*** dmorita has joined #openstack-rally | 00:33 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 00:36 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 00:50 | |
*** fhubik_lunch has joined #openstack-rally | 01:01 | |
*** fhubik_afk has quit IRC | 01:04 | |
*** fhubik_lunch has quit IRC | 01:11 | |
*** fhubik_lunch has joined #openstack-rally | 01:11 | |
*** fhubik_lunch is now known as fhubik_afk | 01:11 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 01:20 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 01:52 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 01:54 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 02:09 | |
*** dpaterson has joined #openstack-rally | 02:25 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 02:33 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 02:39 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 02:49 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 02:54 | |
*** boris-42 has quit IRC | 02:58 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 03:22 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 03:29 | |
*** yingjun_ has joined #openstack-rally | 03:33 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 03:33 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 03:34 | |
*** yingjun_ has quit IRC | 03:38 | |
openstackgerrit | Li Yingjun proposed openstack/rally: Fixes devstack repo https://review.openstack.org/181304 | 03:39 |
---|---|---|
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 03:52 | |
*** jjmb1 has joined #openstack-rally | 03:54 | |
*** jjmb has quit IRC | 03:55 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 04:05 | |
*** tfreger has joined #openstack-rally | 04:23 | |
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap | 04:23 | |
*** rdas has joined #openstack-rally | 04:51 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 04:53 | |
*** neeti has joined #openstack-rally | 05:09 | |
*** pradeep has joined #openstack-rally | 05:23 | |
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 05:29 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 05:35 | |
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 05:40 | |
*** anshul has joined #openstack-rally | 05:41 | |
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 05:43 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 06:03 | |
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally | 06:22 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 06:23 | |
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-rally | 06:23 | |
*** yfried_ is now known as yfried|afk | 06:24 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried_ | 06:24 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 06:52 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 06:56 | |
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 07:14 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 07:20 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 07:22 | |
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 07:22 | |
*** pbandzi has joined #openstack-rally | 07:24 | |
openstackgerrit | Li Yingjun proposed openstack/rally: Validate tenant related scenarios when using keystone v3 https://review.openstack.org/181321 | 07:29 |
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally | 07:31 | |
*** yfried_ is now known as yfried|afk | 07:36 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried_ | 07:38 | |
*** yfried_ has quit IRC | 07:46 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 07:52 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 07:57 | |
*** karimb has joined #openstack-rally | 08:18 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 08:20 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 08:23 | |
*** yfried has joined #openstack-rally | 08:24 | |
yfried | andreykurilin1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168849/ | 08:25 |
yfried | andreykurilin1: this is waiting for you :) | 08:25 |
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 08:27 | |
*** fhubik has joined #openstack-rally | 08:28 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: Remove executable bit from files that should not be executable https://review.openstack.org/181373 | 08:28 |
*** aix has joined #openstack-rally | 09:20 | |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-rally | 09:31 | |
*** aswadr has joined #openstack-rally | 09:33 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 09:36 | |
*** pbandzi has quit IRC | 09:41 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 09:41 | |
*** pbandzi has joined #openstack-rally | 09:42 | |
*** pbandzi has quit IRC | 09:44 | |
*** pbandzi has joined #openstack-rally | 09:46 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 09:46 | |
*** nkhare has joined #openstack-rally | 09:54 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 09:56 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 10:01 | |
vaidy | andreykurilin1, ping | 10:22 |
vaidy | boris-42, ping | 10:22 |
vaidy | yfried, ping | 10:23 |
yfried | vaidy: hey | 10:26 |
vaidy | yfried, hi | 10:26 |
vaidy | yfried, have a question regarding deployment create command | 10:27 |
vaidy | yfried, deployment create --fromenv commands creates the users and tags them as admin even they are normal user | 10:27 |
vaidy | yfried, i think that is wrong | 10:27 |
vaidy | yfried, that needs to be verified and created | 10:28 |
yfried | vaidy: what do you mean "tags them as admin"? | 10:28 |
vaidy | yfried, if you see the db entry for permission column all the users have admin tagged to them even if they are non admin users | 10:29 |
vaidy | yfried, which is wrong | 10:29 |
yfried | vaidy: I've never worked with non-admin users in rally. is this part of new users-accounts feature? | 10:30 |
yfried | vaidy: anyway, seems to me you are right. maybe post a bug? | 10:30 |
vaidy | yfried, for instance say a default devstack instance create 3 users admin/demo/alt_demo | 10:31 |
yfried | vaidy: ok | 10:31 |
vaidy | yfried, admin should have admin permission and demo and alt_demo should have users permission | 10:31 |
vaidy | yfried, but the db entries have admin for all 3 users | 10:31 |
yfried | vaidy: ok | 10:32 |
vaidy | yfried, which if not correct | 10:32 |
yfried | vaidy: I understand | 10:32 |
yfried | vaidy: as I've said - seems like a bug | 10:32 |
vaidy | yfried, yeah i will go ahead and post a bug with details | 10:32 |
vaidy | yfried, thanks | 10:33 |
vaidy | yfried, because this affects my other fix | 10:33 |
vaidy | :) | 10:33 |
yfried | vaidy: sure | 10:33 |
vaidy | yfried, i can't validate if its admin of a normal user because deployment.get doesn't return anything for normal users | 10:34 |
vaidy | yfried, thanks will post a bug though | 10:34 |
yfried | vaidy: I have no idea what you are talking about. sorry | 10:34 |
vaidy | yfried, no problem, i have posted a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1453758 | 10:43 |
openstack | vaidy: Error: malone bug 1453758 not found | 10:43 |
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk | 10:48 | |
*** dmorita has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 11:03 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 11:07 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 11:17 | |
*** fhubik has quit IRC | 11:19 | |
*** fhubik_afk has quit IRC | 11:19 | |
*** fhubik has joined #openstack-rally | 11:21 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_afk | 11:26 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 11:30 | |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-rally | 11:32 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 11:41 | |
*** softCloud has joined #openstack-rally | 11:53 | |
*** fhubik_afk is now known as fhubik | 11:58 | |
openstackgerrit | Mikhail Dubov proposed openstack/rally: Release 0.0.4 https://review.openstack.org/180498 | 11:59 |
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-rally | 12:05 | |
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC | 12:07 | |
*** rdas has quit IRC | 12:17 | |
*** fhubik has quit IRC | 12:18 | |
*** fhubik has joined #openstack-rally | 12:18 | |
*** MaxPC has joined #openstack-rally | 12:20 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 12:32 | |
*** agarciam has quit IRC | 12:42 | |
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally | 12:43 | |
frickler | boris-42: would you prefer if we split https://review.openstack.org/179428 into two patches so that we can discuss the change to secgroup.py seperately? | 12:48 |
*** jjmb1 has quit IRC | 12:49 | |
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-rally | 12:50 | |
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-rally | 12:50 | |
boris-42 | frickler: changes are just wrong | 12:50 |
boris-42 | frickler: we don't need to split them because there is nothing to discuss there | 12:50 |
boris-42 | frickler: you can use this context with any of benchmark scenarios | 12:50 |
boris-42 | frickler: and it will create and won't delete any sec groups | 12:51 |
frickler | boris-42: wrong, it will try to delete them twice and I get errors for the second try | 12:51 |
boris-42 | frickler: which produce bigger issue than one that you are trying to fix | 12:51 |
boris-42 | frickler: nope | 12:51 |
boris-42 | frickler: it will try to delete them twice only because we have currently issues with cleanup mechanism and cleanups inside context | 12:52 |
boris-42 | frickler: and this will happen only if cleanup context is used | 12:52 |
boris-42 | frickler: that deletes secgroups | 12:53 |
boris-42 | frickler: and it is not use for all scenarios | 12:53 |
frickler | so is there a different bug report for that? | 12:53 |
frickler | but o.k., so I'll just remove that part of the change | 12:53 |
boris-42 | frickler: it's not bug* | 12:53 |
boris-42 | frickler: it's just bad framework | 12:54 |
boris-42 | frickler: and for now we don't know how to fix it properly | 12:54 |
boris-42 | frickler: wtakase is working on improvment of cleanup mechansim | 12:54 |
boris-42 | frickler: part of those changes are related | 12:54 |
boris-42 | frickler: to isolation of resources create by ctx and scenario | 12:55 |
boris-42 | frickler: you can rewrite that code that deletes secuirity group | 12:56 |
boris-42 | frickler: in next way | 12:56 |
boris-42 | list of security groups / send delete requests if they exist | 12:56 |
boris-42 | so it won't pring warnings message | 12:57 |
boris-42 | but I would prefer to do this in separated patch anyway | 12:58 |
boris-42 | frickler: ^ | 12:58 |
frickler | boris-42: yeah, I agree, so let me first update the current patch | 12:59 |
boris-42 | frickler: yep | 13:00 |
boris-42 | frickler: btw are you going to attend summit? | 13:00 |
frickler | boris-42: yep | 13:03 |
boris-42 | frickler: so Rally has 1 talk + 3 design sessions | 13:03 |
*** flamebot has joined #openstack-rally | 13:04 | |
openstackgerrit | Jens Rosenboom proposed openstack/rally: Fix security groups cleanup https://review.openstack.org/179428 | 13:09 |
frickler | boris-42: yes, I added them to my schedule, but I'm currently still like 3x overbooked most of the time :D | 13:09 |
boris-42 | frickler: lol | 13:10 |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 13:11 | |
frickler | mostly comes from being op + dev at the same time, I really hope that the Ops Summit will get separated next time | 13:11 |
boris-42 | frickler: heh | 13:13 |
boris-42 | frickler: I don't know who I am | 13:13 |
boris-42 | =) | 13:13 |
*** tfreger has quit IRC | 13:16 | |
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 13:27 | |
*** pradeep has quit IRC | 13:29 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 13:42 | |
*** yfried|afk has quit IRC | 13:44 | |
*** yfried|afk has joined #openstack-rally | 13:45 | |
*** msdubov_ has joined #openstack-rally | 13:49 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 13:54 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 13:54 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 13:55 | |
vaidy | boris-42, ping | 13:59 |
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 14:01 | |
*** nkhare has quit IRC | 14:03 | |
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 14:05 | |
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 14:06 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 14:06 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-rally | 14:07 | |
*** rook has quit IRC | 14:09 | |
*** neeti has quit IRC | 14:10 | |
*** rook has joined #openstack-rally | 14:11 | |
*** nkhare has joined #openstack-rally | 14:17 | |
*** openstack has joined #openstack-rally | 14:20 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 14:21 | |
*** msdubov_ has quit IRC | 14:27 | |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/181915 | 14:30 |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 14:33 | |
*** pradeep has joined #openstack-rally | 14:34 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 14:35 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
*** stpierre has joined #openstack-rally | 14:35 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 14:35 | |
vaidy | boris-42, https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1453758 | 14:48 |
openstack | vaidy: Error: malone bug 1453758 not found | 14:48 |
vaidy | boris-42, i feel this should be fixed to get the other bug you assigned me to be working | 14:48 |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 15:01 | |
*** nkhare has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
*** rook has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
*** aix has quit IRC | 15:12 | |
boris-42 | vaidy: I do not understand that bug | 15:14 |
*** aswadr has quit IRC | 15:14 | |
boris-42 | vaidy: could you provide more details? | 15:14 |
vaidy | boris-42, hi | 15:17 |
vaidy | boris-42, you remember you had given me this bug to fix? | 15:18 |
vaidy | https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1449760 | 15:18 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1449760 in Rally "Rally deployment check doesn't check "users" credentials " [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Vaidyanath (vaidyanath-m) | 15:18 |
vaidy | boris-42, when i was testing this i found that when i execute "rally deployment create --fromenv" | 15:18 |
vaidy | boris-42, the db gets updated with permission for users | 15:19 |
vaidy | boris-42, in my case the devstack have admin/demo/alt_demo all 2 users get the permission as admin in the db | 15:19 |
*** rook has joined #openstack-rally | 15:20 | |
boris-42 | vaidy: so please give me some context... | 15:22 |
boris-42 | vaidy: what is "I was testing this" | 15:22 |
boris-42 | vaidy: regarding to "rally deployment create --fromenv" -> it's just shortcut and it requires that you have admin users in admin tenant inside the global env variables | 15:23 |
vaidy | boris-42, even if I have demo and demo in global env variables "rally deployment create --fromenv" will create the deployment | 15:24 |
boris-42 | vaidy: yep | 15:26 |
boris-42 | vaidy: it will | 15:26 |
boris-42 | vaidy: even if you have invalid user it will create | 15:27 |
vaidy | boris-42, so both admin and demo gets the permission column updated as "admin" | 15:27 |
vaidy | boris-42, i am talking in the context of database | 15:29 |
vaidy | boris-42, the database table deployment has a column permission which gets a value admin for both users admin and demo | 15:30 |
vaidy | boris-42, which is wrong | 15:30 |
boris-42 | vaidy: hm | 15:34 |
boris-42 | vaidy: in any case this won't be used in future and it is not used for now | 15:34 |
vaidy | boris-42, didn't get you | 15:35 |
boris-42 | vaidy: this column is not used | 15:35 |
vaidy | boris-42, ok in that case coming back to (what is "I was testing this") | 15:36 |
boris-42 | vaidy: so this column https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/db/sqlalchemy/models.py#L84 ? | 15:36 |
vaidy | boris-42, hope you remember you assigned me the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/144976 | 15:36 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 144976 in GetDeb Software Portal "Create package: vnstat" [Wishlist,Fix released] | 15:36 |
boris-42 | vaidy: or values inside it | 15:36 |
boris-42 | vaidy: seems like it's not bug that I asked you... | 15:37 |
vaidy | boris-42, deployment check for normal users | 15:38 |
boris-42 | vaidy: so yep | 15:38 |
boris-42 | vaidy: this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1449760 | 15:38 |
openstack | Launchpad bug 1449760 in Rally "Rally deployment check doesn't check "users" credentials " [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Vaidyanath (vaidyanath-m) | 15:38 |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 15:39 | |
boris-42 | vaidy: ^ you forgot last 0 | 15:39 |
vaidy | boris-42, sorry typo | 15:39 |
vaidy | boris-42, on what basis should I validate the admin users and normal users | 15:40 |
boris-42 | vaidy: if it is in deploymnet.get("admin") - it must be admin | 15:41 |
boris-42 | vaidy: in deployment.get("users") - you have users that are not admin | 15:41 |
boris-42 | vaidy: as we discussed in your patch before (you shouldn't touch existing code) | 15:42 |
boris-42 | vaidy: and just add after it few lines of code | 15:42 |
vaidy | boris-42, ok | 15:42 |
boris-42 | vaidy: that just creates osclients.Clients instance and run keystone() | 15:42 |
vaidy | boris-42, fine | 15:43 |
vaidy | boris-42, but just getting to know the complete flow | 15:43 |
vaidy | boris-42, understanding the bits and parts of rally so that in future it will be easy to fix future bugs | 15:44 |
vaidy | boris-42, please bare with me | 15:44 |
boris-42 | vaidy: yep sure | 15:44 |
boris-42 | vaidy: so you can actually improve deployment create plugin | 15:45 |
boris-42 | vaidy: this https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/deploy/engines/existing.py#L134-L144 | 15:46 |
*** anshul has quit IRC | 15:46 | |
boris-42 | vaidy: so you can raise exceptions if no such users or so on | 15:47 |
vaidy | boris-42, sure this seems to be a good scope for inprovement | 15:47 |
vaidy | boris-42, yes | 15:48 |
boris-42 | vaidy: but it should be separated change | 15:49 |
boris-42 | vaidy: imho | 15:49 |
vaidy | boris-42, yes that will be a seperate activity | 15:49 |
vaidy | boris-42, will try to create a new bug and will take up that | 15:49 |
openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/181915 | 15:52 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 15:57 | |
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_ | 15:58 | |
*** e0ne_ is now known as e0ne | 15:58 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 16:10 | |
*** pradeep has quit IRC | 16:21 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 16:32 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 16:33 | |
openstackgerrit | Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark https://review.openstack.org/171625 | 16:36 |
*** pradeep has joined #openstack-rally | 16:37 | |
*** karimb has quit IRC | 16:45 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 16:48 | |
openstackgerrit | Roman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: Add deploy environment murano benchmark https://review.openstack.org/171625 | 16:55 |
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-rally | 16:58 | |
*** davideagnello has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-rally | 17:00 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 17:03 | |
*** baker has joined #openstack-rally | 17:08 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
*** turul has joined #openstack-rally | 17:15 | |
*** turul is now known as afazekas | 17:15 | |
boris-42 | frickler: hey | 17:16 |
boris-42 | frickler: can we do cleanup of security groups without this hack: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/179428/8/rally/benchmark/context/users.py | 17:16 |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
*** arxcruz has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
*** vipul has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
*** yfried has quit IRC | 17:37 | |
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: We have discovered post-upgrade issues with Gerrit affecting nova (and potentially other projects). Some changes will not appear and some actions, such as queries, may return an error. We are continuing to investigate. | 17:39 | |
*** ChanServ changes topic to "We have discovered post-upgrade issues with Gerrit affecting nova (and potentially other projects). Some changes will not appear and some actions, such as queries, may return an error. We are continuing to investigate." | 17:39 | |
*** fresh has joined #openstack-rally | 17:46 | |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-rally | 17:54 | |
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 17:55 | |
*** pradeep has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
*** baker has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
*** baker has joined #openstack-rally | 18:00 | |
*** baker_ has joined #openstack-rally | 18:02 | |
*** baker has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
*** pradeep has joined #openstack-rally | 18:12 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 18:19 | |
*** yfried has joined #openstack-rally | 18:19 | |
*** yfried has quit IRC | 18:19 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 18:20 | |
*** igormarnat_ has joined #openstack-rally | 18:24 | |
*** pradeep has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
*** akuznetsova has quit IRC | 18:25 | |
*** igormarnat has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** dmellado has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** yfried has joined #openstack-rally | 18:26 | |
*** svasheka has quit IRC | 18:26 | |
*** igormarnat_ is now known as igormarnat | 18:27 | |
*** pradeep has joined #openstack-rally | 18:27 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 18:27 | |
*** akuznetsova has joined #openstack-rally | 18:27 | |
*** dmellado has joined #openstack-rally | 18:27 | |
*** svasheka has joined #openstack-rally | 18:27 | |
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris | 18:33 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 18:35 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 18:41 | |
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away | 18:41 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 18:42 | |
*** harlowja has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-rally | 18:52 | |
*** baker_ has quit IRC | 19:02 | |
*** baker has joined #openstack-rally | 19:02 | |
*** baker has quit IRC | 19:02 | |
*** baker has joined #openstack-rally | 19:03 | |
*** softCloud has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
*** baker has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
boris-42 | frickler: you can put any order number to secuirty group cleanup | 19:12 |
boris-42 | frickler: so it will be cleaned and the proper time | 19:12 |
*** baker has joined #openstack-rally | 19:12 | |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Nova scenario to boot multiple servers in one request https://review.openstack.org/176858 | 19:19 |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add Heat scenario to test scaling policies https://review.openstack.org/178436 | 19:20 |
openstackgerrit | Chris St. Pierre proposed openstack/rally: Add scenario to modify Cinder volume metadata https://review.openstack.org/174894 | 19:21 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 19:29 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 19:34 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 19:34 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 19:49 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 19:53 | |
*** fresh has quit IRC | 19:55 | |
*** baker_ has joined #openstack-rally | 20:01 | |
*** baker has quit IRC | 20:01 | |
*** baker_ has quit IRC | 20:04 | |
*** baker has joined #openstack-rally | 20:04 | |
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC | 20:07 | |
*** drwho has joined #openstack-rally | 20:17 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 20:22 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 20:27 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 20:32 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 20:33 | |
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-rally | 20:43 | |
frickler | boris-42: the order only works within rally.benchmark.context.cleanup.context, but network cleanup is in rally.benchmark.context.network which comes strictly afterwards | 20:50 |
frickler | boris-42: the only other location I can see feasible would be NeutronWrapper.delete_network in rally/benchmark/wrappers/network.py, but IMHO that would not be much cleaner | 20:52 |
boris-42 | frickler: why we can't delete security groups during cleanup of network context | 20:53 |
boris-42 | frickler: seems more reasonable? | 20:53 |
boris-42 | frickler: I really don't want to make monster from user context | 20:54 |
boris-42 | frickler: btw I saw some email thread from stpierre regarding to this | 20:54 |
frickler | boris-42: in the end it is one resource per tenant, not per network | 20:54 |
stpierre | the email thread i started was sort of related, but it was only for 'default' security group deletion on nova-network. and i'm not sure i care enough to do the work necessary for it, since we're moving off of nova-network before too terribly long | 20:55 |
*** meteorfox_ has joined #openstack-rally | 20:55 | |
boris-42 | stpierre: lol | 20:55 |
boris-42 | someday after few years | 20:56 |
boris-42 | rally team will remove nova-network related hacks | 20:56 |
boris-42 | frickler: so I have idea | 20:57 |
boris-42 | frickler: so what if we just refactor the security group context (allow_ssh) | 20:58 |
boris-42 | frickler: so it will delete only it's own secruity group rules & generic cleanup won't delete | 20:59 |
boris-42 | frickler: this ssh | 20:59 |
boris-42 | frickler: like resource from context can have rally_ctx_* | 21:01 |
boris-42 | frickler: thoughts? | 21:01 |
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-rally | 21:02 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 21:03 | |
frickler | boris-42: that would resolve the conflict between these two, but I don't see where it would help with the default security group | 21:03 |
frickler | boris-42: we need to remove the default sg also when allow_ssh context is not used | 21:06 |
boris-42 | frickler: so seems like we have to do like you did for default one =(( | 21:06 |
boris-42 | frickler: yep | 21:06 |
boris-42 | me hate openstack=( | 21:06 |
frickler | boris-42: its not like I didn't try other options | 21:06 |
boris-42 | and how users/tenants are implemented=( | 21:06 |
*** botang has quit IRC | 21:07 | |
*** botang has joined #openstack-rally | 21:08 | |
frickler | yes, being able to have objects referencing tenants which no longer exist is really bad | 21:08 |
frickler | but I guess we have to be happy with what we have | 21:09 |
frickler | just like the bug I had with nova the other day ... turns out it can't be easily fixed because that would be an API change what in turn would need a new micro-version ... | 21:10 |
frickler | or the glance bug with SSL, can't be fixed in stable/juno because there is no proper branch for python-glanceclient | 21:11 |
frickler | but I disgress, better get to bed now ... ;) | 21:11 |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 21:12 | |
boris-42 | frickler: reviewed your patch | 21:17 |
boris-42 | frickler: some nits | 21:17 |
boris-42 | frickler: otherwise we have to merge it | 21:17 |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 21:20 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 21:21 | |
*** MaxPC has quit IRC | 21:23 | |
*** meteorfox_ has quit IRC | 21:27 | |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 21:41 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
*** botang has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
boris-42 | jlk: ping | 22:08 |
jlk | howdy | 22:08 |
boris-42 | jlk: working on diagrams for presentation | 22:08 |
boris-42 | jlk: https://twitter.com/PavlovicBoris/status/597885837892853761 =) | 22:08 |
jlk | haha | 22:09 |
boris-42 | jlk: not too much?) | 22:09 |
jlk | I"m searching for the right image to represent a dead rabbit (server) | 22:09 |
jlk | boris-42: s/to/in/ for the first square | 22:10 |
jlk | but that process is about right | 22:10 |
boris-42 | jlk: ah going to fix | 22:10 |
boris-42 | jlk: =) | 22:14 |
boris-42 | jlk fixed https://twitter.com/PavlovicBoris/status/597887423406874625 | 22:14 |
boris-42 | jlk: oh this is going to be funny =) | 22:15 |
*** drwho has quit IRC | 22:26 | |
*** baker has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
*** stpierre has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
*** mpopow has joined #openstack-rally | 22:46 | |
*** mpopow has quit IRC | 22:51 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 23:14 | |
*** imarnat is now known as igormarnat | 23:24 | |
*** botang has joined #openstack-rally | 23:29 | |
*** igormarnat is now known as imarnat | 23:35 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is going offline while we perform an emergency downgrade to version 2.8. | 23:55 | |
*** ChanServ changes topic to "Gerrit is going offline while we perform an emergency downgrade to version 2.8." | 23:55 | |
*** botang has quit IRC | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!