Monday, 2026-11-02

*** ianw is now known as Guest453603:59
opendevreviewAbhishek Kekane proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix image task tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/101347808:41
opendevreviewAbhishek Kekane proposed openstack/tempest master: Fix image task tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/101126309:02
Friedrich[m]Hi everyone, I'm quite new to OpenStack so I wanted to check in here first: I would like to add some "smart" config options/mechanisms to Tempest, to make it easier to share and reuse Tempest configs, and generally improve QoL for Tempest users.. Starting with specifying flavors by name, looking up the validation users from image metadata, maybe more.  Is this a reasonable line of thought? And does anyone have an idea, how to09:59
Friedrich[m]approach the implementation? From what I've read the tempest configuration flow does not yet incorporate any interaction with the tested cloud, so pulling in any of the auth/client parts would be quite a change.09:59
opendevreviewThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/tempest master: Compare image stores in any order in the import waiter  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/101349410:45
opendevreviewThomas Bechtold proposed openstack/tempest master: Raise InvalidConfiguration for a missing scenario img_file  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/101349510:45
opendevreviewDr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/devstack master: Block tox 4.67.5  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/101350212:29
abhishekkopenstacksdk-functional-devstack is broken, might need to hold rechecks until it is fixed12:58
opendevreviewAbhishek Kekane proposed openstack/tempest master: Remove dead image task test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/101126313:09
fricklerykarel: do you have some contact who could fix the software factory CI spam for devstack? this has been going on for some time and I'm really tempted to just disable that account, see e.g. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/101350213:42
ykarelfrickler, i can push patch to disable that for devstack, as that third party CI was running centos-10-stream job when upstream didn't have coverage, but now shouldn't be needed13:43
fricklerykarel: ah, that would be fine, too13:44
fricklersadly the change is still failing on a swift job, guess we'll either have to force-merge or make swift n-v for now.13:46
ykarelpushed disable third party job https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/5909613:48
sean-k-mooneyfrickler: follow up to your change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/101355214:44
sean-k-mooneyfrickler: tl;dr not all our jobs actully inherit form openstakc-tox14:44
sean-k-mooneywe should proably rework our job inheritiance to make them all inherit via openstack-tox but that a bigger changes14:46

Generated by irclog2html.py 4.1.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!