*** zzzeek has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
*** zzzeek has joined #openstack-oslo | 00:23 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo | 00:54 | |
*** cognifloyd has quit IRC | 01:15 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 04:47 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo | 05:18 | |
*** sboyron_ has joined #openstack-oslo | 05:39 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-oslo | 07:03 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 07:26 | |
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-oslo | 07:32 | |
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau | 07:35 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo | 08:10 | |
hberaud | moguimar, smcginnis: please can you push +W (if everything seems ok for you) we have an urgent bug downstream related to that | 08:15 |
---|---|---|
hberaud | moguimar: FYI normally with backports on stable branches a single approval from core is enough on oslo | 08:16 |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 08:33 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-oslo | 08:33 | |
*** brinzhang has quit IRC | 08:35 | |
*** elod is now known as elod_pto | 08:41 | |
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 09:03 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-oslo | 09:35 | |
openstackgerrit | Wenping Song proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Use TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE instead of obsolete UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE https://review.opendev.org/757515 | 09:35 |
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-oslo | 09:39 | |
*** iurygregory has quit IRC | 09:57 | |
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-oslo | 09:58 | |
moguimar | hberaud, which patch? | 10:44 |
hberaud | moguimar: lol sorry I forgot the link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/757033/ | 10:47 |
moguimar | ok, +W | 10:48 |
hberaud | moguimar: thanks | 10:48 |
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-oslo | 10:52 | |
openstackgerrit | Wenping Song proposed openstack/oslo.config master: Remove Babel requirement https://review.opendev.org/757534 | 11:26 |
*** hberaud has quit IRC | 11:30 | |
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-oslo | 11:35 | |
*** brinzhang_ has quit IRC | 11:37 | |
*** brinzhang_ has joined #openstack-oslo | 11:37 | |
openstackgerrit | Zihao Wang proposed openstack/osprofiler master: Remove six.moves https://review.opendev.org/757540 | 11:40 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tooz master: Blacklist etcd3gw 0.2.6 https://review.opendev.org/755086 | 12:02 |
moguimar | hberaud, stephenfin wanna push this one? | 12:05 |
hberaud | moguimar: https://review.opendev.org/755086 ? | 12:07 |
moguimar | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742155 | 12:07 |
moguimar | hberaud ^ | 12:08 |
moguimar | forgot the link too xD | 12:08 |
hberaud | moguimar: ahaha np, I'll validate this one, but I prefer to let stephenfin push the +W button to avoid conflicts of interest | 12:09 |
moguimar | hberaud, I think there was another one you +W | 12:10 |
moguimar | and after 35 patches on the same topic, I think we're quite safe | 12:10 |
moguimar | pbr is going to be the tough one though | 12:11 |
hberaud | moguimar: yep but I wasn't the publisher of the last PS | 12:11 |
hberaud | yep I agree I think we are safe | 12:11 |
moguimar | I mean this one | 12:12 |
moguimar | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742152/ | 12:12 |
moguimar | ah, the PS | 12:12 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/oslo.config stable/victoria: sphinxext: Add 'merge_domaindata' https://review.opendev.org/753379 | 12:14 |
hberaud | moguimar: so I think you're right we can go ahead I fast approved this one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742155/5 | 12:14 |
moguimar | hberaud, can you check Clark Boylan's comment on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742160/ | 12:15 |
moguimar | and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/757309/2 | 12:15 |
hberaud | omw | 12:15 |
hberaud | moguimar: any opinion to bring there? => https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742160/9/tox.ini I'll drop these changes | 12:20 |
moguimar | hberaud, removing that line defeats the purpose of using pre-commit | 12:22 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/oslo.privsep stable/train: Make compatible with msgpack 1.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/757033 | 12:22 |
hberaud | moguimar: it depends... we still have it available here, but our CI wouldn't relying on it | 12:30 |
hberaud | moguimar: my main concern is more in the formalization of this part through our entire scope | 12:31 |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo | 12:39 | |
*** lbragstad has quit IRC | 12:40 | |
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-oslo | 12:46 | |
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-oslo | 12:59 | |
*** Luzi has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
*** iurygregory has quit IRC | 13:27 | |
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-oslo | 13:28 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/tooz master: Adding pre-commit https://review.opendev.org/742155 | 13:42 |
moguimar | hberaud, sorry I was out for lunch | 13:43 |
moguimar | and now pbr is the last one of them =D | 13:44 |
moguimar | I think we can bring this patch for the meeting | 13:44 |
hberaud | moguimar: good idea | 13:46 |
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-oslo | 14:27 | |
hberaud | #startmeeting oslo | 15:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Mon Oct 12 15:00:09 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: oslo)" | 15:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'oslo' | 15:00 |
hberaud | Courtesy ping for bnemec, smcginnis, moguimar, johnsom, stephenfin, bcafarel, kgiusti, jungleboyj, sboyron | 15:00 |
beekneemech | o/ | 15:00 |
*** beekneemech is now known as bnemec | 15:00 | |
hberaud | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting | 15:00 |
stephenfin | o/ | 15:00 |
bcafarel | o/ | 15:00 |
johnsom | o/ | 15:00 |
kgiusti | o/ | 15:01 |
moguimar | o/ | 15:01 |
sboyron_ | o/ | 15:01 |
hberaud | #topic Red flags for/from liaisons | 15:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Red flags for/from liaisons (Meeting topic: oslo)" | 15:03 | |
*** sboyron_ is now known as sboyron | 15:03 | |
bcafarel | all good for victoria on neutron side | 15:04 |
moguimar | nothing from Barbican | 15:04 |
johnsom | Nothing from Octavia | 15:04 |
hberaud | I don't expect a whole lot of activity on this right now, final release is really near now. | 15:05 |
hberaud | #topic Releases | 15:06 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Releases (Meeting topic: oslo)" | 15:06 | |
hberaud | As said we are now on the final sprint for victoria | 15:06 |
hberaud | #topic Action items from last meeting | 15:07 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Action items from last meeting (Meeting topic: oslo)" | 15:07 | |
hberaud | Nothing new to bring here either | 15:08 |
hberaud | #topic pre-commit on PBR | 15:08 |
*** openstack changes topic to "pre-commit on PBR (Meeting topic: oslo)" | 15:08 | |
hberaud | as moguimar suggested it could be worth to speak a bit about this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742160/9/tox.ini | 15:09 |
moguimar | 1st thing is pbr still tests tempest-full, and according to frickler, we can drop it | 15:10 |
hberaud | 99% of the pre-commit patches are now merged but Clark suggested to avoid to call pre-commit with tox | 15:10 |
hberaud | moguimar: good point | 15:10 |
moguimar | which I created a patch to drop it here: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/757309/2 | 15:11 |
bnemec | I would assume the reason for running tempest is to verify that the things installed with pbr are actually working. | 15:11 |
bnemec | Unless we're verifying that some other way. | 15:11 |
bnemec | Oh, I see. | 15:12 |
bnemec | It's a python 2 thing, not dropping tempest completely. | 15:12 |
moguimar | yeah, tempest-full-py3 is still there | 15:12 |
hberaud | yep | 15:12 |
sboyron | yes | 15:12 |
bnemec | Hmm, that's a bit problematic though. pbr is branchless so we can't just drop py2 on older releases. | 15:13 |
hberaud | moguimar: so if I understand it correctly it will allow us to continue with our stuff and on the other hand we will keep some testing for py2.7, exact? | 15:14 |
moguimar | this second patch is just to drop tempest-full for python2 | 15:15 |
moguimar | as suggested by frickler | 15:15 |
bnemec | Ah, I see Clark suggested a solution to that in his comment. | 15:15 |
moguimar | after I fixed requirements.txt to only install pre-commit for python3+ we don't depend on that patch anymore | 15:16 |
hberaud | I see | 15:16 |
hberaud | I remember this part now | 15:17 |
moguimar | the pre-commit patch was failing cause there is no pre-commit 2.6.0 in py27 | 15:17 |
moguimar | and it is in test-requirements | 15:17 |
moguimar | but is only used in the pep8 env | 15:17 |
moguimar | which is py3+ | 15:18 |
hberaud | yep | 15:18 |
hberaud | concerning the cache part I asked some feedback from Clark especially on the uniformity of these patches | 15:19 |
hberaud | but I don't expect a positive response | 15:19 |
hberaud | I mean I think he will give the priority to the cache aspects | 15:20 |
openstackgerrit | Moisés Guimarães proposed openstack/pbr master: Adding pre-commit https://review.opendev.org/742160 | 15:21 |
moguimar | I'm rebasing it without the tempest-full drop | 15:21 |
hberaud | nice | 15:21 |
bnemec | Pulling from github in ci is pretty bad. | 15:22 |
moguimar | so now we have 35 bad patches | 15:22 |
hberaud | lol | 15:22 |
bnemec | Is there any chance of getting pre-commit to install from pypi packages instead of source? | 15:23 |
moguimar | could we work with upstream pre-commit to also accept a package? | 15:23 |
hberaud | bnemec: we chosen this way as some persons asked for more security by avoiding to pull unchecked versions | 15:25 |
hberaud | bnemec: so we proposed to pull a specific commit rather than a specific version | 15:25 |
hberaud | moguimar: which package? | 15:26 |
bnemec | How is installing from source more secure than installing from a release? | 15:26 |
moguimar | we would need flake8 and the pre-commit hoops | 15:26 |
moguimar | hooks | 15:26 |
hberaud | moguimar: yep | 15:27 |
moguimar | so we would need https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks | 15:27 |
moguimar | I'm not sure if it is relased as a package | 15:27 |
moguimar | thing is pre-commit was always from source | 15:28 |
moguimar | then we pinned the versions | 15:28 |
moguimar | and someone complained that tags could be relabeled | 15:28 |
moguimar | so we pinned to commit hash | 15:28 |
hberaud | pre-commit and flake8 are mainstream projects so if a security hole appear I think it will appear on pypi too | 15:30 |
moguimar | I think we are losing the point | 15:30 |
hberaud | yep | 15:30 |
moguimar | so, there is no install from pypi now | 15:31 |
moguimar | we only have source install | 15:31 |
hberaud | moguimar: do you want to lead some related actions this week? | 15:31 |
moguimar | how do we go on from here? | 15:31 |
moguimar | I can reach out to pre-commit folks upsream | 15:31 |
hberaud | awesome | 15:31 |
bnemec | That would be a good first step. | 15:31 |
bnemec | Then depending on how that discussion goes we can figure out what to do. | 15:32 |
hberaud | #action moguimar to reach pre-commit people | 15:32 |
hberaud | +1 | 15:32 |
hberaud | anything else about this? | 15:32 |
moguimar | I guess we can go on | 15:32 |
hberaud | #topic Weekly Wayward Wallaby Review | 15:33 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Weekly Wayward Wallaby Review (Meeting topic: oslo)" | 15:33 | |
hberaud | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/640057/ | 15:33 |
hberaud | we are now branched so I assume that we could continue with that | 15:34 |
bnemec | It's only in the generator, so I think it's unlikely we would have an 11th hour bug fix touching this code. | 15:35 |
hberaud | #topic Open discussion | 15:35 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: oslo)" | 15:35 | |
hberaud | anything else? | 15:35 |
bnemec | Yep, a couple of things. | 15:35 |
bnemec | First, the PTG. | 15:35 |
bnemec | Currently the only topic on the etherpad is the retrospective, and a cross-project for the policy popup which will happen elsewhere. | 15:36 |
bnemec | So at this point I'm thinking we don't need to meet at all, if there's nothing to discuss. | 15:36 |
hberaud | agreed | 15:37 |
moguimar | not even to see each other on video instead of text =P | 15:37 |
hberaud | :) | 15:37 |
bnemec | I mean, it's during the regular meeting time so we could also jump on a meetpad. :-) | 15:37 |
moguimar | we can also discuss the DPL | 15:37 |
bnemec | That was actually my next topic. | 15:37 |
hberaud | moguimar: I planed to bring this point here | 15:38 |
bnemec | We'll need to at least assign official liaisons for the three required positions. | 15:38 |
hberaud | #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-project-leadership.html#process-for-opting-in-to-distributed-leadership | 15:38 |
hberaud | as said I'm volunteer for the release liaison but at least we need more than that, any volunteer? | 15:39 |
hberaud | (and I'm volunteer on the meeting facilitator role too) | 15:40 |
bnemec | I guess I can stay on as the security liaison. It's a pretty low time commitment and I'm already admin of the oslo-coresec team. ;-) | 15:40 |
hberaud | bnemec: awesome, thanks | 15:41 |
moguimar | so what is the 3rd missing? | 15:41 |
bnemec | tact-sig (essentially, infra) | 15:41 |
hberaud | any volunteer? | 15:42 |
sboyron | I'm not a core, so I won't be official tag-sig but I can help | 15:44 |
damani | just one question it's necesarry be core to be liaison ? | 15:44 |
bnemec | I'm probably not a good choice for that one since I can't commit to dealing with ci fire drills in a timely fashion anymore. | 15:44 |
bnemec | Not necessarily, but it's helpful in case there are patches that need to be pushed through. | 15:45 |
johnsom | Yeah, sorry, but I am already over extended. | 15:45 |
bnemec | However, as long as there are cores available that you can ping it would probably be okay to have a non-core as the liaison here. | 15:45 |
hberaud | sboyron, damani: I've no idea about if we need to be core for this job, I guess yes, but we could ask to TC members about this point | 15:46 |
bnemec | And, frankly, if no cores volunteer then it's clearly better to have a non-core than no liaison at all. :-) | 15:46 |
hberaud | I agreed with bnemec | 15:46 |
bnemec | I could also see it being a good path to becoming a core, if that's a goal you have. | 15:47 |
damani | sboyron, are you volunteer ? | 15:47 |
hberaud | sboyron: so you're interested by the tact-sig? | 15:47 |
bnemec | Fighting ci fires will teach you a lot about how the projects work and interact. | 15:47 |
hberaud | damani: are you interesting by the release liaison job? | 15:47 |
damani | hberaud, yes | 15:48 |
hberaud | s/interesting/interested | 15:48 |
damani | i'm really interested | 15:48 |
hberaud | damani: nice | 15:48 |
moguimar | damani++ | 15:48 |
sboyron | hberaud I am really interrested to help | 15:48 |
bnemec | It would be good to have more than one release liaison, for the same reason we always had two people who could ack release requests in the past. | 15:48 |
bnemec | (PTL + liaison) | 15:48 |
hberaud | sboyron: awesome | 15:48 |
moguimar | I can help hberaud with the releases | 15:49 |
hberaud | moguimar: damani is volunteer too | 15:49 |
moguimar | ah, I see | 15:49 |
sboyron | I'll need some help since I do not know all process yet, but tact-sig or release liaison are some interresting subject | 15:49 |
bnemec | How do we want to keep track of this? Maybe a policy spec doc so we can review proposed liaisons in the normal way? | 15:49 |
moguimar | I thought he was volunteering for tact-sig | 15:49 |
hberaud | moguimar: maybe you can create a pair tact-sig with sboyron | 15:50 |
moguimar | sounds good, although I have no idea at all of tact-sig responsibilities | 15:50 |
hberaud | a pair of core/non-core and mentoring sboyron and damani | 15:50 |
sboyron | it's ok for me to work in a pair, sound goods | 15:50 |
hberaud | and help them to become core developer on oslo with us | 15:51 |
bnemec | moguimar: Basically be the point of contact for infra if something in our ci jobs breaks. | 15:51 |
bnemec | It doesn't necessarily mean you have to fix all the ci breakages, but it helps if you know who to pull in to fix them. | 15:51 |
moguimar | sboyron, what is your timezone? | 15:51 |
sboyron | CEST | 15:51 |
damani | hberaud, moguimar, sounds really good | 15:51 |
sboyron | what about yours moguimar ? | 15:51 |
moguimar | same I guess | 15:51 |
moguimar | Czech Republic | 15:52 |
hberaud | excellent! I think we reached a great step | 15:52 |
sboyron | same yes, great | 15:52 |
bnemec | Thinking some more on this, maybe it's better to keep track of our liaisons on the wiki. | 15:52 |
bnemec | We already have a contact list here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#The_Oslo_Team | 15:52 |
hberaud | johnsom: are you interested for some of these roles? | 15:53 |
bnemec | We could add a liaisons section to that. | 15:53 |
hberaud | bnemec: good idea | 15:53 |
hberaud | bnemec: do you want to lead that? | 15:53 |
johnsom | hberaud I can continue as a TaskFlow core and the security group, but I cannot take on new responsibilities at this time. | 15:53 |
bnemec | Yeah, I can do that quick. | 15:54 |
hberaud | johnsom: ack np | 15:54 |
hberaud | bnemec: awesome thanks | 15:54 |
hberaud | #action bnemec to keep track of our liaisons on the wiki. | 15:54 |
hberaud | anything else? | 15:54 |
bnemec | That's all I had. | 15:56 |
hberaud | Ok then I think we are done | 15:56 |
hberaud | Thanks for joining! | 15:56 |
sboyron | hberaud, Thanks | 15:56 |
hberaud | #endmeeting | 15:56 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Common Libraries | https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo" | 15:56 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Mon Oct 12 15:56:27 2020 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:56 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2020/oslo.2020-10-12-15.00.html | 15:56 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2020/oslo.2020-10-12-15.00.txt | 15:56 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2020/oslo.2020-10-12-15.00.log.html | 15:56 |
damani | bnemec, i have refactor the patch, can you please review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/746723/ ? | 15:57 |
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk | 16:01 | |
bnemec | Okay, I created https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Project_Leadership_Liaisons | 16:02 |
bnemec | hberaud moguimar sboyron damani: please check that I put everyone in the right place and fill in any details I didn't have. | 16:03 |
moguimar | hberaud at utc+2? | 16:03 |
bnemec | That's what was in the other table. | 16:03 |
hberaud | bnemec, moguimar, bnemec, moguimar, johnsom, stephenfin, kgiusti, smcginnis, damani, sboyron: FYI I missed this point, I'm volunteer to manage the DPL process https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-project-leadership.html#process-for-opting-in-to-distributed-leadership to move our team under this kind of leadership, I'll submit a patch soon to update our status | 16:03 |
hberaud | moguimar: yep UTC+2 | 16:03 |
moguimar | where are you based? | 16:03 |
hberaud | france | 16:04 |
moguimar | I forgot that France spans 14 timezones | 16:04 |
moguimar | ok, no jokes now. But CZ is UTC+1 | 16:04 |
moguimar | maybe you're counting daylight saving? | 16:04 |
sboyron | moguimar, France is UTC+1 too | 16:05 |
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC | 16:05 | |
hberaud | moguimar: we abandonned city timezone only 1 century ago | 16:05 |
damani | bnemec, thanks a lot for the wiki | 16:05 |
sboyron | UTC+1 in winter and UTC+2 in summer; | 16:05 |
moguimar | ah, so I'm at UTC+2 | 16:05 |
moguimar | and not +1 =P | 16:06 |
sboyron | 6pm right now ;) | 16:06 |
moguimar | fixed | 16:07 |
moguimar | the wiki | 16:07 |
moguimar | hberaud, the timezone joke is on the overseas part of france | 16:08 |
moguimar | like Brazil borders with Frace at French Guiana | 16:08 |
hberaud | moguimar: yeah I understood your joke :) | 16:09 |
sboyron | bnemec, I updated the wiki with all my info; thanks | 16:09 |
hberaud | moguimar: french polynesia help us too | 16:10 |
hberaud | (to cover all these TZ) | 16:10 |
stephenfin | hberaud: great! :) | 16:11 |
hberaud | but a century ago all french city also had their own TZ too | 16:11 |
hberaud | city/cities | 16:11 |
hberaud | bnemec: awesome thanks for the wiki | 16:11 |
hberaud | damani: feel free to update our informations https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Project_Leadership_Liaisons | 16:12 |
hberaud | s/our/your | 16:12 |
damani | hberaud, yes | 16:13 |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 16:21 | |
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 16:35 | |
*** hamalq has joined #openstack-oslo | 16:49 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/oslo.config master: Convert rst to plaintext for oslo.config output https://review.opendev.org/640057 | 17:38 |
*** dciabrin_ has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
hamalq | hi is there any documentation about how the reply message work on for rabbitmq driver? | 18:34 |
*** dciabrin_ has joined #openstack-oslo | 18:36 | |
hamalq | is the rabbitmq feature used for that https://www.rabbitmq.com/direct-reply-to.html | 18:39 |
hamalq | is this ^^? | 18:39 |
*** sboyron has quit IRC | 20:23 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-oslo | 20:26 | |
*** kgiusti has left #openstack-oslo | 21:00 | |
*** sboyron has joined #openstack-oslo | 21:04 | |
*** sboyron has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
hamalq | : hberaud hi how are u? can u please help me with ^^ | 21:30 |
openstackgerrit | sean mooney proposed openstack/oslo.messaging master: add min of 1 to rpc_conn_pool_size https://review.opendev.org/757654 | 21:47 |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo | 21:47 | |
*** rcernin has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-oslo | 22:30 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
*** hamalq has quit IRC | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!