| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Use yoga stable constraint in tox to release 31.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/837777 | 00:14 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Switch back the tox constraint to master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/837779 | 00:22 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Unblock gate to temporary remove the py3.6|7 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/842821 | 01:22 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: ^^ tempest plugin sanity job also got broken before py36|7 things merged. I need to make it non-voting to merge py36|7 patch. | 01:24 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Make tempest plugin sanity job voting again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843041 | 01:26 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: ^^ making it voting with depends-on murano tempest plugin fix | 01:26 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: DNM: tetsing tempest master with stable/ussuri constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843044 | 01:39 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Use UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/ussuri testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843045 | 01:47 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack master: Drop openEuler support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/842534 | 11:34 |
| gryf | hello, quick question, what version of ubuntu should be used for gate jobs to avoid some weird issues? | 13:04 |
| frickler | gryf: there are always weird issues. currently Ubuntu 20.04 is still the most tested version, we are working on 22.04 but not 100% there yet | 13:07 |
| gryf | frickler, got it, thanks! | 13:08 |
| dansmith | johnsom: "luckily" my patch hit the same brick package issue and did the right thing: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/f8f92563509c4245887b9f1ebe53778f/log/job-output.txt#8911 | 13:30 |
| johnsom | Nice | 14:02 |
| opendevreview | yatin proposed openstack/devstack-gate master: Use stable constraints for Tempest venv for stable/train testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-gate/+/843148 | 14:12 |
| opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/tempest master: Make test_server_actions.resource_setup() wait for SSHABLE https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843155 | 14:50 |
| dansmith | clarkb: weirdly, I'm seeing "unable to load plugin dbcounter" locally, | 14:54 |
| dansmith | on jammy, even though it works in the job | 14:54 |
| dansmith | I can import it in the python shell, but the entry point seems to be missing or something | 14:54 |
| clarkb | dansmith: with my py_modules changes? | 14:56 |
| clarkb | that was exactly what I saw without the py_modules update fwiw | 14:56 |
| dansmith | yeah | 14:56 |
| clarkb | if you look in the python package install area you probably have a dbcounter-stuff.egg-info or whatever the dir is but no dbcounter.py there. There should be a dbcounter.py at the same dir level as the egg info | 14:57 |
| dansmith | yep and it's there | 14:57 |
| clarkb | without py_modules dbcounter.py was not installed. With it it was | 14:57 |
| dansmith | and I can import it, | 14:57 |
| clarkb | oh so this is a separate issue | 14:57 |
| dansmith | and entry_points.txt is correct, | 14:58 |
| dansmith | but sqla fails to find it | 14:58 |
| dansmith | 2022-05-24 14:10:05.842 | ERROR keystone sqlalchemy.exc.NoSuchModuleError: Can't load plugin: sqlalchemy.plugins:dbcounter | 14:58 |
| dansmith | but it's clearly working on jobs | 14:58 |
| clarkb | sounds like similar symptoms but different mechanism for failure. What I observed prior to py_moduels was very similar but was due to dbcounter.py not being installed by pip at all | 14:58 |
| dansmith | so bizarre that it works upstream though.. this is a totes fresh jammy vm | 14:59 |
| kopecmartin | #startmeeting qa | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue May 24 15:00:19 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'qa' | 15:00 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting | 15:00 |
| kopecmartin | agenda ^^ | 15:00 |
| opendevreview | James Parker proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Take into account shared CPUs per NUMA https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/843157 | 15:00 |
| gmann | o/ | 15:01 |
| kopecmartin | o/ | 15:02 |
| frickler | \o | 15:02 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) | 15:02 |
| kopecmartin | we have just dropped openeuler support from devstack | 15:03 |
| kopecmartin | nothing else from my side here | 15:04 |
| frickler | yes, sadly no continued maintainance once the support was added | 15:04 |
| frickler | openstacksdk 0.99.0 was released | 15:04 |
| frickler | mainly as a 1.0.0pre1 release. that may trigger some issues | 15:05 |
| gmann | +1 | 15:05 |
| kopecmartin | thanks for the heads up | 15:05 |
| kopecmartin | moving on | 15:06 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Zed Priority Items progress | 15:06 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-priority | 15:06 |
| kopecmartin | any updates on this front? | 15:06 |
| gmann | nothing special | 15:06 |
| kopecmartin | nothing special from my side either | 15:07 |
| kopecmartin | #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning | 15:07 |
| kopecmartin | nothing here for now | 15:07 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Gate Status Checks | 15:07 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) | 15:08 |
| kopecmartin | 2 reviews, both approved, waiting on gates | 15:08 |
| gmann | yeah, py36|7 is all stuck | 15:09 |
| gmann | and not merged yet | 15:09 |
| kopecmartin | yup, mainly because some jobs are quite unstable lately, mainly the ceph one | 15:10 |
| kopecmartin | it was a reason of many rechecks | 15:10 |
| gmann | yeah, let's see | 15:11 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks | 15:11 |
| kopecmartin | stable | 15:12 |
| kopecmartin | #link #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable | 15:12 |
| kopecmartin | master | 15:12 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic | 15:12 |
| frickler | the "error" thing was me | 15:12 |
| frickler | triggered the wrong project | 15:12 |
| frickler | but then manual triggers are broken in zuul somehow | 15:13 |
| kopecmartin | :) np | 15:13 |
| frickler | everything else still suspicously green | 15:13 |
| kopecmartin | apart from those 2 errors it's all green | 15:13 |
| kopecmartin | yeah | 15:13 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Distros check | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | centos9-stream | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=tempest-full-py3-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | fedora | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0 | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | debian | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0 | 15:14 |
| frickler | maybe we should also add a link for the jammy jobs? | 15:15 |
| kopecmartin | not that bad, could be better though, especially in case of centos as it failed a few gate jobs | 15:15 |
| kopecmartin | yeah | 15:15 |
| kopecmartin | good point | 15:15 |
| kopecmartin | jammy jobs | 15:17 |
| kopecmartin | https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0 | 15:17 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0 | 15:17 |
| frickler | debian looks a bit flaky, I'll check those later | 15:18 |
| kopecmartin | ack, thanks | 15:19 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Sub Teams highlights | 15:19 |
| frickler | ah, those are mainly the ansible v5 checks | 15:19 |
| kopecmartin | Changes with Review-Priority == +1 | 15:19 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) | 15:19 |
| kopecmartin | regarding the backports in devstack, do we need to merge them in order? from the latest release back? or can i approve all at once? | 15:20 |
| gmann | either is fine in devstack bakport | 15:21 |
| gmann | approve once also work as we do many times | 15:21 |
| kopecmartin | ack, thanks | 15:22 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Open Discussion | 15:23 |
| kopecmartin | anything for the open discussion? | 15:23 |
| frickler | I have one slightly political topic | 15:23 |
| gmann | yeah, I have added two items | 15:23 |
| gmann | frickler: go ahead first | 15:23 |
| frickler | I would like to gather some early planning feedback on the next PTG | 15:23 |
| frickler | the foundation seems to think that it is a good idea to have people travelling around the world again | 15:23 |
| frickler | to which I 100% do not agree for multiple reasons | 15:23 |
| gmann | yeah, its physical event | 15:24 |
| frickler | so the question is: can we as a team agree to continue to hold a virtual PTG? | 15:24 |
| frickler | maybe outside of the global PTG if some people are still travelling there? | 15:24 |
| gmann | good point. even in TC I pointed to ask for community feedback first but that did not happen | 15:24 |
| gmann | frickler: once challenge in that is we need to make it either virtual only or physical. hybrid can be more complex | 15:25 |
| frickler | I for sure won't travel and I also consider boycotting a mixed one, yes | 15:25 |
| gmann | yeah | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | i think we can set a date (different from the PTG one) and hold our own virtual meeting to connect with the community | 15:26 |
| gmann | and no slot in physical one? | 15:26 |
| kopecmartin | considering the number of attendees during latest PTGs and number of topics as well | 15:27 |
| kopecmartin | i would be ok with no slot in the physical event | 15:27 |
| gmann | but then it still the issue as frickler pointed | 15:27 |
| gmann | we should have in either one. otherwise virtual one will be considered as just a QA call | 15:28 |
| gmann | I might travel as it is in USA but not 100% sure, I am totally not fine on travel and completely agree with frickler concern. | 15:29 |
| gmann | and I am ok to have virtual one | 15:29 |
| kopecmartin | yes, therefore i'm inclined to hold in virtually only, i said i would be ok with no slot in the physical event | 15:29 |
| kopecmartin | *hold it | 15:29 |
| gmann | +1 | 15:29 |
| frickler | so maybe not appearing at the in-person PTG as a team would be a good sign towards the foundation | 15:30 |
| frickler | I'll also suggest this to other team I'm participating in | 15:30 |
| frickler | teams | 15:30 |
| frickler | seems we kind of agree on this | 15:31 |
| frickler | so gmann you can go ahead with your topics I guess | 15:31 |
| kopecmartin | it seems yes | 15:31 |
| gmann | yeah | 15:31 |
| gmann | sure | 15:31 |
| gmann | first is Py36|7 support in Tempest | 15:31 |
| gmann | #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-May/028622.html | 15:32 |
| gmann | as you know py36|7 drop in oslo or projects and we though of keeping support in tempest but that is broken | 15:32 |
| gmann | I proposed two option on ML and matthew replied from req perspective option1 and how complex that is | 15:33 |
| gmann | and even if we go with that we are kind of saying Tempest master code will work on py36 but with old oslo so no new feature from olso? | 15:33 |
| gmann | which give a clear indication that it is better to drop it from Tempest also as its deps are non-py36 now | 15:34 |
| gmann | one challenge in that Tempest master will not support py36|7 for stable/victoria to stable/yoga as those branch support py36|7 | 15:35 |
| gmann | which again has two solution 1. run tempest in py38 in virtual env and test stable/yoga on py36 2. use old tempest to test them | 15:35 |
| gmann | I am in favor of dropping in tempest, what you say? | 15:36 |
| gmann | may be i am just typing things you all know :) but just in case.. | 15:36 |
| kopecmartin | dropping from tempest and testing with py38 in a venv for older releases sounds good | 15:36 |
| frickler | what was the reason again for tempest not to have stable branches? | 15:36 |
| gmann | yeah, that is what we did for py27 drop too | 15:37 |
| opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/tempest master: DNM: Test encrypted LM with local attach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843163 | 15:37 |
| gmann | frickler: at least still Tempest master can be used to test stable branch and master openstack. yes not in all python version but we have way | 15:38 |
| gmann | via virtual env | 15:38 |
| gmann | and give us interop testing benefits, testing stable+master openstack with same set of tests | 15:38 |
| opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/tempest master: DNM: Test encrypted LM with local attach https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843163 | 15:38 |
| kopecmartin | although if it was branched, it would still work for interop i think | 15:39 |
| frickler | you could still test yoga openstack against master tempest, even if a yoga tempest branch exists | 15:39 |
| kopecmartin | maybe it would be even easier | 15:39 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: well, you will test them with different set of tests right? | 15:39 |
| kopecmartin | right | 15:40 |
| gmann | frickler: but then what is benefit or yoga tempest branch if we continue testing with tempest master | 15:40 |
| frickler | you do test with a different set of tests now, if <yoga needs tagged tempest | 15:40 |
| kopecmartin | oh, on the other side it would require a lot of changes in the interop tooling | 15:40 |
| frickler | you could switch once master stops working | 15:40 |
| frickler | like now for py36 jobs | 15:40 |
| gmann | frickler: no, we will continue testing with master stable/yoga and older supported branch | 15:40 |
| frickler | but still backport changes to tests | 15:40 |
| frickler | I'm not convinced a py38 venv will work on c8s | 15:41 |
| frickler | did someone test that? | 15:41 |
| gmann | stable/victoria - stable/yoga tested on ubuntu bionic and it has py38 so tempest virtual env can run on that its just if any downstream cloud want to test py36 stable/yoga then they need to create tempest master virutal env on py38 | 15:42 |
| gmann | c8s has py38 which worked for me on fips testing switch | 15:42 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack stable/yoga: Configure placement section in neutron conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/842747 | 15:42 |
| frickler | hmm, o.k., I don't want to argue this, I'm not a tempest person really, just tried to understand things | 15:43 |
| gmann | with tempest branch, concern is it can end up like 'disable this test in stable as we change API in incompatible way' and it will pass stable branch testing as well as master even API are changed | 15:43 |
| gmann | and tempest branchless catches these things | 15:44 |
| gmann | it is no different than when we dropped py27 but yes it will be same for every py3 minor version drop in OpenStack | 15:46 |
| kopecmartin | yeah, let's workaround the situation with the virtual env and py38 for now | 15:46 |
| frickler | o.k., I think you still had a second topic? | 15:46 |
| gmann | yeah, sorry. I already started thinking on next meeting of release name | 15:47 |
| gmann | (gmann) Stable/ussuri is blocked for Tempest master and master constraints | 15:47 |
| gmann | this is more of information as I have not finished the work | 15:47 |
| gmann | stable/ussuri is in EM and failing with Tempest master and master constraint | 15:48 |
| kopecmartin | thanks for the info | 15:48 |
| gmann | I started pining tempest for stable/ussuri but then got distracted, I am doing now and should be ready soon https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:ussuri-pin-tempest | 15:48 |
| gmann | and I think once we figure this out then we can make new release of tempest | 15:48 |
| gmann | which is this #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:ussuri-last | 15:49 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/tempest master: Add test to rebuild volume backed instance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/831018 | 15:49 |
| gmann | and we can add poy36|7 drop also in that release or so | 15:49 |
| gmann | but we agreed on dropping py36|7 from tempest right? | 15:49 |
| *** whoami-rajat__ is now known as whoami-rajat | 15:50 | |
| kopecmartin | gmann: we did | 15:50 |
| gmann | cool. I will work on these two gate blocker and should be ready soon | 15:50 |
| gmann | that is all from me | 15:50 |
| kopecmartin | thank you gmann | 15:51 |
| frickler | o.k., just to complete the ansible thing I mentioned | 15:51 |
| frickler | zuul currently runs with ansible 2.9 (I think?) which is eol | 15:51 |
| frickler | zuul 6.0.0 now supports to switch to ansible 5, which I think is ansible-core 2.12 | 15:51 |
| clarkb | yes 2.9 is the default | 15:51 |
| frickler | there is a test patch up in devstack, which shows some work to do | 15:52 |
| frickler | not urgent, but also not to be delayed forever | 15:52 |
| clarkb | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/843033 currently it fails when trying to become the stack user. I don't understand it yet but they have a whole document on the problem at https://docs.ansible.com/ansible-core/2.12/user_guide/become.html#risks-of-becoming-an-unprivileged-user | 15:52 |
| frickler | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/843033/ | 15:52 |
| frickler | maybe switch to accessing the test nodes as stack user directly instead of zuul sudoing? | 15:53 |
| frickler | or dump the stack user and run as zuul. locally I run as ubuntu all the time | 15:54 |
| clarkb | ya I'm not sure yet. Probably good to understand why 2.9 worked but 5 doesn't and go from there | 15:54 |
| frickler | o.k., that's it from me, thx clarkb for filling in the details | 15:56 |
| kopecmartin | thanks for bringing this up frickler | 15:56 |
| kopecmartin | i need to run | 15:56 |
| kopecmartin | thank you everyone | 15:56 |
| kopecmartin | see you around | 15:57 |
| kopecmartin | #endmeeting | 15:57 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue May 24 15:57:01 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:57 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-05-24-15.00.html | 15:57 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-05-24-15.00.txt | 15:57 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-05-24-15.00.log.html | 15:57 |
| frickler | thanks kopecmartin | 15:57 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: thanks | 15:57 |
| ykarel | gmann, can you check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-gate/+/843148 | 16:18 |
| ykarel | comment | 16:18 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM try devstack and friends with ansible v5 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/843033 | 16:24 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM: testing ansible testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/843170 | 16:24 |
| frickler | clarkb: ^^ sorry I had to rebase in order to be able to edit .zuul.yaml. testing now whether the failing task might be special because it is running a custom ansible module | 16:24 |
| clarkb | no problem. I'm more than happy to have others help out on figuring out the ansible v5 stuff :) | 16:31 |
| opendevreview | James Parker proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Take into account shared CPUs per NUMA https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/843157 | 16:34 |
| clarkb | frickler: looking at a diff of the source code I wonder if the problem is not having the file be executable on the source side so it isn't preserved on the copy to the remote node | 16:38 |
| clarkb | I'm definitely not seeing how we don't fail already | 16:44 |
| clarkb | but have a hunch that maybe if we set those files to +x to start that they'd carry that perm over and the chmod would be a noop and not fail? | 16:44 |
| frickler | clarkb: interesting, I can give that a test in a minute | 16:44 |
| frickler | clarkb: hmm, the run-devstack task fails the same way and that is just a simple builtin command | 16:46 |
| frickler | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/87a0332bbc964c4ea0d12466843f0185/console | 16:48 |
| frickler | I guess that rules out both your idea and mine | 16:48 |
| frickler | anyway, time for a break, bbl | 16:48 |
| gmann | ykarel: yeah, train still has legacy zuulv2 jobs. checking it | 16:49 |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 16:51 | |
| clarkb | I think the check at this line for being an admin user is why it works in 2.9 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.9.27/lib/ansible/plugins/action/__init__.py#L527 In v5 it falls through unless the command succeeds: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.12.6/lib/ansible/plugins/action/__init__.py#L615-L627 | 16:55 |
| clarkb | hrm maybe that isn't it I didn't see that else for the error on line 542 | 16:58 |
| gmann | ykarel: replied, legacy-tempest-neutron-full-stable should run on focal, I missed to migrate that, please do and I will be good on your change. | 17:02 |
| ykarel | gmann, ok will do | 17:04 |
| ykarel | Thanks | 17:04 |
| gmann | ykarel: thanks for taking care of it. | 17:06 |
| opendevreview | yatin proposed openstack/devstack-gate master: Switch legacy-tempest-neutron-full-stable to focal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-gate/+/843176 | 17:18 |
| ykarel | gmann, pushed ^, let's see how it goes | 17:18 |
| ykarel | if fails will check tomorrow | 17:18 |
| gmann | ykarel: no issue, I will update if it does, do not worry and have a nice sleep, already late for you | 17:19 |
| ykarel | Thanks gmann, bye | 17:19 |
| gmann | ykarel: or may be its normal working hr for you ike whoami-rajat :P | 17:19 |
| ykarel | it's same as his :) | 17:20 |
| gmann | :) | 17:20 |
| whoami-rajat | :D | 17:20 |
| clarkb | frickler: I'm not much closer because I've discovered that my suse install isn't likely represetnative of the ubuntu test nodes. In particular setfacl seems to work on my btrfs file system. That said ansible-playbook -vvv seems to give sufficient verbosity to see what steps ansible si taking so we can trace it through the old and new versions if run against ubuntu to understand | 17:21 |
| clarkb | why one is working and the other doesn't. I need to pause on this now though to get other stuff done | 17:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack stable/wallaby: Configure placement section in neutron conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/842749 | 17:23 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM: testing ansible testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/843170 | 17:59 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/devstack stable/ussuri: Test Tempest 26.1.0 on ussuri https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/838051 | 18:11 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM: testing ansible testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/843170 | 18:23 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Drop py3.6 and py3.7 from Tempest https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843182 | 18:29 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM: testing ansible testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/843170 | 18:33 |
| clarkb | frickler: I'm unable to reproduce this issue with ansible 2.9 or 5 on a jammy held node I have. Both appear to run the setfacl successfully | 18:37 |
| clarkb | this is using both a local connection and ssh with the controlling user being zuul and the become user being stack | 18:38 |
| clarkb | so now I'm wondering if the reason for the failure is some sort of setfacl issue | 18:38 |
| clarkb | maybe our base image doesn't install the acl package? | 18:38 |
| clarkb | but if we do that it will work (and something devstack does pull it in?) | 18:39 |
| clarkb | yes acl is not installed on a jammy node by default | 18:40 |
| clarkb | I wonder if installing thta package would be sufficient to make this work | 18:40 |
| clarkb | oh hey you might be 10 minutes ahead of me :) | 18:42 |
| clarkb | that still doesn't explain why the old version of nasible didn't care, but I suspect progress | 18:43 |
| frickler | clarkb: yes, I don't grok all the details yet, but I held a node and saw that it was missing the setfacl, so I'm trying now what happens when we install it | 18:46 |
| frickler | test landed on a rax node, which means 10min of copying /opt before seeing results | 18:47 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Take into account shared CPUs per NUMA https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/843157 | 18:54 |
| frickler | devstack running now https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/stream/113f568178fc4012b7cb862713a48130?logfile=console.log | 18:56 |
| clarkb | it passed with acl installed | 19:25 |
| opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: DNM try devstack and friends with ansible v5 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/843033 | 20:06 |
| frickler | gmann: kopecmartin: I missed to tag this patch in the backport series with RP+1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/842748 | 20:39 |
| gmann | frickler: +A | 20:40 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: can you check this grenade skip job running change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/842799 | 22:11 |
| kopecmartin | gmann: done | 22:22 |
| gmann | thanks | 22:22 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack stable/xena: Configure placement section in neutron conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/842748 | 22:23 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: Use UPPER_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/ussuri testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843045 | 22:52 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/devstack stable/ussuri: Pin Tempest to 26.1.0 tag for stable/ussuri testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/838051 | 22:55 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: vkmc I am not sure you did talk about devstack-plugin-ceph-tempest-py3 job failing for identity error, I am seeing that failure more frequent now a days, open a bug for tracking, we should fix it soon https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1975648 | 23:03 |
| gmann | gouthamr: ^^ in case you are aware of this error | 23:03 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: DNM: tetsing tempest master with stable/victoria constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843044 | 23:06 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/tempest master: End support for stable/victoria https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/843221 | 23:13 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: ^^ end of support for stable/victoria. I am going to do release for ussuri-last and victoria-last together (still testing the things) | 23:14 |
| gmann | and may be py36|7 drop also. all three things for 31.0.0 | 23:17 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/grenade master: Do not run grenade-skip-level job on older stable branches https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/842799 | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!