*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:16 | |
edmondsw | efried so... I shouldn't have proposed those translations for stable/queens. I should have proposed for master, and then backported to queens | 00:17 |
---|---|---|
edmondsw | hit me in the car on the way home | 00:17 |
edmondsw | I guess at this point I will just propose the same changes to master as a new commit | 00:17 |
*** edmondsw has quit IRC | 00:23 | |
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:24 | |
*** edmondsw has quit IRC | 00:28 | |
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:29 | |
*** edmondsw has quit IRC | 00:32 | |
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 00:32 | |
*** edmondsw has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 01:39 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 01:43 | |
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 03:18 | |
*** apearson has joined #openstack-powervm | 03:57 | |
*** apearson has quit IRC | 04:39 | |
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm | 05:57 | |
*** tjakobs has quit IRC | 06:02 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 07:26 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 12:34 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:36 | |
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:38 | |
openstackgerrit | Matthew Edmonds proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: update translations for queens https://review.openstack.org/562570 | 12:53 |
edmondsw | efried ^ | 12:53 |
edmondsw | I'll do the same for the other two projects if you approve | 12:53 |
efried | edmondsw: was gonna say, I don't think there's anything preventing you from cherry-picking forward. | 12:53 |
efried | did you try it? | 12:53 |
edmondsw | that's what this is | 12:53 |
efried | okay, I hadn't looked yet. | 12:54 |
efried | ... | 12:54 |
edmondsw | efried I added a note in the commit message | 12:54 |
efried | i c it | 12:54 |
efried | edmondsw: +A, proceed. | 12:55 |
edmondsw | efried tx | 12:55 |
openstackgerrit | Matthew Edmonds proposed openstack/networking-powervm master: update translations for queens https://review.openstack.org/562573 | 12:58 |
edmondsw | efried I'm getting a weird error when I try to cherry-pick for ceilometer-powervm: fatal: bad object a29ca2b75ed3a4cdd6e725f1f6a1d8e026e1771d | 13:01 |
edmondsw | any ideas? | 13:01 |
efried | ... | 13:01 |
edmondsw | efried oh nm... | 13:02 |
edmondsw | I forgot to git pull first | 13:02 |
efried | k | 13:02 |
efried | mm, that'd do it :) | 13:02 |
edmondsw | typing too fast :) | 13:02 |
openstackgerrit | Matthew Edmonds proposed openstack/ceilometer-powervm master: update translations for queens https://review.openstack.org/562575 | 13:04 |
*** esberglu has quit IRC | 13:05 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-powervm master: update translations for queens https://review.openstack.org/562570 | 13:14 |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:24 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:25 | |
edmondsw | efried esberglu I've proposed 6.0.1 tags (queens) for ceilometer-powervm and networking-powervm | 13:26 |
edmondsw | added you guys | 13:26 |
edmondsw | I'll start working on rocky milestone tags | 13:26 |
edmondsw | so more coming | 13:26 |
esberglu | ack | 13:28 |
efried | edmondsw: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-April/129541.html | 13:38 |
edmondsw | efried nice | 13:38 |
efried | edmondsw: You mean, "nice of them to let us know, for a change"? | 13:39 |
edmondsw | that too... but I was gonna propose this myself when I got a chance | 13:39 |
efried | ah, cool | 13:40 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ceilometer-powervm master: update translations for queens https://review.openstack.org/562575 | 13:42 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/networking-powervm master: update translations for queens https://review.openstack.org/562573 | 13:43 |
edmondsw | efried esberglu I have also proposed this for PowerVMStackers to follow stable policy: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/562591/ | 13:49 |
edmondsw | I believe we already are, just not tagged as such | 13:49 |
efried | edmondsw: Doug implied we weren't. | 13:49 |
edmondsw | oh? when? | 13:49 |
edmondsw | oh, in the irc chat yesterday? | 13:49 |
edmondsw | I believe he meant that we're not tagged for it | 13:50 |
edmondsw | which is what this fixes | 13:50 |
efried | in the nova-powervm release patch | 13:51 |
efried | cool | 13:51 |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 13:52 | |
efried | edmondsw: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/562583/ | 13:53 |
edmondsw | sure, why not | 13:53 |
edmondsw | I don't think it really matters | 13:53 |
edmondsw | this is just a milestone tag | 13:53 |
efried | it's more about the paperwork of "let's release what's at the tip of master right now" | 13:53 |
edmondsw | sure | 13:54 |
efried | That freakin translation drop was a no-op anyway, as noted. | 13:54 |
efried | 'cept for correcting a single-character error in the portuguese. | 13:54 |
edmondsw | should we hold off on any further merges until the milestone tag goes in, so we're not doing this repeatedly? | 13:54 |
efried | Oh, did you have a bunch of stuff queued up? | 13:55 |
efried | :P | 13:55 |
efried | I thought we were pretty clean in the *-powervm repos at this point. | 13:55 |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:57 | |
esberglu | efried: edmondsw: Queens undercloud is good to go (I have the staging env. running queens right now) | 14:02 |
esberglu | 6200 | 14:02 |
esberglu | The only blocker there previously was the unknown origin of jenkins dropping connections | 14:03 |
esberglu | which turned out to be an issue with the NIC configuration on the staging management server | 14:03 |
efried | booya, who figgered that one out? | 14:04 |
esberglu | thorst | 14:04 |
efried | Thought so. | 14:04 |
esberglu | Which I'm very thankful for, I would never have gotten there | 14:04 |
efried | Me neither. Not in a million years. | 14:05 |
edmondsw | me three | 14:14 |
edmondsw | very glad that is resolved :) | 14:14 |
esberglu | Yep. Now the only multinode blocker is figuring out the compute host situation | 14:16 |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 14:23 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:25 | |
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:27 | |
*** tjakobs has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
*** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:40 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:42 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 14:54 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:56 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 15:08 | |
openstackgerrit | Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: DNM: ci check https://review.openstack.org/328315 | 15:08 |
*** zerick has joined #openstack-powervm | 15:10 | |
edmondsw | esberglu is there any difference between https://tarballs.openstack.org/nova-powervm/nova_powervm-6.0.1.tar.gz and https://github.com/openstack/nova-powervm/archive/6.0.1.tar.gz ? | 15:24 |
esberglu | Not sure, I don't see why they wouldn't be the same though | 15:37 |
esberglu | edmondsw: Why do you ask? | 15:42 |
edmondsw | just noticed that you had pointed the PowerVC guys to the latter form before, and got curious | 15:43 |
esberglu | I probably just copied whoever was doing it before I was :) | 15:52 |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 15:55 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 15:56 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 16:11 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 16:14 | |
edmondsw | efried both IT and OOT drivers lack support for the metadata service, right? | 16:24 |
efried | edmondsw: No idea. | 16:24 |
edmondsw | I think we're config drive only | 16:25 |
edmondsw | esberglu you know? | 16:25 |
esberglu | Nope | 16:25 |
edmondsw | I'm pretty sure that's the case... I'm gonna add it to the OOT todo etherpad | 16:26 |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 16:57 | |
*** efried has quit IRC | 17:26 | |
*** efried has joined #openstack-powervm | 17:35 | |
*** efried has quit IRC | 17:44 | |
*** efried has joined #openstack-powervm | 17:53 | |
*** tjakobs_ has joined #openstack-powervm | 18:25 | |
openstackgerrit | Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: DNM: CI Check2 https://review.openstack.org/328317 | 18:27 |
*** tjakobs has quit IRC | 18:29 | |
efried | edmondsw: yt? | 18:31 |
edmondsw | efried hey | 18:36 |
efried | edmondsw: I remember hearing something about wanting linux distros like RedHat to implicitly support PowerVM in their openstacks by virtue of the PowerVM driver being in tree. Does any of that sound familiar? | 18:37 |
edmondsw | yes | 18:38 |
edmondsw | Red Hat wouldn't be the best example, because they're a little different than others in what they'll support, but in general yes | 18:38 |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has joined #openstack-powervm | 18:49 | |
*** AlexeyAbashkin has quit IRC | 18:59 | |
esberglu | edmondsw: efried: Update on multinode CI. I have a proof of concept working, but it's kind of weird (and doesn't address the same underlying compute host issue yet) | 20:05 |
esberglu | Most of the roadblocks that I'm hitting are why upstream moved to zuul v3 and ditched jenkins | 20:05 |
efried | I thought we did that too | 20:06 |
esberglu | I'll be pushing up a patch this afternoon, but would like to talk through it with you guys at that point and see what you think before I go any further | 20:06 |
esberglu | efried: zuul v3 is not ready for 3rd party CI yet | 20:06 |
efried | o | 20:06 |
edmondsw | I won't be able to talk through anything until Friday of next week at the earliest | 20:07 |
edmondsw | out tomorrow, in Austin Mon-Thurs | 20:07 |
edmondsw | unless we do it today | 20:07 |
esberglu | Okay, let me just push what I have up quick then | 20:07 |
esberglu | edmondsw: efried: 6504 | 20:11 |
esberglu | So the basic flow, zuul with match a change and call the '{name}-oot-multi' | 20:11 |
esberglu | Which does everything through stacking the control node | 20:11 |
esberglu | Then triggers the second job "compute_node_multi" | 20:12 |
esberglu | Which does everything through stacking the compute node | 20:12 |
* efried takes micturation break | 20:12 | |
esberglu | This is the part that gets kind of weird. After the compute nodes stacks we need to go back to the control node and discover the hosts then run tempest | 20:13 |
esberglu | However, due to the nature of jenkins, we can't define a second job on the control node to do so | 20:14 |
esberglu | Also due to the nature of jenkins, as soon as the compute job completes, the node will be deleted, so we can't add a step to the control job to do so after the compute node job completes | 20:14 |
esberglu | "to do so" == discover_hosts and stacking | 20:15 |
esberglu | So what I have right now, is that the compute node will issue remote ssh commands back to the control node to discover the hosts and run tempest | 20:15 |
edmondsw | yep | 20:15 |
edmondsw | I think that's probably right | 20:16 |
esberglu | After those complete, the compute node job finishes, cleans up, then back to the control node job which finished and cleans up | 20:16 |
esberglu | It's not ideal, but I think that it is the best we can do with the current tooling without completely redesigning how we deploy our CI | 20:16 |
efried | If it works, go for it. We'll get Mujahid to do that last thing. | 20:18 |
esberglu | This could be fully functional as it is if we use one massive SSP with all the compute hosts | 20:18 |
esberglu | I'm still thinking about how to force the same host and have some ideas, but need to test them | 20:19 |
esberglu | edmondsw: You're okay with this too? | 20:21 |
edmondsw | esberglu yep | 20:21 |
edmondsw | esberglu what ensures that both hosts are found by discover_hosts? | 20:24 |
edmondsw | I think we might have a race condition where the compute-only host may not always be found | 20:25 |
edmondsw | based on that link I sent you the other day where that service shows up on the controller asynchronously and you might have to wait for it | 20:25 |
edmondsw | something to keep an eye out for | 20:26 |
esberglu | edmondsw: Noted | 20:26 |
edmondsw | esberglu do we still need groups like https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/590,members now that we tag everything via openstack/releases? | 20:37 |
edmondsw | and maybe that's a question for the release channel | 20:37 |
esberglu | edmondsw: I don't think so | 20:37 |
*** esberglu has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
*** tjakobs_ has quit IRC | 22:07 | |
efried | edmondsw: Opportunity to suck up just hit the ML | 22:21 |
efried | ...for a guy who knows his security. | 22:22 |
edmondsw | efried ack, tx | 22:22 |
edmondsw | efried I assume you meant this http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-April/129574.html | 22:33 |
edmondsw | I replied | 22:33 |
efried | edmondsw: Yes I did. Cool. | 22:33 |
*** edmondsw has quit IRC | 22:49 | |
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 22:49 | |
*** edmondsw has quit IRC | 22:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!