out of 5, with usable test results and comprehensiveness/accuracy of contributor docs tied for highest at 3.7 while actionable feedback from reviewers was lowest at 2.3 | 13:47 |
| fungi | the most common contribution challenges selected were getting reviewer attention, unhelpful or incorrect review responses, and shallow initial reviews leading to additional rounds of revisions | 13:47 |
| fungi | established contributors remarked that the review experience in neutron had improved compared to prior cycles, noting the team is small and overloaded by the volume, but indicated disappointment in some features not landing for gazpacho | 13:47 |
| fungi | the new survey questions about ai tools indicate most respondents used ai assistance (claude code and copilot), helping them to analyze the existing source code and its relationships with dependencies, and writing tests/debugging failures | 13:47 |
| fungi | the rankings on the maintainer survey response was considerably higher, ranging from 4 (timeliness of reviews and comprehensive/current contributor docs) up to 5 (actionable feedback from reviewers and usefulness of test results) | 13:47 |
| fungi | contributing challenges for the maintainer were getting the attention of other maintainers to review their changes and persistent test failures blocking their work | 13:47 |
| fungi | when reviewing, this maintainers saw many from contributors who didn't address feedback, were incomplete missing test/docs or a bp/spec, and which weren't aligned with the development priorities of the team | 13:48 |
| fungi | the maintainer indicated using no ai tools to assist them in reviewing nor to help in writing their own contributions | 13:48 |
| fungi | as for metrics, active maintainer count fell by another 12% in gazpacho over the previous cycle, continuing a slow but steady decline that has been going on for at least the past several years (we only analyzed this as far back as bobcat) | 13:48 |
| fungi | however, the reviewer count in gazpacho increased 21% over flamingo, returning closer to caracal cycle levels and perhaps indicating a growing untapped pool of potential future maintainers | 13:48 |
| fungi | interestingly, even though change volume increased 4% the team still managed to basically keep up by closing 99% as many as were opened, in stark contrast to the relatively negative feedback from contributor survey respondents | 13:48 |
| fungi | though comments in surveys did mention the maintainers seemed overwhelmed, and that changes proposed often weren't strongly aligned to the team's priorities, which could explain some of the skew in perception vs reality | 13:48 |
| fungi | an important note about metrics this time: since flamingo we've switched from bitergia to lfx insights as our data source, and while the numbers between them are similar there are some slight differences in how activities are counted | 13:48 |
| fungi | because of this, we re-ran metrics analyses for previous cycles against the new system in order to make sure we weren't trending numbers from different backends and drawing misleading conclusions due to changing measurement methods | 13:48 |
| fungi | anyway, that was a quick dump, i know it's a lot to take in but i didn't want to eat up too much of your meeting, so i'll put this on the agenda again for a later week to give everyone time to digest and come up with questions or ideas | 13:49 |
| fungi | one thing we're interested in finding out is whether the team implemented any new contributor or reviewer practices over the course of the last cycle, for example techniques that were discussed in the previous round of analyses | 13:49 |
| fungi | though i'm happy to answer any immediate feedback now too if there's time | 13:49 |
| ralonsoh | > relatively negative feedback from contributor survey respondents | 13:50 |
| ralonsoh | how is that? any particular reason? | 13:51 |
| ralonsoh | (if I'm not wrong, this is for the whole openstack, right?) | 13:51 |
| fungi | this was for neutron specifically | 13:51 |
| fungi | contributors filling out a survey about their activities in neutron deliverables | 13:51 |
| haleyb | "neutron had 3 contributors and 1 maintainer fill out surveys" | 13:52 |
| haleyb | that's not enough to really draw conclusions imo | 13:53 |
| ralonsoh | I was the maintainer ^ in this survey | 13:53 |
| fungi | yes, it's more than most teams had, but there were something like 6 teams with more responses | 13:53 |
| haleyb | i thought i replied too, but perhaps i missed it | 13:53 |
| ralonsoh | really? I did it too | 13:54 |
| fungi | we're going to try new tactics for promoting the surveys for hibiscus, including opening them earlier (hopefully rc1 week) and closing them at the end of the ptg week trying to drive up responses and visibility at the ptg | 13:54 |
| haleyb | i probably missed it | 13:54 |
| ralonsoh | it is really a pity to read this feedback, to be honest | 13:54 |
| ralonsoh | We spend lot of time reviewing patches, attending bugs, etc | 13:55 |
| haleyb | "the maintainer indicated using no ai tools to assist them in reviewing nor to help in writing their own contributions" | 13:55 |
| fungi | well, as i said there's a discrepancy between contributor perception and the reality indicated by statistics | 13:55 |
| haleyb | what is strange about that comment is that we are using a lot more AI to do our work | 13:55 |
| haleyb | but maybe that was from last cycle? | 13:55 |
| fungi | this was specifically for the gazpacho cycle, yes | 13:55 |
| fungi | i havea feeling the responses will be somewhat different from hibiscus | 13:56 |
| haleyb | we will have AI write the responses and we will have great results! :) | 13:56 |
| haleyb | seriously though, i will look through the above | 13:57 |
| mlavalle | lol | 13:57 |
| haleyb | i think we do a pretty good job with reviews, can always be better, but there are always some reviews that just take a long time | 13:58 |
| fungi | yes, you closed 99% as many changes as were opened, like i said | 13:58 |
| fungi | but the unfortunate nature of human recollection is that you'll remember the one change that took forever to get a review, not the 10 that merged within a few days | 13:58 |
| haleyb | right | 13:59 |
| fungi | anyway, that was all i had for today | 13:59 |
| ralonsoh | thanks a lot! | 14:00 |
| fungi | it's my pleasure | 14:00 |
| haleyb | thanks for the info fungi is there going to be any deeper info on the stats? or maybe after the cycle ends we'll have an update | 14:01 |
| fungi | yes, we can. i have the raw data right here but tried to highlight the most interesting bits | 14:01 |
| haleyb | fungi: ack, for now we can maybe just digest this | 14:02 |
| fungi | mostly we're trying to look at how these responses and metrics trend over the longer term, we're only a few cycles into the effort so no conclusions yet on what activities might be helping | 14:02 |
| haleyb | right, we don't have any AI-assisted reviews at the moment afaik, just zuul jobs | 14:03 |
| haleyb | we are over time | 14:03 |
| haleyb | ralonsoh: you also had a topic, besides the neutron-lib change | 14:03 |
| ralonsoh | you can close the meeting | 14:04 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2160021%22 | 14:04 |
| ralonsoh | and we can talk after it | 14:04 |
| haleyb | ack, sounds good | 14:04 |
| haleyb | thanks for attending everyone, have a great week | 14:04 |
| haleyb | #endmeeting | 14:04 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jul 21 14:04:20 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:04 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2026/networking.2026-07-21-13.00.html | 14:04 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2026/networking.2026-07-21-13.00.txt | 14:04 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2026/networking.2026-07-21-13.00.log.html | 14:04 |
| ralonsoh | bye! | 14:04 |
| ralonsoh | So, easy reviews: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2160021%22 | 14:04 |
| ralonsoh | we are short of core reviewers these weeks | 14:04 |
| ralonsoh | and then the n-lib patch | 14:04 |
| ralonsoh | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/996435 | 14:04 |
| ralonsoh | I'm ok with reverting it | 14:05 |
| haleyb | ralonsoh: ack, will look at those | 14:05 |
| ralonsoh | if we revert, we would be able again to find some DB errors due to race conditions | 14:05 |
| ralonsoh | but now we are leaving leftovers in the DB | 14:05 |
| ralonsoh | that must not happen | 14:05 |
| ralonsoh | so, it is better if a request fails rather than leaving somethign there in the DB | 14:06 |
| ykarel | +1 | 14:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/ovn-octavia-provider master: Remove python-neutronclient dependency from unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/998110 | 14:49 |
| opendevreview | Fernando Royo proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider master: Add SOURCE_IP lb-algorithm support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/998093 | 14:51 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Add FIP connectivity test from VM on external network https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/998161 | 14:57 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron master: DNM: BGP job: set min_compute_nodes to enable DifferentHostFilter https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998162 | 15:04 |
| opendevreview | Terry Wilson proposed openstack/neutron master: Set options:arp_proxy on the LSP, not the LRP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998164 | 15:20 |
| opendevreview | Terry Wilson proposed openstack/neutron master: Set options:arp_proxy on the LSP, not the LRP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998164 | 15:56 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: db: Remove DVR csnat_l3_agent_bindings dead migration code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/996247 | 16:00 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Add EVPN network advanced server operations tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/997727 | 16:10 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: db: Remove Embrane LBaaS dead migration code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/996248 | 16:34 |
| opendevreview | Elvira García Ruiz proposed openstack/neutron master: [WIP] Clean PVLAN Port Groups and ACLs when plugin is deleted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998184 | 16:36 |
| opendevreview | Elvira García Ruiz proposed openstack/neutron master: Clean PVLAN Port Groups and ACLs when plugin is deleted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998184 | 16:44 |
| opendevreview | Terry Wilson proposed openstack/neutron master: Set options:arp_proxy on the LSP, not the LRP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998164 | 16:46 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: db: Remove portbindingports dead migration code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/996249 | 17:13 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: db: Remove LBaaS dead migration code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/997226 | 17:13 |
| opendevreview | Jakub Libosvar proposed openstack/neutron master: evpn: Allow evpn routers only with OVN router flavor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998200 | 17:53 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/neutron master: Register SR-IOV physnets in ML2 type driver config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998056 | 17:53 |
| opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/neutron master: Register SR-IOV physnets in ML2 type driver config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998056 | 17:54 |
| opendevreview | Jakub Libosvar proposed openstack/neutron master: evpn: Fail when using --advertise-host on non-EVPN routers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998208 | 18:27 |
| opendevreview | Jakub Libosvar proposed openstack/neutron master: bgp: Add output_port for main LR static route https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998058 | 18:54 |
| opendevreview | Jakub Libosvar proposed openstack/neutron-lib master: bgp: Add leak_routes network attribute https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/998213 | 19:12 |
| opendevreview | Jakub Libosvar proposed openstack/neutron master: bgp: Introduce leak_routes API attribute https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998214 | 19:14 |
| opendevreview | alisafari proposed openstack/ovn-octavia-provider master: Deduplicate hm-ports on cross-agent race https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovn-octavia-provider/+/998216 | 19:22 |
| opendevreview | Miro Tomaska proposed openstack/neutron master: [DNM] POC standalone tool for creating evpn router https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998053 | 19:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-lib master: Add missing vnic-type values to api-ref https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-lib/+/998069 | 19:34 |
| opendevreview | Jakub Libosvar proposed openstack/neutron master: bgp: Add DB interaction for leak_routes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998220 | 19:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!