| *** k0da has quit IRC | 00:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/networking-powervm master: add lower-constraints job https://review.openstack.org/555936 | 00:07 |
|---|---|---|
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:27 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 00:45 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 03:37 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 03:38 | |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 04:33 | |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
| *** chhagarw has joined #openstack-powervm | 05:03 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 05:25 | |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 07:51 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 08:08 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 09:18 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 09:30 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 09:44 | |
| *** chhagarw has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 11:05 | |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 11:07 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 11:28 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:13 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:46 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 12:51 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:52 | |
| *** chhagarw has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:21 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:47 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:51 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:58 | |
| edmondsw | #startmeeting PowerVM Driver Meeting | 14:03 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Mar 27 14:03:21 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is edmondsw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:03 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:03 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting' | 14:03 |
| edmondsw | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm_driver_meeting_agenda | 14:03 |
| edmondsw | #topic In-Tree Driver | 14:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "In-Tree Driver (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:03 | |
| edmondsw | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm-in-tree-todos | 14:03 |
| edmondsw | esberglu you want to give us a quick update? | 14:04 |
| esberglu | Yep | 14:04 |
| efried | รถ/ (new haircut) | 14:04 |
| edmondsw | :) | 14:05 |
| esberglu | Need to respond to a few things on network hotplug for mriedem | 14:05 |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 14:05 | |
| esberglu | But looks like he's ready to +2 after that | 14:05 |
| edmondsw | well, after we get the CI testing it | 14:05 |
| edmondsw | how's that going? | 14:05 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Sounded like he was okay with putting it through anyways, he asked about that in -nova yesterday | 14:06 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Still haven't gotten active RMC was gonna talk to mdrabe today | 14:06 |
| edmondsw | yeah, I saw, but the way I read it he was only ok with +2 once the CI is testing it | 14:06 |
| esberglu | Could be, either way we need to get that working | 14:07 |
| edmondsw | yep | 14:07 |
| esberglu | vSCSI, Snapshot, DiskAdapter and Localdisk are all ready for review | 14:07 |
| edmondsw | let's focus on getting that working in CI | 14:07 |
| esberglu | Yep | 14:07 |
| esberglu | Next up is resize but I'm gonna sit on that until we start moving on the rest | 14:08 |
| edmondsw | +1 on vscsi | 14:08 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Do the pypowervm 1.1.12 in a follow on? | 14:09 |
| edmondsw | I guess. that's what efried suggested, and I'll yield to him on that | 14:09 |
| esberglu | Adding a todo to the etherpad | 14:10 |
| efried | did I say that? | 14:10 |
| edmondsw | yep, in the review | 14:10 |
| efried | Oh, because we were going to wait until 1.1.13 to bump the minimum. | 14:11 |
| edmondsw | 1.1.13 should be cut today, and as soon as that's in u-c we can bump the minimum | 14:11 |
| edmondsw | if that happens before we see anyone looking at vscsi, we can make the change there, else we can try to do a followon | 14:11 |
| edmondsw | sound like a plan? | 14:11 |
| esberglu | Sounds good | 14:11 |
| esberglu | That's all I had for IT | 14:12 |
| edmondsw | I'm still trying to get to reviewing snapshot :( | 14:12 |
| efried | runways start tomorrow. | 14:12 |
| edmondsw | cool | 14:12 |
| efried | Have we queued up the ready reviews in there yet? | 14:13 |
| edmondsw | efried I think vscsi is the only one really ready | 14:13 |
| edmondsw | I will add it | 14:13 |
| esberglu | Nope was waiting until I had +1s from both of you on vSCSI | 14:13 |
| esberglu | And CI for network hotplug | 14:13 |
| efried | am I not +1 on that yet? | 14:13 |
| edmondsw | you are... I wasn't until just now | 14:13 |
| efried | okay. | 14:14 |
| efried | Wanna wait a week, I can be +2 :) | 14:14 |
| edmondsw | esberglu actually you go ahead and add vscsi to the runway | 14:14 |
| esberglu | Oh yeah congrats efried! | 14:14 |
| edmondsw | efried oh? :) | 14:14 |
| edmondsw | congrats then! | 14:14 |
| efried | thanks, provisionally. The nom is out on the ML. | 14:14 |
| edmondsw | hadn't noticed yet... that's awesome | 14:14 |
| efried | I'm right chuffed, as they used to say on the east side (of London) | 14:15 |
| edmondsw | as you should be | 14:15 |
| edmondsw | one thing about localdisk | 14:16 |
| edmondsw | did we work out what we're doing so that conf settings don't conflict between IT and OOT? | 14:17 |
| esberglu | Oh right. No we didn't | 14:17 |
| edmondsw | are you going to try my suggestion of an OOT change to check and see if the setting is already defined and if so not redefine it? | 14:18 |
| esberglu | Sure | 14:18 |
| edmondsw | ok, let us know how that goes | 14:18 |
| edmondsw | anything else for IT? | 14:18 |
| efried | That doesn't sound like it'll work. I don't think you can predict the load order. | 14:18 |
| efried | Perhaps ask around in -oslo | 14:19 |
| edmondsw | that was my fear | 14:19 |
| efried | Or on the dev ML. | 14:19 |
| efried | I bet dhellmann has this answer off the top. | 14:19 |
| edmondsw | I thought maybe we could assume nova was loaded before a nova virt driver, though | 14:19 |
| esberglu | We could name the IT group something slightly different | 14:19 |
| edmondsw | yeah, he'd be the person I'd go to | 14:19 |
| edmondsw | esberglu I really don't want to name things differently if we can avoid it | 14:19 |
| efried | Namespacing would be okay, except we really want the in | 14:20 |
| efried | in-tree one to be called [powervm] | 14:20 |
| edmondsw | a) I want consistency | 14:20 |
| efried | oh, now I remember. | 14:20 |
| edmondsw | b) I like the existing names better than anything else I've thought of | 14:20 |
| efried | (edmondsw We wouldn't have to change the conf option names, just the group name. But even so) | 14:20 |
| efried | I remember how we need to tackle this. | 14:21 |
| edmondsw | efried right... but like you said, we want the group name to stay the same | 14:21 |
| efried | Because we already lockstep nova and nova-powervm. | 14:21 |
| efried | We introduce the conf option into nova and then *remove* same from nova-powervm. | 14:21 |
| esberglu | Can we just add it to nova and remove from nova-powervm | 14:21 |
| esberglu | Yeah | 14:21 |
| efried | Those patches land in quick succession and we're good. | 14:21 |
| edmondsw | except for the time between the first merge and the second | 14:22 |
| esberglu | efried: There might still be a problem with that, the group would get registered twice I think | 14:22 |
| efried | which should be negligible. Put Depends-On from the nova-powervm patch to the nova patch. | 14:22 |
| edmondsw | and CI will be failing OOT for the IT change | 14:22 |
| edmondsw | which I guess we can ignore | 14:23 |
| efried | yeah | 14:23 |
| efried | esberglu: Not sure about the group redef thing. Another one for dhellmann. | 14:23 |
| edmondsw | do we have Depends-On working? | 14:23 |
| esberglu | no | 14:23 |
| efried | oh, right. No. But that's okay. We'll just land 'em quickly. | 14:23 |
| edmondsw | yeah, I didn't think so | 14:24 |
| edmondsw | k | 14:24 |
| edmondsw | so esberglu will check with dhellmann on the group redef thing | 14:24 |
| edmondsw | and we'll take it from there | 14:24 |
| edmondsw | #topic Out-of-tree Driver | 14:25 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Out-of-tree Driver (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:25 | |
| edmondsw | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm-oot-todos | 14:25 |
| efried | or just try it | 14:25 |
| edmondsw | we've got a couple things waiting for the pypowervm bump | 14:26 |
| edmondsw | already said that should release today, so the bump should happen later this week | 14:26 |
| edmondsw | I think a couple of us have dropped more comments on the volume refactor, and it will need to be rebased again | 14:27 |
| efried | Are we really going forward with that? | 14:27 |
| efried | I mean, I'm all for the idea, but does tjakobs really have the bandwidth to go test all the drivers live? | 14:28 |
| edmondsw | he hasn't said otherwise | 14:28 |
| edmondsw | he was willing | 14:28 |
| esberglu | I thought there was something in slack the other day suggesting otherwise | 14:28 |
| efried | okay, wfm. *I* ain't gonna do it. | 14:28 |
| edmondsw | we'll see how that goes, but I would really like to see that merge | 14:28 |
| edmondsw | (once thoroughly tested) | 14:29 |
| efried | yeah, cause I'm going to be pretty hardline about not merging it unless it's tested. | 14:29 |
| edmondsw | same | 14:29 |
| edmondsw | I think everyone's in agreement there | 14:29 |
| edmondsw | besides tjakobs, I want PowerVC to test it | 14:29 |
| edmondsw | so we know the things they use are still working | 14:30 |
| edmondsw | that should give us another layer of confidence | 14:30 |
| *** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:30 | |
| edmondsw | anything else OOT? | 14:30 |
| edmondsw | oh chhagarw is working on some stuff for iscsi that I should bring up | 14:31 |
| edmondsw | we've got an issue there where I don't think it will be possible to setup the same volume through both NovaLink as a VIOS and through traditional VIOS | 14:31 |
| edmondsw | so we're trying to work out how to handle that | 14:32 |
| efried | at the same time? | 14:32 |
| efried | uh, sorry, maybe that didn't make any sense at all. | 14:32 |
| efried | Never mind. | 14:32 |
| edmondsw | k | 14:32 |
| edmondsw | at any rate, there will be nova-powervm changes coming for iscsi in one form or another | 14:33 |
| edmondsw | anything else OOT? | 14:33 |
| esberglu | nope | 14:33 |
| edmondsw | #topic Device Passthrough | 14:33 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Device Passthrough (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:33 | |
| edmondsw | I haven't been able to do much here the last week | 14:34 |
| edmondsw | efried you have anything? | 14:34 |
| efried | Today is spec review day. Tomorrow runways start. Other than continuing to shepherd outstanding patches and review related stuff, no update from last time. | 14:34 |
| efried | update_provider_tree is queued up for the first runway, I think. | 14:35 |
| edmondsw | yep, saw that | 14:35 |
| edmondsw | very good | 14:35 |
| efried | So I expect that to be merged within the next week or two. | 14:35 |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:35 | |
| efried | But progress on NRP-in-a_c is still very slow. | 14:35 |
| efried | And that's going to be a prereq for... everything else. | 14:35 |
| edmondsw | a_c ? | 14:35 |
| efried | Including granular | 14:35 |
| efried | GET /allocation_candidates | 14:35 |
| edmondsw | ah | 14:35 |
| efried | The placement API that does scheduling | 14:36 |
| efried | basically | 14:36 |
| efried | meanwhile pretty much every spec on the slate talks about using granular as if it's already a thing | 14:36 |
| efried | So no pressure. | 14:36 |
| edmondsw | :) | 14:37 |
| edmondsw | alright, moving on to CI | 14:37 |
| edmondsw | #topic PowerVM CI | 14:37 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "PowerVM CI (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:37 | |
| edmondsw | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm_ci_todos | 14:37 |
| edmondsw | esberglu? | 14:37 |
| esberglu | Top priority is the network hotplug CI | 14:37 |
| edmondsw | +1 | 14:37 |
| esberglu | Then I can hop back into the nodepool update | 14:38 |
| esberglu | Everything is running smoothly again for the most part | 14:38 |
| esberglu | IT and OOT are actually seeing the vOPT naming conflict thing at about the same rate | 14:39 |
| esberglu | Meaning https://review.openstack.org/#/c/540453/ isn't really doing anything | 14:39 |
| esberglu | And that it might not be the naming conflict we thought it was | 14:39 |
| edmondsw | hmm | 14:39 |
| esberglu | Need to hop back into that and debug | 14:40 |
| edmondsw | should we prioritize multinode testing over the nodepool update? | 14:41 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: I really wanted to finish the mgmt service upgrade and queens upgrade first | 14:42 |
| esberglu | But keep getting pulled off elsewhere | 14:42 |
| edmondsw | think we're getting close there? | 14:42 |
| esberglu | Probably time to start weighing that choice though | 14:42 |
| esberglu | Idk it depends on if the management service update fixes the issues that the queens undercloud is seeing | 14:43 |
| edmondsw | you've already got a commit up for resize, and it will need multinode CI before it has a chance of merging | 14:43 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Yeah I will start looking at it more in depth, I'll try to have a plan moving forward for next weeks meeting | 14:44 |
| edmondsw | sounds good | 14:44 |
| esberglu | Nothing else from me | 14:45 |
| edmondsw | #topic Open Discussion | 14:46 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:46 | |
| edmondsw | efried and I just got approval to book travel for the summit | 14:46 |
| efried | Oh, cool, hadn't seen that. | 14:46 |
| edmondsw | should be in your inbox | 14:46 |
| efried | 222 unread as of right now. | 14:47 |
| edmondsw | I plan to go ahead and do that today, see how booked the hotels are (probably full) | 14:47 |
| edmondsw | will let you know what I find | 14:47 |
| edmondsw | anything else to discuss? | 14:47 |
| efried | I may ping you later for info about which hotels etc. I don't remember seeing anything on the website last time I looked. | 14:47 |
| edmondsw | hmm... I registered, but haven't looked for flights/hotels yet | 14:48 |
| * efried headless chicken / one-armed wallpaper hanger / one-legged man in ass-kicking contest today | 14:48 | |
| edmondsw | yeah, today is gonna be rough for me too | 14:48 |
| edmondsw | have a dentist appointment, Ben is visiting so we have extra meetings with that, etc. | 14:49 |
| efried | so, let's close this down if nothing else to discuss (that can't wait) | 14:49 |
| edmondsw | yep | 14:49 |
| edmondsw | #endmeeting | 14:49 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "This channel is for PowerVM-related development and discussion. For general OpenStack support, please use #openstack." | 14:49 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Mar 27 14:49:36 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:49 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-03-27-14.03.html | 14:49 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-03-27-14.03.txt | 14:49 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-03-27-14.03.log.html | 14:49 |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
| edmondsw | efried the email I got after registering for the summit has a link for discounted hotels | 15:33 |
| efried | edmondsw: okay, so there's not just one main preferred hotel or whatever. | 15:34 |
| edmondsw | efried there are 8 listed | 15:34 |
| edmondsw | summit itself is held at a convention center | 15:34 |
| efried | edmondsw: It's nice to be in the same hotel as other people. But I guess if it's that spread out. | 15:34 |
| edmondsw | agreed | 15:35 |
| efried | edmondsw: Any sense for whether car rental will be practical/necessary? | 15:35 |
| edmondsw | probably the closer the better | 15:35 |
| edmondsw | looks like the 8 hotels are all within a few blocks, so probably only need a rental if we have to book further out | 15:35 |
| edmondsw | I have no idea what public transportation is like in Vancouver | 15:35 |
| edmondsw | I expect nice but haven't looked | 15:36 |
| edmondsw | https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/travel/ | 15:36 |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 16:00 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 16:08 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-powervm | 17:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Taylor Jakobson proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: Refactor volume drivers https://review.openstack.org/530816 | 17:19 |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | Taylor Jakobson proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: Refactor volume drivers https://review.openstack.org/530816 | 17:21 |
| esberglu | efried: edmondsw: mdrabe: I'm still trying to get active RMC for the tempest instances. Any chance it could be an issue that we're doing remote pypowervm? | 17:54 |
| esberglu | I know next to nothing about RMC | 17:54 |
| efried | You're saying RMC isn't coming up at all? | 18:04 |
| esberglu | Right | 18:05 |
| mdrabe | esberglu: RMC on what? | 18:06 |
| esberglu | But I can spawn from the same image on the undercloud and RMC will become active | 18:06 |
| mdrabe | Do the images have the rsct packages installed? | 18:07 |
| esberglu | mdrabe: We have a set of neos (CI undercloud) in a multinode openstack that spawn instances | 18:07 |
| esberglu | These instances then stack AIO devstack (cloud on top of cloud) and but use remote pypowervm from the undercloud neos | 18:08 |
| esberglu | The AIO devstack then spawns instances for tempest testing purposed | 18:08 |
| esberglu | purposes | 18:09 |
| esberglu | It's this top level of instances that won't reach active RMC | 18:09 |
| efried | esberglu: Do we have this same issue OOT? | 18:09 |
| esberglu | The image has rsct packages installed, and if a spawn an instance on the undercloud can get an active RMC connection | 18:09 |
| esberglu | efried: Yes | 18:09 |
| efried | oh, okay | 18:10 |
| esberglu | I'm working this on OOT right now not IT | 18:10 |
| esberglu | But it shouldn't matter | 18:10 |
| efried | oh, okay | 18:10 |
| esberglu | I thought that the remote pypowervm might have something to do with it since the image works on the undercloud, but not the overcloud | 18:11 |
| mdrabe | esberglu: Was this working before and now all of a sudden it's not? | 18:14 |
| esberglu | mdrabe: Nope we've never been waiting for active rmc connections on the overcloud | 18:14 |
| esberglu | But we need to now because network interface attach requires active rmc | 18:15 |
| mdrabe | Are these NL partitions? | 18:15 |
| esberglu | The undercloud neos are | 18:16 |
| esberglu | Not the overcloud | 18:17 |
| esberglu | Which is why we are using remote pypowervm (the AIO instances use remote pypowervm running on the neos) | 18:17 |
| edmondsw | I can't see how it would matter that this is remote pypowervm vs. normal | 18:18 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Idk I'm just spitballing here | 18:18 |
| edmondsw | esberglu yeah, understood. It's a good question, but I think the answer is "no" | 18:19 |
| edmondsw | well... it might be something related, though | 18:20 |
| edmondsw | thinking | 18:20 |
| edmondsw | nah, I got nothing | 18:21 |
| *** chhagarw has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
| edmondsw | the LPARs run on the real NovaLink, not the proxy where we do remote pypowervm, so rsct should be working the same way it always does | 18:22 |
| edmondsw | something about the host system? | 18:23 |
| edmondsw | since it's not the image | 18:23 |
| edmondsw | mdrabe could there be something misconfigured on the NovaLink side rather than on the LPAR rsct side? | 18:23 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Same novalink though | 18:28 |
| edmondsw | hm | 18:28 |
| edmondsw | I wonder if someone in the #novalink channel would have better ideas | 18:29 |
| mdrabe | esberglu: Wanna do a meeting about it? Might be better to chit chat | 18:31 |
| esberglu | mdrabe: Sure | 18:32 |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 18:35 | |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 18:39 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 18:42 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| *** k0da has joined #openstack-powervm | 19:05 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 19:59 | |
| *** edmondsw_ has joined #openstack-powervm | 20:01 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
| *** edmondsw_ has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 20:04 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 20:59 | |
| *** edmondsw_ has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:00 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 21:04 | |
| *** edmondsw_ has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
| mdrabe | esberglu: Was taking a look at the latest failure on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555309/3 which has dependency on pypowervm 1.1.13 | 21:21 |
| mdrabe | Does the undercloud need to be updated for that? | 21:21 |
| esberglu | mdrabe: Nope pypowervm needs to be bumped to 1.1.13 in openstack/requirements upper-constraints.txt | 21:23 |
| mdrabe | Ah k thnx | 21:24 |
| efried | and lower-constraints in nova-powervm | 21:25 |
| mdrabe | efried: you mean requirements.txt in nova-powervm? | 21:32 |
| efried | mdrabe: requirements.txt will get bot-updated when we bump g-r in the requirements project. But there's a shiny new lower-constraints.txt file that we have to update ourselves. | 21:32 |
| mdrabe | efried: It's so shiny I can't find it. It's not under nova-powervm? | 21:34 |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:35 | |
| efried | mdrabe: Mahbad: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555964/ | 21:36 |
| efried | not yet merged. | 21:36 |
| efried | because nova needs to be in pypi first. | 21:36 |
| efried | So yeah, for right now we just need to funnel the g-r bump through the requirements project and let the bot propose our requirements.txt update. | 21:36 |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 21:36 | |
| mdrabe | Ah okay thnx | 21:37 |
| *** arunman has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:41 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 21:47 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:48 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 21:49 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
| *** arunman has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 22:01 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
| *** k0da has quit IRC | 22:32 | |
| *** tjakobs has quit IRC | 22:48 | |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 23:12 | |
| *** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 23:17 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!