| opendevreview | Abhishek Kekane proposed openstack/tempest master: Add tempest coverage for new cache API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/825112 | 07:47 |
|---|---|---|
| *** soniya29|ruck is now known as soniya29|ruck|lunch | 08:35 | |
| *** soniya29|ruck|lunch is now known as soniya29|ruck | 08:55 | |
| opendevreview | Gorka Eguileor proposed openstack/devstack master: Add support for shared os_brick file lock path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/849329 | 09:46 |
| *** soniya29|ruck is now known as soniya29|ruck|afk | 10:18 | |
| *** soniya29|ruck|afk is now known as soniya29|ruck | 10:40 | |
| opendevreview | Roman Popelka proposed openstack/tempest master: Remove unstable_test decorator https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/849506 | 12:45 |
| *** soniya29 is now known as soniya29|out | 14:58 | |
| kopecmartin | #startmeeting qa | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jul 12 15:00:10 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'qa' | 15:00 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Weekly_QA_Team_meeting | 15:00 |
| kopecmartin | agenda ^^ | 15:00 |
| gmann | o/ | 15:00 |
| lpiwowar | o/ | 15:00 |
| frickler | o( | 15:01 |
| frickler | or something similar :D | 15:01 |
| kopecmartin | :D | 15:01 |
| kopecmartin | o/ | 15:01 |
| lpiwowar | 🖕 | 15:01 |
| lpiwowar | :D | 15:01 |
| lpiwowar | Sorry:D | 15:01 |
| lpiwowar | That was mistake | 15:01 |
| kopecmartin | :D wut? :D | 15:01 |
| kopecmartin | and my client even translated that to an image | 15:02 |
| kopecmartin | lol | 15:02 |
| lpiwowar | When you write ":DD" in the lounce it is shortcut for the emoji | 15:02 |
| lpiwowar | the lounge | 15:02 |
| lpiwowar | Yep ... Sorry :D | 15:02 |
| kopecmartin | nice, we opened the meeting with a joke ;) | 15:02 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional) | 15:02 |
| kopecmartin | we made an intermediate release of tempest | 15:03 |
| frickler | I will be mostly offline for the next 2.5 weeks (pto but staying home, so some chance I get bored ;-) | 15:03 |
| kopecmartin | frickler: ack, enjoy your vacation | 15:03 |
| frickler | not sure it will be possible to enjoy the heat, but I'll do my best ;) | 15:04 |
| kopecmartin | oh, yeah :/ | 15:04 |
| kopecmartin | good luck | 15:04 |
| lpiwowar | @frickler enjoy!:) | 15:05 |
| kopecmartin | #topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning | 15:05 |
| kopecmartin | we have approx a month for the PTG team signup | 15:05 |
| kopecmartin | the deadline is August 12th | 15:05 |
| frickler | do we need to sign up if we only do virtual session(s) | 15:06 |
| frickler | or do you really intend to do some in-person event? | 15:06 |
| kopecmartin | i didn't see an option to choose between personal or virtual | 15:06 |
| frickler | yes, because the foundation doesn't care about it's members | 15:07 |
| kopecmartin | I would prefer not to go in person this time and IIRC most of us didn't want to go in person too | 15:07 |
| gmann | there is no virtual option in signup | 15:07 |
| frickler | so we'll have to organize a virtual session on our own, is my current understanding | 15:07 |
| gmann | so if we do not want to have physical PTG then just do not sign up. updating it in ML also good notice | 15:07 |
| gmann | frickler: as per current setup of PTG, yes. and we can organize that which should not be hard | 15:08 |
| kopecmartin | ack, i'll send an email | 15:08 |
| frickler | well the difficult part will be avoiding conflicts with other teams. at least kolla is likely to do the same thing | 15:08 |
| kopecmartin | just to make sure, is here anyone who would like to/is going to travel and attend PTG in person? | 15:08 |
| gmann | but do we want to setup at the same time physical PTG are? | 15:09 |
| frickler | likely not at the same time, but neither kolla | 15:09 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: I might travel as I am in North America only but depends on the situation that time as COVID cases are increasing | 15:09 |
| frickler | to allow people to join that also go to ohio | 15:09 |
| gmann | yeah, we can setup some non conflicting time | 15:10 |
| kopecmartin | i'm for non conflicting time too | 15:10 |
| lpiwowar | kopecmartin +1 | 15:10 |
| gmann | kind of mid cycle meetup we used to have. but virtually this time | 15:10 |
| gmann | per project mid cycle meetup | 15:11 |
| gmann | I think cinder team does that? | 15:11 |
| gmann | anyways I think doing virtually in some non conflicting is good idea | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | i don't know about others, we can do that for sure, we'll discuss the date later | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | yeah | 15:14 |
| gmann | yeah | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | moving on | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Zed Priority Items progress | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-zed-priority | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | any updates here? | 15:14 |
| kopecmartin | we're working on 'Unstable tests in Tempest monitoring' | 15:15 |
| kopecmartin | i was also experimenting with Rocky linux, but i got stuck on rabbitmq iirc | 15:17 |
| kopecmartin | that's all from my side | 15:17 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Gate Status Checks | 15:17 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) | 15:17 |
| kopecmartin | no reviews | 15:18 |
| kopecmartin | any urgent reviews? | 15:18 |
| kopecmartin | bare recheck tracking | 15:19 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary | 15:19 |
| kopecmartin | we've got worse :( | 15:19 |
| gmann | yeah | 15:19 |
| kopecmartin | please don't do bare rechecks | 15:19 |
| kopecmartin | we're at 81% , we were on 64% | 15:20 |
| frickler | well I'm not sure how useful this statistic is. "recheck foo" without any useful comment isn't helpful either | 15:20 |
| gmann | yeah, recommendation is try to check the failure at least and build that practice | 15:20 |
| kopecmartin | but the percentage might got higher also because we didn't do enough not bare rechecks in the last week -> so the few bare recheck stand out a bit | 15:21 |
| frickler | the ratio per merged change might be more interesting indeed | 15:22 |
| kopecmartin | might be .. there is a table of reviews with most rechecks, that's interesting | 15:23 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Periodic jobs Status Checks | 15:24 |
| kopecmartin | stable | 15:24 |
| kopecmartin | #link #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&pipeline=periodic-stable | 15:24 |
| kopecmartin | master | 15:24 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic | 15:24 |
| kopecmartin | all is good it seems | 15:24 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Distros check | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | cs-9 | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=tempest-full-py3-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-8-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=0 | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | fedora | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=0 | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | debian | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=0 | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | jammy | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovn-source&job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-jammy-ovs&skip=0 | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | cs-9 jobs seem to have a better passing rate than 2 weeks ago | 15:25 |
| kopecmartin | seems that the libvirt bug got fixed | 15:26 |
| kopecmartin | the rest looks quite good too i guess | 15:27 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Sub Teams highlights | 15:27 |
| kopecmartin | Changes with Review-Priority == +1 | 15:27 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade) | 15:27 |
| kopecmartin | one change there | 15:28 |
| kopecmartin | i'll check that later today | 15:29 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Open Discussion | 15:29 |
| kopecmartin | anything for the open discussion? | 15:29 |
| lpiwowar | Nothing from my side | 15:29 |
| frickler | there was this discussion about tempest using admin access needlessly yesterday, did you see that? | 15:30 |
| frickler | like https://opendev.org/openstack/tempest/src/branch/master/tempest/scenario/manager.py#L1362 as example | 15:31 |
| frickler | I once tried something similar with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/678198 , but gave up | 15:31 |
| gmann | yeah, there are many which are not aligned with the default access rule | 15:31 |
| gmann | as RBAC access is changing and reader role will come, we can do some audit that time and fix the things | 15:32 |
| kopecmartin | i did , not sure what to do with that, do we wanna invest some time and start rewriting that to non-admin clients where possible? | 15:32 |
| gmann | yeah | 15:32 |
| gmann | as per the default RBAC policy for that API | 15:32 |
| frickler | gmann: so that would be system-reader then? | 15:33 |
| gmann | frickler: project reader only as of now. | 15:33 |
| gmann | and legacy admin continue the same. to read the things at system level | 15:34 |
| gmann | but using admin unnecessary for non-admin things we should change. | 15:35 |
| kopecmartin | yup, that sounds more than reasonable | 15:36 |
| frickler | ok | 15:36 |
| kopecmartin | i'll try to write it up to the priority document so we can track the progress etc | 15:37 |
| frickler | damiandabrowski: ^^ maybe that answers your question a bit better | 15:37 |
| kopecmartin | ok, moving on | 15:38 |
| kopecmartin | #topic Bug Triage | 15:38 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-zed | 15:38 |
| kopecmartin | devstack has no new bugs | 15:38 |
| kopecmartin | \o/ | 15:38 |
| kopecmartin | wau | 15:38 |
| kopecmartin | thanks frickler for the triage | 15:39 |
| frickler | welcome, maybe some day we'll be bug free ... ;) | 15:39 |
| kopecmartin | that would be awesome | 15:40 |
| gmann | +1 | 15:40 |
| kopecmartin | then we could focus only to open reviews :D | 15:40 |
| damiandabrowski | frickler: thank You! | 15:40 |
| kopecmartin | i see this got updated since the review | 15:40 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/841719 | 15:41 |
| kopecmartin | gmann: does it address your comments? ^^ | 15:41 |
| kopecmartin | today i found this small fix for a test in tempest, i haven't checked in detail yet, although it seems to be a small detail | 15:41 |
| kopecmartin | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/848830 | 15:41 |
| kopecmartin | anyway, this is all from my side | 15:42 |
| kopecmartin | if there is nothing else, we can close the office hour | 15:42 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: sure, will check it | 15:42 |
| gmann | nothing from me | 15:42 |
| kopecmartin | thanks everyone | 15:43 |
| kopecmartin | see you around | 15:43 |
| frickler | thx kopecmartin | 15:43 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: thanks | 15:43 |
| kopecmartin | #endmeeting | 15:43 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jul 12 15:43:12 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:43 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-07-12-15.00.html | 15:43 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-07-12-15.00.txt | 15:43 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-07-12-15.00.log.html | 15:43 |
| lpiwowar | kopecmartin thanks | 15:44 |
| *** frickler is now known as frickler_pto | 16:00 | |
| opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/tempest master: Wait for floating IP assocation in scenario manager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/849562 | 16:05 |
| opendevreview | James Parker proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Update NUMA Affinity tests for per port policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/832693 | 19:54 |
| jamesbenson | A quick question, there are Metadata tests that are being intentionally skipped: | 20:48 |
| jamesbenson | setUpClass (tempest.api.compute.servers.test_server_metadata.ServerMetadataTestJSON) ... SKIPPED: Metadata is read-only on non-Xen-based deployments. | 20:48 |
| jamesbenson | This appears to be correct as we are not running on Xen. But on Refstack: Excluding flagged tests, this cloud passes 97.1% (265/273) of the required tests in the 2021.11 required capabilities for the program. | 20:48 |
| jamesbenson | I'm running ./setup_env -t 31.1.0 -p 3.8 | 20:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!