*** kbyrne has quit IRC | 00:17 | |
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-rally | 00:20 | |
*** dspano has quit IRC | 01:11 | |
*** psuriset has quit IRC | 01:29 | |
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally | 01:29 | |
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally | 01:43 | |
*** psuriset has quit IRC | 02:37 | |
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-rally | 02:49 | |
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally | 02:50 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 03:37 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 04:17 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 04:18 | |
*** sacharya has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 04:23 | |
*** rdas has joined #openstack-rally | 04:52 | |
*** tfreger has joined #openstack-rally | 04:54 | |
*** psuriset has quit IRC | 04:56 | |
*** yfried_ has quit IRC | 05:02 | |
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally | 05:09 | |
*** psuriset has quit IRC | 05:26 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 05:36 | |
*** yfried_ has joined #openstack-rally | 05:55 | |
*** yfried__ has joined #openstack-rally | 05:56 | |
*** yfried__ is now known as yfried | 05:59 | |
*** yfried_ has quit IRC | 05:59 | |
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally | 06:12 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 06:44 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 06:45 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 06:49 | |
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally | 07:03 | |
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally | 07:12 | |
*** abehl has joined #openstack-rally | 07:16 | |
*** abehl has joined #openstack-rally | 07:17 | |
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-rally | 07:27 | |
*** albertw has quit IRC | 07:38 | |
*** kbaikov has joined #openstack-rally | 07:39 | |
*** albertw has joined #openstack-rally | 07:39 | |
*** kbaikov has quit IRC | 07:41 | |
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally | 07:44 | |
*** fhubik has joined #openstack-rally | 07:45 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb | 07:46 | |
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik | 07:47 | |
*** kbaikov has joined #openstack-rally | 07:48 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 07:49 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 07:53 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 08:10 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 08:16 | |
*** zerda has joined #openstack-rally | 08:18 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb | 08:19 | |
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik | 08:25 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 08:32 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 08:44 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 08:52 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 09:05 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 09:13 | |
openstackgerrit | Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh https://review.openstack.org/210137 | 09:14 |
---|---|---|
*** klindgren__ has joined #openstack-rally | 09:15 | |
*** klindgren_ has quit IRC | 09:17 | |
openstackgerrit | Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add unit test https://review.openstack.org/210700 | 09:18 |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 09:24 | |
*** _kiran_ has joined #openstack-rally | 09:28 | |
*** kiran-r has quit IRC | 09:31 | |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally | 09:31 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 09:33 | |
openstackgerrit | nayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Add Cinder create_and_update_volume scenario https://review.openstack.org/208996 | 09:40 |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 09:42 | |
openstackgerrit | Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh https://review.openstack.org/210137 | 09:44 |
*** cdent has joined #openstack-rally | 09:45 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb | 09:49 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 10:00 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 10:14 | |
*** redixin has joined #openstack-rally | 10:15 | |
*** rediskin has joined #openstack-rally | 10:16 | |
*** redixin has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
*** rediskin has quit IRC | 10:16 | |
*** redixin has joined #openstack-rally | 10:17 | |
*** sunilm has joined #openstack-rally | 10:19 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 10:20 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 10:20 | |
*** agarciam1 has joined #openstack-rally | 10:26 | |
*** agarciam1 has quit IRC | 10:26 | |
*** agarciam1 has joined #openstack-rally | 10:26 | |
*** agarciam has quit IRC | 10:27 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 10:28 | |
openstackgerrit | Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Refactor BenchmarkEngine https://review.openstack.org/209046 | 10:39 |
openstackgerrit | Kiran proposed openstack/rally: Add unit test https://review.openstack.org/210700 | 10:49 |
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally | 10:51 | |
yfried | kiran-r: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193527 why are vips created using admin client and not regular client? | 10:53 |
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-rally | 10:53 | |
*** _kiran_ has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
openstackgerrit | Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add classes for task HTML report charts https://review.openstack.org/159458 | 10:57 |
kiran-r | yfried: In Line #362 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193527/32/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/neutron/utils.py,cm we are trying to use an un-authorized tenant. | 10:59 |
yfried | kiran-r: why? | 11:00 |
yfried | kiran-r: something here is wrong. these ops should be done on default tenant | 11:01 |
openstackgerrit | Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add chunks support to report https://review.openstack.org/146814 | 11:03 |
yfried | kiran-r: please go over my comments | 11:05 |
openstackgerrit | Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add chunks support to report https://review.openstack.org/146814 | 11:08 |
kiran-r | yfried: Sorry I was away | 11:08 |
yfried | kiran-r: np | 11:09 |
yfried | kiran-r: posted comments to your patch | 11:09 |
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik | 11:09 | |
kiran-r | yfried: I saw. :) | 11:09 |
kiran-r | yfried: I will get back to you on the admin_clients thingy soon. | 11:10 |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 11:11 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 11:12 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 11:12 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 11:13 | |
yfried | kiran-r: I saw you were asked this already | 11:13 |
kiran-r | yfried: using clients will say the ¨pool was not found¨ | 11:14 |
kiran-r | When iterated around the context created pools | 11:15 |
kiran-r | yfried: And I realized that we need to specify tenant_id where the pool was earlier created. | 11:16 |
kiran-r | yfried: specifying tenant_id was throwing an error saying trying use unauthenticated tenant. admin_clients solved all the problem. | 11:17 |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 11:18 | |
yfried | kiran-r: then maybe the pools were created badly. | 11:18 |
yfried | kiran-r: I'm not sure how, but the lbaas ctx seems to be creating the pools without tenant id | 11:22 |
yfried | kiran-r: in that ctx, you should either: | 11:22 |
yfried | kiran-r: retrieve the tenant's client from the client manager (don't know how) | 11:23 |
yfried | kiran-r: use pool_create with tenant id, | 11:23 |
yfried | kiran-r: ^ assuming the client you have in ctx is admin | 11:23 |
openstackgerrit | Alexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Reports] Add Load Profile chart to report https://review.openstack.org/169828 | 11:24 |
*** tab_ has joined #openstack-rally | 11:24 | |
openstackgerrit | Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Fix typo in 'new rally input task format' spec https://review.openstack.org/211107 | 11:27 |
kiran-r | yfried: You mean I need to create context pools using tenant_id?? | 11:28 |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 11:32 | |
*** kiran-r has quit IRC | 11:32 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 11:34 | |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 11:35 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 11:36 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 11:37 | |
*** rdas has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
*** sunilm has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
*** zerda has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
*** ahirshbeg_ has joined #openstack-rally | 11:51 | |
*** pboldin has joined #openstack-rally | 11:54 | |
pboldin | Hi all, please review https://review.openstack.org/183228/ | 11:54 |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 11:59 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb | 12:03 | |
ahirshbeg_ | Hello fellow Rally users. Can some one point or explain the following variables in the runner input task since I wasn't able to find explanation in the code: | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | "runner": { "rps": 1, "type": "rps", "timeout": 360, "times": 200 } | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | AFAIK rps = Scenario task per second | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | type = ??? | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | timeout = Total timeout per task (regardless of the fact it is still running) | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | times = Total times of task requests to made | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | So in theory it will take me 200 seconds to send all task request, am I right here? | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | From debug log I see: | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | 2015-08-10 14:02:44.256 17810 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task c49e3985-95ac-4e41-a2b5-5ed4ca38ceb7 | ITER: 4 START | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | 2015-08-10 14:02:44.257 17811 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task c49e3985-95ac-4e41-a2b5-5ed4ca38ceb7 | ITER: 5 START | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | 2015-08-10 14:02:44.257 17811 RALLYDEBUG rally.plugins.common.runners.rps [-] Worker: 2 rps: 0.499915286353 (requested rps: 0.25) | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | 2015-08-10 14:02:44.256 17810 RALLYDEBUG rally.plugins.common.runners.rps [-] Worker: 2 rps: 0.499857049339 (requested rps: 0.25) | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | 2015-08-10 14:02:44.258 17813 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task c49e3985-95ac-4e41-a2b5-5ed4ca38ceb7 | ITER: 6 START | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | 2015-08-10 14:02:44.259 17814 INFO rally.benchmark.runners.base [-] Task c49e3985-95ac-4e41-a2b5-5ed4ca38ceb7 | ITER: 7 START | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | 2015-08-10 14:02:44.259 17814 RALLYDEBUG rally.plugins.common.runners.rps [-] Worker: 2 rps: 0.49995562828 (requested rps: 0.25) | 12:04 |
ahirshbeg_ | 2015-08-10 14:02:44.258 17813 RALLYDEBUG rally.plugins.common.runners.rps [-] Worker: 2 rps: 0.499929765793 (requested rps: 0.25) | 12:04 |
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik | 12:08 | |
*** Miouge has joined #openstack-rally | 12:08 | |
pboldin | ahirshbeg_: please use paste.openstack.org | 12:08 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: "type" is runner type - this is one from existing runners | 12:09 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: here are runners that come with rally https://github.com/openstack/rally/tree/master/rally/plugins/common/runners | 12:10 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_ `times' is how many iterations to run, e.g. how many times call the scenario (but how exactly to make these calls is the runner part) | 12:11 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: `timeout' options is specific to `rps' runner | 12:12 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L40 | 12:13 |
openstackgerrit | Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh https://review.openstack.org/210137 | 12:22 |
ahirshbeg_ | pboldin: thank for the note, will do next time | 12:23 |
ahirshbeg_ | amaretskiy: thanks, can you please explain rps? as we see from the log it's not sending one per second(task 4 & 5 start at the exact same moment) | 12:24 |
ahirshbeg_ | http://paste.openstack.org/show/412353/ | 12:26 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: RPS runner starts`rps' iterations per `timeout' | 12:27 |
amaretskiy | for example we have times = 200 , rps = 10, timeout = 5, then RPS runner (we definitely have to use type = "rps") will start 10 iteration per each 5 seconds, there will be 20 starts (10 * 20 = 200) | 12:29 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: in opposite to `constant' and `serial' runners, rps runner does not wait until some iterations ends, it just starts interations, so it can generate the most high load | 12:30 |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 12:32 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 12:34 | |
ahirshbeg_ | im a bit confused, please review my input task parms and the output is see in the log:http://paste.openstack.org/show/412356/ the times aren't as you explained | 12:35 |
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-rally | 12:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Kirill Shileev proposed openstack/rally: Add CobblerProvider provider https://review.openstack.org/188847 | 12:47 |
openstackgerrit | nayna-patel proposed openstack/rally: Add Cinder create_and_update_volume_snapshot scenario https://review.openstack.org/211132 | 12:57 |
openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/175549 | 12:59 |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 13:02 | |
*** Makika_ has joined #openstack-rally | 13:05 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 13:06 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 13:09 | |
*** Makika_ has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/175549 | 13:10 |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 13:13 | |
ahirshbeg_ | amaretskiy: so how can i run one task per second/each second? | 13:26 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: "rps": 1, "timeout": 1 | 13:27 |
*** psuriset has quit IRC | 13:30 | |
yfried | amaretskiy: mtg now? | 13:32 |
yfried | redixin: ^? | 13:32 |
openstackgerrit | Illia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: [WIP] Add task format converter https://review.openstack.org/211160 | 13:38 |
*** ikhudoshyn has joined #openstack-rally | 13:42 | |
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally | 13:44 | |
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-rally | 13:48 | |
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-rally | 13:50 | |
*** dspano has quit IRC | 13:54 | |
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally | 13:55 | |
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally | 13:56 | |
ahirshbeg_ | amaretskiy: it's seems like it still launch the tasks faster then one per second: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412370/ | 13:58 |
*** mbonell has joined #openstack-rally | 13:59 | |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: add scenario config to paste | 13:59 |
yfried | amaretskiy: is there a mtg now? | 14:00 |
amaretskiy | yfried: it should be | 14:01 |
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-rally | 14:04 | |
boris-42 | ping kun_huang | 14:04 |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 14:04 | |
boris-42 | kun_huang: it's meeting time | 14:04 |
boris-42 | yfried: ^ | 14:05 |
boris-42 | redixin: ^ | 14:05 |
amaretskiy | ahirshbeg_: please include task config to paste | 14:06 |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 14:16 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 14:17 | |
*** ahirshbeg_ has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
*** fhubik is now known as fhubik_brb | 14:24 | |
openstackgerrit | Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh https://review.openstack.org/210137 | 14:26 |
*** fhubik_brb is now known as fhubik | 14:27 | |
*** cas__ has joined #openstack-rally | 14:32 | |
*** arxcruz has quit IRC | 14:34 | |
*** yingjun has quit IRC | 14:41 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 14:44 | |
*** ushkalim has joined #openstack-rally | 14:47 | |
yfried | boris-42: andreykurilin: amaretskiy: quick q re rps runner | 14:48 |
yfried | continuing ahirshbeg's q | 14:48 |
yfried | we would like to have an iteration fire over X seconds (without waiting for the previous to finish) | 14:49 |
amaretskiy | yfried: RPS runner does not wait until some iterations finished | 14:50 |
yfried | but it seems from the logs that they are all fired rapidly regardless of our "timeout=X" | 14:50 |
amaretskiy | yfried: give paste with task config included | 14:50 |
yfried | amaretskiy: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412356/ config | 14:51 |
openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/175549 | 14:51 |
yfried | amaretskiy: log http://paste.openstack.org/show/412353/ | 14:51 |
amaretskiy | yfried: I think I made a mistake regarding `timeout', sorry | 14:52 |
yfried | amaretskiy: so bug? | 14:53 |
amaretskiy | I don't think so | 14:53 |
yfried | amaretskiy: or wrong input? | 14:53 |
amaretskiy | give me a minute..... | 14:53 |
*** puranamr has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
*** fhubik has quit IRC | 14:57 | |
amaretskiy | rps is run per second (one second), and timeout is operation timeout | 14:58 |
amaretskiy | https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L41 | 14:58 |
amaretskiy | I was wrong regarding `timeout' | 14:58 |
amaretskiy | so RPS runner starts N iterations per 1 second | 14:59 |
amaretskiy | and there is no bug | 14:59 |
yfried | amaretskiy: so 1 - the doc should be improved (we need to apply rally info to runners) | 14:59 |
amaretskiy | yfried ahirshbeg_ ^ | 14:59 |
ivasev | hi guys i am kinda new to rally, i was wondering is there a config where i can specify which versions i want to use like glance v1/v2, keystone and etc | 15:00 |
yfried | amaretskiy: 2 - who would I deploy 1 iteration every X seconds? | 15:00 |
yfried | amaretskiy: 3 - what is timeout? | 15:00 |
yfried | ivasev: I think that's an openstack issue and not rally - rally doesn't set the openstack backend | 15:02 |
*** cas__ has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
amaretskiy | yfried: I think it would be nice to add some descriptive explanations regarding runners to rally doc | 15:02 |
yfried | amaretskiy: http://paste.openstack.org/show/412356/ how should the "runner" section be changed to deploy 1 iteration every X seconds? | 15:03 |
*** agarciam1 has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally | 15:04 | |
amaretskiy | I think we need another custom runner for that... | 15:05 |
*** agarciam has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
yfried | amaretskiy: what does timeout stand for? | 15:05 |
*** agarciam has joined #openstack-rally | 15:05 | |
yfried | amaretskiy: according to you, the input I had should have fired 1 every 1sec. it didn't | 15:05 |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 15:08 | |
rvasilets | yfried, did you tried to run with rps less then 1? https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L41 | 15:09 |
yfried | rvasilets: no. would it work https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L120-L123 ? | 15:09 |
rvasilets | yfried, I don't know. But its easy to check) | 15:10 |
yfried | ushkalim: ^ plz try | 15:11 |
ivasev | yfried: not sure about that | 15:11 |
ivasev | if it was me i will add a config for the user to chose :) | 15:11 |
ivasev | depending on what is available in the catalog, because it seems rally chose instead of me, and i have to change the code | 15:12 |
yfried | ivasev: are you talking about using rally to DEPLOY openstack? (currently only with fuel, AFAIK) | 15:12 |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 15:13 | |
yfried | ivasev: I think you are talking about clients and not backends | 15:13 |
ivasev | yes clients | 15:13 |
yfried | ivasev: "use keystone v3 if endpoint exists" ? | 15:13 |
yfried | ushkalim: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/common/runners/rps.py#L29-L93 | 15:15 |
ivasev | yes, or at very least i did not find a way to reconfigure it | 15:15 |
yfried | ushkalim: this is the logic rps uses to fire iterations. I have to go. please continue with amaretskiy | 15:15 |
yfried | ivasev: not sure. let me take a look | 15:15 |
yfried | ivasev: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/plugins/openstack/scenarios/keystone/utils.py#L41-L43 seems like v3 isn't supported yet | 15:18 |
yfried | ivasev: you are welcome to either contribute to it or contact boris-42 with RFE | 15:18 |
yfried | ivasev: sorry I can't help you further | 15:18 |
ivasev | yfried: i was wondering for glance v2 | 15:18 |
ivasev | thanks a ton for helping me out! | 15:19 |
yfried | ivasev: https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/osclients.py | 15:21 |
yfried | ivasev: looks like some of the code allows for init of different client version. not sure how to trigger it from user's end | 15:22 |
boris-42 | amaretskiy: yfried about docs | 15:22 |
yfried | ivasev: have to leave now. sorry | 15:22 |
yfried | boris-42: ? | 15:22 |
ivasev | thanks a ton yfried | 15:22 |
boris-42 | amaretskiy: yfried I would like to finish swithching to plugin base | 15:22 |
boris-42 | amaretskiy: yfried and move info funcationallity to plugin base | 15:22 |
boris-42 | amaretskiy: yfried after that we will generate automatically docs about runners and other stuff | 15:22 |
boris-42 | amaretskiy: yfried so am I rigth you would like to have runner that runs bunch of items each X seconds | 15:23 |
boris-42 | iterations* | 15:23 |
*** mbonell has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
openstackgerrit | Sergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Add new script for rally-gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/175549 | 15:24 |
yfried | boris-42: yep | 15:24 |
yfried | boris-42: seems like rps should be able to do that | 15:24 |
boris-42 | yfried: nope | 15:24 |
yfried | boris-42:? | 15:24 |
boris-42 | yfried: it is another type of runner | 15:24 |
boris-42 | yfried: rps just runs iterations each 1/RPS second | 15:25 |
yfried | boris-42: doesn't RPS mean N requests per T seconds? | 15:25 |
openstackgerrit | Kirill Shileev proposed openstack/rally: Add CobblerProvider provider https://review.openstack.org/188847 | 15:25 |
boris-42 | per 1 second | 15:25 |
boris-42 | redixin: ^ you shoudl review this | 15:25 |
yfried | boris-42: well, if not currently, it should be easily extended | 15:25 |
boris-42 | rvasilets: kir patch | 15:26 |
boris-42 | yfried: so it is just different type of load | 15:26 |
redixin | boris-42, sure | 15:26 |
boris-42 | yfried: rps runs jsut each 1/RPS one iteration | 15:26 |
rvasilets | rvasilets, you want me to review Kirill patch? | 15:26 |
*** redixin has quit IRC | 15:26 | |
yfried | boris-42: s/"1"/"user input"/ | 15:27 |
rvasilets | Does RPS should be integer only? | 15:27 |
yfried | boris-42: and you're done | 15:27 |
boris-42 | rvasilets: I was tyrping redixin | 15:27 |
boris-42 | yfried: ? | 15:27 |
boris-42 | yfried: we don't need that | 15:27 |
yfried | boris-42: I must leave. can we discuss this early tomorrow? | 15:27 |
boris-42 | yfried: just put in RPS: 0.5 / 0.3 or something else | 15:27 |
rvasilets | boris-42, I 've member that there was a patch abouit 0<RPS<1 but not remember what it did | 15:28 |
yfried | boris-42: in 15hrs | 15:28 |
boris-42 | and you will get 1 iteration per 2 seconds | 15:28 |
boris-42 | yfried: ok | 15:28 |
yfried | ushkalim: ^^ | 15:28 |
boris-42 | yfried: see you tomorrow just ping me | 15:28 |
yfried | boris-42: if you're online | 15:28 |
yfried | boris-42: bye | 15:28 |
rvasilets | boris-42, looks like I was right) | 15:28 |
*** abehl has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
*** kiran-r has joined #openstack-rally | 15:29 | |
ushkalim | yfried, ;) | 15:29 |
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally | 15:29 | |
*** yfried has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
*** agarciam has quit IRC | 15:38 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
*** rvasilets has quit IRC | 15:47 | |
ushkalim | boris-42, amaretskiy http://paste.openstack.org/show/412388/ debug log http://paste.openstack.org/show/412389/ config | 15:47 |
ushkalim | worker1 is working as expected every 2 sec | 15:48 |
ushkalim | but worker 2 and worker 3 are not | 15:49 |
*** tfreger has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
*** slo_ has joined #openstack-rally | 15:53 | |
*** ikhudoshyn has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
*** kbaikov has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
*** psuriset has quit IRC | 16:04 | |
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-rally | 16:07 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 16:12 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 16:13 | |
*** kiran-r has quit IRC | 16:14 | |
*** ushkalim has quit IRC | 16:17 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 16:30 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:33 | |
*** puranamr has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
*** yfried has joined #openstack-rally | 16:38 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 16:38 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 16:39 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 16:47 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:52 | |
*** amaretskiy has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 17:04 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 17:05 | |
*** yfried has quit IRC | 17:12 | |
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-rally | 17:21 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 17:30 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 17:32 | |
*** dspano has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
boris-42 | ^ uh seems bad | 17:39 |
boris-42 | ^ let me recheck | 17:39 |
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally | 17:39 | |
*** abehl has joined #openstack-rally | 17:44 | |
*** tosky has quit IRC | 17:55 | |
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-rally | 17:57 | |
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally | 17:58 | |
*** flwang has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 17:59 | |
*** PrashantS has joined #openstack-rally | 17:59 | |
*** PrashantS has quit IRC | 18:04 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 18:06 | |
*** puranamr has quit IRC | 18:07 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
*** flwang has joined #openstack-rally | 18:11 | |
*** yfried has joined #openstack-rally | 18:12 | |
*** abehl has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 18:21 | |
*** tfreger has joined #openstack-rally | 18:36 | |
*** luz_ has joined #openstack-rally | 18:56 | |
*** luz_ is now known as luz-away | 19:00 | |
*** temujin_ has joined #openstack-rally | 19:00 | |
*** tfreger has quit IRC | 19:07 | |
*** exploreshaifali has joined #openstack-rally | 19:11 | |
boris-42 | kun_huang: around? | 19:19 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: ping | 19:20 |
meteorfox | boris-42: hey | 19:20 |
*** exploreshaifali has quit IRC | 19:40 | |
openstackgerrit | Oleh Anufriiev proposed openstack/rally: Update rally/contrib to use install_rally.sh https://review.openstack.org/210137 | 19:41 |
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 19:43 | |
*** echoingu_ has joined #openstack-rally | 19:44 | |
*** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 19:47 | |
*** echoingu_ has quit IRC | 19:57 | |
boris-42 | meteorfox: could you please help with review of patch | 19:58 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/209046/ | 19:58 |
meteorfox | boris-42: sure, taking a look now | 19:58 |
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 19:59 | |
boris-42 | meteorfox: it's just nice refactoring | 19:59 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
*** slo_ has quit IRC | 20:16 | |
meteorfox | boris-42: my only 'concern' with that patch would be that it seems the code does 2 things, it consumes the results but it also checks them for SLA. Maybe in the future the SLA check can be refactored out, and perhaps using generators, or something similar, yield the results to another function or object, that runs the checks or any other stuff | 20:26 |
meteorfox | boris-42: I know that it was already like that, and he just refactored it to use a ContextManager | 20:27 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: seems like harder | 20:30 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: than current solution | 20:30 |
meteorfox | boris-42: yeah, maybe if one day we have more 'validators' like the SLA checks, then it might be worth pursuing something like that | 20:31 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: so I am refactoring validators | 20:32 |
boris-42 | meteorfox: but it is to heavy task | 20:32 |
*** luz-away has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/rally: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/210865 | 20:37 |
*** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 20:46 | |
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC | 20:47 | |
*** cdent has quit IRC | 20:53 | |
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-rally | 21:00 | |
*** ivasev has quit IRC | 21:05 | |
*** dspano has quit IRC | 21:20 | |
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally | 21:21 | |
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 21:54 | |
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-rally | 21:57 | |
*** dspano has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
*** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 21:59 | |
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 22:02 | |
*** dspano has joined #openstack-rally | 22:16 | |
openstackgerrit | Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Make context plugins decide how to map their data for scenario https://review.openstack.org/203911 | 22:19 |
*** MaxPC has joined #openstack-rally | 22:22 | |
*** echoingumesh has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
*** MaxPC has quit IRC | 22:43 | |
openstackgerrit | Boris Pavlovic proposed openstack/rally: Make context plugins decide how to map their data for scenario https://review.openstack.org/203911 | 22:43 |
*** yfried is now known as yfried|afk | 23:14 | |
*** echoingumesh has joined #openstack-rally | 23:19 | |
*** baker has joined #openstack-rally | 23:30 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally | 23:30 | |
*** yfried|afk is now known as yfried | 23:34 | |
*** jaypipes has quit IRC | 23:42 | |
*** baker has quit IRC | 23:45 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 23:49 | |
*** pvaneck has quit IRC | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!