Thursday, 2019-05-16

openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally master: [deployment] Fix --from-env option for openstack  https://review.opendev.org/65919704:19
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally master: Release 1.5.1 with a fix for os deployment create from env  https://review.opendev.org/65919704:53
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally master: Release 1.5.1 with a fix for os deployment create from env  https://review.opendev.org/65919705:24
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-rally05:31
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rally master: Release 1.5.1 with a fix for os deployment create from env  https://review.opendev.org/65919705:48
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally05:53
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : Hi guys (Pini from Redhat), any update on when the 'Bad Creds' bug will be resolved ? (https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1829030). I see that's its already fixed in master , so my question is what is the plan of correction here ?  backport the [fix commit](https://github.com/openstack/rally-openstack/commit/5f1a8f7137c19d74d58fd0ddf9e2ab319662ad0b) to V.1.4.0 or may05:59
openstackLaunchpad bug 1829030 in Rally "[rally 1.5.0] rally deployment create --fromenv creates wrong spec for openstack platform" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to Andrey Kurilin (andreykurilin)05:59
rallydev-botbe state the date for V1.5.0 when the fix is released ? thanks :)05:59
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : @pinikomarov hi. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/659440/ we are waiting for openstack release team for approving a new release for Rally framework06:01
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : as for rally-openstack release - we have an issue related to CI there. as soon as it will be fixed, we will make a release for it as well06:01
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : @pinikomarov as a workaround, you can create a deployment/environment config from environment than dump it, remove https_key manually and create another deployment/environment with modified config06:03
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin Thanks , for the quick reply! , as a workaroud we are using master branch with the fix06:03
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : @pinikomarov master branch of rally-openstack or rally ?06:04
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin yep06:04
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : ok06:04
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : sorry for this issue06:04
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin when you say "waiting for openstack release team"  can you link to an open issue or point me to the people responsible ? I can put some importance on the issue I think ... chenb is the one of them ? any way please give me any details so I can help work on this from my side , have to drop for now , BIG thanks!06:06
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : @pinikomarov "waiting for openstack release team" relates to release of rally framework. patch is here - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/659440/ . As soon as it will be approved, a new version will be released06:08
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Fix various testing  https://review.opendev.org/65730606:15
*** e0ne has quit IRC06:36
*** rcernin has quit IRC07:01
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC07:03
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-rally07:05
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-rally07:13
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally07:48
*** tesseract has quit IRC07:52
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-rally07:52
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-rally08:03
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Fix various testing  https://review.opendev.org/65730608:03
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally08:08
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : seems the above review is merged , what is that all that is needed for a new version ?09:15
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : *is that all that is needed for a new version ?09:16
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin ^^^ ?09:16
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : oh ok now I see it : https://pypi.org/project/rally/#history V1.5.109:20
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin  , so after testing the issue is still there (without the workarounds) , so I'm guessing we need a new version of : https://pypi.org/project/rally-openstack/#history right ? so what does a new version of rally-openstack depends on ? when should it be released ? Thanks09:39
*** tosky has quit IRC10:10
*** tosky has joined #openstack-rally10:11
*** pcaruana has quit IRC10:27
*** luksky has joined #openstack-rally10:52
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-rally11:37
*** itlinux has quit IRC13:10
*** pcaruana has quit IRC13:56
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-rally14:27
*** itlinux has quit IRC14:31
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-rally14:37
*** luksky has quit IRC15:19
*** e0ne has quit IRC15:38
*** pcaruana has quit IRC15:47
*** tesseract has quit IRC16:05
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC16:08
*** luksky has joined #openstack-rally16:21
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Fix various issues  https://review.opendev.org/65730616:27
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : @pinikomarov who are you creating a new deployment? it should work without releaseing a new version of rally-openstack16:31
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Fix various issues  https://review.opendev.org/65730617:28
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is being restarted to add gitweb links back to Gerrit. Sorry for the noise.17:37
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-rally17:39
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : we are doing this : https://github.com/redhat-openstack/infrared/blob/769f458b2d6400c8b93320c1a4fe48d0251747cd/plugins/rally/tasks/run.yml#L718:07
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin  that is the Infrared code that runs the deployment part18:08
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : strange18:09
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : with rally 1.5.1 it should work18:09
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : @pinikomarov are you sure that 1.5.1 is there?18:12
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Add optional property user_password to user context  https://review.opendev.org/65879719:51
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Switch to latest Rally release  https://review.opendev.org/65893819:52
*** pcaruana has quit IRC19:52
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Switch to latest Rally release  https://review.opendev.org/65893819:52
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: [wip] try to save osprofiler reports separately  https://review.opendev.org/65370819:52
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-rally20:10
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:12
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin yes : I'm working with these versions : (rally) [stack@undercloud-0 rally]$ pip freeze|grep rally20:45
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : strange20:48
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : are you trying to work with old deployments or create a new one?20:48
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : but isn't the fix on the openstack-rally side and not rally ..?20:49
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : I create a new deployment on a fresh overcloud20:49
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : so there are 2 fixes. they are trying to fix different things20:49
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : rally<1.5.0 had hardcoded things for discovering openstack environment variables. rally 1.5.0 tried to remove hard-code to a specific platform (openstack) and use generic way for discovering environment variables(asking deployment&environment plugins for discovering them).20:52
rallydev-botriables20:52
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : so first fix, which is delivered with rally 1.5.1 is an attempt to fix invalid spec from rally-openstack 1.4.020:53
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : and I do not know why it doesn't work (it should)20:53
openstackgerritMerged openstack/rally-openstack master: Fix various issues  https://review.opendev.org/65730621:24
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : so what I see is that this fix is already in rally1.5.1 : https://github.com/openstack/rally-openstack/commit/c7483386e6b59474c83e3ecd0c7ee0e77ff50c0221:39
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin but it was not merged in openstack-rally : looging at the page : https://opendev.org/openstack/rally-openstack/commits/branch/master21:40
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : I see that the release1.4.0 happened before the said patch was merged :                                            ver1.4  commit : https://opendev.org/openstack/rally-openstack/commit/992419828496abe48a6dedc71416ea8bebb87e77  ...  then the https_key commit:   https://opendev.org/openstack/rally-openstack/commit/c7483386e6b59474c83e3ecd0c7ee0e77ff50c0221:43
rallydev-bot21:43
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : I see chenb has merged that https_key merge fix ... but no version/tag update has happened since ...?21:44
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : so I'm guessing the fix should be bumping openstack-rally version 1.4.0 to : https://opendev.org/openstack/rally-openstack/commit/c7483386e6b59474c83e3ecd0c7ee0e77ff50c02 ?21:47
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : thanks for bye for now21:47
*** tosky has quit IRC21:59
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : @pinikomarov the first fix should work for rally_openstack <=1.4.022:06
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : @andreykurilin hmm maybe I'm confused , but the location where this fix : https://github.com/openstack/rally-openstack/commit/5f1a8f7137c19d74d58fd0ddf9e2ab319662ad0b      is at : [r@r rally-openstack]$ find . |grep credential.py22:16
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : @pinikomarov ok, let me try to explain the workflow of `rally deployment create --fromenv` (based on 1.5.0 release) . rally deployment iterates over specific type of plugins and asks them where they detect anything at system environment. rally-openstack (1.4.0 and less) in this case will return a spec with a key "https_key". `rally deployment` saves received spec at d22:21
rallydev-botatabase and use it for further interaction with a cloud. While calling `deployment check` rally uses a spec from database and transmits it to OpenStackCredentials object from rally-openstack package. OpenStackCredentials object fails since the fix to rally-openstack repo was not released yet22:21
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : this is what happens with rally 1.5.0 release22:21
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : the fix which is merged to rally and released 1.5.1 has a specific check that checks that rally-openstack package is <=1.4.0 and deletes broken key "https_key"22:22
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : which means that this fix doesn't require releasing rally-openstack22:23
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] andreykurilin : anyway, I'm planning to release rally-openstack as soon as possible22:23
rallydev-bot[From Gitter] pinikomarov : oh , ok I see thanks  for the explanation (that the one :                      config["existing@openstack"].pop("https_key"))22:38
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Switch to latest Rally release  https://review.opendev.org/65893822:54
*** luksky has quit IRC23:04
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-rally23:04
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Fix LP #1819284 and barbican.get_secret of barbican service  https://review.opendev.org/65389923:40
openstackLaunchpad bug 1819284 in Rally "barbican scenarios do not take soft deletion logic into account and take a long time to complete while waiting for secret deletion timeouts to happen" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1819284 - Assigned to chenhb (chen-haibing1)23:40
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Fix LP #1819284 and barbican.get_secret of barbican service  https://review.opendev.org/65389923:40
openstackgerritAndrey Kurilin proposed openstack/rally-openstack master: Add barbican scenarios for orders  https://review.opendev.org/63104223:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!