Monday, 2015-08-10

*** kbyrne has quit IRC00:17
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-rally00:20
*** dspano has quit IRC01:11
*** psuriset has quit IRC01:29
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally01:29
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally01:43
*** psuriset has quit IRC02:37
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-rally02:49
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally02:50
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally03:37
*** PrashantS has quit IRC04:17
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally04:18
*** sacharya has quit IRC04:21
*** PrashantS has quit IRC04:23
*** rdas has joined #openstack-rally04:52
*** tfreger has joined #openstack-rally04:54
*** psuriset has quit IRC04:56
*** yfried_ has quit IRC05:02
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally05:09
*** psuriset has quit IRC05:26
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally05:36
*** yfried_ has joined #openstack-rally05:55
*** yfried__ has joined #openstack-rally05:56
*** yfried__ is now known as yfried05:59
*** yfried_ has quit IRC05:59
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally06:12
*** PrashantS has quit IRC06:44
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally06:45
*** PrashantS has quit IRC06:49
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally07:03
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally07:12
*** abehl has joined #openstack-rally07:16
*** abehl has joined #openstack-rally07:17
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-rally07:27
*** albertw has quit IRC07:38
*** kbaikov has joined #openstack-rally07:39
*** albertw has joined #openstack-rally07:39
*** kbaikov has quit IRC07:41
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally07:44
*** fhubik has joined #openstack-rally07:45
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb07:46
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik07:47
*** kbaikov has joined #openstack-rally07:48
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk07:49
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried07:53
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally08:10
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:16
*** zerda has joined #openstack-rally08:18
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb08:19
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik08:25
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally08:32
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally08:44
*** PrashantS has quit IRC08:52
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:53
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally09:05
*** PrashantS has quit IRC09:13
openstackgerritOleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/21013709:14
*** klindgren__ has joined #openstack-rally09:15
*** klindgren_ has quit IRC09:17
openstackgerritKiran proposed openstack/rally: Add unit test  https://review.openstack.org/21070009:18
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally09:24
*** _kiran_ has joined #openstack-rally09:28
*** kiran-r has quit IRC09:31
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally09:31
*** PrashantS has quit IRC09:33
openstackgerritnayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Add Cinder create_and_update_volume scenario  https://review.openstack.org/20899609:40
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally09:42
openstackgerritOleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/21013709:44
*** cdent has joined #openstack-rally09:45
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb09:49
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk10:00
*** PrashantS has quit IRC10:14
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally10:14
*** redixin has joined #openstack-rally10:15
*** rediskin has joined #openstack-rally10:16
*** redixin has quit IRC10:16
*** rediskin has quit IRC10:16
*** redixin has joined #openstack-rally10:17
*** sunilm has joined #openstack-rally10:19
*** PrashantS has quit IRC10:20
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried10:20
*** agarciam1 has joined #openstack-rally10:26
*** agarciam1 has quit IRC10:26
*** agarciam1 has joined #openstack-rally10:26
*** agarciam has quit IRC10:27
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally10:28
openstackgerritIllia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Refactor BenchmarkEngine  https://review.openstack.org/20904610:39
openstackgerritKiran proposed openstack/rally: Add unit test  https://review.openstack.org/21070010:49
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally10:51
yfriedkiran-r: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193527 why are vips created using admin client and not regular client?10:53
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-rally10:53
*** _kiran_ has quit IRC10:55
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC10:57
openstackgerritAlexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add classes for task HTML report charts  https://review.openstack.org/15945810:57
kiran-ryfried: In Line #362 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193527/32/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/neutron/utils.py,cm we are trying to use an un-authorized tenant.10:59
yfriedkiran-r: why?11:00
yfriedkiran-r: something here is wrong. these ops should be done on default tenant11:01
openstackgerritAlexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add chunks support to report  https://review.openstack.org/14681411:03
yfriedkiran-r: please go over my comments11:05
openstackgerritAlexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add chunks support to report  https://review.openstack.org/14681411:08
kiran-ryfried: Sorry I was away11:08
yfriedkiran-r: np11:09
yfriedkiran-r: posted comments to your patch11:09
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik11:09
kiran-ryfried: I saw. :)11:09
kiran-ryfried: I will get back to you on the admin_clients thingy soon.11:10
*** PrashantS has quit IRC11:11
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally11:12
*** PrashantS has quit IRC11:12
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally11:13
yfriedkiran-r: I saw you were asked this already11:13
kiran-ryfried: using clients will say the ¨pool was not found¨11:14
kiran-rWhen iterated around the context created pools11:15
kiran-ryfried: And I realized that we need to specify tenant_id where the pool was earlier created.11:16
kiran-ryfried: specifying tenant_id was throwing an error saying trying use unauthenticated tenant. admin_clients solved all the problem.11:17
*** PrashantS has quit IRC11:18
yfriedkiran-r: then maybe the pools were created badly.11:18
yfriedkiran-r: I'm not sure how, but the lbaas ctx seems to be creating the pools without tenant id11:22
yfriedkiran-r: in that ctx, you should either:11:22
yfriedkiran-r: retrieve the tenant's client from the client manager (don't know how)11:23
yfriedkiran-r: use pool_create with tenant id,11:23
yfriedkiran-r: ^ assuming the client you have in ctx is admin11:23
openstackgerritAlexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add Load Profile chart to report  https://review.openstack.org/16982811:24
*** tab_ has joined #openstack-rally11:24
openstackgerritIllia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Fix typo in 'new rally input task format' spec  https://review.openstack.org/21110711:27
kiran-ryfried: You mean I need to create context pools using tenant_id??11:28
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally11:32
*** kiran-r has quit IRC11:32
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC11:34
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk11:35
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally11:36
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC11:37
*** rdas has quit IRC11:48
*** sunilm has quit IRC11:48
*** zerda has quit IRC11:48
*** ahirshbeg_ has joined #openstack-rally11:51
*** pboldin has joined #openstack-rally11:54
pboldinHi all, please review https://review.openstack.org/183228/11:54
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried11:59
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb12:03
ahirshbeg_Hello fellow Rally users. Can some one point or explain the following variables in the runner input task since I wasn't able to find explanation in the code:12:04
ahirshbeg_ "runner": {         "rps": 1,          "type": "rps",          "timeout": 360,          "times": 200       }12:04
ahirshbeg_AFAIK rps = Scenario task per second12:04
ahirshbeg_type = ???12:04
ahirshbeg_timeout = Total timeout per task (regardless of the fact it is still running)12:04
ahirshbeg_times = Total times of task requests to made12:04
ahirshbeg_So in theory it will take me 200 seconds to send all task request, am I right here?12:04
ahirshbeg_From debug log I see:12:04
ahirshbeg_2015-08-10 14:02:44.256 17810 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task c49e3985-95ac-4e41-a2b5-5ed4ca38ceb7 | ITER: 4 START12:04
ahirshbeg_2015-08-10 14:02:44.257 17811 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task c49e3985-95ac-4e41-a2b5-5ed4ca38ceb7 | ITER: 5 START12:04
ahirshbeg_2015-08-10 14:02:44.257 17811 RALLYDEBUG rally.plugins.common.runners.rps [-] Worker: 2 rps: 0.499915286353 (requested rps: 0.25)12:04
ahirshbeg_2015-08-10 14:02:44.256 17810 RALLYDEBUG rally.plugins.common.runners.rps [-] Worker: 2 rps: 0.499857049339 (requested rps: 0.25)12:04
ahirshbeg_2015-08-10 14:02:44.258 17813 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task c49e3985-95ac-4e41-a2b5-5ed4ca38ceb7 | ITER: 6 START12:04
ahirshbeg_2015-08-10 14:02:44.259 17814 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task c49e3985-95ac-4e41-a2b5-5ed4ca38ceb7 | ITER: 7 START12:04
ahirshbeg_2015-08-10 14:02:44.259 17814 RALLYDEBUG rally.plugins.common.runners.rps [-] Worker: 2 rps: 0.49995562828 (requested rps: 0.25)12:04
ahirshbeg_2015-08-10 14:02:44.258 17813 RALLYDEBUG rally.plugins.common.runners.rps [-] Worker: 2 rps: 0.499929765793 (requested rps: 0.25)12:04
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik12:08
*** Miouge has joined #openstack-rally12:08
pboldinahirshbeg_: please use paste.openstack.org12:08
amaretskiyahirshbeg_: "type" is runner type - this is one from existing runners12:09
amaretskiyahirshbeg_: here are runners that come with rally https://github.com/openstack/rally/tree/master/rally/plugins/common/runners12:10
amaretskiyahirshbeg_ `times' is how many iterations to run, e.g. how many times call the scenario (but how exactly to make these  calls  is the runner part)12:11
amaretskiyahirshbeg_: `timeout' options is specific to `rps' runner12:12
amaretskiyahirshbeg_: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L4012:13
openstackgerritOleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/21013712:22
ahirshbeg_pboldin: thank for the note, will do next time12:23
ahirshbeg_amaretskiy: thanks, can you please explain rps? as we see from the log it's not sending one per second(task 4 & 5 start at the exact same moment)12:24
ahirshbeg_http://paste.openstack.org/show/412353/12:26
amaretskiyahirshbeg_:  RPS runner starts`rps' iterations per `timeout'12:27
amaretskiyfor example we have times = 200 , rps = 10, timeout = 5, then RPS runner (we definitely have to use type = "rps") will start 10 iteration per each 5 seconds, there will be 20 starts (10 * 20 = 200)12:29
amaretskiyahirshbeg_: in opposite to `constant' and `serial' runners, rps runner does not wait until some iterations ends, it just starts interations, so it can generate the most high load12:30
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk12:32
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried12:34
ahirshbeg_im a bit confused, please review my input task parms and the output is see in the log:http://paste.openstack.org/show/412356/ the times aren't as you explained12:35
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-rally12:45
openstackgerritKirill Shileev proposed openstack/rally: Add CobblerProvider provider  https://review.openstack.org/18884712:47
openstackgerritnayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Add Cinder create_and_update_volume_snapshot scenario  https://review.openstack.org/21113212:57
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/17554912:59
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally13:02
*** Makika_ has joined #openstack-rally13:05
*** PrashantS has quit IRC13:06
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally13:06
*** PrashantS has quit IRC13:09
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally13:09
*** Makika_ has quit IRC13:09
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/17554913:10
*** PrashantS has quit IRC13:13
ahirshbeg_amaretskiy: so how can i run one task per second/each second?13:26
amaretskiyahirshbeg_: "rps": 1, "timeout": 113:27
*** psuriset has quit IRC13:30
yfriedamaretskiy: mtg now?13:32
yfriedredixin: ^?13:32
openstackgerritIllia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] Add task format converter  https://review.openstack.org/21116013:38
*** ikhudoshyn has joined #openstack-rally13:42
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally13:44
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-rally13:48
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-rally13:50
*** dspano has quit IRC13:54
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally13:55
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally13:56
ahirshbeg_amaretskiy: it's seems like it still launch the tasks faster then one per second: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412370/13:58
*** mbonell has joined #openstack-rally13:59
amaretskiyahirshbeg_: add scenario config to paste13:59
yfriedamaretskiy: is there a mtg now?14:00
amaretskiyyfried: it should be14:01
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-rally14:04
boris-42ping kun_huang14:04
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally14:04
boris-42kun_huang: it's meeting time14:04
boris-42yfried: ^14:05
boris-42redixin: ^14:05
amaretskiy ahirshbeg_:  please include task config to paste14:06
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk14:16
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried14:17
*** ahirshbeg_ has quit IRC14:20
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb14:24
openstackgerritOleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/21013714:26
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik14:27
*** cas__ has joined #openstack-rally14:32
*** arxcruz has quit IRC14:34
*** yingjun has quit IRC14:41
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally14:44
*** ushkalim has joined #openstack-rally14:47
yfriedboris-42: andreykurilin: amaretskiy: quick q re rps runner14:48
yfriedcontinuing ahirshbeg's q14:48
yfriedwe would like to have an iteration fire over X seconds (without waiting for the previous to finish)14:49
amaretskiyyfried: RPS runner does not wait until some iterations finished14:50
yfriedbut it seems from the logs that they are all fired rapidly regardless of our "timeout=X"14:50
amaretskiyyfried: give paste with task config included14:50
yfriedamaretskiy: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412356/ config14:51
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/17554914:51
yfriedamaretskiy: log http://paste.openstack.org/show/412353/14:51
amaretskiyyfried: I think I made a mistake regarding `timeout', sorry14:52
yfriedamaretskiy: so bug?14:53
amaretskiyI don't think so14:53
yfriedamaretskiy: or wrong input?14:53
amaretskiygive me a minute.....14:53
*** puranamr has quit IRC14:55
*** fhubik has quit IRC14:57
amaretskiyrps is run per second (one second), and timeout is operation timeout14:58
amaretskiyhttps://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L4114:58
amaretskiyI was wrong regarding `timeout'14:58
amaretskiyso RPS runner starts N iterations per 1 second14:59
amaretskiyand there is no bug14:59
yfriedamaretskiy: so 1 -  the doc should be improved (we need to apply rally info to runners)14:59
amaretskiyyfried ahirshbeg_ ^14:59
ivasevhi guys i am kinda new to rally, i was wondering is there a config where i can specify which versions i want to use like glance v1/v2, keystone and etc15:00
yfriedamaretskiy: 2 - who would I deploy 1 iteration every X seconds?15:00
yfriedamaretskiy: 3 -  what is timeout?15:00
yfriedivasev: I think that's an openstack issue and not rally - rally doesn't set the openstack backend15:02
*** cas__ has quit IRC15:02
amaretskiyyfried: I think it would be nice to add some descriptive explanations regarding runners to rally doc15:02
yfriedamaretskiy: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412356/ how should the "runner" section be changed to deploy 1 iteration every X seconds?15:03
*** agarciam1 has quit IRC15:04
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally15:04
amaretskiyI think we need another custom runner for that...15:05
*** agarciam has quit IRC15:05
yfriedamaretskiy: what does timeout stand for?15:05
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally15:05
yfriedamaretskiy: according to you, the input I had should have fired 1 every 1sec. it didn't15:05
*** PrashantS has quit IRC15:07
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally15:08
rvasiletsyfried, did you tried to run with rps less then 1? https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L4115:09
yfriedrvasilets: no. would it work https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L120-L123 ?15:09
rvasiletsyfried, I don't know. But its easy to check)15:10
yfriedushkalim: ^ plz try15:11
ivasevyfried: not sure about that15:11
ivasevif it was me i will add a config for the user to chose :)15:11
ivasevdepending on what is available in the catalog, because it seems rally chose instead of me, and i have to change the code15:12
yfriedivasev: are you talking about using rally to DEPLOY openstack? (currently only with fuel, AFAIK)15:12
*** PrashantS has quit IRC15:13
yfriedivasev: I think you are talking about clients and not backends15:13
ivasevyes clients15:13
yfriedivasev: "use keystone v3 if endpoint exists" ?15:13
yfriedushkalim: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L29-L9315:15
ivasevyes, or at very least i did not find a way to reconfigure it15:15
yfriedushkalim: this is the logic rps uses to fire iterations. I have to go. please continue with amaretskiy15:15
yfriedivasev: not sure. let me take a look15:15
yfriedivasev: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/keystone/utils.py#L41-L43 seems like v3 isn't supported yet15:18
yfriedivasev: you are welcome to either contribute to it or contact boris-42 with RFE15:18
yfriedivasev: sorry I can't help you further15:18
ivasevyfried: i was wondering for glance v215:18
ivasevthanks a ton for helping me out!15:19
yfriedivasev: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/osclients.py15:21
yfriedivasev: looks like some of the code allows for init of different client version. not sure how to trigger it from user's end15:22
boris-42amaretskiy: yfried about docs15:22
yfriedivasev: have to leave now. sorry15:22
yfriedboris-42: ?15:22
ivasevthanks a ton yfried15:22
boris-42amaretskiy: yfried I would like to finish swithching to plugin base15:22
boris-42amaretskiy: yfried and move info funcationallity to plugin base15:22
boris-42amaretskiy: yfried after that we will generate automatically docs about runners and other stuff15:22
boris-42amaretskiy: yfried so am I rigth you would like to have runner that runs bunch of items each X seconds15:23
boris-42iterations*15:23
*** mbonell has quit IRC15:23
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs  https://review.openstack.org/17554915:24
yfriedboris-42: yep15:24
yfriedboris-42: seems like rps should be able to do that15:24
boris-42yfried: nope15:24
yfriedboris-42:?15:24
boris-42yfried: it is another type of runner15:24
boris-42yfried: rps just runs iterations each 1/RPS second15:25
yfriedboris-42: doesn't RPS mean N requests per T seconds?15:25
openstackgerritKirill Shileev proposed openstack/rally: Add CobblerProvider provider  https://review.openstack.org/18884715:25
boris-42per 1 second15:25
boris-42redixin: ^ you shoudl review this15:25
yfriedboris-42: well, if not currently, it should be easily extended15:25
boris-42rvasilets: kir patch15:26
boris-42yfried: so it is just different type of load15:26
redixinboris-42, sure15:26
boris-42yfried: rps runs jsut each 1/RPS one iteration15:26
rvasiletsrvasilets, you want me to review Kirill patch?15:26
*** redixin has quit IRC15:26
yfriedboris-42: s/"1"/"user input"/15:27
rvasiletsDoes RPS should be integer only?15:27
yfriedboris-42: and you're done15:27
boris-42rvasilets: I was tyrping redixin15:27
boris-42yfried: ?15:27
boris-42yfried: we don't need that15:27
yfriedboris-42: I must leave. can we discuss this early tomorrow?15:27
boris-42yfried: just put in RPS: 0.5 / 0.3 or something else15:27
rvasiletsboris-42, I 've member that there was a patch abouit 0<RPS<1 but not remember what it did15:28
yfriedboris-42: in 15hrs15:28
boris-42and you will get 1 iteration per 2 seconds15:28
boris-42yfried: ok15:28
yfriedushkalim: ^^15:28
boris-42yfried: see you tomorrow just ping me15:28
yfriedboris-42: if you're online15:28
yfriedboris-42: bye15:28
rvasiletsboris-42, looks like I was right)15:28
*** abehl has quit IRC15:28
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally15:29
ushkalimyfried, ;)15:29
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally15:29
*** yfried has quit IRC15:32
*** agarciam has quit IRC15:38
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC15:43
*** rvasilets has quit IRC15:47
ushkalimboris-42, amaretskiy  http://paste.openstack.org/show/412388/ debug log    http://paste.openstack.org/show/412389/   config15:47
ushkalimworker1 is working as expected every 2 sec15:48
ushkalimbut worker 2 and worker 3 are not15:49
*** tfreger has quit IRC15:50
*** slo_ has joined #openstack-rally15:53
*** ikhudoshyn has quit IRC15:58
*** kbaikov has quit IRC16:03
*** psuriset has quit IRC16:04
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-rally16:07
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally16:12
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally16:13
*** kiran-r has quit IRC16:14
*** ushkalim has quit IRC16:17
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally16:30
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:33
*** puranamr has quit IRC16:35
*** yfried has joined #openstack-rally16:38
*** PrashantS has quit IRC16:38
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally16:39
*** PrashantS has quit IRC16:43
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally16:47
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:52
*** amaretskiy has quit IRC17:04
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC17:04
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally17:05
*** yfried has quit IRC17:12
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-rally17:21
*** PrashantS has quit IRC17:29
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally17:30
*** PrashantS has quit IRC17:32
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally17:32
*** dspano has quit IRC17:32
boris-42^ uh seems bad17:39
boris-42^ let me recheck17:39
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally17:39
*** abehl has joined #openstack-rally17:44
*** tosky has quit IRC17:55
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-rally17:57
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally17:58
*** flwang has quit IRC17:58
*** PrashantS has quit IRC17:59
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally17:59
*** PrashantS has quit IRC18:04
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally18:06
*** puranamr has quit IRC18:07
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:10
*** flwang has joined #openstack-rally18:11
*** yfried has joined #openstack-rally18:12
*** abehl has quit IRC18:13
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally18:21
*** tfreger has joined #openstack-rally18:36
*** luz_ has joined #openstack-rally18:56
*** luz_ is now known as luz-away19:00
*** temujin_ has joined #openstack-rally19:00
*** tfreger has quit IRC19:07
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally19:11
boris-42kun_huang: around?19:19
boris-42meteorfox: ping19:20
meteorfoxboris-42: hey19:20
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC19:40
openstackgerritOleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh  https://review.openstack.org/21013719:41
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally19:43
*** echoingu_ has joined #openstack-rally19:44
*** echoingumesh has quit IRC19:47
*** echoingu_ has quit IRC19:57
boris-42meteorfox: could you please help with review of patch19:58
boris-42meteorfox: this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209046/19:58
meteorfoxboris-42: sure, taking a look now19:58
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally19:59
boris-42meteorfox: it's just nice refactoring19:59
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:12
*** slo_ has quit IRC20:16
meteorfoxboris-42: my only 'concern' with that patch would be that it seems the code does 2 things, it consumes the results but it also checks them for SLA. Maybe in the future the SLA check can be refactored out, and perhaps using generators, or something similar, yield the results to another function or object, that runs the checks or any other stuff20:26
meteorfoxboris-42: I know that it was already like that, and he just refactored it to use a ContextManager20:27
boris-42meteorfox: seems like harder20:30
boris-42meteorfox: than current solution20:30
meteorfoxboris-42: yeah, maybe if one day we have more 'validators' like the SLA checks, then it might be worth pursuing something like that20:31
boris-42meteorfox: so I am refactoring validators20:32
boris-42meteorfox: but it is to heavy task20:32
*** luz-away has quit IRC20:32
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/21086520:37
*** echoingumesh has quit IRC20:46
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC20:47
*** cdent has quit IRC20:53
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-rally21:00
*** ivasev has quit IRC21:05
*** dspano has quit IRC21:20
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally21:21
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally21:54
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-rally21:57
*** dspano has quit IRC21:58
*** echoingumesh has quit IRC21:59
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally22:02
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally22:16
openstackgerritBoris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Make context plugins decide how to map their data for scenario  https://review.openstack.org/20391122:19
*** MaxPC has joined #openstack-rally22:22
*** echoingumesh has quit IRC22:28
*** MaxPC has quit IRC22:43
openstackgerritBoris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Make context plugins decide how to map their data for scenario  https://review.openstack.org/20391122:43
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk23:14
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally23:19
*** baker has joined #openstack-rally23:30
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally23:30
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried23:34
*** jaypipes has quit IRC23:42
*** baker has quit IRC23:45
*** e0ne has quit IRC23:49
*** pvaneck has quit IRC23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!