Thursday, 2013-09-12

*** mriedem has quit IRC00:01
*** hemna is now known as hemnafk00:02
*** HenryG_ has joined #openstack-qa00:04
*** HenryG__ has joined #openstack-qa00:08
*** HenryG__ has quit IRC00:08
*** HenryG has quit IRC00:08
*** HenryG_ has quit IRC00:12
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-qa00:12
*** sthaha has joined #openstack-qa00:24
*** weshay has quit IRC00:52
*** marun has quit IRC01:03
*** lisandro2 has joined #openstack-qa01:18
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-qa01:22
*** lisandro2 has left #openstack-qa01:23
*** fandikurnia01 has joined #openstack-qa01:53
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-qa01:56
*** HenryG has quit IRC02:53
*** nosnos has quit IRC02:57
*** anteaya__ is now known as anteaya02:57
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-qa02:58
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa03:03
openstackgerritminsel proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Handling network resources in tenant isolation  https://review.openstack.org/4557803:15
*** jhenner has quit IRC03:18
*** anteaya has quit IRC03:33
*** shanks has joined #openstack-qa03:56
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa04:13
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC04:14
*** prekarat has joined #openstack-qa04:16
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa04:20
*** prekarat has quit IRC04:20
openstackgerritIvan-Zhu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: test_server_actions into v3 part2  https://review.openstack.org/3960904:29
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC04:30
openstackgerritMh Raies proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Bulk Subnets and Ports creation  https://review.openstack.org/4487004:31
raiesjaypipes: hi04:32
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa04:33
openstackgerritMh Raies proposed a change to openstack/tempest: dding negative test for port  https://review.openstack.org/4537204:39
*** prekarat has joined #openstack-qa04:40
openstackgerritMh Raies proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adding negative test for port  https://review.openstack.org/4537204:41
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC04:48
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa04:57
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-qa05:02
raiesHi I need help on git rebase05:11
*** yfried has joined #openstack-qa05:22
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC05:31
*** harlowja has quit IRC05:31
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-qa05:31
clarkbraies: best to just ask05:35
raiesclarkb: I have a parent and its an child branch05:36
raiesparent is updated05:36
*** harlowja_ has joined #openstack-qa05:36
raiesnot I need to update child05:36
raiesso that parent is also being updated in child05:36
clarkbgit review -d $parent_change_number #note resulting branch the git review -d $child_change_number and finally git rebase -i branchnameforparent05:37
raiesyou men I shold run follwing commands05:38
raiesa. git review -d $parent_change_number05:38
*** harlowja has quit IRC05:38
raiesb.  git review -d $child_change_number on same terminal05:38
raiesthen c. git rebase -i05:39
raies??05:39
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-qa05:39
clarkbyes but rebase -i needs an argument05:39
raiesyes i will give that also05:39
clarkbit is the branch name of the branch created by the first command05:39
raiesyes i.e. for parent right ?05:40
clarkbyes05:40
raiesactually I follwed last para of https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow05:40
raiesbut there is a wrong (as per me) step "git checkout $DEV_TOPIC_BRANCH"05:41
openstackgerritnayna-patel proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Added test to check list/show extensions-neutron  https://review.openstack.org/4503005:41
raiesinstead as per you here is "git review -d $child_change_number"05:41
*** harlowja_ has quit IRC05:42
raiesclarkb: thanks05:42
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa05:42
clarkbeither way works05:42
raiesno https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow does not worke for me05:43
raiesthere is error no such branch during child checkout05:43
clarkb$DEV_TOPIC_BRANCH is a variable, a standin for where your child is05:44
raiesyes I know I replaced that with topic branch05:45
raiesclarkb: "error: could not apply error is " is commig on follwing your way after rebase05:46
openstackgerritYair Fried proposed a change to openstack/tempest: added an api test for security_groups  https://review.openstack.org/4460705:46
clarkbraies can you paste the entire output beginning with the first step?05:46
raiesok wait for 1 min05:46
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Remove wait_for_image_resp_code  https://review.openstack.org/3899505:50
openstackgerritafazekas proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Remove wait_for_image_resp_code  https://review.openstack.org/3899505:52
raiesclarkb: http://pastebin.com/m4YVeSyy05:53
raiescheck L1405:53
clarkbraies: you need to resolve the conflicts05:55
clarkbraies: `git status` will show you which files have conflicts, edit them, the file contents will be tagged around the conflicts, edit the file so that you remove the tags and the file has the content that you want05:56
clarkbraies: git add the files when you are done resolving the confligs then `git rebase --continue`05:56
raiesok05:56
raiesclarkb: thanks06:06
*** coolsvap has quit IRC06:13
*** dkorn has joined #openstack-qa06:16
*** nosnos has quit IRC06:17
*** wramthun has quit IRC06:22
*** EspressoLuv has joined #openstack-qa06:22
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-qa06:24
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC06:43
*** prekarat has quit IRC06:50
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-qa06:57
*** prekarat has joined #openstack-qa06:59
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-qa07:05
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC07:06
raiesafazekas: please check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44870/ . I have incorporated jaypipes review comments07:09
raiesafazekas: now one subnet is created with name and other is without name parameter07:09
openstackgerritZhi Kun Liu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: add admin client for scenario tests  https://review.openstack.org/4620507:17
afazekasraies: I think once I commented would be nice to verify the other attributes when reading back the list. Can you add it ?07:28
raiesafazekas: I did not understand07:29
afazekasYou just assering the id but not the cidr or name07:30
raieswhere ?07:31
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/44870/9/tempest/api/network/test_networks.py L28807:31
raiesI think it is not necessary07:33
raiestill now I am not seeing this type of check any where07:33
raiesstill if you are suggesting I can check that also07:33
raieswhat you say ? how can I get +2 from you :p07:34
raiesafazekas: are u there ?07:37
openstackgerritZhi Kun Liu proposed a change to openstack/tempest: add server resizing tests  https://review.openstack.org/4473207:38
afazekasraies: in some test cases they are verified in other test cases they are not, but the better way is to do it. +2 but I noted it.07:38
afazekasCan you review this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46050/ ?07:40
raiesok I will review it07:42
openstackgerritZhi Kun Liu proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: remove whitebox configuration in tempest.conf  https://review.openstack.org/4601607:49
raiesafazekas: what is the need of "_process_floating_response"07:51
raiesdoes _root_tag_fetcher_and_xml_to_json_parse not handles all the resuests ?07:52
*** afazekas has quit IRC07:55
*** giulivo has joined #openstack-qa07:56
*** yassine has joined #openstack-qa08:02
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa08:09
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo08:17
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-qa08:17
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Fix race condition for test_flavors_extra_specs  https://review.openstack.org/4558608:19
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Add service tags to api.volume  https://review.openstack.org/4578208:20
*** bashok has joined #openstack-qa08:51
*** zhikunliu has joined #openstack-qa08:52
*** prekarat has quit IRC08:58
*** madan has joined #openstack-qa09:03
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa09:04
*** zhikunliu has quit IRC09:06
*** jhenner has quit IRC09:06
*** zhikunliu has joined #openstack-qa09:19
*** prekarat has joined #openstack-qa09:27
openstackgerritsahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adds tests covering Swift's Container Quota middleware  https://review.openstack.org/4623209:31
*** rdekel has joined #openstack-qa09:37
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-qa09:39
openstackgerritsahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adds tests covering Swift's container quotas middleware  https://review.openstack.org/4623209:39
*** madan has quit IRC09:58
*** rdekel has quit IRC10:10
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa10:21
bashokHi, while running this test  tempest.api.compute.security_groups.test_security_groups.SecurityGroupsTestJSON.test_server_security_groups[gate] on H3 code I am getting this error http://paste.openstack.org/show/46826/ , can anyone shed some light on this10:26
*** madan has joined #openstack-qa10:26
openstackgerritSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adds tests covering Swift's container quotas middleware  https://review.openstack.org/4623210:31
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:36
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa10:38
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-qa10:51
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:54
*** zhikunliu has quit IRC10:58
*** rdekel has joined #openstack-qa10:59
*** weshay has joined #openstack-qa11:02
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa11:07
sdagueafazekas, cyeoh: can you guys vote on the new core thread when you get a chance, you are the remaining folks that haven't, thanks!11:08
cyeohsdague: done11:12
* afazekas searching 11:17
sdagueafazekas: it's under the [qa] tag on dev, I sent it yesterday11:18
*** rdekel has quit IRC11:20
afazekassdague: done, thx11:20
sdagueno prob11:20
bashokafazekas, hi11:24
bashokafazekas, I am reposting my question again,11:24
bashokwhile running this test  tempest.api.compute.security_groups.test_security_groups.SecurityGroupsTestJSON.test_server_security_groups[gate] on H3 code I am getting this error http://paste.openstack.org/show/46826/ , can anyone shed some light on this11:25
bashokafazekas, could you please provide some input, similarly I have other failure tests where I am seeing this "no attribute error"11:25
afazekaspsedlak, jhenner, ianw: ^^11:27
*** fandikurnia01 has quit IRC11:28
openstackgerritTal Kammer proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Initial basic setup of openstack and tempest config file  https://review.openstack.org/4292011:28
*** jhenner has quit IRC11:39
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa11:40
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-qa11:40
afazekasbashok: testtools version?, which tempest version?, how did you started tempest ?11:41
sdaguegah, mkoderer I just realized I misspelled your first name through the whole core nomination process.... sorry about that. :(11:42
mkoderersdague: I am used to that np :P11:43
bashokafazekas, http://paste.openstack.org/show/46836/ I followed the mentioned instructions11:44
bashokafazekas, having around 140+ 'error' tests as well, in total around 1000+ tests ran11:44
afazekasbashok: I will ask several guy about do they seen this issue, nowadays I am using fedora for test dev11:49
sdaguemkoderer: well welcome to core, I just added privs to you, so you have +2 and +A now11:49
sdaguegiulivo: same to you11:49
raiessdague: please check and approve https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44870/11:51
bashokafazekas, ok, I am mostly seeing "ImportError: No module named" and "no attirubute error" in the failed as well as 'error' tests. do you suggest to use any other versions of tempest?11:52
afazekasIt looks like nose or testtools version issue11:55
sdagueraies: looks fine, though I'd like jaypipes to make sure his concerns were addressed before approving11:58
raiessdague: ok12:00
bashokafazekas, nose==1.3.012:02
bashok this version is fine?12:02
* giulivo didn't deserve that so much, but enjoys being trusted at least for not messing up :)12:02
Anjumkoderer , giulivo : many many congratulations to both of you12:03
*** annegentle has quit IRC12:08
giulivoAnju, after all the time you managed to get that thing in the only week I was on pto!12:11
giulivothat was sad I wanted to +1 that12:12
Anjugiulivo:  talking about the volume tests12:13
giulivoyeah I meant the xml interface12:14
Anjuyess12:14
Anjubut now onwards u will give + 2 :)12:14
*** madan has quit IRC12:17
mkoderergiulivo: congrats :)12:18
giulivomkoderer, so we only miss to meet now12:19
openstackgerritRalf Haferkamp proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Fix LDAP support for openSUSE  https://review.openstack.org/4626512:27
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-qa12:39
*** fandikurnia01 has joined #openstack-qa12:40
*** dkorn has quit IRC12:42
*** dkorn has joined #openstack-qa12:43
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-qa12:48
*** fandikurnia01 has quit IRC12:49
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC12:49
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-qa12:57
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-qa12:58
*** yves has joined #openstack-qa12:59
yvesHi all, can someone help me with how jenkins checks python code? pep8 and flake8 succeed localy on my branch, but fail on the jenkeins server with this message : http://logs.openstack.org/54/46254/2/check/gate-horizon-pep8/acc14a5/console.html13:01
*** annegentle is now known as annegentle_away13:02
timelloyves: you should import datetime only and use: datetime.timedelta instead13:03
yvestimello: Thanks. How can I get these errors localy? what are the flake8 and pep8 settings so that I can check localy before submitting a patch?13:06
*** yassine has quit IRC13:08
timelloyves: well... I don't know the horizon tree... but for nova we use run_tests.sh -p to check pep8 errors13:08
*** yassine has joined #openstack-qa13:09
*** yfried has quit IRC13:09
yvestimello: works also for horizon, thanks :-)13:11
timellonp13:11
yvestimello: I was running "./run_tests.sh -N --pep8" but this was not reporting any error13:12
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-qa13:15
timelloyves: yeah, I think -p does some extra things13:15
yvestimello: well thanks for the help. is there a reason why we should only import full modules?13:22
*** sthaha has quit IRC13:24
timelloyves: code standards for Openstack... but I think it explicitly shows where the function come from... it's more readable IMO.13:24
*** malini_afk is now known as malini13:26
*** nosnos has quit IRC13:26
sdagueyves: -N prevents the hacking module from running13:31
yvestimello: When I have a look here : https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CodingStandards it point to http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/ which is less restrictive. Do you have any other link to the code standards for Openstack? Thanks a lot for your guidance.13:31
sdaguewhich means -N -p gives the wrong answer13:31
yvessdague: Oh, ok, Thanks, the comments inside my run_sh file say "-N, --no-virtual-env     Don't use virtualenv.  Run tests in local environment" instead...13:35
sdagueyves: correct, but hacking gets pulled because of the virtual env13:36
yvessdague: Thanks13:36
sdaguehttps://github.com/openstack-dev/hacking is the repo we are using for this, and has the master HACKING.rst doc13:37
sdagueprojects can turn off checks if they want, so there may be some local variation13:37
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-qa13:39
yvessdague: thanks a lot all my questions are answered here https://github.com/openstack-dev/hacking/blob/master/HACKING.rst :-)13:40
*** burt has joined #openstack-qa13:53
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add services tags to scenario tests  https://review.openstack.org/4578314:07
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add hacking check for service tags in scenario  https://review.openstack.org/4578414:07
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add service tag section to HACKING.rst  https://review.openstack.org/4592614:07
*** yfried has joined #openstack-qa14:10
mtreinishafazekas: ping14:11
afazekasmtreinish: pong14:12
mtreinishafazekas: hey is there a reason we need to keep bin/tempest around?14:12
mtreinishit's just an out of date duplicate of run_tests14:12
afazekasmtreinish: it is out of sync, you can remove it14:13
afazekasThis script supposed to be used in released tempest version as an installed starter script,14:13
mtreinishafazekas: ok that's what I thought. I just wanted to make sure there weren't any setup.py implications14:13
afazekasnow even the setup.cfg does not have it14:14
afazekasit hes14:14
afazekasit is referenced by the setup.cfg14:14
mtreinishafazekas: yeah I'll pull that out when I remove it14:15
afazekasCan we add the run_tests.sh with an another name ?14:15
mtreinishafazekas: add it to setup.cfg?14:17
afazekasyes, but the run_tests.sh seams too generic name14:17
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/45783/4 IMHO all test which boots a VM utilizes the image service14:18
afazekasmtreinish: can you review it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35165/14:20
* afazekas I will be back14:24
*** annegentle_away is now known as annegentle14:24
*** adalbas has quit IRC14:28
*** afazekas has quit IRC14:30
openstackgerritSahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Adds tests covering Swift's container quotas middleware  https://review.openstack.org/4623214:40
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC14:42
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-qa14:44
*** prekarat has quit IRC14:51
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-qa14:51
*** yassine has quit IRC14:58
*** yassine has joined #openstack-qa14:58
*** mkollaro has quit IRC15:03
*** dkorn has quit IRC15:07
*** yves has quit IRC15:15
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-qa15:21
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa15:21
*** yves has joined #openstack-qa15:28
*** raies_ has joined #openstack-qa15:32
raies_afazekas: please check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/45372/15:34
*** bashok has quit IRC15:36
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Remove bin/tempest script  https://review.openstack.org/4630515:40
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Remove Whitebox tests  https://review.openstack.org/4611615:40
*** marun has joined #openstack-qa16:02
*** yassine has quit IRC16:04
mtreinishafazekas: about the image service tag, thats not a guarantee. It'll only pull the image from glance if there isn't a local copy in the cache. So I don't think we should tag that.16:09
mtreinishalso if it was the case that it made the glance call every time then we wouldn't tag it anyway because the tag wouldn't mean anything then. (We'd have to tag every test that did a server create)16:10
openstackgerritSean McCully proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Changes Test, port is not gauranteed unused  https://review.openstack.org/4545916:10
afazekasDo you need a glance for the first cached version ?16:10
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away16:11
afazekasEven is the image cached is nova ask for the additional metadata when booting a new vm ?16:12
mtreinishafazekas: I'm not sure on the details I haven't looked at the nova code on it in detail. But, either way read the description for tags I put in the hacking file.16:14
mtreinishwe only tag the test with a service if it makes a direct api call to the service. (or through an extension like nova images or volumes)16:14
mtreinishI'll be back for the meeting time to eat16:14
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo16:24
*** yves has quit IRC16:26
*** DennyZhang has joined #openstack-qa16:26
DennyZhangI've filed my first bug for tempest project early yesterday. (https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1224155) . But I got no response since then. Do you guys have any suggestions for how to make it keep going? Thanks.16:27
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away16:36
mkodererMeeting......16:59
mkoderer:)17:00
dkranzsdague: You running the meeting?17:01
sdagueyes, sorry just got back from lunch17:02
*** DennyZhang has quit IRC17:02
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-qa17:09
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Add services tags to scenario tests  https://review.openstack.org/4578317:15
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-qa17:21
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Enable tenant isolation to tempest for neutron  https://review.openstack.org/4631417:33
mtreinishmlavalle: ^^^ just fyi17:33
*** HenryG_ has joined #openstack-qa17:33
mlavallemtreinish: cool!17:34
openstackgerritDennyZhang proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add missing import of 'subunit' in requirements.txt  https://review.openstack.org/4631517:35
*** HenryG has quit IRC17:36
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC17:42
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-qa17:44
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-qa17:51
openstackgerritDennyZhang proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add missing import of 'subunit' in requirements.txt  https://review.openstack.org/4631517:52
openstackgerritDennyZhang proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add missing import of 'subunit' in requirements.txt  https://review.openstack.org/4632417:58
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/42920/18:01
mkoderersdague: you mention a "meetup" in the meeting18:02
mkoderersdague: what's your plan?18:02
*** rockyg has quit IRC18:03
*** tkammer has quit IRC18:11
openstackgerritMatthew Treinish proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Do not merge test of neutron tenant isolation.  https://review.openstack.org/4633018:13
*** DennyZhang has joined #openstack-qa18:14
afazekassdague, mtreinish: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35165/18:21
*** afazekas is now known as afazekas_zz18:23
*** raies_ has quit IRC18:29
mtreinishmlavalle: it doesn't seem like it will pass the neutron gate job: http://logs.openstack.org/30/46330/1/check/gate-tempest-devstack-vm-neutron/87ca515/18:31
*** mlavalle has quit IRC18:34
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-qa18:38
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-qa18:40
dkranzmkoderer: I think Sean was talking about a possible gathering between summits. I doubt he has a concrete plan at this point.18:41
atiwarianyone, please tell me how to fix the tempest issue occurring in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46123/ due to my fix?18:41
atiwariit seems circular dependency me18:42
atiwarihttps://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/master/tempest/api/identity/admin/v3/test_tokens.py test need some modification18:42
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Remove bin/tempest script  https://review.openstack.org/4630518:44
openstackgerritJoe Gordon proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: WIP: Disable ceilometer.compute.nova_notifier driver  https://review.openstack.org/4633618:44
dkranzatiwari: Just a minute...18:51
atiwarithanks18:51
*** mkollaro has quit IRC18:53
dkranzatiwari: So is the issue that you are changing a failure code?18:53
dkranzatiwari: In some keystone api?18:53
atiwariactually as part of my fix, I changed KEystone API which used to return 401 and now it is 40418:54
dkranzatiwari: Was this api part of grizzly?18:54
atiwariI think so18:55
dkranzatiwari: In any event, you will need to change the tempest test to accept either the old or new failure code.18:55
atiwaribut if I make change in tempest all the existing commit will fail18:56
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC18:56
atiwariwhich still have the old API18:56
dkranzatiwari: I'm not sure it is a good idea to change this in the v2 api.18:57
atiwariit is v318:57
atiwaritempest/api/identity/admin/v3/test_tokens.py18:57
dkranzatiwari: was that part of grizzly?18:58
dkranzatiwari: Perhaps I was wrong.18:58
dkranzatiwari: One of the points of tempest is to block api changes by default.18:58
dkranzatiwari: If you want to do this you have to temporarily change tempest so that it will pass with either the old or new version18:59
dkranzatiwari: This has been called the tempest-two-step18:59
atiwariis there and guide line ?19:00
dkranzatiwari: I have to go now. I'm not sure.19:00
dkranzatiwari: Perhaps sdague or mtreinish can answer that.19:01
atiwariok, thanks19:01
dkranzatiwari: I'll be back in a bit.19:01
openstackgerritDennyZhang proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add missing import of 'subunit' in test-requirements.txt  https://review.openstack.org/4632419:04
atiwarisdague or mtreinish , can you guys please help me?19:05
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-qa19:05
mlavallemtreinish: I have a couple of meetings this afternoon. But I'll take a look later today and get back to you. ok?19:08
openstackgerritEdward Hope-Morley proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Add cinder-backup functional tests  https://review.openstack.org/4546519:11
mlavallemtreinish: after a quick look on the logs, though, it seems we are exhausting the ip addresses available in the public network19:12
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo19:12
mlavallemtreinish: how many parallel tests are you running in this vm?19:13
mlavallemtreinish: this is the command in the log that creates the public net we are attaching to:19:27
mlavalleneutron subnet-create --ip_version 4 --gateway 172.24.4.225 --name public-subnet 1f400dd4-820d-480f-9789-3a6de905d477 172.24.4.224/28 -- --enable_dhcp=False19:27
mlavallemtreinish: as you can see, we are using a CIDR /28. I think we have too few public addresses.19:29
openstackgerritArvind Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Disabling a test so that change 46123 can be reviewed  https://review.openstack.org/4634119:34
openstackgerritArvind Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Disabling a test so that change 46123 can be reviewed  https://review.openstack.org/4634119:35
atiwarican someone please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46341?19:36
*** malini is now known as malini_afk19:40
*** adalbas has quit IRC19:44
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-qa19:46
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC19:54
*** DennyZhang has quit IRC19:55
mtreinishmlavalle: sorry I was in a meeting19:57
mtreinishmlavalle: it was running serially19:57
mlavallemtreinish: in that case, i'll run some of those tests that failed tonight in my devstack instance and see what's the deal. I'll ping you tomorrow morning19:58
*** mriedem has quit IRC19:59
*** mriedem1 has joined #openstack-qa20:00
*** mriedem1 has quit IRC20:01
afazekas_zzmtreinish, sdague: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36627/20:02
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-qa20:03
*** HenryG_ has quit IRC20:03
afazekas_zzDoes it need to be  a gate config, or can it be devstack default ?20:03
yfriedhas anyone ever tried running nose with --pdb flag?20:05
* afazekas_zz not20:07
*** afazekas_zz has quit IRC20:07
*** weshay has quit IRC20:12
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away20:16
*** weshay has joined #openstack-qa20:21
openstackgerritArvind Tiwari proposed a change to openstack/tempest: Disabling a test so that change 46123 can be reviewed  https://review.openstack.org/4634120:32
atiwarimtreinish, waiting for review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46341, it is holding one of my Keystone fix20:36
*** mlavalle_ has joined #openstack-qa20:55
sdaguemtreinish: so the thing that the nova team does on do not merge changes is to -2 their own patch20:55
sdaguethen you can control the hold, even in pushing new versions20:56
openstackgerritYair Fried proposed a change to openstack/tempest: change security-groups to neutron in scenario  https://review.openstack.org/4635320:56
mtreinishsdague: ok I'll do that20:56
*** mlavalle has quit IRC20:56
*** mlavalle_ is now known as mlavalle20:56
mtreinishalthough I don't think that there will ever need to a be new version for it20:57
sdaguemtreinish: sure, then you can just WIP it20:57
*** mriedem1 has joined #openstack-qa21:00
*** bashok has joined #openstack-qa21:01
openstackgerritYair Fried proposed a change to openstack/tempest: change security-groups to neutron in scenario  https://review.openstack.org/4635321:01
*** mriedem has quit IRC21:02
openstackgerritYair Fried proposed a change to openstack/tempest: change security-groups to neutron in scenario  https://review.openstack.org/4635321:05
*** bashok has quit IRC21:05
adalbasmtreinish, about the whitebox tests, they really use the sqlachemy schemas and changed the status in the database21:09
adalbasmtreinish, however, nova unit tests stubs all that on fakes.21:09
adalbasso, we dont really care about getting the status in the db once we remove the whitebox tests. Are my assumptions right?21:11
mtreinishadalbas: that's not entirely true. There are a set of nova unit tests that test migrations against a real db.21:14
mtreinishyou would have to use an interface similar to that21:15
adalbasmtreinish, can you point where those nova tests are?21:15
mtreinishadalbas: sure one sec I'll dig them up21:16
adalbasmtreinish, i found nova/tests/db21:17
adalbasit seems to be those21:17
mtreinishadalbas: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/db/test_migrations.py21:18
adalbasmtreinish, right! tks, this one seems to have many of the tests too: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/db/test_db_api.py21:19
*** dkranz has quit IRC21:21
*** weshay has quit IRC21:24
*** mriedem1 has quit IRC21:36
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Add hacking check for service tags in scenario  https://review.openstack.org/4578421:52
jog0sdague: ping21:52
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Add service tag section to HACKING.rst  https://review.openstack.org/4592621:58
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack/tempest: Remove Whitebox tests  https://review.openstack.org/4611621:59
giulivomtreinish, maybe it's time for me to finally22:04
giulivoput in place into the checks thing somehing which would check properly for those skip messages?22:04
giulivowho such a bad working22:09
giulivoI meant the checks for the skip messages22:09
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-qa22:12
*** lifeless_ has joined #openstack-qa22:13
*** lifeless has quit IRC22:15
sdaguejog0: what's up?22:15
*** lifeless_ is now known as lifeless22:18
jog0so I was thinking how to address the issue of people running recheck no bug when they shouldn't be22:18
jog0and part of the issue is its sometimes hard to figure out what bug to mark22:18
jog0sdague: so what about telling people to ask this room for help instead of running recheck no bug22:18
jog0that will help us get better recheck numbers22:18
sdaguejog0: we could, but the reality is the people that are consciencious already ask22:25
sdagueand I don't think telling people to ask will help22:25
sdaguein reality I think the current recheck system isn't fixable per say, we need something more robust that does pattern matching or provides user editting of the content later22:26
jog0sdague: I am not sure if many people know about this room even22:26
sdaguebut it's better than nothing22:26
jog0sdague: yeah logstash queries will be very useful22:27
sdagueso the people that most abuse recheck no bug are developers that are pretty disconnected22:27
sdagueI ran stats at some ptoin22:27
sdaguepoint22:27
jog0 Ifind even russellb and others do recheck no  bug22:27
sdagueso I'd rather solve this in code22:27
jog0maybe not often but sometimes22:27
sdaguepretty infrequently22:27
sdaguemost of the time russellb will ask around for the right bug or dig it up, as will all the responsible devs. The reality is the manual process is pretty hard at this point22:28
sdagueand I think we can tool it to be better22:28
jog0sdague: ture22:29
sdagueso I'd rather just live with what we have, and work towards full replacement tooling that groks the logs more22:29
jog0true, I have been able to find some good logstash queries  so far22:29
*** atiwari has quit IRC22:29
sdagueyeh, once I finally stop traveling (man I know what mordred must feel like) my first goal is the stack trace checker in success runs22:30
sdaguethen this comes next22:30
jog0sdague: hmm this may be easier then we think ...22:31
jog0on a job fail search logstash for a set of queries22:31
jog0and see if any pop up22:31
sdaguesure, it should go through the es api though, so we can do it programatically22:32
sdaguehonestly, I started down that path, and then global requirements ate all my time :)22:32
jog0yeah do you mind if I take a whack at it today22:32
jog0sdague: heh22:32
jog0have any working code on it?22:32
sdagueI had some test connect code22:33
sdagueit took me a bit to find the right search lib22:33
sdaguebut dinner is coming off right now, so I need to run to it. I can get it out to you in the morning (or maybe later tonight)22:34
sdaguehonestly have to find that git tree22:34
jog0that would be great thanks22:34
sdagueactually, this might be the test code I had - https://github.com/sdague/gatemine22:35
clarkbjog0: there is also a logstash/elasticsearch command line client written in ruby22:36
clarkbjog0: which may be helful for mocking something up22:36
clarkb(doing raw es in python is probably better for the actual thing)22:36
jog0clarkb: thanks22:36
openstackgerritA change was merged to openstack-dev/devstack: Added Trove (Database as a Service).  https://review.openstack.org/3816922:42
*** jhenner has quit IRC22:56
*** adalbas has quit IRC23:11
jog0clarkb sdague: thanks for the help got the basics working, can filter a search to last 10 hits23:14
*** mlavalle has quit IRC23:19
clarkbcool. I would be interested in seeing what you have when you are ready to share23:23
clarkbjog0 ^23:23
openstackgerritNachi Ueno proposed a change to openstack-dev/devstack: Add Elastic Search backend for ceilometer  https://review.openstack.org/4638423:29
jog0clarkb: yeah http://paste.openstack.org/show/4694123:29
jog0first draft23:29
jog0just lists 10 most recent of that23:30
jog0next step is: When a tempest job failure is detected, by monitoring gerrit (using gerritlib), a collection of logstash queries will be run on the failed job to detect what the bug was.23:30
clarkbI like it23:31
clarkbI have been thinking that tracking the query string in the bugs may help too23:32
clarkbjog0 also not that when you get that event is the same time logstash gets it. and processing isnt immediate and may backlog23:33
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-qa23:39
giulivoping dosaboy23:42
*** jhenner has quit IRC23:44
giulivodosaboy for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/45465 I think you'll have to init the backupclient with the admin credentials23:44
jog0clarkb: I was afraid that processing would be a bit later23:46
jog0clarkb: yeah I want to hook into lauchpadlib too23:46
clarkbjog0: we can emit events/gearman jobs/somethign from the log processors if that helps23:47
clarkbthey don't do that today though23:47
jog0clarkb: so they would report when they are ready?23:48
jog0I was wondering if there are any stream processing tools for elasticsearch23:48
clarkbes can do reverse queries, but logstash doesn't support them directly so they end up not being super useful and yes I believe you can stream23:49
clarkbwe can also stream out of the logstash workers to other endpoints if that helps23:49
jog0all I want to do is run a query on all incoming data23:49
clarkbjog0: reverse queries are the preferred solution I think23:50
clarkbbut we would need to add support for them into the thing doing log processing23:50
clarkbwhich is logstash today23:50
jog0for now I will just do the ugly solution, poll logtash until the results I want are in23:52
clarkbI think it is a good place to start23:53
clarkbjog0: if you delay ~60 seconds before the first query I expect most of your queries will hit what they need the first time around23:53
clarkbjog0: you can see what the delay is like by comparing the received_at field to the timestamp field for the last log entry of files23:54
jog0oh good idea23:55
clarkbjog0: http://www.elasticsearch.org/guide/reference/api/percolate/ for the reverse queries (again not terribly useful now, but potentially useful if we make logstash understand them)23:57
jog0clarkb: timestamp and recieved are pretty close23:58
*** mkollaro has quit IRC23:58
jog0clarkb: yeah I saw that23:58
jog0going to focus on the quick and dirty for now23:58
clarkbjog0: timestamps will be close when the system isn't under load23:58
clarkbif things go south we can fall behind (but typically catch up again in lulls)23:58
jog0https://github.com/jogo/elasticRecheck23:59
clarkbawesome, I have watched that repo23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!