| *** huntxu has joined #openstack-qinling | 00:42 | |
| *** caoyuan has joined #openstack-qinling | 00:50 | |
| *** caoyuan has quit IRC | 01:04 | |
| *** caoyuan has joined #openstack-qinling | 01:54 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dong Ma proposed openstack/qinling master: Function Aliases spec proposal https://review.openstack.org/568755 | 01:59 |
|---|---|---|
| larainema | hi lxkong, around? | 02:02 |
| lxkong | larainema: yeah, i'm here, but i am a little busy with something else. You can leave message to me so I will reply you maybe after half an hour | 02:03 |
| lxkong | larainema: i'm sorry | 02:03 |
| larainema | no problem | 02:04 |
| larainema | i just updated the alias spec, if you got time, just a quick talk the db part of alias with function and function version | 02:10 |
| *** caoyuan has quit IRC | 03:47 | |
| *** caoyuan has joined #openstack-qinling | 03:47 | |
| *** caoyuan has quit IRC | 03:56 | |
| lxkong | larainema: hi, sorry for letting you wait for a long time | 03:59 |
| lxkong | larainema: so, what's your question? | 03:59 |
| larainema | lxkong, actually I want to confirm the correct relation of function, function version and alias form DB part | 04:03 |
| lxkong | larainema: in the alias table, we could define function_id, function_version, name, description | 04:03 |
| *** caoyuan has joined #openstack-qinling | 04:04 | |
| lxkong | but pay attention to the function_version | 04:04 |
| lxkong | if the user doesn't provide function_version, it should have a default value | 04:04 |
| lxkong | or, we just make it simple by define the function_version as a required field | 04:05 |
| lxkong | which makes more sense | 04:05 |
| lxkong | because the alias should be definitive | 04:05 |
| larainema | From my understanding, alias | 04:06 |
| larainema | Should be like 1x1 relation with function id and function version | 04:06 |
| lxkong | yes, you are right | 04:07 |
| larainema | So the function version should be required in alias table | 04:08 |
| larainema | Okay, I just to double confirm it, as the implementation of qinling version is not same like the lambda from my understanding | 04:12 |
| larainema | So some part of alias I am not so sure about it | 04:12 |
| lxkong | larainema: yeah, it's not necessary that we implement features the same with AWS Lambda | 04:13 |
| lxkong | especially that we have different data models with lambda | 04:13 |
| larainema | Okay, can you review the spec again and I will first start with DB part of alias | 04:16 |
| lxkong | larainema: sure, it's on my todo list for today | 04:16 |
| lxkong | larainema: thanks for that proposal | 04:16 |
| larainema | thanks for the review, going to have lunch | 04:18 |
| lxkong | enjoy your lunch | 04:18 |
| openstackgerrit | Dong Ma proposed openstack/qinling master: Function Aliases spec proposal https://review.openstack.org/568755 | 06:34 |
| *** caoyuan_ has joined #openstack-qinling | 09:37 | |
| *** caoyuan has quit IRC | 09:40 | |
| *** caoyuan_ has quit IRC | 10:36 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jiangyuan proposed openstack/qinling master: Runtime implementation for non-image type function. https://review.openstack.org/568051 | 10:55 |
| *** huntxu has quit IRC | 11:14 | |
| *** caoyuan has joined #openstack-qinling | 14:02 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jiangyuan proposed openstack/qinling master: Runtime implementation for non-image type function. https://review.openstack.org/568051 | 14:27 |
| *** caoyuan has quit IRC | 15:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!