| apal | boris-42: ? | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| *** karimb has quit IRC | 00:09 | |
| *** davideagnello has quit IRC | 00:20 | |
| *** davideagnello has joined #openstack-rally | 00:27 | |
| *** davideagnello has quit IRC | 00:33 | |
| *** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 00:37 | |
| *** jaypipes has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 00:50 | |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 01:08 | |
| *** vkmc has quit IRC | 01:25 | |
| openstackgerrit | Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Fix rally plugins relative imports https://review.openstack.org/176153 | 01:26 |
| *** vkmc has joined #openstack-rally | 01:29 | |
| *** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away | 02:03 | |
| *** yingjun has quit IRC | 02:18 | |
| *** softCloud has quit IRC | 02:22 | |
| *** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 02:48 | |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 02:52 | |
| *** davideagnello has joined #openstack-rally | 02:53 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 02:54 | |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 02:56 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 03:16 | |
| *** echoingu_ has joined #openstack-rally | 03:18 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 03:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Fix rally plugins relative imports https://review.openstack.org/176153 | 03:20 |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 03:22 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 03:22 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 03:24 | |
| *** davideagnello has quit IRC | 03:25 | |
| *** pradeep has joined #openstack-rally | 03:28 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 03:30 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 03:31 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 03:31 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 03:31 | |
| *** nkhare has joined #openstack-rally | 03:33 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 03:41 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 03:41 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 03:46 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 03:46 | |
| *** echoingu_ has quit IRC | 03:56 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 03:57 | |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 03:57 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 04:00 | |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 04:02 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 04:02 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 04:05 | |
| *** panbalag has left #openstack-rally | 04:38 | |
| *** tfreger has joined #openstack-rally | 04:43 | |
| *** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 04:43 | |
| *** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally | 04:50 | |
| *** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 05:06 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 05:12 | |
| *** neeti has joined #openstack-rally | 05:17 | |
| *** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap | 05:31 | |
| *** rdas has joined #openstack-rally | 05:33 | |
| *** rdas has quit IRC | 05:39 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 05:39 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 05:40 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 05:41 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 05:44 | |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 05:46 | |
| *** rdas has joined #openstack-rally | 05:48 | |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
| *** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 06:01 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 06:18 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 06:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mike Durnosvistov proposed openstack/rally: Server block migration scenario https://review.openstack.org/175875 | 06:22 |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 06:23 | |
| *** davideagnello has joined #openstack-rally | 06:26 | |
| *** davideagnello has quit IRC | 06:31 | |
| *** ptoohill has quit IRC | 06:53 | |
| *** ptoohill has joined #openstack-rally | 06:57 | |
| *** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk | 07:13 | |
| *** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 07:14 | |
| *** yingjun_ has joined #openstack-rally | 07:27 | |
| *** yingjun_ has quit IRC | 07:27 | |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 07:35 | |
| *** Miouge_ has joined #openstack-rally | 07:35 | |
| *** Miouge has quit IRC | 07:37 | |
| *** Miouge_ is now known as Miouge | 07:37 | |
| *** karmatronic has joined #openstack-rally | 07:38 | |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 07:40 | |
| *** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally | 07:41 | |
| *** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-rally | 07:44 | |
| *** karmatronic has quit IRC | 07:52 | |
| *** karmatronic has joined #openstack-rally | 07:52 | |
| *** pbandzi has joined #openstack-rally | 07:58 | |
| *** yingjun has quit IRC | 08:00 | |
| *** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 08:02 | |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 08:02 | |
| *** yingjun has quit IRC | 08:08 | |
| *** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 08:10 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 08:18 | |
| *** yfried|afk has quit IRC | 08:26 | |
| *** yfried|afk has joined #openstack-rally | 08:26 | |
| *** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 08:26 | |
| *** rook has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 08:32 | |
| *** rook has joined #openstack-rally | 08:32 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 08:32 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 08:37 | |
| *** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap | 08:40 | |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: re https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146838/7/rally/benchmark/functional.py,cm | 08:48 |
| *** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
| *** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-rally | 08:50 | |
| *** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk | 08:51 | |
| *** yingjun has quit IRC | 08:54 | |
| openstackgerrit | Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Fix rally plugins relative imports https://review.openstack.org/176153 | 09:00 |
| *** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 09:03 | |
| *** tfreger has quit IRC | 09:03 | |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 09:03 | |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 09:04 | |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, yeah, I think it would be better to make msg = default_msg + custom_msg | 09:06 |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, what do you think, all in one single line or default_msg in one line, and the custom message in another line? | 09:06 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: could you plz explain why you had to implement the assertions at all? | 09:07 |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, i think boris-42 can gave you a better explanation since he was the one who request it :D | 09:07 |
| arxcruz | I know it will be part of the functional framework, and we can't use assertX without inherit from TestCase | 09:07 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: did he sepcifically ask you to WRITE code that already exist somewhere else | 09:08 |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, yes | 09:08 |
| arxcruz | :) | 09:08 |
| arxcruz | to be part of rally, so rally won't have external dependencies | 09:08 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: then this definatly needs to be documented in commit message (if not in code) | 09:08 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: well, then you could implement SSH and drop paramiko... | 09:09 |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 09:09 | |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: I'm not saying you don't have a good reason for that. I'm just saying the the reason should be well documented | 09:09 |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, sure, I will write down in the commit message don't worry :) | 09:10 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: could you please look into that? | 09:10 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: tnx | 09:10 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: or maybe put it in release notes. if we are dropping a requirement... | 09:11 |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 09:11 | |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: ^ that's msdubov area | 09:11 |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16DXpfbqvlzMFaqaXAcJsBzzpowb_XpymaK2aFY2gA2g/edit#gid=0 | 09:14 |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 09:18 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 09:19 | |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 09:21 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 09:23 | |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 09:25 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 09:30 | |
| *** anshul has quit IRC | 09:30 | |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: btw, another question | 09:30 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: take assertEqual | 09:31 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: you are doing if not a==b: raise RallyAssertionError | 09:31 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: why not do "assert a==b" and get builtin assertion error? | 09:32 |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, https://docs.python.org/2/reference/simple_stmts.html#the-assert-statement | 09:34 |
| yfried|afk | boris-42: andreykurilin__: any idea why this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172831/ is unavailable? | 09:34 |
| arxcruz | The current code generator emits no code for an assert statement when optimization is requested at compile time | 09:35 |
| arxcruz | asserts are removed when you use optimization | 09:35 |
| arxcruz | :) | 09:35 |
| yfried|afk | well, will the testing use optimization? seems reasonable to assume they won't. but whatever - you get the same result with roughly the same amount of code, right? | 09:37 |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, I don't think use assert is a good practice | 09:38 |
| arxcruz | even the TestCase assertXYZ code doesn't use it | 09:38 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: really? I was sure the did. I remember seeing it once. I might be wrong | 09:39 |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, I check the source code recently :) | 09:39 |
| yfried|afk | arxcruz: I trust you :) | 09:40 |
| *** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 09:42 | |
| arxcruz | yfried|afk, :) | 09:44 |
| *** yingjun has quit IRC | 09:44 | |
| *** rdas has quit IRC | 09:47 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 09:49 | |
| *** aix has joined #openstack-rally | 10:00 | |
| *** pradeep has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
| *** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC | 10:04 | |
| *** anshul has quit IRC | 10:09 | |
| *** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 10:15 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 10:24 | |
| *** nkhare has quit IRC | 10:26 | |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 10:31 | |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 10:34 | |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 10:34 | |
| *** anshul has quit IRC | 10:37 | |
| *** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 10:50 | |
| *** anshul has quit IRC | 10:50 | |
| *** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 10:51 | |
| *** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 10:51 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 10:53 | |
| *** e0ne_ is now known as e0ne | 10:55 | |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 11:02 | |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 11:04 | |
| *** aix has quit IRC | 11:07 | |
| *** nkhare has joined #openstack-rally | 11:07 | |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 11:09 | |
| *** anshul has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 11:13 | |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 11:15 | |
| *** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 11:15 | |
| *** rdas has joined #openstack-rally | 11:16 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 11:24 | |
| *** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 11:27 | |
| *** pradeep has joined #openstack-rally | 11:30 | |
| boris-42 | yfried__: ? | 11:31 |
| boris-42 | yfried__: no asserts in production code | 11:31 |
| boris-42 | yfried__: Rally is production code | 11:32 |
| boris-42 | yfried__: it's okay to run it with -o | 11:32 |
| boris-42 | yfried__: and I dislike idea of using unittest for anything except of unittests | 11:32 |
| boris-42 | yfried__: and one more thing is that we can't extend default unittest exceptions | 11:32 |
| boris-42 | yfried__: which will create issues | 11:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: Fix rally plugins relative imports https://review.openstack.org/176153 | 11:33 |
| boris-42 | arxcruz: this is explanations ^ | 11:34 |
| boris-42 | arxcruz: of why we shouldn't use unittest framework parts | 11:34 |
| arxcruz | yfried__, ^ | 11:36 |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 11:37 | |
| *** e0ne_ has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
| openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: [DO NOT MERGE] Testing coverage job https://review.openstack.org/175558 | 11:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve coverage job https://review.openstack.org/175841 | 11:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Fix creating user in keystone v3 wrapper https://review.openstack.org/175504 | 11:39 |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 11:40 | |
| *** softCloud has joined #openstack-rally | 11:41 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 11:46 | |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 11:53 | |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 11:56 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 11:58 | |
| *** aix has joined #openstack-rally | 11:58 | |
| *** msdubov_ has joined #openstack-rally | 11:59 | |
| openstackgerrit | svasheka proposed openstack/rally: Add keystone update_user_password scenario https://review.openstack.org/165422 | 12:00 |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 12:01 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mike Durnosvistov proposed openstack/rally: Add sample for the server block migration scenario https://review.openstack.org/175875 | 12:02 |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 12:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | svasheka proposed openstack/rally: Replace _delete_service method with _resource_delete https://review.openstack.org/176267 | 12:07 |
| *** rdas has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: Wait for status https://review.openstack.org/172466 | 12:09 |
| *** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 12:11 | |
| *** jaypipes has joined #openstack-rally | 12:15 | |
| *** yingjun has quit IRC | 12:15 | |
| *** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 12:16 | |
| *** redixin has joined #openstack-rally | 12:16 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-rally | 12:18 | |
| *** rook_ has joined #openstack-rally | 12:22 | |
| *** rook_ has quit IRC | 12:22 | |
| openstackgerrit | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/rally: Adding FunctionalMixin class https://review.openstack.org/146838 | 12:24 |
| *** anshul has quit IRC | 12:26 | |
| *** mwagner_lap has quit IRC | 12:31 | |
| *** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 12:38 | |
| *** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 12:41 | |
| *** e0ne_ is now known as e0ne | 12:46 | |
| *** nkhare has quit IRC | 12:47 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 12:48 | |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 12:58 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 12:59 | |
| *** pbandzi has quit IRC | 13:04 | |
| *** pbandzi has joined #openstack-rally | 13:06 | |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 13:12 | |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 13:14 | |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 13:16 | |
| *** Miouge has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
| *** Miouge has joined #openstack-rally | 13:24 | |
| *** redixin has quit IRC | 13:26 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 13:29 | |
| yfried__ | boris-42: arxcruz: ok. please put this in commit msg, for the next one to ask the same thing | 13:29 |
| *** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-rally | 13:33 | |
| *** pradeep has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
| *** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 13:46 | |
| *** pbandzi has quit IRC | 13:47 | |
| *** yingjun has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
| *** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-rally | 13:48 | |
| *** e0ne_ has quit IRC | 13:56 | |
| openstackgerrit | Nikita Konovalov proposed openstack/rally: [Sahara] Fix the config descriptions https://review.openstack.org/176321 | 13:59 |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 13:59 | |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 14:00 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 14:09 | |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 14:10 | |
| openstackgerrit | Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add function decorator `log_deprecated_args' https://review.openstack.org/174453 | 14:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Refactor run_command_over_ssh, add script_args https://review.openstack.org/173371 | 14:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Pavel Boldin proposed openstack/rally: Add `LogCatcher' context https://review.openstack.org/174454 | 14:15 |
| *** stpierre has joined #openstack-rally | 14:25 | |
| *** msdubov_ has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: Add sample for the server block migration scenario https://review.openstack.org/175875 | 14:25 |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 14:38 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 14:42 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 14:42 | |
| *** pradeep has joined #openstack-rally | 14:43 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 14:44 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 14:46 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: Add keystone update_user_password scenario https://review.openstack.org/165422 | 14:49 |
| *** davideagnello has joined #openstack-rally | 14:54 | |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 14:57 | |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 15:04 | |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 15:09 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 15:10 | |
| davideagnello | boris-42: is there a way to have scenario descriptions to show up in generated reports? | 15:17 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: not yet | 15:17 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: blocked by input task format | 15:18 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: ok, something the new format would allow too | 15:18 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: it will allow bunch of stuff | 15:18 |
| *** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC | 15:18 | |
| davideagnello | boris-42: yup, I have noticed :) | 15:19 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: I hope it will the last change in input format | 15:19 |
| boris-42 | will be* | 15:19 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: yeah, it gets more complicated each time. looks like the new format is comprehensive to allow some critical functionality | 15:21 |
| *** arxcruz has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: yep | 15:27 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: we didn't know about this functionallity year ago | 15:27 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: when we introduced the second format (current one) | 15:27 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: but it was amazing step forward=) | 15:27 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: because first format was really terrible=) | 15:28 |
| *** kiran-r has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
| *** csoukup has joined #openstack-rally | 15:35 | |
| *** c_soukup has joined #openstack-rally | 15:36 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
| *** csoukup has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
| *** c_soukup has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
| *** csoukup has joined #openstack-rally | 15:37 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 15:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Improve coverage job https://review.openstack.org/175841 | 15:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: [DO NOT MERGE] Testing coverage job https://review.openstack.org/175558 | 15:38 |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 15:39 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 15:41 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 15:42 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 15:42 | |
| *** neeti has quit IRC | 15:44 | |
| *** yfried|afk is now known as yfried__ | 15:48 | |
| *** pbandzi has joined #openstack-rally | 15:50 | |
| *** yfried__ is now known as yfried|afk | 16:04 | |
| *** yfried|afk has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
| *** coolsvap|afk has quit IRC | 16:21 | |
| *** coolsvap|afk has joined #openstack-rally | 16:24 | |
| *** tosky_ has joined #openstack-rally | 16:30 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 16:33 | |
| *** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-rally | 16:37 | |
| *** davideagnello has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
| *** subscope_ has joined #openstack-rally | 16:48 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
| *** pbandzi has quit IRC | 16:54 | |
| *** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja | 16:59 | |
| *** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC | 17:03 | |
| *** pradeep has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
| *** subscope_ has quit IRC | 17:07 | |
| *** subscope_ has joined #openstack-rally | 17:07 | |
| *** karmatronic has quit IRC | 17:10 | |
| *** yfried|afk has joined #openstack-rally | 17:15 | |
| *** davideagnello has joined #openstack-rally | 17:21 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 17:32 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
| davideagnello | boris-42: when Rally runs a benchmark with a constant runner and concurrency greater than 1, it looks like it spawns a process for each concurrent scenario being executed? these python processes run in parallel in order to simulate concurrent requests to your target cloud? | 17:45 |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 17:49 | |
| aix | davideagnello, not really, basically in the reality the number of process is the number of available cpu cores | 17:59 |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 17:59 | |
| davideagnello | ok, I noticed it takes a min between that times and concurrency | 18:00 |
| aix | davideagnello, yes and concurrency is "divided" by number of processes and scenarios are being executed in threads | 18:01 |
| aix | davideagnello, i.e you have 2 Cpu cores and 4 as concurrency, so 2 threads in 2 processes will be ran concurrently | 18:02 |
| davideagnello | aix: ok makes sense. so concurrency depends on the hardware you are running on top of | 18:03 |
| aix | davideagnello, The number of concurrently ran scenarios is always the same on different hardware but the way how the concurrent scenarios are being started is different, maybe it could have performance impact, i.e. If you compare for example "starting 1000 concurrent scenarios on machine with 1 cpu core" vs. "starting 1000 concurrent scenarios on machine with 1000 CPU cores" | 18:07 |
| aix | davideagnello, in the first case 1000 threads will be strated in one process, and in the second scenario one thread per each process will be started.. | 18:07 |
| aix | davideagnello, so 1000 processes with one thread (add 2. case) | 18:08 |
| davideagnello | aix: ok, understood. thank you for the details, very helpful :) | 18:09 |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 18:09 | |
| aix | davideagnello, yw | 18:09 |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 18:09 | |
| boris-42 | aix: thanks for helping davideagnello =) | 18:13 |
| *** tosky_ has quit IRC | 18:15 | |
| *** prashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 18:17 | |
| *** softCloud1 has joined #openstack-rally | 18:18 | |
| *** softCloud has quit IRC | 18:19 | |
| *** aix has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: Improve coverage job https://review.openstack.org/175841 | 18:50 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: thank you :) | 18:53 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: when executing a rally task with a provided .yaml or json file, can you specify to run just one benchmark from this file? | 18:54 |
| openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Fix creating user in keystone v3 wrapper https://review.openstack.org/175504 | 19:21 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: so you can write such template | 19:23 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: actually rally input task are jinja2 templates | 19:23 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: take a look here | 19:23 |
| *** jaypipes has quit IRC | 19:24 | |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 19:25 | |
| meteorfox | boris-42: I was thinking about adding a new 'scenario' primitive, that could be useful. I want to know, what you think, and see if it's even a good idea | 19:26 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: so, first the problem, | 19:26 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: https://rally.readthedocs.org/en/latest/tutorial/step_4_task_templates.html | 19:27 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: hm? | 19:27 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: there are multiple scenarios available, but sometimes I want to run the same scenario multiple times, but with different arguments. For example concurrent builds, 10 times with 1 concurrent, 20 times with 2 concurrent, 40 times with 4 concurrent, ..... | 19:28 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: so I was thinking of a scenario of scenarios | 19:28 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: for example, a RepeatScenario, that can repeat a finite number of times a collections of scenarios | 19:29 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: hm not sure? | 19:29 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: why not just passing N times | 19:29 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: scenario? | 19:29 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: or a WeightedScenarios, runs certain scenarios more than others based on a weight | 19:30 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: I dont' understand the use case of this | 19:30 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: well, say, later when we have concurrent scenarios this could run in parallel | 19:30 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: let me show you in another tool, the same kind of concept, where scenarios compose | 19:31 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: so you would like to have single iterations that run Scenario1 Scenario2 Secenaro3 | 19:31 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: yeah, something like that, or could be Scenario 1 multiple times with different arguments | 19:32 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: hm | 19:32 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: I know today, you can repeat multiple 'args,runner,context' blocks, but it's too verbose | 19:32 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: a lot of things are repeated | 19:32 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: it is okay | 19:33 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: so I would prefer to keep verbose mode | 19:34 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: like if you need to check for all images & flavors matrix | 19:34 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: that VMTask.boot_run_command works | 19:34 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: hmm ok | 19:35 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: you should use something like this https://gist.github.com/boris-42/b2a457b4f781357bd07f | 19:35 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: ooh that could work | 19:35 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: yep you can have arrays with args | 19:35 |
| meteorfox | boris-42: I forget you can do those things with jinja | 19:35 |
| boris-42 | ([flavor, image, times], .....) | 19:35 |
| boris-42 | and run N times | 19:36 |
| boris-42 | meteorfox: actually this is what I would like to see as certified task | 19:36 |
| meteorfox | ok | 19:36 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: ok, thank you. looks like you can't specify a specific benchmark when running a rally task | 19:37 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: yep | 19:37 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: just if you write such task | 19:37 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: after finishing new format | 19:38 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: I am thinking about allowing to run specific group or benchmark name | 19:38 |
| boris-42 | regexp/exact match | 19:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: WIP: Add manifest file and split jobs https://review.openstack.org/175973 | 19:40 |
| *** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-rally | 19:40 | |
| openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/175549 | 19:40 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: ok cool | 19:43 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: it will help if you write feature request | 19:44 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: https://github.com/openstack/rally/tree/master/doc/feature_request | 19:44 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: could you do it? | 19:44 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: so I won't forget to schedule it | 19:44 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: what was the command to extract the results from previous test runs and get the $? populated? thought I had it copied from before | 19:44 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: yes, I will! | 19:44 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: ah | 19:45 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: rally task sla_check | 19:45 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: great, got it. thanks :) | 19:46 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: so please make feature request it shouldn't take too much time | 19:46 |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 19:47 | |
| *** echoingu_ has joined #openstack-rally | 19:50 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 19:50 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 19:54 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-rally | 19:55 | |
| davideagnello | boris-42: doing it now | 19:56 |
| *** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 19:57 | |
| *** subscope_ has quit IRC | 19:59 | |
| *** psd has joined #openstack-rally | 20:03 | |
| psd | does anyone here know Carlos L. Torres' irc nick? | 20:05 |
| boris-42 | psd: meteorfox ^ | 20:06 |
| meteorfox | psd: that's me | 20:07 |
| psd | meteorfox: hey! | 20:08 |
| meteorfox | psd: hi | 20:08 |
| psd | meteorfox: Not sure if you checked out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169432/5/doc/specs/in-progress/add_cloud_info.rst | 20:09 |
| meteorfox | psd: I saw your comment :) | 20:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Davide Agnello proposed openstack/rally: Adding new feature request for Rally. https://review.openstack.org/176460 | 20:10 |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
| psd | meteorfox: do you want me to add/change something or just put up a new patch? | 20:12 |
| meteorfox | psd: I was just asking for an example, of what's going to be the format of the JSON value for the environment_info | 20:13 |
| meteorfox | psd: ideally, you could show an example in the spec | 20:13 |
| meteorfox | psd: sorry, I have a meeting to go now | 20:14 |
| psd | meteorfox: okay, I'll add one and put up a new patch. thanks :) | 20:17 |
| meteorfox | psd: sure, I'll review it once is up. thanks! | 20:18 |
| *** echoingu_ has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 20:25 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 20:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alexander Gubanov proposed openstack/rally: Adds Nova floating IPs bulk tests https://review.openstack.org/168054 | 20:46 |
| *** csoukup has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
| davideagnello | boris-42: Does Rally supports accessing service API's directly through REST API's? useful for some negative testing | 21:00 |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 21:01 | |
| davideagnello | boris-42: vs. writing your own rest client as part of your tests | 21:02 |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 21:02 | |
| *** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 21:03 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 21:19 | |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: so not sure what to say | 21:26 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: we don't have anything done realted to this | 21:26 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: but you can use python request lib | 21:26 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: ok thanks, will look into python's request lib | 21:27 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 21:29 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-rally | 21:30 | |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117705/ | 21:30 |
| *** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 21:31 | |
| davideagnello | boris-42: cool | 21:35 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: can you capture logs of a specific test run after running a task for it? similar to generating reports anytime after benchmark run | 21:36 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: rally logs? | 21:39 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: logs captured from benchmark runs? | 21:40 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: the ones that get generated when you run with -v and --debug | 21:41 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: so nope | 21:42 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: ok so we should store the output as needed then when running benchmarks | 21:44 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: so you can add as well feature requrest | 21:46 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: regarding to this | 21:46 |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: and we will try to find the way to implement it | 21:46 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: ok :) | 21:46 |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 21:56 | |
| boris-42 | davideagnello: btw please update this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176460/ =) | 22:00 |
| davideagnello | boris-42: whoops, ok | 22:00 |
| *** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-rally | 22:05 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 22:11 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-rally | 22:11 | |
| *** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 22:12 | |
| *** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 22:13 | |
| *** prashantS has quit IRC | 22:16 | |
| *** jaypipes has joined #openstack-rally | 22:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: [Swift] Add base for Swift API Benchmarks: Patch-2 https://review.openstack.org/159258 | 22:32 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: Add function decorator `log_deprecated_args' https://review.openstack.org/174453 | 22:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Prabhjyot Singh Sodhi proposed openstack/rally: [SPEC] Create 'add cloud info' spec file https://review.openstack.org/169432 | 22:38 |
| *** karimb has joined #openstack-rally | 22:39 | |
| *** karimb has quit IRC | 22:45 | |
| *** shakamunyi has quit IRC | 22:46 | |
| *** psd has quit IRC | 22:54 | |
| *** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC | 22:59 | |
| openstackgerrit | Davide Agnello proposed openstack/rally: Adding new feature request for Rally. https://review.openstack.org/176460 | 23:36 |
| openstackgerrit | Davide Agnello proposed openstack/rally: Adding new feature request for Rally. https://review.openstack.org/176460 | 23:38 |
| openstackgerrit | Davide Agnello proposed openstack/rally: feature request to capture task logs https://review.openstack.org/176551 | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!