| opendevreview | yatin proposed openstack/grenade master: Start ovn services if enabled https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/839407 | 05:25 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | yatin proposed openstack/grenade master: Start ovn services if enabled https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/839407 | 06:13 |
| opendevreview | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/devstack stable/victoria: [OVN] Use OVN from packages https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/770077 | 07:12 |
| *** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 07:27 | |
| fmount | sean-k-mooney: tosky gouthamr vkmc o/ very late here but I don't see any technical problem on testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/826484 on cs9 | 07:33 |
| fmount | Ceph is containers only w/ cephadm, and since in that code we get the latest pacific rpm, you don't need any additional repo | 07:34 |
| fmount | sorry not the rpm, we get the python from github ^ | 07:35 |
| fmount | sean-k-mooney: also in tripleo we already run the same pacific containers in cs9 hosts, so I'm not expecting big issues here (related to ceph of course) | 07:36 |
| fmount | sean-k-mooney: if you look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/834223/9/.zuul.yaml you can see the options you need in your local to run devstack-plugin-ceph w/ cephadm | 07:37 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: Add Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (jammy) platform job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839359 | 09:37 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM: Testing only jammy job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839389 | 09:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | fmount: thanks ill pass that on and see if i can test it myself | 09:42 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack master: Set public bridge up for v6 only configurations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839230 | 10:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack stable/train: Make neutron-grenade non-voting on stable/train https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/838722 | 10:28 |
| opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/tempest master: Introduce @serial test execution decorator https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/821732 | 11:33 |
| *** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk | 11:48 | |
| *** pojadhav|afk is now known as pojadhav | 12:26 | |
| kopecmartin | gmann: test removal process needs to be updated for sure, as you pointed out yesterday, although I don't know what we will replace some of the steps with :/ | 12:38 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM: Testing only jammy job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839389 | 13:31 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: yeah, let me propose something by this or early next week and there we can discuss what best we can do with available toolings. | 14:00 |
| kopecmartin | gmann: ack | 14:06 |
| dansmith | I'm seeing this while trying to devstack locally this morning: | 14:31 |
| dansmith | pkg_resources.ContextualVersionConflict: (ovsdbapp 1.15.1 (/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages), Requirement.parse('ovsdbapp>=1.16.0'), {'neutron'}) | 14:31 |
| dansmith | slaweq: any ideas? | 14:31 |
| opendevreview | James Parker proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Handle libvirt modular daemon container names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/839561 | 14:47 |
| jamesbenson | I have a teardown bug/failure that always happens on this one test. Can anyone take a look at it? | 14:51 |
| jamesbenson | tearDownClass (tempest.api.compute.servers.test_multiple_create.MultipleCreateTestJSON) fails with: Details: {'type': 'SubnetInUse', 'message': 'Unable to complete operation on subnet 26b4c09f-4b2d-4634-a8b1-79db7a9b58ab: One or more ports have an IP allocation from this subnet.', 'detail': ''} | 14:52 |
| opendevreview | James Parker proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Handle libvirt modular daemon container names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/839561 | 15:12 |
| opendevreview | James Parker proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Handle libvirt modular daemon container names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/839561 | 15:42 |
| opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/devstack master: Performance monitor counting improvements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839067 | 15:44 |
| opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/devstack master: WIP: Test static perfdata comparisons https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/838947 | 15:44 |
| opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: WIP Let's try a TripleO multinode jobs again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/839584 | 15:47 |
| frickler | dansmith: is this for master? are you redeploying devstack on an older installation? make sure to update your requirements repo | 15:50 |
| dansmith | frickler: you'll love this, but on a clean vm it ran okay.. fully cleaned, blew away /opt and uninstalled some old deps like openvswitch* and ovn*, but it persisted | 15:50 |
| dansmith | so something was still stuck there, but I wasn't sure what it was | 15:51 |
| dansmith | and yes, master | 15:51 |
| dansmith | by "fully cleaned" I meant "I tried fully cleaning my existing vm to resolve, and that didn't help | 15:52 |
| frickler | one more data point in favor of my "user fresh VMs" mantra I guess ;) | 16:00 |
| dansmith | hence "you'll love this" :) | 16:03 |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 17:01 | |
| opendevreview | Eduardo Olivares proposed openstack/tempest master: Validate network downtime during live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/828686 | 17:29 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM: Testing only jammy job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839389 | 17:42 |
| opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/devstack master: Performance monitor counting improvements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839067 | 17:44 |
| opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/devstack master: WIP: Test static perfdata comparisons https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/838947 | 17:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Handle libvirt modular daemon container names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/839561 | 18:25 |
| *** artom__ is now known as artom | 18:53 | |
| opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/devstack master: Performance monitor counting improvements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839067 | 19:11 |
| opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/devstack master: WIP: Test static perfdata comparisons https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/838947 | 19:11 |
| melwitt | is this a known issue tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream failing on stable/xena for "/opt/stack/devstack/functions-common: line 354: lsb_release: command not found"? | 19:52 |
| melwitt | [ERROR] /opt/stack/devstack/functions-common:420 Unable to determine DISTRO, can not continue. https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7d8258f5c7e1474f8b1a4a138acc1aca/log/job-output.txt#1177 | 19:53 |
| clarkb | melwitt: I'm surprised that xena runs centos-9 jobs as centos-9-stream became a thing during yoga iirc | 19:55 |
| clarkb | is it possible the job just shouldn't run there? | 19:55 |
| clarkb | also possible I'ev got my timelines mixed up and this is a real bug | 19:55 |
| melwitt | oh hm, good point | 19:56 |
| melwitt | there was a centos 8 stream testing dropped recently in general.. hm | 19:58 |
| clarkb | but only on master I think | 19:58 |
| clarkb | but ya maybe something in that process mixed up jobs? | 19:58 |
| melwitt | yeah that's what I was thinking too.. | 19:59 |
| melwitt | I'll look around and see if I can find anything related | 19:59 |
| melwitt | looks like stable/xena is intentionally included https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/zuul.d/integrated-gate.yaml#L146 | 20:11 |
| clarkb | huh | 20:13 |
| clarkb | melwitt: one sec I found some relevant code in devsatck | 20:14 |
| clarkb | melwitt: https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack/src/branch/master/functions-common#L414-L421 that is what master does. The xena branch does not do this https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack/src/branch/stable/xena/functions-common#L348-L354 | 20:15 |
| clarkb | I would say that devstack on xena doesn't support centos 9 stream. Either that fix needs to be backported or we should stop running xena on centos 9 | 20:15 |
| melwitt | ahh | 20:15 |
| melwitt | yeah I see | 20:15 |
| melwitt | gmann: thoughts? ^ | 20:16 |
| gmann | melwitt: checking | 22:25 |
| gmann | melwitt: got the issue, it is due to my recent commit on dropping centos-8-stream - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/839274/1/zuul.d/integrated-gate.yaml#369 | 22:28 |
| gmann | melwitt: I did not realize it is in integrated template. fixing it | 22:28 |
| melwitt | gmann: ok cool, was about to ask you what you think is the best fix :) thank you | 22:28 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack master: Tolerate missing deps in get-stats.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/839217 | 22:49 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix the integrated-gate-compute job template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/839647 | 22:50 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix the integrated-gate-compute job template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/839647 | 22:53 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix the integrated-gate-compute job template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/839647 | 22:55 |
| melwitt | cc elodilles ^ | 22:56 |
| gmann | melwitt: also testing it on nova gate, hope all branch variant works fine https://review.opendev.org/q/I801efdc7d5cb05f8584bbaaeecb9b053b33a6099 | 22:57 |
| melwitt | ++ | 22:57 |
| gmann | sorry for trouble. I added note there just in case we do not miss stable branches next time we change it | 22:58 |
| melwitt | no worries | 22:58 |
| clarkb | gmann: melwitt: so I think that isn't the fix you want. The fix I would do is to delete the branches: parameter entirely and then manage the jobs in each stable branch | 22:58 |
| clarkb | oh wait tempest isn't branched? | 22:59 |
| gmann | yes it is tempest | 22:59 |
| clarkb | I guess this is a downside to not branching tempest | 22:59 |
| gmann | well we can maintain it with branch variant so not big deal. we just missed it. same we have integrated-gate template in openstack-zuul-job | 23:00 |
| clarkb | ya I just generally try to steer people away from the branches: directive beacuse it creates confusion when branching. But tempest doesn't do that so just need to ensure the values are correct instead | 23:00 |
| gmann | melwitt: it seems working fine I removed my -W | 23:13 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: if you are around or in your morning, this is unblocking nova stable branch gate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/839647 | 23:14 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!