| *** elodilles_pto is now known as elodilles | 07:01 | |
| *** gthiemon1e is now known as gthiemonge | 07:46 | |
| kopecmartin | frickler: gmann do we need to do anything before approving this? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/916493 | 08:22 |
|---|---|---|
| frickler | kopecmartin: maybe we can prepare a bit, like drop grenade jobs in 2023.1. or we can keep fixing things after the branch happens. iirc we also didn't reach a conclusion yet whether qa should move first or last in that stack | 09:28 |
| sean-k-mooney | i think we can drop the grenade jobs once the source branch becomes unmaintiened | 10:24 |
| sean-k-mooney | in this case once stable/zed transtions to unmainted/zed | 10:25 |
| sean-k-mooney | personally i would od the changeon 2023.1 first | 10:26 |
| sean-k-mooney | to remove the job and then transition the branch to avoid breaking the ci | 10:26 |
| opendevreview | James Parker proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Update nodes yaml to use cpu architecture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/902168 | 14:58 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/devstack master: lib/apache: Use module paths instead of WSGI scripts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/902758 | 15:40 |
| opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph master: Standalone nfs-ganesha with cephadm deployment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/915212 | 16:08 |
| gmann | kopecmartin: +1 from me. I agree with sean-k-mooney on dropping grenade jobs once the source branch becomes unmaintiened | 17:01 |
| gmann | frickler: on moving qa at last or first, this is good question and during yoga unmaintained phase, i saw many queries about unmaintained branch jobs are not running or failing bcz qa is not yet ready/moved to unmaintained. I think moving them first is good way | 17:02 |
| gmann | *them first* i mean moving qa first | 17:02 |
| gmann | at least we can try it this time and see how it goes or it create more break/confusion | 17:05 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: Update nodes yaml to use cpu architecture https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/902168 | 17:51 |
| sean-k-mooney | elodilles: ^ relvent to what we were disucssing in nova meeting | 18:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | im not against having the greneade jobs but i am kind fo against fixing the grenade jobs | 18:03 |
| sean-k-mooney | so if they just work or just work with a minor change to update then name | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | im not against keeping them on 2023.1 but if they require ongoing effort to maintian i think we shoudl either as the unmaintiend group to fix them or just remove them | 18:04 |
| sean-k-mooney | what i dont want is to over deliver what we promised agian and have people depend/exepct that | 18:05 |
| auniyal | is there a way in devstack to use ceph for cinder in exsting lvm deployment, | 18:39 |
| auniyal | so I have a deploymet where volume drive is lvmdriver but I would like to change it to ceph | 18:40 |
| frickler | auniyal: devstack is for testing, not for deployments that need migration to different setups | 18:46 |
| auniyal | frickler, yes here I did not meant for any prod level deployment, I just want to tests few volume realted things and update patches. so I believe answer is no, we can not change it in existing stack, and we have redeploy devstack with ceph plugin ? | 18:51 |
| frickler | yes | 18:53 |
| auniyal | ack, thanks | 18:53 |
| opendevreview | Brian Haley proposed openstack/devstack master: Fix datetime.utcnow() deprecation warning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/916837 | 19:42 |
| opendevreview | Amit Uniyal proposed openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin master: WIP: evacuation tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/whitebox-tempest-plugin/+/915393 | 20:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!