Wednesday, 2016-05-25

« Tuesday, 2016-05-24 Index Thursday, 2016-05-26 »
*** pvaneck has quit IRC00:26
openstackgerritTon Ngo proposed openstack/rally: [Magnum] Context and scenario for Magnum baymodel  https://review.openstack.org/30954600:30
*** akrzos has quit IRC00:50
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally00:51
*** akrzos has joined #openstack-rally00:56
*** lakerzhou has joined #openstack-rally01:11
*** zackf has joined #openstack-rally01:11
*** zackf has quit IRC01:11
*** zackf has joined #openstack-rally01:12
*** lakerzhou has quit IRC01:15
*** zackf has quit IRC01:17
*** akrzos has quit IRC01:19
*** Deng has joined #openstack-rally01:19
*** akrzos has joined #openstack-rally01:21
*** lakerzhou has joined #openstack-rally01:37
*** yanyanhu has joined #openstack-rally01:40
*** zackf has joined #openstack-rally01:44
*** ilbot3 has quit IRC01:45
*** ilbot3 has joined #openstack-rally01:48
*** zackf has quit IRC01:49
*** akrzos has quit IRC02:10
*** bkopilov has quit IRC02:13
*** arnoldje has joined #openstack-rally02:16
*** zackf has joined #openstack-rally02:17
*** zackf has quit IRC02:25
*** absubram has joined #openstack-rally03:06
*** absubram_ has joined #openstack-rally03:10
*** absubram has quit IRC03:11
*** absubram_ is now known as absubram03:11
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-rally03:35
*** lakerzhou has quit IRC03:58
*** zackf has joined #openstack-rally04:32
*** zackf has quit IRC04:33
*** zackf has joined #openstack-rally04:44
openstackgerritDave McCowan proposed openstack/rally: Use correct parameter name for CA file with heat client  https://review.openstack.org/32077604:47
*** zackf has quit IRC04:49
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC05:13
openstackgerritTon Ngo proposed openstack/rally: [Magnum] Scenario to create a Magnum bay  https://review.openstack.org/30962005:26
*** psuriset has quit IRC05:37
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally05:52
*** arnoldje has quit IRC05:58
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-rally06:00
*** psuriset has quit IRC06:01
*** njohnston has quit IRC06:12
*** psuriset has joined #openstack-rally06:13
*** njohnston has joined #openstack-rally06:14
*** ig0r_ has quit IRC06:17
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-rally06:21
*** yanyanhu has quit IRC06:24
*** yanyanhu has joined #openstack-rally06:24
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-rally06:30
*** yanyanhu has quit IRC06:37
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-rally06:47
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally06:52
*** rdas has joined #openstack-rally06:52
*** yanyanhu has joined #openstack-rally07:13
*** amaretskiy has joined #openstack-rally07:14
openstackgerritAlexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Plugins] Fix custom output from boot_runcommand_delete()  https://review.openstack.org/32046007:19
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-rally07:21
openstackgerritAlexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Plugins] Add deprecation mark to dummy scenario  https://review.openstack.org/32036507:44
*** anshul has joined #openstack-rally07:46
*** anshul is now known as Guest5043107:47
*** lakerzhou has joined #openstack-rally07:54
*** lakerzhou has quit IRC07:59
*** ushkalim has joined #openstack-rally08:10
*** ig0r_ has joined #openstack-rally08:20
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally08:26
*** _hanhart has quit IRC08:32
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rally: [Reports] Add Jinja2 template for upcoming Trends report  https://review.openstack.org/29868008:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rally: [Reports][CLI] Introduce Trends report  https://review.openstack.org/27672108:48
openstackgerritChandidas Gharami proposed openstack/rally: rally-ci recheck  https://review.openstack.org/31407008:53
*** ushkalim has quit IRC09:04
*** ushkalim has joined #openstack-rally09:17
*** mvk has quit IRC09:22
strigaziHi rally team, I have a question about adding magnum09:28
strigazifrom the first comment from Roman in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309566/ I understand that we should first add a scenario for listing baymodels. Is this correct?09:30
*** alex____ has joined #openstack-rally09:31
amaretskiystrigazi: hi09:33
*** alex____ has left #openstack-rally09:33
strigaziamaretskiy: hi09:35
amaretskiystrigazi: I'm currently having a look at your patches....09:36
strigaziamaretskiy: I'm waiting. We have only the magnum client merged. As you told be before, we need a job and a scenario09:37
amaretskiy strigazi: yes, we need a way to prove that context or scenario really works09:39
amaretskiyit is highly desirable to have context/scenario verified by real run09:40
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC09:40
strigaziamaretskiy: is it ok to start with a scenario that just lists baymodels?09:40
amaretskiy strigazi: absolutely, it is ok09:40
strigazithen we add context for baymodels and eventually add a scenario to create and delete baymodels09:41
*** redixin has joined #openstack-rally09:42
strigaziAt the same (with creating the baymodel list scenario) we should add a job on openstack-infra/project-config09:42
amaretskiystrigazi: I see that there are both context and scenario "list_baymodels" within the same patch - we usually split contexts and scenarios to different (but related) patches, however this maybe not critical09:43
strigaziI'm wokring on it, to split09:43
strigaziadding tests too09:43
amaretskiyhaving a job is really important for having changes merged09:44
amaretskiyeven simple scenario like list_baymodels should be verified on gates09:44
strigaziDoes it make sense to added to openstack/project-config/jenkins/jobs/magnum.yaml instead of rally.yaml ?09:44
strigazis/openstack/openstack-infra09:46
amaretskiymagnum.yaml will configure jobs to magnum project, which is also useful, especially for magnum team09:49
amaretskiyhowever we need to add a magnum job to our project as well09:50
strigaziamaretskiy: ok09:50
amaretskiyI'm currently asking redixin about that09:50
amaretskiyhe usually does this09:51
amaretskiyredixin: ping09:51
strigaziamaretskiy: ok, so gate jobs on rally and magnum (for magnum team)09:52
redixinwe usually use tempest for functional tests on gates09:52
redixinbut you can use rally if you want to09:52
amaretskiyredixin: we need magnum job09:53
amaretskiyredixin: to check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/309546/ and related patches09:53
*** mvk has joined #openstack-rally09:55
*** lakerzhou has joined #openstack-rally09:55
strigaziredixin: I'm working on spliting the patch to have one just for listing baymodels09:55
strigaziI'll sync later today with Winnie Tsang and Ton Ngo from my team09:56
redixinstrigazi: so if we want to test magnum scenarios in rally, we need to edit rally.yaml09:58
strigaziredixin: ack09:58
*** lakerzhou has quit IRC10:00
strigaziPlease confirm that we should proceed as following: baymodel_list scenario + rally gate job -> baymodel_context -> create and delete baymodel scenario10:02
strigazithen: the same three steps for bays10:03
*** yingjun has quit IRC10:05
redixinstrigazi: list scenario first? to list something we should create something right?10:15
redixincreate_and_delete looks like better choice for first scenario10:15
amaretskiyredixin:  there is a magnum context for that10:15
redixinmagnum context already merged?10:15
amaretskiyredixin: no, it is proposed10:15
amaretskiyredixin: as well as list_baymodels scenario10:16
amaretskiyredixin: I think we need "experimental" job with magnum service10:16
amaretskiyto check these changes10:16
*** luzC has quit IRC10:34
*** akrzos has joined #openstack-rally10:37
*** akrzos has quit IRC10:39
*** rdas has quit IRC10:42
*** yanyanhu has quit IRC10:46
*** luzC has joined #openstack-rally11:01
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed openstack/rally: Mock generate_cidr in unit test  https://review.openstack.org/32089811:05
openstackgerritAlexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Spec] Small fixes in introduce-class-based-scenario-implementation.rst  https://review.openstack.org/32090311:09
openstackgerritchenhb proposed openstack/rally: Fix CinderVolumes.create_volume_and_clone  https://review.openstack.org/31855511:12
*** bkopilov has quit IRC11:12
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-rally11:13
*** akrzos has joined #openstack-rally11:17
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC11:18
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-rally11:18
*** rdas has joined #openstack-rally11:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rally: Use correct parameter name for CA file with heat client  https://review.openstack.org/32077611:44
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally11:44
*** yingjun has quit IRC11:54
*** MaxPC has joined #openstack-rally11:56
*** lakerzhou has joined #openstack-rally11:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rally: [Spec] Small fixes in introduce-class-based-scenario-implementation.rst  https://review.openstack.org/32090311:58
*** lakerzhou has quit IRC12:00
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally12:01
openstackgerritAlexander Maretskiy proposed openstack/rally: [Plugins] Fix custom output from boot_runcommand_delete()  https://review.openstack.org/32046012:06
*** yingjun_ has joined #openstack-rally12:11
*** yingjun has quit IRC12:14
*** asti has joined #openstack-rally12:17
openstackgerritChandidas Gharami proposed openstack/rally: rally-ci recheck  https://review.openstack.org/31407012:25
*** lakerzhou has joined #openstack-rally12:39
openstackgerritYaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Get rid of hard-coded list of plugins in tempest.conf  https://review.openstack.org/32096912:45
*** absubram has quit IRC12:47
*** stpierre has joined #openstack-rally12:49
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-rally12:50
*** absubram has joined #openstack-rally12:50
*** yingjun_ has quit IRC13:03
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally13:03
strigaziamaretskiy: are you there?13:04
amaretskiystrigazi: yes13:04
amaretskiyredixin rvasilets ping13:05
*** ig0r__ has joined #openstack-rally13:05
strigaziamaretskiy: sorry I was away. To plan our action with my team. Should we pursue the create and delete scenario first or go with the simpler baymodel_list? I was confused by redixin answer13:06
rvasiletspong13:06
amaretskiyredixin rvasilets: lets finally get a decision about magnum gates job13:06
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-rally13:07
rvasiletsI think that its doesn't matter what scenario. They already created list scenario. So lets left it imho13:07
strigaziWhich scenario must be priotitzed to be added to rally gate?13:07
redixincreate_and_delete vs context + whatever_list13:08
amaretskiystrigazi: as far as I understand, redixin suggests to have a "scenario create_and_list_baymodels" instead of "context+scenario list_baymodels"13:08
amaretskiystrigazi: I agree with him13:08
redixin2nd option is more compex right?13:08
*** ig0r_ has quit IRC13:08
rvasiletsyes 2nd is more complex13:09
strigazibut for scenario create_and_list_baymodels we need the context as well, right?13:09
redixinso we need one patch with one scenario and working gate job13:09
rvasiletsofcause create_and_delete much simpler13:09
redixinfor create_and_list we dont need any contexts13:09
amaretskiyredixin rvasilets: how about magum job? we should verify scenarios, shouldn't we?13:10
rvasiletsbecause it creates itself13:10
rvasiletsof cause we should13:10
rvasiletsI'd prefer to create simple job13:10
rvasiletsnot experemental13:10
rvasiletsas we don't have limits abount number of jobs13:11
redixinim ok with rally-magnum-dsvm job. i just wonder why you decided to start with context+scenario instead of starting with create_and_delete scenario13:12
strigaziSo, for create and list we can do it only with magnum/utils and a scenario?13:12
strigaziredixin: I thought that conext was needed for create13:12
redixinyep13:12
strigazicreate_and_delete makes more sense for us as well13:13
*** yingjun_ has joined #openstack-rally13:14
*** rvasilets__ has joined #openstack-rally13:15
*** yingjun has quit IRC13:15
strigaziOne more question, the patch for the job in project-config must be merged first?13:16
redixinstrigazi: sure. we need to test code before it can be merged into rally13:17
redixinnobody wants broken code in the master branch13:18
strigaziredixin: ack13:18
openstackgerritIllia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Use existing users in 'create_and_list_networks'  https://review.openstack.org/32098913:31
strigaziredixin: I'm following https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Rally/RallyGates and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186702/13:43
strigazimostly change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/186702/13:45
redixinstrigazi: looks good. just use check pipeline instead of experimental13:45
strigaziredixin: ack13:45
*** yingjun_ has quit IRC13:46
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally13:46
*** yingjun has quit IRC13:50
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally13:59
*** rdas has quit IRC14:01
*** zackf has joined #openstack-rally14:09
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-rally14:11
strigaziredixin: I'm defining a job template and a builder in jenkins/jobs/rally.yaml and adding a rally job in magnum repo. Correct?14:17
*** diogogmt has quit IRC14:20
*** arnoldje has joined #openstack-rally14:21
redixinstrigazi: why magnum repo? do you want to have rally charts on every patch in magnum?14:22
redixinstrigazi: this make sense but first we need to cover scenarios itself14:23
redixinso we need to add a job in rally repo14:23
strigaziredixin: ack, adding to magnum repo can be done later14:24
strigaziredixin: In a job we can have more than one scenarios?14:25
redixinstrigazi: sure. we usually run one .yaml file with bunch of scenarios14:27
strigaziredixin: ok14:28
strigazihttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/321026/14:33
*** KevinE has joined #openstack-rally14:35
strigazirvasilets amaretskiy redixin: I hope I got it right https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321026/14:37
*** rvasilets__ has quit IRC14:39
amaretskiystrigazi: looks good for first sight14:41
strigaziamaretskiy: nice14:42
*** jroll has joined #openstack-rally14:43
*** ciprian-barbu has joined #openstack-rally14:44
ciprian-barbuylobankov: ping14:45
ylobankovciprian-barbu: pong14:46
ciprian-barbuylobankov: hey, I'm contacting you about a change I proposed for rally14:46
ciprian-barbuI only found out about #openstack-rally now, so sorry for the delay14:46
*** abalutoiu has quit IRC14:46
jrollamaretskiy: /b 3714:47
ciprian-barbuthe gerrit change is at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/315171/14:47
jrolloops, sorry for that :(14:47
amaretskiy:)14:47
rvasiletsstrigazi, will review14:47
ylobankovciprian-barbu: I will take a look at it today :)14:47
ciprian-barbuylobankov: any time it fancies you, thank you!14:48
ciprian-barbuI need to sort out the failed jenkins verification as well, anteaya suggested I look at tox.ini14:48
KevinEHello all, anyone familiar enough with keystoneclient to tell me how I can manipulate this variable in my deployments? https://github.com/openstack/python-keystoneclient/blob/master/keystoneclient/httpclient.py#L226-L22715:01
KevinEAlso good Morning :)15:02
openstackgerritYaroslav Lobankov proposed openstack/rally: [Verify] Fixing sahara plugin tempest tests  https://review.openstack.org/32096915:03
stpierreKevinE: rally has no support for that -- you'll need to add support for it to the ExistingCloud deployment plugin, and figure out how to pass it to keystoneauth115:06
KevinEanyone want to help me add rally support for something to the ExistingCloud deployment plugin, and figure out how to pass it to keystoneauth1?15:07
KevinEstpierre: lol thanks, at least I have a path to go down again :)15:08
*** yingjun has quit IRC15:10
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-rally15:10
KevinEWhy does the Openstack CLI differentiate between endpoint_type and OS-interface, but Rally does not? Is an Openstack cli interface = to a Rally endpoint_type?15:11
*** yingjun has quit IRC15:15
openstackgerritIllia Khudoshyn proposed openstack/rally: Use existing users in 'create_and_list_networks'  https://review.openstack.org/32098915:16
stpierreKevinE: afaict it looks like you can pass endpoint_override to keystoneclient.client.Client at https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/osclients.py#L26515:19
stpierrei might suggest hardcoding it there as a PoC just to make sure it will actually work for you15:19
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-rally15:19
stpierrethen you can worry about adding it to https://github.com/openstack/rally/blob/master/rally/deployment/engines/existing.py15:19
ylobankovHi guys! could you please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/310232/ ? Thanks in advance.15:21
*** Guest50431 has quit IRC15:41
KevinEstpierre: hmm, no matter what I put in that string, it still fails to contact the admin endpoint :/15:49
*** madhu_ak has joined #openstack-rally15:50
*** arxcruz has quit IRC15:51
KevinEks = client.Client(version=version, endpoint_override="https://publicURL:5000", **args)15:51
stpierreno idea. i just read the source15:57
*** kbaikov has quit IRC16:00
stpierrecan anyone put some eyes on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/311526/ ? that will unblock our gate jobs on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300159/, which would be a really nice improvement to have16:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC16:04
*** amaretskiy has quit IRC16:07
*** ushkalim has quit IRC16:10
*** tesseract has quit IRC16:13
openstackgerritRoman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP][Spec] Rally Task Validation refactoring  https://review.openstack.org/28318016:22
*** MaxPC has quit IRC16:24
KevinEHow do I make the endpoint auth?16:29
KevinEendpoint_type *16:29
stpierrehow do you make it do what?16:34
*** madhu_ak has quit IRC16:34
KevinEoops lol I mean interface. The interface can be public admin or internal, but also auth to force-use the auth_url?16:36
openstackgerritRoman Vasilets proposed openstack/rally: [WIP][Spec] Rally Task Validation refactoring  https://review.openstack.org/28318016:49
*** Deng has quit IRC16:57
*** MaxPC has joined #openstack-rally16:59
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:00
*** wootehfoot has joined #openstack-rally17:09
*** KevinE has quit IRC17:20
*** KevinE has joined #openstack-rally17:22
*** ig0r__ has quit IRC17:51
*** adiantum has quit IRC17:52
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally17:54
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-rally18:04
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:06
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally18:11
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:14
*** lakerzhou has quit IRC18:20
*** mvk has quit IRC18:20
*** KevinE has quit IRC18:21
*** lakerzhou has joined #openstack-rally18:34
*** ningy has joined #openstack-rally18:55
*** ningy_ has joined #openstack-rally18:56
*** ningy has left #openstack-rally18:56
ningy_@here can someone help to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248298/ ?18:58
ningy_rally ci check and experimental job are all passed18:59
*** mvk has joined #openstack-rally19:04
*** KevinE has joined #openstack-rally19:26
*** KevinE has quit IRC19:28
*** KevinE has joined #openstack-rally19:28
*** akrzos has quit IRC20:25
*** KevinE has quit IRC20:52
*** akrzos has joined #openstack-rally21:21
*** akrzos has quit IRC21:32
*** stpierre has quit IRC21:35
*** redixin has quit IRC21:36
*** ningy_ has left #openstack-rally21:39
*** wootehfoot has quit IRC21:49
*** asti has quit IRC21:51
*** arnoldje has quit IRC22:13
*** diogogmt has quit IRC22:27
*** akrzos has joined #openstack-rally22:33
*** arnoldje has joined #openstack-rally22:50
*** akrzos has quit IRC22:58
*** akrzos has joined #openstack-rally23:05
*** harlowja has quit IRC23:12
*** MaxPC has quit IRC23:24
*** wormwood has quit IRC23:30
« Tuesday, 2016-05-24 Index Thursday, 2016-05-26 »

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!