| openstackgerrit | XiaojueGuan proposed openstack/nova-powervm master: Trivial: Update pypi url to new url https://review.openstack.org/565393 | 03:37 |
|---|---|---|
| openstackgerrit | XiaojueGuan proposed openstack/ceilometer-powervm master: Trivial: Update pypi url to new url https://review.openstack.org/565438 | 06:17 |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-powervm | 12:19 | |
| efried | ō/ | 12:40 |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:16 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 13:34 | |
| *** tjakobs has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:57 | |
| *** mujahidali has joined #openstack-powervm | 13:58 | |
| edmondsw | #startmeeting PowerVM Driver Meeting | 14:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue May 1 14:00:06 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is edmondsw. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'powervm_driver_meeting' | 14:00 |
| edmondsw | efried esberglu mujahidali ^ | 14:00 |
| esberglu | \o | 14:00 |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ceilometer-powervm master: Trivial: Update pypi url to new url https://review.openstack.org/565438 | 14:00 |
| efried | ō/ | 14:00 |
| edmondsw | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm_driver_meeting_agenda | 14:00 |
| efried | mujahidali: Greetings, nice to meetcha. | 14:00 |
| edmondsw | #topic In-Tree Driver | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "In-Tree Driver (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:00 | |
| edmondsw | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm-in-tree-todos | 14:00 |
| edmondsw | esberglu walk us through the latest? | 14:01 |
| mujahidali | efried: thanks :) | 14:01 |
| esberglu | We need scenario testing to move forward on snapshot and localdisk. I'll go into more detail during CI section | 14:01 |
| esberglu | vSCSI is blocked until we have some sort of volume testing | 14:02 |
| esberglu | And cold mig/resize is waiting on multinode CI | 14:02 |
| esberglu | That's pretty much it | 14:02 |
| edmondsw | esberglu I dropped some comments on localdisk | 14:02 |
| esberglu | ack | 14:02 |
| edmondsw | of course CI is the priority atm | 14:02 |
| edmondsw | looks like z got back into a runway quickly after they resolved their CI issues... hopefully things go as well for us | 14:03 |
| edmondsw | #topic Out-of-Tree Driver | 14:04 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Out-of-Tree Driver (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:04 | |
| edmondsw | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm-oot-todos | 14:04 |
| edmondsw | I don't know of any progress made on OOT since the last meeting | 14:05 |
| edmondsw | I think everyone's been focused elsewhere | 14:06 |
| edmondsw | so, moving along... | 14:06 |
| edmondsw | #topic Device Passthrough | 14:06 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Device Passthrough (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:06 | |
| edmondsw | efried anything new here? | 14:06 |
| efried | Looks like tetsuro is taking over the nrp-in-alloc-cands series, which is gooood. He proposed the microversion patch last night. | 14:06 |
| edmondsw | sweet | 14:07 |
| efried | His bp/spec for including all resources in provider summaries got approved this morning, which is also gooood. That was going to hold up the series. | 14:07 |
| efried | I'm getting real close to having granular ready. Just a couple more tests to write and a bug to work out. | 14:07 |
| efried | Course, we're going to be racing each other. | 14:07 |
| efried | Whoever loses is going to have some serious rebasing hell. | 14:08 |
| efried | But at least progress is being made. | 14:08 |
| efried | end. | 14:08 |
| *** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm | 14:08 | |
| edmondsw | tx | 14:08 |
| edmondsw | #topic PowerVM CI | 14:08 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "PowerVM CI (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:08 | |
| edmondsw | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/powervm_ci_todos | 14:08 |
| edmondsw | welcome mujahidali! | 14:08 |
| esberglu | 3 major things going on right now for CI | 14:09 |
| efried | Seems ill since last night | 14:09 |
| esberglu | efried: Yep. We can start there. The queens cloud is seeing those same EOF errors we were seeing on the staging | 14:09 |
| esberglu | However, on staging we changed the NIC type from some weird protocol to virtio and everything was fine | 14:10 |
| efried | oh, right, this is what we were thinking was the glance wsgi business | 14:10 |
| esberglu | Production is already using virtio | 14:10 |
| efried | 'cept that should be in queens | 14:10 |
| esberglu | efried: The glance wsgi thing was a real issue | 14:10 |
| mujahidali | edmondsw: thanks :) | 14:11 |
| esberglu | I'm running glance not with wsgi on production | 14:11 |
| esberglu | So I will be doing more recon on the EOF errors today | 14:11 |
| edmondsw | I assume that's top priority | 14:12 |
| esberglu | yes | 14:12 |
| edmondsw | and then next would be the scenario tests so we can resume IT efforts | 14:12 |
| esberglu | 2) Scenario CI | 14:12 |
| esberglu | I've got working scenario tests for OOT, running the suite with the same changes IT right now | 14:12 |
| esberglu | I will be running those tests as part of the base CI job | 14:13 |
| edmondsw | how can we tell they're working if the CI as a whole is not working? | 14:13 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Staging env. | 14:13 |
| edmondsw | ah | 14:13 |
| esberglu | Still some things to clean up there, but I think that should be ready by the end of the week | 14:14 |
| edmondsw | got numbers on what that added to the OOT CI times? | 14:14 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: I've only ran twice all the way through | 14:14 |
| esberglu | 1 was 100s longer, the other actually ran faster than the base time I was comparing against | 14:14 |
| edmondsw | wow | 14:15 |
| edmondsw | that would be really nice if we find it's negligible | 14:15 |
| efried | ++ | 14:15 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Yep. Obviously I want to get a lot more runs going through to confirm first, but seems that it may be | 14:15 |
| edmondsw | sure | 14:16 |
| esberglu | 3) Multinode CI | 14:16 |
| esberglu | I know what I want to do here and am 90% sure it's gonna work, just need to finish scenario before I test | 14:16 |
| esberglu | I learned that the subnodes are NOT always on the same underlying compute host | 14:17 |
| esberglu | So we're going to have to define an AZ for each neo host. Then we can force the subnodes to be on the same neo host in nodepool | 14:18 |
| edmondsw | i.e. read the AZ of the parent, then specify that AZ for the subnode? | 14:18 |
| edmondsw | my concern with AZs is that if we split each host into a different AZ, don't we have to specify the AZ on any deploy? | 14:20 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Not exactly | 14:20 |
| edmondsw | and we don't care which AZ is used for the parent, so how do we pick one? | 14:20 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: So we will have a bunch of providers in the nodepool conf, 1 for each AZ | 14:20 |
| esberglu | And then we will say spawn 1 node and 1 subnode | 14:20 |
| esberglu | Since the provider is a specific AZ, both node and subnode will be in it | 14:21 |
| esberglu | The IP of the subnode is then saved in some nodepool files on the subnode | 14:21 |
| edmondsw | so we just tell nodepool we want 1 node and 1 subnode, and for the node it picks a provider, we don't have to? | 14:21 |
| esberglu | *on the main node | 14:21 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Yep | 14:21 |
| edmondsw | ok nice | 14:21 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Only downside is that the config file is gonna be kinda gross, but oh well | 14:22 |
| edmondsw | so how does the subnode AZ get specified? | 14:22 |
| edmondsw | subnode will always come from the same provider? | 14:22 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Yes, you just have to config it right | 14:22 |
| edmondsw | k | 14:22 |
| esberglu | That's all I have | 14:22 |
| edmondsw | work your magic :) | 14:23 |
| edmondsw | let's talk a bit about vSCSI CI | 14:23 |
| esberglu | Sure | 14:23 |
| edmondsw | I assume that's next after the 3 we just covered | 14:23 |
| esberglu | I thought we determined we didn't have the HW for it? | 14:23 |
| edmondsw | I think that depends on which solution we're talking about | 14:24 |
| edmondsw | in order to test vSCSI on every CI run, yeah, I think we would need more hardware | 14:24 |
| edmondsw | but mriedem suggested that it would be ok to just have a job that could be run on-demand | 14:24 |
| edmondsw | and I think we could probably do that with the hardware we have | 14:24 |
| edmondsw | I don't think we've ever done anything like that before, but I assume there are other examples out there we could look at | 14:25 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: I can start thinking about it | 14:26 |
| edmondsw | esberglu thoughts? | 14:26 |
| edmondsw | tx | 14:26 |
| esberglu | edmondsw: Idk how we will run on demand once jenkins goes away | 14:26 |
| esberglu | Maybe zuul v3 has a way to do so, but I haven't seen anything like that ever | 14:27 |
| edmondsw | esberglu I'd probably start by asking mriedem if he knows of an example you could look at | 14:28 |
| esberglu | We can sort through the details once I know more | 14:28 |
| edmondsw | and then go from there, talk to him or infra about the zuul v3 options | 14:28 |
| edmondsw | I wonder if that's one of the reasons zuul v3 isn't ready for 3rd party CI | 14:28 |
| edmondsw | mujahidali coming up to speed? | 14:29 |
| edmondsw | have a quick update on your status? | 14:30 |
| esberglu | He's got access to all of the repos, etc. now. I've started adding him to CI reviews and will start giving him some tasks | 14:30 |
| edmondsw | alright tx | 14:32 |
| edmondsw | #topic Open Discussion | 14:32 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: PowerVM Driver Meeting)" | 14:32 | |
| edmondsw | anything else? | 14:32 |
| mujahidali | esberglu: thanks for the update. edmondsw: yeah, I am looking into the code and reading the wiki | 14:32 |
| edmondsw | ok good | 14:32 |
| edmondsw | if there's nothing else, we can get some time back. Thanks! | 14:33 |
| edmondsw | #endmeeting | 14:33 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "This channel is for PowerVM-related development and discussion. For general OpenStack support, please use #openstack." | 14:33 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue May 1 14:33:41 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:33 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-05-01-14.00.html | 14:33 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-05-01-14.00.txt | 14:33 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/powervm_driver_meeting/2018/powervm_driver_meeting.2018-05-01-14.00.log.html | 14:33 |
| *** mujahidali has quit IRC | 14:38 | |
| *** gman-tx has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
| *** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm | 15:44 | |
| *** gman-tx has quit IRC | 16:22 | |
| *** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm | 16:25 | |
| *** gman-tx has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
| *** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm | 19:11 | |
| *** gman-tx has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
| *** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm | 19:46 | |
| *** gman-tx has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
| *** gman-tx has joined #openstack-powervm | 20:46 | |
| *** gman-tx has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
| *** tjakobs has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-powervm | 23:41 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 23:41 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!