Tuesday, 2022-12-06

*** yadnesh|away is now known as yadnesh04:45
*** akekane is now known as abhishekk05:36
opendevreviewwangxiyuan proposed openstack/devstack master: Add openEuler 22.03 LTS support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/85223706:12
*** yadnesh is now known as yadnesh|afk08:13
*** yadnesh|afk is now known as yadnesh09:20
opendevreviewSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/devstack master: Drop lib/neutron module  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/86501411:38
opendevreviewSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/devstack master: Rename lib/neutron-legacy to lib/neutron  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/86501511:38
opendevreviewLukas Piwowarski proposed openstack/tempest master: DNM: Test tempest-multioned-full-py3 job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/86669211:40
*** yadnesh is now known as yadnesh|afk12:00
*** yadnesh|afk is now known as yadnesh13:10
opendevreviewSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/grenade master: Use default neutron backend in the base grenade job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/86247513:43
opendevreviewSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/grenade master: Use default neutron backend in the base grenade job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/86247513:53
*** akekane is now known as abhishekk14:05
kopecmartin#startmeeting qa15:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Dec  6 15:00:27 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kopecmartin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'15:00
kopecmartin#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_Office_hours15:00
kopecmartinagenda ^15:00
frickler\o15:01
kopecmartino/15:05
kopecmartinseems it's just 2 of us 15:05
kopecmartincool, let's go through the usual irst15:05
kopecmartinfirst15:05
kopecmartin#topic Announcement and Action Item (Optional)15:06
kopecmartinnothing new here15:06
kopecmartin#topic Antelope Priority Items progress15:06
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/qa-antelope-priority15:06
* kopecmartin checking the status15:06
fricklerslaweq is pretty active with the cleanup, but it seems there are issues still with neutron-tempest-plugin jobs15:07
kopecmartinthat's great we have some progress there, thanks slaweq15:08
slaweqkopecmartin np15:08
slaweqyes, I still have some issues with neutron-tempest-plugin jobs and I'm working on it15:09
slaweqhopefully this week it will be ready to review finally :)15:09
kopecmartinsounds good :)15:09
kopecmartinthere has been a development in the srbac jobs in tempest15:10
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/61448415:10
kopecmartinalthough now we're having a problem with the multinode job, has been failing recently :/ 15:10
kopecmartinsomething with cirros, is it possible your cirros bump would help frickler?15:11
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/85977315:11
kopecmartinlet me find the issue15:11
kopecmartini think the job hit something similar to this15:11
kopecmartin#link https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/issues/993515:11
fricklerI would need to check that, sadly there are other issues still with new cirros15:11
kopecmartinoh, so we can't proceed with that?15:12
fricklerI didn't look for some time, need to refresh myself on the current status.15:12
fricklerbut there were some things with neutron still I think, where I wasn't sure how things are supposed to work15:13
kopecmartini see , ack15:14
kopecmartinmoving on15:14
kopecmartin#topic OpenStack Events Updates and Planning15:14
kopecmartinsipping for now15:14
kopecmartin#topic Gate Status Checks15:14
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B2+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)15:14
kopecmartinnothing there, any urgent / gate blocking patch to reviews?15:15
fricklerI don't think so15:15
kopecmartincool15:15
kopecmartin#topic Bare rechecks15:15
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/recheck-weekly-summary15:15
kopecmartinwe're at 0% out of 11 rechecks, pretty good15:16
kopecmartin#topic Periodic jobs Status Checks15:16
kopecmartinstable 15:16
kopecmartinhttps://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-yoga&job_name=tempest-full-xena&job_name=tempest-full-wallaby-py3&job_name=tempest-full-victoria-py3&job_name=tempest-full-ussuri-py3&job_name=tempest-full-zed&pipeline=periodic-stable15:16
kopecmartinmaster15:16
kopecmartinhttps://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Ftempest&project=openstack%2Fdevstack&pipeline=periodic15:16
kopecmartinregarding the c9 fips job15:17
kopecmartinit was discussed and decided that just increasing the timeout will be the best idea15:18
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/86604915:18
kopecmartinlast week we also discussed removing devstack-no-tls-proxy job from stable branches15:18
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/q/I4c0a5144da2549fe988bbabe8536e9a9873e1cf715:18
kopecmartinotherwise the periodic jobs look healthy 15:19
frickleroh, I thought I'd approved those, will do now15:19
kopecmartinthanks 15:19
fricklerfor fips also there is a key in infra now from canonical to run fips on ubuntu15:20
kopecmartin#topic Distros check15:20
fricklerbut I'm not sure who's working on creating actual jobs using it15:20
kopecmartinyeah, i've heard that 15:20
kopecmartinhaving ubuntu job running on fips would potentially solve the timeout issue 15:21
kopecmartini don't know that either :/15:21
kopecmartinlet me write this up to the priority etherpad 15:21
kopecmartini made a note of it in the etherpad, i'll fill the details after the meeting15:22
kopecmartincs-915:22
kopecmartinhttps://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-full-centos-9-stream&job_name=devstack-platform-centos-9-stream&skip=015:22
kopecmartinfedora 15:22
kopecmartinhttps://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-fedora-latest&skip=015:22
kopecmartindebian15:22
kopecmartinhttps://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-debian-bullseye&skip=015:22
kopecmartinubuntu15:22
kopecmartinhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-ubuntu-focal&skip=015:22
kopecmartinrocky 15:23
kopecmartinhttps://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=devstack-platform-rocky-blue-onyx15:23
* kopecmartin checking the failures15:23
kopecmartinnot many failures, a few builds were aborted, but otherwise they're pretty successful 15:24
kopecmartin#topic Sub Teams highlights15:25
kopecmartinChanges with Review-Priority == +115:25
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/q/label:Review-Priority%253D%252B1+status:open+(project:openstack/tempest+OR+project:openstack/patrole+OR+project:openstack/devstack+OR+project:openstack/grenade)15:25
kopecmartin2 reviews, one is failing on the multinode job15:25
kopecmartin#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/199891615:25
kopecmartini need to have a closer look15:26
kopecmartinthe other looks good, +w15:27
kopecmartin#topic Open Discussion15:28
kopecmartinanything for the open discussion?15:28
fricklermaybe talk about openeuler once more?15:28
fricklerhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/85223715:28
fricklerIMO we could merge it15:29
kopecmartinyeah, it looks quite stable now15:30
fricklerI know we said at the ptg to wait for a cycle, but I don't think it will get better or worse15:30
kopecmartinok, i'll review later today, need to double check that with the review where we removed support for it15:30
kopecmartingmann: wdyt^ ?15:31
fricklerI didn't do a complete review of the latest state yet either, but if we agree to move on with it, I'll do that15:31
kopecmartini agree, the only reason we removed the support was that it was failing an no one cared 15:32
kopecmartinif it is stable now, i have nothing against15:32
*** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|afk15:32
kopecmartinanything else?15:32
kopecmartinbtw gmann, any thoughts on this? 15:33
kopecmartin#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/82173215:33
kopecmartin#topic Bug Triage15:33
kopecmartin#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-bug-triage-antelope15:33
kopecmartinnumbers were recorded 15:33
kopecmartinother than that i don't have anything else15:34
* frickler neither15:35
kopecmartinok then, let's call it for today15:36
kopecmartinthanks frickler, see you around 15:37
kopecmartin#endmeeting15:37
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Dec  6 15:37:18 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:37
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-12-06-15.00.html15:37
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-12-06-15.00.txt15:37
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/qa/2022/qa.2022-12-06-15.00.log.html15:37
frickler\o thx kopecmartin 15:39
*** yadnesh is now known as yadnesh|away15:51
opendevreviewSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/grenade master: Use default neutron backend in the base grenade job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/grenade/+/86247515:55
gmannkopecmartin: 821732 is in my list, did not get chance to look but will try this week16:38
gmannfrickler: kopecmartin: for openEuler, 852237 is adding non-voting job which is more possible to get ignored if they start failing. if it is stable we should add it voting or if we want to confirm first then weekly periodic should be fine for this cycle and then based on results we can make it voting in next cycle?16:40
fricklergmann: non-voting + periodic would be my preferred option16:50
gmannfrickler: sure, at least periodic gets checked in weekly office hour. I am ok with n-v also along with that16:51
kopecmartingmann: frickler sounds good, i agree with you two17:47
*** pojadhav|afk is now known as pojadhav18:37
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack stable/yoga: Stop running devstack-no-tls-proxy on stable branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/86604320:13
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack stable/xena: Stop running devstack-no-tls-proxy on stable branch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/86604420:13
opendevreviewMerged openstack/devstack master: Stop setting [ovs_vif_ovs] ovsdb_interface  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/86610120:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!