Tuesday, 2022-03-15

*** pojadhav|afk is now known as pojadhav04:45
opendevreviewFrancesco Pantano proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Deploy with cephadm  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/82648407:08
*** arxcruz|off is now known as arxcruz07:47
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:38
opendevreviewBenny Kopilov proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix test_basic_metadata_definition_namespaces  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83375008:38
opendevreviewBenny Kopilov proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix test_basic_metadata_definition_namespaces  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83375008:41
*** arxcruz is now known as arxcruz|brb09:20
opendevreviewmitya-eremeev-2 proposed openstack/tempest master: Tempest tests are aware of networks  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83178409:38
opendevreviewSoniya Murlidhar Vyas proposed openstack/tempest master: Add compute_security_client and compute_security_ group_rules_client  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83375810:05
*** pojadhav- is now known as pojadhav11:05
opendevreviewFrancesco Pantano proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Deploy with cephadm  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/82648411:20
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|break11:35
*** arxcruz|brb is now known as arxcruz11:42
*** pojadhav|break is now known as pojadhav12:08
opendevreviewBenny Kopilov proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix test_basic_metadata_definition_namespaces  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83375012:54
opendevreviewDouglas Viroel proposed openstack/tempest master: DNM - Testing CI  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83377812:58
opendevreviewSoniya Murlidhar Vyas proposed openstack/tempest master: Add compute_floating_ips_client  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83378813:30
opendevreviewFrancesco Pantano proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Deploy with cephadm  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/82648413:51
dansmithclarkb: frickler: did you see my comment here? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/83124514:12
fricklerdansmith: yes, but wanted to discuss at the upcoming meeting14:15
dansmithfrickler: cool14:18
kopecmartin#startmeeting qa15:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Mar 15 15:00:13 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'15:00
kopecmartin#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting15:00
soniya29kopecmartin, hello15:00
kopecmartinagenda ^^15:00
kopecmartinsoniya29: hi15:00
gmanno/15:01
kopecmartino/15:01
kopecmartinlet's start15:01
kopecmartin#topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)15:01
kopecmartinwe have release a new version / tag of tempest15:01
kopecmartin30.0.015:01
kopecmartingmann: anything else we need to do? i'm checking the qa's release wiki page15:02
kopecmartin#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/QA/releases15:02
kopecmartinw.r.t. devstack and grenade we're waiting for a stable branch i guess15:03
gmannI think yes, for tempest all good. and next is to wait for signal from release team once we need to start the devstack and grenade things15:04
gmannelodilles: ^^15:04
kopecmartingood15:04
kopecmartin#topic Yoga Priority Items progress15:05
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-yoga-priority15:05
kopecmartinany updates?15:05
soniya29yes15:05
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/hacking master: Update CI to use unversioned jobs template  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/hacking/+/83381115:06
soniya29https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:tempest-scenario-manager-cleanup+project:+openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin+owner:+self15:06
gmannsoniya29: you are including self in query. you mean this series right? #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:tempest-scenario-manager-cleanup+project:+openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin15:07
soniya29gmann, yeah15:07
kopecmartinnice, there are many patches incomming related to the cleanup15:08
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:tempest-scenario-manager-cleanup15:08
kopecmartinthank you soniya29 and rpopelka15:08
soniya29apart from this15:08
kopecmartini'm gonna review (at least some) right after this meeting15:08
gmannsoniya29: why we are replacing the methods one by one instead of replacing whole scenario manager?15:08
gmannat least for all methods we have in tempest.scenario manager as stable15:08
kopecmartingmann: plugins may have their own custom methods in there15:09
kopecmartinplus it's easier to have smaller reviews15:09
soniya29gmann, we have some customization in the plugin methods15:09
soniya29gmann, so need to review the method implementation first and the remove them15:09
gmannkopecmartin: yeah, I mean just leave those and replace everything in one shot ? there are less plugins having their custom method15:09
gmannsoniya29: I doubt, bcz  I copied them as it is from what tempest has15:10
soniya29in next meeting, i will make a list of those custom methods, so that we can discuss about them15:10
soniya29but yes there are such methods whose implementation varies from tempest scenario manager15:11
gmannfor example, barbican case what is the last patch? is this? #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin/+/83380115:11
soniya29gmann, kopecmartin, also i found that in some methods we are missing on some clients in tempest15:12
kopecmartingmann: well, sure, if there is a plugin, which doesn't have anything custom in their manager, we can do that in one shot, but there might be even a small customization, like port name, let's take blazar as an example - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/blazar-tempest-plugin/+/830595/5/blazar_tempest_plugin/tests/scenario/manager_freeze.py15:12
soniya29gmann, yes, that's the last one i posted15:12
gmannsoniya29: it is hard to see the series, is it new gerrit UI or just me not able to see the dependencies? you did it with dependencies right? not all patch as separate in barbican tempest plugin?15:13
kopecmartingmann: i don't think they are dependent 15:14
gmannkopecmartin: yeah for such plugins we can do in multiple steps. 15:14
kopecmartindo they need to be?15:14
soniya29gmann, i have dependencies on tempest15:14
soniya29s/have/have added15:14
soniya29because we are missing some clients in tempest which are available in plugin15:14
soniya29here barbican-tempest-plugin15:14
gmannkopecmartin: soniya29 ok then you will have merge conflict if single plugins changes are not dependent 15:14
kopecmartinoh, yeah , that's true15:15
kopecmartinbut first someone from the plugin needs to review15:15
gmannthat is why i was confused on how to review it and see what is end pic of scenario manager15:15
gmannanyways I will review them and put comment there15:16
soniya29gmann, kopecmartin, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83378815:16
soniya29https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83375815:16
gmannkopecmartin: I think we can also verify it with what implementation we have or via git history is easy. 15:16
gmannsoniya29: ok so those are conflict and plugins cannot use it from master15:17
gmannor everything is from master now?15:18
kopecmartinsoniya29: please rebase those 2 patches in tempest, put one of them on top of the other .. we can merge them , however, plugins will be able to use them in a few cycles, not right now15:19
kopecmartinotherwise we would break the plugins compatibility with the older tempest 15:19
soniya29gmann, i am not sure :)15:19
gmannkopecmartin: I am trying to recall on that why we waited for replacement until train use old tempest?15:19
gmannohk15:20
soniya29kopecmartin, okay15:20
gmannso if plugin master is using the old tempest and these new things can break them15:20
kopecmartingmann: i think we waited a few cycles only because we didn't want to make the plugins incompatible with one release older tempest15:20
gmannyeah15:20
kopecmartinand we kinda agreed that a few cycle difference = a few releases of tempest (3?) are enough15:21
soniya29kopecmartin, gmann, and we wait more now then we will have more divergence i guess :)15:21
soniya29s/and/and if15:21
soniya29kopecmartin, yupp15:21
gmannsoniya29: we can do place the things what present in tempest 27.0.0 not what we moved/added after that15:21
gmannI will review those patches and add detail comment. 15:22
soniya29gmann, sure15:22
kopecmartini'll review too15:22
kopecmartingood15:22
kopecmartinany other updates regarding the priority items?15:23
soniya29nope15:24
gmannyeah, let's review and decide the direction before we have lot more patches15:24
gmannnothing else from me15:24
kopecmartingmann: you mean right now?15:24
gmannkopecmartin: i mean in review15:25
kopecmartinoh, yeah, we can do that , sure :) 15:25
kopecmartinmoving on then15:25
kopecmartin#topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning15:25
gmannor we can discuss in PTG 15:25
kopecmartinwe have etherpad for the topics to discuss during PTG sessions15:25
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-ptg15:25
gmannif review comments are not understandable or easy to understand. 15:25
kopecmartinanyone, please add there any topic you want to discuss15:25
kopecmartingmann: i agree15:26
soniya29gmann, sure15:26
kopecmartinin the ptg etherpad time slots we booked for QA can be found as well15:26
gmannkopecmartin: soniya29 added it in etherpad, I will add detail/overview later15:26
kopecmartingmann: perfect15:27
gmannso we can reivew add our thoughts and then discuss and finalize the direction in PTG15:27
kopecmartini have to add a few topics too, can't force myself to write it up 15:27
kopecmartingmann:  +115:27
soniya29gmann, till then, should we slow down/stop the patches?15:27
kopecmartinsoniya29: let's see based on the number of comments and things raised in them 15:28
soniya29kopecmartin, sounds good :)15:28
gmannyeah15:29
kopecmartin#topic Gate Status Checks15:29
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)15:29
kopecmartinone review there15:30
kopecmartini workflowed that tls-proxy patch15:30
kopecmartinfrickler: dansmith ^^15:30
dansmiththanks15:30
kopecmartindansmith: thank you for chasing the errors15:31
kopecmartinnow let's see what will get broken :D 15:31
dansmithyep :)15:31
kopecmartin.. i think it will be fine, either way we would need to address that , sooner or later15:31
kopecmartin#topic Periodic jobs Status Checks15:32
kopecmartin#link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-xena-py3&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-train-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable15:32
kopecmartin#link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic15:32
kopecmartinseems all good there 15:32
kopecmartin#topic Sub Teams highlights15:32
kopecmartinChanges with Review-Priority == +115:32
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade+OR+project:openstack/hacking)15:32
kopecmartinno changes 15:33
kopecmartin#topic Open Discussion15:33
kopecmartinanything for the open discussion?15:33
gmannnothing else from me. I need to find time to check the SSH-able failure on rescue tests. I will try today or tomorrow15:34
kopecmartinok, thanks gmann15:34
kopecmartin#topic Bug Triage15:35
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-bug-triage-yoga15:35
kopecmartini see a decrease in open/new bugs for tempest and devstack projects, thank you for triaging15:35
kopecmartinthat's all from my side15:36
kopecmartinthank you everyone15:36
kopecmartinsee you around15:36
soniya29kopecmartin, thanks :)15:36
kopecmartin#endmeeting15:36
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Mar 15 15:36:36 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:36
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-03-15-15.00.html15:36
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-03-15-15.00.txt15:36
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-03-15-15.00.log.html15:36
opendevreviewArtom Lifshitz proposed openstack/tempest master: DNM: Try integration tests with Python 3.9 on Focal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83384415:36
gmannkopecmartin: thanks 15:36
opendevreviewSoniya Murlidhar Vyas proposed openstack/tempest master: Add compute_security_client and compute_security_ group_rules_client  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/83375815:40
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack master: Fix tls-proxy on newer versions of openssl  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/83124516:11
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off17:14
*** arxcruz is now known as arxcruz|off17:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!