| *** gibi_ is now known as gibi | 09:14 | |
| damani[m] | hi | 09:35 |
|---|---|---|
| damani[m] | tkajinam, can you take look on that please when you have time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/1005713 | 09:36 |
| tkajinam | damani[m], left a comment there | 09:38 |
| damani[m] | thanks a lot, i will check now | 09:39 |
| damani[m] | ok yes for me that works let's say 2027.2 | 09:39 |
| damani[m] | i changed it now | 09:40 |
| opendevreview | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Defer deprecated components removal to 2027.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/1005713 | 09:41 |
| damani[m] | tkajinam, done | 09:42 |
| tkajinam | I'm unsure if we can fix the timeline now, before we hear feasible deadline from projects but I may not block it. | 09:54 |
| opendevreview | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/oslo.service master: Defer deprecated components removal to 2027.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/1005713 | 10:25 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/oslo.service master: Defer deprecated components removal to 2027.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.service/+/1005713 | 14:28 |
| gmaan | damani[m]: tkajinam ^^ how this is related to eventlet removal? I think we should remove it in 2027.1 and not in non-SLURP 2027.2. commented in gerrit | 16:46 |
| tkajinam | gmaan, if your point is that we shouldn't remove it in SLURP then we can even defer it to 2028.1 . my main point is that we should not remove these in 2027.1 because some of the consumers within openstack didn't removed/deprecated all their implementations in 2026.1 | 23:25 |
| tkajinam | I agree the described reason itself may not justify the delay | 23:25 |
| tkajinam | or are we good to kill these immediately during this cycle and then let them fix their problems forcefully ? | 23:26 |
| tkajinam | (an example is cinder | 23:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!