Thursday, 2026-08-06

opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Ensure spawn pool workers have logging configured  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/98269109:46
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Ensure spawn pool workers have logging configured  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/98269109:55
zigoCan we have a new release for oslo.config please ? I need a version with my sample_max and sample_min (ie: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.config/+/995676 ) so I can fix Cinder reproducibility.13:39
stephenfinzigo: if you can push a patch to openstack/releases, I can ack it13:57
zigostephenfin: Oh, welcome back !13:59
zigoI can, but never did, I'm not sure how that works.14:00
zigoIs this in a special repo ?14:00
croelandtHey! Glance might try to change the oslo.service loopingcall backend dynamically (see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/999840) to get rid of a dependency on eventlet. But I also see eventlet is about to become optional (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/992774). Are there any plans to switch the default backend to "threading" rather than "eventlet"?14:00
zigoHere, I guess: https://github.com/openstack/releases14:00
* zigo reads past commits14:01
zigostephenfin: Is this correct ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/99997514:05
stephenfinLooks good, yeah14:23
stephenfinAnd thanks :)14:23
zigoAh, fun I've learned this. Thanks to you !15:10
damani[m]hi there 15:40
damani[m]can i get some code review on that patch please https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/98269115:41
gmaananyone up for this review, DelayExecutors (moved from Nova to futurist with more generic approach)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/97550818:34
gmaanneed 2nd core review, I am +2 on that and gibi +118:36

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!