| opendevreview | Thomas Bachman proposed openstack/neutron master: Fix use of NetworkContext https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/994936 | 00:47 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Miro Tomaska proposed openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Add dynamic VNI provisioning for EVPN tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/998604 | 01:17 |
| opendevreview | Miro Tomaska proposed openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Add EVPN network advanced server operations tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/1000194 | 01:19 |
| opendevreview | Miro Tomaska proposed x/whitebox-neutron-tempest-plugin master: [DNM] POC whitebox test which will allow inspecting state of chassis https://review.opendev.org/c/x/whitebox-neutron-tempest-plugin/+/1000366 | 01:20 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/neutron master: BGP job: enable more tempest scenarios and cross-compute scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998162 | 06:54 |
| opendevreview | Roman Hros proposed openstack/neutron master: Ignore missing Port_Group when detaching ports in update_port https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/1000412 | 07:25 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed x/whitebox-neutron-tempest-plugin master: Fix IGMP snooping test failure after OVS restart https://review.opendev.org/c/x/whitebox-neutron-tempest-plugin/+/1000413 | 07:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: vpn: decouple LibreSwan from OpenSwan implementation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999801 | 08:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: tests: replace ``load_tests`` with stestr regex filtering https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999791 | 08:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Add LibreSwan functional tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999606 | 08:06 |
| opendevreview | Miro Tomaska proposed openstack/neutron master: Add upstream EVPN multinode Zuul job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/994257 | 09:09 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: driver: remove OpenSwan driver implementation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999832 | 09:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Remove dead variable TEMPLATE_PATH https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999857 | 09:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: Add agnostic WSGI support for API worker election and identification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/995666 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: Add mod_wsgi support to ``get_api_worker_count()`` https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/995800 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Rally changed in the past how plugins can import https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/1000417 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Remove dead method ``add_ipsec_connection`` https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999858 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Remove empty OVN process subclasses https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999859 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: vpn: fix misleading ``os.path.join()`` with absolute path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999861 | 09:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: Make ``get_start_time()`` server-agnostic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/995802 | 09:24 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Remove unused ``debtcollector`` and ``oslo.serialization`` deps https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999862 | 10:07 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Register ``libreswan_opts`` in config sample generator https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/999872 | 10:26 |
| tbachman | Hi neutron devs! Just an FYI: I've updated both the bug in launchpad and my patch re: HPB | 10:41 |
| tbachman | https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2162752 | 10:41 |
| tbachman | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/994936 | 10:42 |
| tbachman | The bug contains a little longer description of the issue. | 10:42 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: Add ASGI worker count support to wsgi_utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/995162 | 11:13 |
| lajoskatona | slaweq, haleyb: Hi, I have a patch series for migrating taas to OVO: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2150209%22 if you have time please check it (based on slaweq's similar work for fwaas) | 11:15 |
| lajoskatona | I also started to push patches for other stadiums to migrate them to OVO: | 11:16 |
| lajoskatona | vpnaas: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2150206%22 | 11:16 |
| lajoskatona | n-d-r: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2150207%22 | 11:16 |
| lajoskatona | but these are under construction currently | 11:16 |
| opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Rally scenario plugin API changed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/1000417 | 11:23 |
| *** LarsErik1 is now known as LarsErikP | 12:18 | |
| slaweq | lajoskatona: sure, I will check them | 12:28 |
| lajoskatona | slaweq: thanks | 12:29 |
| haleyb | lajoskatona: ack, can look after meeting | 13:00 |
| haleyb | #startmeeting networking | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Aug 11 13:00:22 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'networking' | 13:00 |
| haleyb | Ping list: bcafarel, elvira, frickler, mlavalle, mtomaska, slaweq, ykarel, lajoskatona, jlibosva, haleyb, ralonsoh | 13:00 |
| * fungi is around for his topic | 13:00 | |
| lajoskatona | o/ | 13:00 |
| mlavalle | \o | 13:01 |
| ykarel | o/ | 13:01 |
| mtomaska | o/ | 13:01 |
| haleyb | #topic announcements | 13:01 |
| haleyb | we can get started | 13:01 |
| bcafarel | o/ | 13:01 |
| haleyb | We are currently in Week R-7 of Hibiscus | 13:02 |
| haleyb | Week R-5 is the Hibiscus- milestone (August 24th) | 13:02 |
| haleyb | #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html | 13:02 |
| haleyb | this is the release countdown email | 13:02 |
| lajoskatona | somebody else is older again.... | 13:02 |
| haleyb | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/N6IA4TYCGVI5OE3JK7WXKSLVEOFLYCBH/ | 13:02 |
| haleyb | lajoskatona: is there a happy birthday? | 13:03 |
| lajoskatona | no, just nearly over another cycle :-) | 13:04 |
| haleyb | ah, yes, will it be 34 releases? | 13:04 |
| lajoskatona | around that as I count | 13:05 |
| haleyb | i'll have a toast to one more year then :) | 13:06 |
| haleyb | 2027.1 election nominations opened last week | 13:06 |
| haleyb | #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/FDPHRND5ZM4CTGRXLGAQD7FGHK5NE34G/ | 13:07 |
| haleyb | Candidates interested in serving for the next calendar year (TC), or development cycle (PTL) should announce their candidacies and platforms during this week. Please see the Election site for specific timing information | 13:07 |
| haleyb | #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/ | 13:07 |
| haleyb | let me know if anyone has any interest in being PTL (again), otherwise I'll be happy to stay on another cycle | 13:08 |
| haleyb | the other thing coming up is the PTG | 13:10 |
| haleyb | "Indri" PTG October 12-16, 2026 | 13:10 |
| haleyb | PTG Website: https://openinfra.org/ptg/ | 13:10 |
| haleyb | i signed-up Neutron, will link the etherpad once it's created | 13:11 |
| lajoskatona | thanks | 13:11 |
| haleyb | i had added an item on the Neutron user survey revisions from slaweq, but now see he added a topic in on-demand so we can talk about that then | 13:12 |
| haleyb | Reminder to please use the priority dashboard for anything neutron/networking related | 13:12 |
| haleyb | #link https://tinyurl.com/59z278km | 13:12 |
| haleyb | RP +1 for "ready to merge" changes, RP +2 for gate blockers and similar | 13:12 |
| haleyb | nothing in the +2 list at the moment which is good | 13:13 |
| haleyb | that was all i had for announcements, is there anything else? | 13:13 |
| haleyb | Reminder: If you have a topic for the drivers meeting on Friday, please add it to the wiki @ https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronDrivers | 13:13 |
| haleyb | there is nothing new on the list at the moment, will send email thursday night if canceled | 13:14 |
| haleyb | #topic bugs | 13:15 |
| haleyb | otherwiseguy was the deputy last week, but i did not see an email | 13:15 |
| haleyb | guess i could have run the new script to generate a summary | 13:16 |
| haleyb | are there any bugs people want to discuss? | 13:16 |
| haleyb | from what i'm remembering by looking most have owners and/or patches proposed, can go through them later | 13:18 |
| haleyb | this week mtomaska is the deputy, next week is bcafarel - is that ok for both of you? | 13:18 |
| * bcafarel sets a reminder for next week | 13:19 | |
| bcafarel | good for me! | 13:19 |
| haleyb | great, thanks! | 13:19 |
| haleyb | hopefully it's ok for miro as well | 13:20 |
| haleyb | #topic specs | 13:20 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/neutron-specs+status:open | 13:20 |
| haleyb | the port group security group rules spec was updated last week | 13:21 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/987786 | 13:21 |
| haleyb | i'll look again and encourage others that have commented to do the same | 13:21 |
| haleyb | there are a couple of others needing updates | 13:22 |
| haleyb | #topic community goals | 13:22 |
| haleyb | there are a few active series here | 13:22 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22sdk_for_neutron%22 | 13:22 |
| haleyb | this is the set of nova patches to move to the sdk | 13:23 |
| lajoskatona | slow progress on the SDK side to have fields=[name, etc] filtering for Neutron resources | 13:23 |
| lajoskatona | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/995724 | 13:23 |
| slaweq | I will review port group spec tomorrow as I see that my previous comments seems to be addressed already | 13:23 |
| haleyb | slaweq: ack, thanks | 13:24 |
| haleyb | lajoskatona: ok, so that's needed for the nova changes? | 13:24 |
| lajoskatona | yes, to have the same optimization that we have in neutronclient, and fetch only the necessary fields | 13:25 |
| lajoskatona | from Neutron API | 13:25 |
| haleyb | right, i see the first i the series depends on it now | 13:26 |
| haleyb | so we should prioritize, i can look later | 13:26 |
| lajoskatona | yes, I tested locally, and I can go through the series when there is an SDK release with it | 13:26 |
| haleyb | great, and i can rebase mine in that series once i see you push updates | 13:27 |
| haleyb | thanks again for working on this | 13:27 |
| haleyb | next series is for your heat changes | 13:28 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522neutron_openstacksdk%2522 | 13:28 |
| lajoskatona | I have some review from Takashi/tkajinam, so kind of progress, I have to find the hiding other Heat core to push it :-) | 13:29 |
| haleyb | i can go through that later this week, but don't have +2 there :( | 13:29 |
| haleyb | this one is closer | 13:30 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522migrate_stadium_osc%2522 | 13:30 |
| haleyb | just two changes left :) | 13:30 |
| lajoskatona | I have to go and fix the osc patch as the SDK for onboard subnets were merged | 13:30 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/995991 | 13:31 |
| lajoskatona | after that as I remember the logging is the only thing to move | 13:31 |
| lajoskatona | if we don't count sfc | 13:32 |
| haleyb | yes, i need to start the networking-sfc removal | 13:32 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Skip broken network segment range update test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/1000364 | 13:32 |
| lajoskatona | I think that's all for the SDK related topics | 13:33 |
| haleyb | #link https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/repository.html#deprecating-a-repository | 13:33 |
| haleyb | lajoskatona: yes, thanks for updates | 13:33 |
| haleyb | final community topic is the tenant_id removal work | 13:33 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22neutron-project-id-migration%22 | 13:33 |
| haleyb | it's a little stuck waiting for the nova series above to merge | 13:34 |
| haleyb | i haven't found a way to get around that yet, will throw some credits at it later | 13:34 |
| lajoskatona | can't you remove the dependency and at least the tenant_id removal can progress ? | 13:35 |
| haleyb | at this point i'll likely defer merging anything until 2027.1 | 13:35 |
| haleyb | lajoskatona: the one neutron change? let me find it | 13:35 |
| lajoskatona | ack | 13:35 |
| haleyb | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/986961 | 13:36 |
| haleyb | i think that's the one you're talking about | 13:36 |
| haleyb | my only worry is breaking something at the end of the cycle with only 7 weeks left, don't mind breaking things at beginning of next one | 13:37 |
| lajoskatona | I think yes | 13:37 |
| haleyb | well, i don't want to break anyone, but there's not a lot of runway left :) | 13:38 |
| lajoskatona | +1, we are really close to the end of cycle | 13:38 |
| haleyb | i did get some feedback on my tempest patch, i'll work on merging that since it's a dependency | 13:39 |
| haleyb | that's all i had on that for the moment | 13:39 |
| haleyb | #topic on-demand | 13:40 |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed x/whitebox-neutron-tempest-plugin master: Fix IGMP snooping test failure after OVS restart https://review.opendev.org/c/x/whitebox-neutron-tempest-plugin/+/1000413 | 13:40 |
| haleyb | there were a few topics in the on-demand section | 13:40 |
| haleyb | fungi: you are first on the list | 13:40 |
| fungi | this was for the "bridging the gap" gazpacho cycle retrospective followup discussion | 13:40 |
| fungi | briefly revisiting this topic from a few weeks back, now that folks have hopefully had time to digest it better... i've got more that came out of a closer look into the data but also wanted to see if anyone had additional thoughts | 13:41 |
| fungi | something i missed calling out is that the average time to response on reviews improved noticeably in gazpacho compared to flamingo; changes got reviewed 23% faster on average (mean), though the typical (median) response time held steady | 13:41 |
| fungi | if the team's reviewing habits have been changing that would be something to continue as it seems to have made a some impact, in fact the average time to review has trended faster for at least the past 5 cycles (halving since bobcat) | 13:41 |
| fungi | fairly impressive given that the active maintainer count has also fallen steadily cycle after cycle and you're still essentially closing as many changes as are being opened each cycle | 13:41 |
| fungi | we had takeaway suggestions, some similar to the previous round... contributors still aren't clear on where maintainers are tracking review priorities, so continuing to work on addressing that communication gap may help | 13:41 |
| fungi | there may also be some communication breakdown in the review process, since maintainers felt the contributors weren't following their guidance while at the same time contributors felt some review feedback they were getting wasn't useful | 13:41 |
| fungi | it might be that many people are not finding or understanding the project's contributor documentation, or don't remember to refer to it, so finding ways to get it in front of them better could help | 13:41 |
| fungi | also the change and reviewer numbers are growing while the active maintainer count is falling, so if possible try to find some time to evaluate new maintainer candidates from the pool of established reviewers and code contributors | 13:42 |
| fungi | if anybody has follow-up thoughts or questions on any of the above, as well as for the survey and metrics analysis from last week now that you've had time to mull it over, i'm happy to answer questions and entertain feedback here | 13:42 |
| fungi | (or in the #openstack-neutron irc channel after the meeting, or on the openstack-discuss mailing list, or even directly/in private for that matter) | 13:42 |
| fungi | and if there are no questions, i'll yield the floor to other topics | 13:43 |
| haleyb | thanks for the feedback there | 13:43 |
| haleyb | i think they are all valid points, we can definitely add things to PTG discussions | 13:44 |
| fungi | i'm also happy to join ptg sessions about this sort of stuff, just let me know | 13:45 |
| haleyb | fungi: i don't remember exactly, but how many people provided input? | 13:45 |
| fungi | neutron had 3 contributors and 1 maintainer fill out surveys | 13:45 |
| haleyb | right | 13:45 |
| fungi | though the metrics were based on evaluation of all official neutron deliverable repository activity | 13:45 |
| fungi | obviously if more neutron contributors and maintainers can be encouraged to fill out the hibiscus surveys, that will help us draw better conclusions too | 13:46 |
| haleyb | right, statistics :) | 13:46 |
| fungi | we'll be evaluating those right after the ptg this time, so it's an opportunity to remind everyone | 13:47 |
| haleyb | at least one of those, priority tracking, is addressed via our dashboard, but if i'm remembering correctly, only cores can set those flags | 13:47 |
| fungi | (surveys will be opening during rc1 week, is the current plan) | 13:47 |
| haleyb | it could be opening-up that to anyone will allow people to put something on the RP +1 list (i.e. ready to go) | 13:48 |
| fungi | we're still finalizing the questions for the hibiscus surveys, trying to make them focus a little more on identifying maintainer burn-out and also gauging contributor interest in helping with maintenance tasks | 13:48 |
| cardoe | I'll throw out as a contributor (and operator), the neutron team has been pretty responsive and helpful relative to other OpenStack projects so I want to say thank you. | 13:49 |
| haleyb | fungi: i think we'll also be working on AI-in some of the maintenance tasks as we do the same things every cycle... | 13:49 |
| fungi | yes, i think the metrics we collected bear out cardoe's kudos too, sadly survey bias tends to focus responses on negative experiences rather than positive, so having hard numbers to analyze helps balance that out | 13:50 |
| fungi | haleyb: all interesting ideas, looking forward to seeing what the team comes up with | 13:51 |
| haleyb | cardoe: thanks for saying that, i do know everyone here tries pretty hard on getting things reviewed/merged | 13:51 |
| haleyb | i'll have to remind everyone to fill-out the survey to get a better view | 13:52 |
| haleyb | alright, there were a couple of other topics on the list | 13:52 |
| haleyb | mlavalle: you added one on your review series | 13:52 |
| mlavalle | The series of patches implementing routed networks with multiple segments for ML2/OVN are ready for the next round of reviews. All the reviewers comments have been addressed. There are 4 patches that start here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/995608 | 13:52 |
| mlavalle | that's all | 13:53 |
| mlavalle | reviews are needed | 13:53 |
| haleyb | mlavalle: ack, it's on my list, probably on others as well, thanks for working on it! | 13:53 |
| haleyb | slaweq: and you had a topic on the user survey revision(s) | 13:54 |
| haleyb | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/OpenStack-User-Survey-2026-Neutron-updates | 13:54 |
| slaweq | yes, thx | 13:54 |
| slaweq | I already sent email about it | 13:55 |
| cardoe | mlavalle: I'll review it as well since I use segments quite a bit for the physical networks. | 13:55 |
| haleyb | Deadline for this is Aug 24th so please review before Aug 21st | 13:55 |
| slaweq | I did took a look at the questions from the survey and I have proposed changes to those | 13:55 |
| mlavalle | cardoe, thnaks | 13:55 |
| haleyb | slaweq: ack, thanks | 13:55 |
| slaweq | I wanted to ask al of you to take a look at those my proposals of changes and provide feedback in the etherpad | 13:55 |
| slaweq | I think that it could be good to simplify it a bit and limit numer of possible answers in some questions | 13:56 |
| slaweq | that's all | 13:56 |
| slaweq | unless anyone have any questions or comments now so I am open to talk about it | 13:56 |
| lajoskatona | thanks slaweq, I checked the etherpad but will read it again to comment on it | 13:57 |
| haleyb | great thanks will take a look | 13:57 |
| slaweq | thank You | 13:57 |
| haleyb | cardoe: you mentioned you had a topic | 13:57 |
| cardoe | I was hoping we could get py.typed added on neutron-lib before the final release for this cycle. I know there's not a lot of typing in there but as stephenfin said we don't need it all typed. | 13:58 |
| cardoe | But we could start pulling that in for type checking as an optional opt-in. | 13:58 |
| cardoe | With a goal of getting more of it typed for the next release. | 13:59 |
| haleyb | cardoe: i don't have a problem moving forward with typing, is there a series for it you can link here? | 14:00 |
| haleyb | and maybe we can get on the priority dashboard | 14:00 |
| cardoe | There's been a few patches around confusion of what a field is between neutron and neutron-lib. Like tbachman's bug/patch that he's been talking about relates to that. The field on PortContext is sometimes a "Network" DB obejct and sometimes it's a NetworkContext and it would be good to nail down which that is. | 14:00 |
| cardoe | I can put together a series by putting the same topic on some patches. There's a number of folks that have made one offs for types. Give me just a bit and I'll ping you with it. | 14:01 |
| tbachman | FWIW - my bug and patch: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2162752 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/994936 | 14:01 |
| haleyb | cardoe: right, maybe create a topic if there isn't one already | 14:01 |
| cardoe | Will do | 14:02 |
| haleyb | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22type_tooling%22 - that was an old one | 14:02 |
| haleyb | but feel free to make a new one, doesn't matter to me | 14:02 |
| cardoe | The other ask was to add https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998562 to RP. | 14:02 |
| haleyb | ok, we are over time | 14:02 |
| haleyb | cardoe: ack, will do | 14:03 |
| cardoe | I'll make a new topic and pull the patches together and ping you haleyb. | 14:03 |
| haleyb | thanks everyone for attending, and have a great week! | 14:03 |
| haleyb | #endmeeting | 14:03 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Aug 11 14:03:25 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:03 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2026/networking.2026-08-11-13.00.html | 14:03 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2026/networking.2026-08-11-13.00.txt | 14:03 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/networking/2026/networking.2026-08-11-13.00.log.html | 14:03 |
| mlavalle | \o | 14:03 |
| lajoskatona | o/ | 14:03 |
| haleyb | lajoskatona: hey, if you have a minute can you look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/999831 ? 2024.1 cherry-pick, tia | 14:20 |
| opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/neutron master: Use separate VNI and VLAN physnets in VNIVLANAllocator https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/1000482 | 14:34 |
| opendevreview | Doug Goldstein proposed openstack/neutron master: Use separate VNI and VLAN ScopedRanges in VNIVLANAllocator https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/1000485 | 14:36 |
| cardoe | two different approaches... the bottom one is a bigger change but provides a more exacting API. Since that whole file and it's APIs were introduced this cycle I'm hoping we can fix it before a release happens so that there's no breakage. | 14:37 |
| opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/neutron-vpnaas master: Rally scenario plugin API changed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-vpnaas/+/1000417 | 15:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: Re-set BGP bridges on Chassis_Private after ovn-controller restart https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/999279 | 15:46 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: BGP job: enable more tempest scenarios and cross-compute scheduling https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998162 | 15:46 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron unmaintained/2024.1: Fix accidental removal of router external gateway info https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/999831 | 16:12 |
| opendevreview | Elvira García Ruiz proposed openstack/neutron master: Manage PVLAN PGs in OVN after PVLAN plugin is enabled or disabled https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/998184 | 16:14 |
| opendevreview | Fiorella Yanac proposed openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Add PVLAN cold migration scenario test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/998523 | 16:18 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/neutron master: [CI] Bump swap cs10 fips job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/999732 | 17:12 |
| opendevreview | Fiorella Yanac proposed openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin master: Add PVLAN cold migration scenario test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-tempest-plugin/+/998523 | 17:28 |
| opendevreview | Brian Haley proposed openstack/neutron master: Fix use-dict-literal pylint warnings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/1000648 | 21:07 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!