Tuesday, 2018-02-06

*** svenkat has quit IRC00:16
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm00:21
*** svenkat has joined #openstack-powervm00:25
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:25
*** svenkat has quit IRC00:55
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm02:09
*** edmondsw has quit IRC02:14
*** esberglu has quit IRC02:14
*** svenkat has joined #openstack-powervm03:26
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm03:58
*** edmondsw has quit IRC04:02
*** svenkat has quit IRC04:49
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm05:46
*** edmondsw has quit IRC05:50
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm07:32
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC07:39
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm07:48
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm09:22
*** edmondsw has quit IRC09:27
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Our Zuul infrastructure is currently experiencing some problems and processing jobs very slowly, we're investigating. Please do not approve or recheck changes for now.10:30
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm11:10
*** edmondsw has quit IRC11:15
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC12:59
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm13:01
*** svenkat has joined #openstack-powervm13:05
*** svenkat has quit IRC13:10
*** svenkat has joined #openstack-powervm13:10
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm13:13
*** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm13:23
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC13:25
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm13:27
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC13:38
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm13:53
esberglu#startmeeting powervm_driver_meeting14:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Feb  6 14:00:56 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is esberglu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: powervm_driver_meeting)"14:00
edmondswo/14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting'14:01
efried@/14:01
esberglu#topic In-tree Driver14:01
*** openstack changes topic to "In-tree Driver (Meeting topic: powervm_driver_meeting)"14:01
efried#action esberglu Propose Rocky bp :)14:02
esbergluNot much going on here. I'm gonna start looking at what all will be needed for live migration later this week14:02
esbergluefried: Sure14:02
edmondswdo we need to ping some folks to look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533237/ ?14:02
edmondswefried esberglu I was planning to propose the bp14:03
efriedokay.14:03
esbergluedmondsw: ok14:03
efriedIf you don't change it much, it can get approved by one core :)14:03
edmondswhave been holding up while we finalize first half resources and such14:03
efriedResources schmesources14:04
edmondswshouldn't be significantly different, just include the new goals for Rocky14:04
edmondswjust needs to be proposed before the PTG, right?14:05
efriedEarlier == better.  There's a possibility of someone looking through it now before there's a zillion specs to review.14:06
edmondswI guess it couldn't hurt too much to go ahead and propose it14:07
edmondsw#action edmondsw propose Rocky bp14:07
edmondsw#action edmondsw seek reviews on 53323714:07
efriedI did ^14:07
edmondswefried ok, tx14:08
efriedLooks like spec freeze is usually lined up with release milestone 1, which is in April.14:08
efriedBut yeah, we should be able to have it approved way before that.14:08
edmondswyeah, I figured we have some time, was just shooting to get it in before PTG14:08
efriedJay +2ed the feature classification14:09
edmondswcool14:09
edmondswthat's probably all for IT14:09
esberglu#topic Out-of-tree Driver14:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Out-of-tree Driver (Meeting topic: powervm_driver_meeting)"14:10
efriedsvenkat is ramping up work for SR-IOV max capacity.14:10
edmondswyep, I know of 2 commits there, one I +2d and one with comments14:10
efriedhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/541077/ and 629614:10
edmondswtjakobs has posted another version of the volume driver refactoring, so I'm looking at that14:11
esbergluedmondsw: I started looking at that yesterday, hoping to have some more time today14:12
edmondswesberglu when we're done with this refactor, we should see if it changes anything about our vSCSI IT commit14:12
svenkatnova_powervm patchset will be the final work, i will genrate it when pypowervm is merged.14:12
esbergluedmondsw: Yep14:12
edmondswlike the class name14:12
efriedsvenkat: You've got two +2s on the pypowervm patch; go ahead and merge it.  But you'll need a release before the community patches will pass.14:12
efried...or at least, you should be setting up your tests so that's the case :)14:13
svenkatok..14:13
efriedwith proper autospeccing etc.14:13
svenkatefried: I do not have access to merge pypowervm changes..14:14
edmondswyeah, we shouldn't be merging non-defect nova_powervm changes until Queens releases14:14
efriedsvenkat: That's weird.  Done.14:14
svenkatthanks14:14
svenkatover to networking_powervm patchset - i see Matthew’s comments, i am addressing them.14:15
esbergluI'm going to be cutting RC1 and branching queens release for *-powervm later this week14:15
edmondswesberglu ack14:16
esbergluThat all OOT?14:17
edmondswwe have gotten some positive votes on the proposal to create PowerStackers governance project14:17
edmondswbut it needs a lot of votes to merge, so I'm not sure if that will go in this week or not14:17
edmondsw#action edmondsw probe on how to move the PowerStackers commit along14:18
efried[feature matrix patch is +A]14:18
edmondswsweet14:19
edmondswI think that's all for OOT14:19
edmondswoh, esberglu please look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/540507/14:19
esbergluedmondsw: Will do14:19
esberglu#topic Device Passthrough14:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Device Passthrough (Meeting topic: powervm_driver_meeting)"14:19
esbergluefried: Anything to discuss this week?14:20
efriedI put up a spec for update_provider_tree14:20
efriedRepresenting a lot of work that's already been done, but will be finished up in R.14:21
efriedIt's got Jay's +2 at this point.14:21
efriedhttps://review.openstack.org/54011114:21
efriedReproposal for Granular also has Jay's +2.  https://review.openstack.org/54017914:22
efriedI'm *considering* putting up a spec for placement caching by the scheduler.  But that might be a shitstorm.14:22
efriedSee preliminary shitsquall at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/540111/2/specs/rocky/approved/update-provider-tree.rst@22314:23
edmondswack14:23
edmondswI'll read over that later14:24
efriedThe amount of work remaining for NRP in alloc cands (Jay) is small, so I'm hoping that gets done pretty quickly in R.  Then I can finish granular.  Then we can start implementing update_provider_tree in our driver.14:24
efriedWe can actually start doing that anyway - we just wouldn't have the benefit of nested & granular.14:24
edmondswsounds like the driver-side changes for update_provider_tree are really easy14:25
efriedSo I'm not sure how much we want to invest in that.14:25
efriededmondsw: Yes, they should be fairly easy, except we're going to have some brainwork to do to figure out things like allocation ratios and step sizes.14:25
edmondswyeah, I was thinking just move what we already do into the new method14:26
efriedAnd what I was getting at above is that we may want to hold off until NRP/granular are locked and loaded so we can jump right to the endgame and model stuff the way we ultimately want to.14:26
edmondswdefinitely more work to add onto that14:26
edmondswCI?14:27
esberglu#topic PowerVM CI14:27
*** openstack changes topic to "PowerVM CI (Meeting topic: powervm_driver_meeting)"14:28
esbergluThe post_stack_vm_cleaner fix got rid of that vopt issue14:28
esbergluWe're running OOT with that and efried's naming change14:28
esbergluBut IT just has the cleaner fix14:28
esbergluAnd the issue has disappeared from both14:28
efriedSo do we want to keep the rename "fix"?14:29
efriedThe cleaner fix obviously only applies to the CI env.  But the probability of hitting this in the field is pretty durn small.14:29
edmondswI'd probably drop the rename... it never merged, just the patch merged14:29
edmondswefried oh, true14:29
edmondswyeah, I still think that is really unlikely to be hit in the field14:30
edmondswI think just abandon the rename and merge a removal from the patch list14:30
esbergluSounds good to me14:30
efriedIf it comes up again, we can resurrect the rename.14:31
edmondswyep14:31
efriedAbandoned14:32
esbergluStill haven't gotten to the bottom of the test_update_server_name test14:32
edmondswhow's the move to pike going?14:33
esbergluedmondsw: Was planning on jumping back onto that today14:34
esbergluTried a few things last week, didn't really make any progress14:34
edmondswk14:34
esbergluStill can't get large snapshots working14:34
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm14:34
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm14:35
esbergluThat's all from me14:35
esberglu#topic Open Discussion14:35
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: powervm_driver_meeting)"14:35
esbergluFYI I will be out Thursday and Friday next week14:35
edmondswesberglu ack14:36
efriedJust got PTG approval.14:36
edmondswyes!!!14:36
efriedI'm leaving the Friday before, bringing the wife, and extending the stay into the following week.14:37
edmondswhave fun!14:37
efriedAlso put up a proposal for a talk on Placement in Vancouver.14:37
edmondswgood. I think that's very good14:37
openstackgerritSridhar Venkat proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Support maximum capacity for SR-IOV VNIC  https://review.openstack.org/54107714:38
edmondswFYI I may take a day or two off around the 21st14:38
edmondswthat all for today?14:39
efriedNothing else from me.14:40
edmondswcall it14:41
esberglu#endmeeting14:42
*** openstack changes topic to "This channel is for PowerVM-related development and discussion. For general OpenStack support, please use #openstack."14:42
openstackMeeting ended Tue Feb  6 14:42:29 2018 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:42
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-02-06-14.00.html14:42
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-02-06-14.00.txt14:42
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-02-06-14.00.log.html14:42
esbergluedmondsw: efried: 6302 for the patching revert14:42
efried?214:42
efried+214:42
edmondswsame14:43
efriedsvenkat: We can merge the networking-powervm patch independently, right?14:48
svenkatyes. it can be independent…14:58
edmondswsvenkat is the nova-powervm change proposed yet?14:59
svenkatall it does is to pick maxcapacity from binding profile (if present) and add it to vif . Currently nova_powervm sr-iov vif driver code does not care about it.14:59
svenkatedmondsw: it is on its way… will do it this afternoon...14:59
edmondswsvenkat ack14:59
*** apearson has quit IRC14:59
*** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm15:02
openstackgerritSridhar Venkat proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Support maximum capacity for SR-IOV VNIC  https://review.openstack.org/54107715:07
*** apearson has quit IRC16:01
edmondswesberglu I'm confused... can you figure how UT passed for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541077 given that the pypowervm change isn't in a released version?16:16
edmondswsvenkat ^16:19
edmondswesberglu svenkat oh nm, the networking-powervm change doesn't need the pypowervm change16:19
svenkat541077 is not using pypowercode  (networking_powervm does not use pypowervm code directly…). upcoming nova_powervm will use pypowervm…16:20
svenkatyes...16:20
edmondswright, my bad16:20
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC17:25
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm17:25
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC17:29
openstackgerritSridhar Venkat proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: Support maximum capacity for SR-IOV VNIC  https://review.openstack.org/54138718:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/nova-powervm master: Trim the fat from InstanceInfo  https://review.openstack.org/54050718:34
openstackgerritSridhar Venkat proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: Support maximum capacity for SR-IOV VNIC  https://review.openstack.org/54107718:54
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm19:00
*** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm19:42
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC21:21
*** svenkat has quit IRC22:05
*** apearson has quit IRC22:15
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC22:16
*** edmondsw has quit IRC22:37
*** tjakobs has quit IRC22:37
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm22:38
*** edmondsw has quit IRC22:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!