*** elodilles_pto is now known as elodilles | 09:12 | |
*** iurygregory_ is now known as iurygregory | 12:57 | |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Check if subprocess module is patched https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.concurrency/+/932628 | 15:32 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Check if subprocess module is patched https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.concurrency/+/932628 | 15:33 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Remove windows support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.concurrency/+/932629 | 15:38 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.log master: Remove windows support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.log/+/932631 | 15:44 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/tooz master: Remove Windows support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tooz/+/932632 | 15:48 |
JayF | are there docs or examples for https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.messaging/src/branch/master/oslo_messaging/notify/_impl_routing.py | 17:05 |
JayF | this looks like something I need, but I can't find any documentation on what that routing config should look like at all | 17:05 |
JayF | https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.messaging/src/branch/master/etc/routing_notifier.yaml.sample | 17:06 |
JayF | ooooof that there appears to be no way to send events to two separate messaging driver backends | 17:06 |
JayF | basically, we're trying to implement notifications->kafka operationally, but we want to continue sending notifications needed for designate to the rabbitmq they are currently going to | 17:09 |
JayF | that routing driver probably does exactly what we want if we're willing to fork and make another same-but-different driver | 17:09 |
JayF | I think we'd need https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/victoria/support-transports-per-oslo-notifications.html but any other guidance would be helpful | 17:26 |
JayF | honestly even that alternatives option is likely good enough to handle my use case | 17:26 |
JayF | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo.messaging/+spec/support-transports-per-oslo-notifications afaict zero movement on the implementation | 17:28 |
JayF | Assuming there's nothing I don't know going on here; would oslo devs be amenable to GR-OSS implementing that spec? | 17:31 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/tooz master: Remove Windows support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tooz/+/932632 | 21:20 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Check if subprocess module is patched https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.concurrency/+/932628 | 21:22 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Check if subprocess module is patched directly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.concurrency/+/932628 | 21:29 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Remove windows support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.concurrency/+/932629 | 21:32 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/oslo.concurrency master: Remove windows support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.concurrency/+/932629 | 21:35 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/tooz master: Remove Windows support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tooz/+/932632 | 23:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!