Tuesday, 2016-02-09

*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release00:01
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: import a copy of openstackdocstheme  https://review.openstack.org/27762000:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: remove top table of contents rendering  https://review.openstack.org/27762100:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: remove file-a-bug link  https://review.openstack.org/27762200:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: update home button at the top of the page  https://review.openstack.org/27762300:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: show the local toctree in the left sidebar  https://review.openstack.org/27762400:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: let tables use the whole width of their container  https://review.openstack.org/27762500:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: remove add-a-bug and ask-a-question links from footer  https://review.openstack.org/27762600:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: remove log-a-bug link from header  https://review.openstack.org/27762700:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: change the site name in the search javascript  https://review.openstack.org/27762800:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: move search to a normal sidebar element  https://review.openstack.org/27762900:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: remove "last updated" from top of page  https://review.openstack.org/27763000:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: try to get local search working  https://review.openstack.org/27763100:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: remove logABug function that is no longer used  https://review.openstack.org/27763200:14
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: remove unused superuser images  https://review.openstack.org/27763300:14
*** doug-fish has quit IRC00:22
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release00:24
*** doug-fish has quit IRC00:25
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release00:26
*** doug-fish has quit IRC00:27
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release00:30
*** doug-fish has quit IRC00:40
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release00:45
*** doug-fish has quit IRC01:13
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release02:14
*** doug-fish has quit IRC02:19
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release02:25
*** doug-fish has quit IRC02:45
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release02:46
*** doug-fish has quit IRC02:50
*** dims has joined #openstack-release03:27
*** dims_ has quit IRC03:28
*** dims has quit IRC03:30
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release03:32
*** dims has joined #openstack-release03:43
*** dims has quit IRC03:47
*** doug-fish has quit IRC03:56
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release03:56
*** doug-fish has quit IRC03:57
*** doug-fis_ has joined #openstack-release04:00
*** doug-fis_ has quit IRC04:04
*** rjaiswal has quit IRC04:08
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release04:09
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release05:07
*** jgriffith is now known as jgriffith_away05:07
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-release05:09
*** amotoki has quit IRC05:12
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC05:15
*** doug-fish has quit IRC05:48
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release05:49
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release05:55
*** doug-fish has quit IRC06:08
*** amotoki has quit IRC06:56
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release06:58
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release07:38
*** doug-fis_ has joined #openstack-release07:42
*** doug-fish has quit IRC07:43
*** doug-fis_ has quit IRC07:47
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur09:42
openstackgerritMerged openstack/reno: add release note for earliest-version feature  https://review.openstack.org/27757709:54
*** deva_ has joined #openstack-release10:30
*** amotoki has quit IRC10:34
*** deva_ has quit IRC10:38
*** dims has joined #openstack-release10:45
*** dims has quit IRC10:49
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release10:49
*** dims has joined #openstack-release10:50
*** amotoki has quit IRC10:55
ttxdhellmann: see draft of the "there needs to be at least one" email at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IigLqC7Ixq11:30
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-release11:40
*** dims has quit IRC11:40
*** dims_ has quit IRC12:11
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-release12:19
*** gordc has joined #openstack-release12:36
*** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-release12:38
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release12:45
*** doug-fish has quit IRC12:47
*** doug-fish has joined #openstack-release12:48
openstackgerritAndreas Jaeger proposed openstack/releases: oslo.config 3.6.0 release  https://review.openstack.org/27782013:14
openstackgerritThierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases: Add missing mitaka intermediary releases  https://review.openstack.org/27783013:31
dhellmannttx: the implication from the way this is written is that liaisons don't need to do anything after they tag their final rc for mitaka, and we will pick that up and tag it as final. Is that the idea?13:40
ttxthat way we eliminate them from the critical path13:40
dhellmannsounds good13:41
ttxi.e. on release week we operate all by ourselves13:41
dhellmannI made a few tweaks, but nothing major. LGTM13:41
ttxwhich is about the only way to retain sanity13:41
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-release13:41
ttxok, will send13:41
dhellmannttx: did you have any thoughts on https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/announce-releases-site ?13:41
ttxoh, I missed that oen13:43
ttxjust a sec13:43
dhellmannno rush, I'm going to do my morning routine and come back in a bit13:44
ttxok mail sent13:44
ttxdhellmann: looks good, but I would polish it a bit before we announce it. We discussed moving the instructions to some README since the target audience is source code consumers, not source code producers13:46
ttxI might have time to push a patch for that on top of yours today13:47
dhellmannttx: good point. I also submitted a bunch of patches for the theme today, but search is still broken13:47
dhellmannI might just turn off search and work on it separately13:47
ttxheck, might work on that in the plane tomorrow, sounds offline-compativle13:47
ttx+1 to turning search off13:48
*** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC13:56
*** dims_ has quit IRC14:03
*** dims has joined #openstack-release14:10
*** jgriffith_away is now known as jgriffith14:21
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release14:21
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:31
*** jgriffith is now known as jgriffith_away14:35
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release14:35
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:37
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-release14:41
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:41
dimsmriedem : i've been waiting for you :) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277212/14:42
mriedemoh boy14:42
mriedemhave to get the stable team meeting agenda updated first14:42
*** jgriffith_away is now known as jgriffith14:43
dimsmriedem :) ack. hopefully last BIG one before non-client-library-freeze14:45
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|brb15:03
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2415:07
openstackgerritThierry Carrez proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: Do not mention "independent" in announcements  https://review.openstack.org/27790215:51
dimsheads up : eventlet 0.18.1 got deleted from pypi - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/eventlet/0.18.115:52
*** nikhil is now known as nikhil_k15:56
dimsttx : dhellmann : ttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/277912/16:07
dimsy, real crazy16:09
* ttx stabs16:09
dimshere's the cached 0.18.1 page :) https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:JsNnqm1ngVYJ:https://pypi.python.org/pypi/eventlet/0.18.1+&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us16:09
ttxdims: I ragetweeted16:15
dimsttx : RT-ed16:22
dhellmanndims, ttx : do we know why16:23
*** dtantsur|brb is now known as dtantsur16:24
dimsdhellmann : all i see is 2 commits after 0.18.1 and they don't look like much either :( https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/commits/master/16:25
dhellmannI wonder if there was something wrong with the package16:25
dimsdhellmann : asked on https://github.com/eventlet/eventlet/commit/5bf0a6f32b3e4459b38ad1895c9eb4b0b483dae1#commitcomment-1598219716:26
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: rip out search entirely  https://review.openstack.org/27794216:34
sdaguettx: it's better if you name names16:35
ttxI blame 140char16:35
ttxdhellmann: i was looking into trove-dashboard earlier, and their versioning is a bit unclear. They tagged a commit both 1.0.0 and
* dhellmann hangs his head in sorrow16:40
ttxIn theory they are release:cycle-with-intermediary16:40
ttxwhich would point to 1.0.0 being the right one16:40
ttxBut then, they did the one after the 1.0.0 one16:41
*** amrith has joined #openstack-release16:41
amrithdhellmann, hello16:41
ttxI suspected they wanted to bundle in the same deliverable but trove is at
amrithlet me go find your scrollback16:41
dhellmannhi, amrith, ttx and I were just talking about trove versions16:41
amrithhi ttx, dhellmann16:42
amrithodd I can't find this conversation in scrollback or eavesdrop16:43
amrithlet me see what the context was16:43
amrithhere http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-release/latest.log?16:43
dhellmannamrith : trove has a 1.0.0 and pointing to the same commit16:44
ttxdhellmann: another oddity I spotted is python-fuelclient, which is marked cycle-with-intermediary, while everything else in Fuel is independent, and they don't seem to follow the cycle anyway16:44
dhellmannso it's not clear what version you want. 1.0.0 matches the release model you've signed up for.16:44
ttxprobably just a glitch we can adjust16:44
dhellmannttx: yeah, let's just move that to independent16:44
ttxok, will propose that16:44
amrithdhellmann, let me go look at the tags16:44
amrithone second16:45
amrith6.0.0.0b2 eh16:46
amrithi don't see that16:46
amrithI must be looking in the wrong place16:46
dhellmannthat may be a typo, ttx did you mean
amrithdhellmann, where are you looking?16:47
dhellmannoh, trove-dashboard16:47
amrithoh, trove-dashboard16:47
amrithok, context switching (without a clutch).16:48
amrithlet me check with Craig and Duk on this.16:48
*** dtroyer has joined #openstack-release16:52
amrithdhellmann, I believe that the correct tag is 6.0... and not 1.0.0. I'll confirm. Is this holding something up; is this critical now?16:52
dhellmannamrith : given the release model for that project of cycle-with-intermediary, beta tags aren't correct16:55
dtroyerdhellmann, dims: are we missing something with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276251/ yet?   stevemar submitted https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276373/ for u-c…16:55
dhellmannamrith : we would like to have everything in order soon, so we are ready for the third milestone, but I don't think this is a "drop everything" case16:55
dhellmanndtroyer : I think we're just missing me having time to look at it16:55
dhellmanndtroyer : I'll do that today16:56
dtroyerok, np.  I didn't want to be the holdup16:56
amrithdhellmann, will get back to you shortly. we're in the middle of mid-cycle so within an hour if I can get it confirmed.16:56
cp16netdhellmann: ok so i made the same tag for trove-dashboard as trove and horizon because we needed a tag on it16:56
cp16netsince it was the 6th release of trove in horizon i matched the version16:56
dhellmanncp16net : ok. trove and trove-dashboard have different release models, which implies different versioning16:57
dhellmanncp16net, amrith : if you want to use milestones for trove-dashboard, please update the governance repo16:57
*** jgriffith is now known as jgriffith_away16:58
cp16netdhellmann: ok i wasnt sure if that was kosher because i didnt see many other dashboards with milestones like that16:58
dhellmanncp16net : I'm not sure what you mean?16:59
cp16netdhellmann: i didnt see other dashboards that were in the openstack/releases repo17:01
dhellmanncp16net : look for "dashboard" on http://releases.openstack.org/mitaka/index.html17:01
*** barclaac has joined #openstack-release17:01
dhellmanncp16net : you don't have to use the releases repo to request a release, but you do need to follow the release model you have declared17:02
dhellmannin this case, trove-dashboard is listed as cycle-with-intermediary, which is not compatible with beta releases17:02
cp16netok i'll update that17:02
dhellmannso you either need to switch the release model to cycle-with-milestones if you intend to do milestones, or stop doing beta releases17:02
dhellmanncp16net : that said, we *do* want all projects to register their releases by the end of the cycle, so we can communicate them to deployers via releases.openstack.org17:03
stevemardtroyer: did you want to pick a different hash at this point?17:05
dhellmannstevemar, dtroyer : cliff also has quite a few unreleased changes. Do you want a release there? http://paste.openstack.org/show/486463/17:09
ttxcp16net: if you release the dashboard at the same time as trove, you might also want to make them part of the same deliverable17:10
ttxbut that might be confusing since that would do at mitaka-317:11
cp16netttx: you mean make it the same version for both trove and trove-dashboard17:16
cp16netttx: not sure that it would be a good idea now that i've tagged the dashboard as 6.x though17:16
ttxbasically consider that "trove" is a deliverable with two source code tarballs (trouve and trove-dashboard) and tag them at the same time with the same version in the future17:16
ttxcp16net: yeah, I agree taht at this stage it might confuse things even more17:17
stevemardhellmann: sounds good17:17
ttxAt least 6 > 1 so currently it doesn't look too bad17:17
stevemardhellmann: i'll push up a patch17:17
cp16net:-/ yeah i counted the releases trove was horizon and went with that17:18
ttxdhellmann: do you think we could live with a after a ?17:18
cp16netttx: i'm not sure how the packagers that count on the tags would work with that17:18
cp16neti dont think it would work for them if they are using the tags as the version they are releasing17:19
ttxcp16net: there are ways around it (epochs) for packagers... Is it packaged anywhere already ?17:19
cp16netttx: zigo was asking that the dashboard had a tag so i think he might have done it for debian at least17:20
stevemardhellmann: no releases for cliff during mitaka :O17:20
dhellmannstevemar : yes, we've noticed.17:20
cp16neti'll ask him if it will matter17:21
openstackgerritSteve Martinelli proposed openstack/releases: release cliff 1.16.0  https://review.openstack.org/27797817:22
stevemardhellmann: ^17:23
dhellmannstevemar : ack, I'll put that on my list for today17:23
cp16netttx: so zigo said it wouldnt be a problem now but it would be for the next cycle17:24
-openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is restarting now, to alleviate current performance impact and WebUI errors.17:24
ttxcp16net: right, so better change early if that's what we want17:25
cp16netright i agree17:25
ttxcp16net: the real question is whether you want to couple the two repositories or not17:25
cp16neti think it would make sense to keep them aligned17:26
ttxfrom a consumer perspective it makes it easier to spot the related tarballs / repositories17:26
ttxcp16net: so you may want to push another governance patch adding openstack/trove-dashboard to the trove deliverable17:27
ttxthat can be done on top of the other one17:27
cp16netttx: so that would mean that trove-dashboard would be release managed as well17:30
ttxI'm fine with that17:30
dhellmannttx: I'm going to W+1 this patch to add the pypi link flag: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276467/17:31
openstackgerritKyle Mestery proposed openstack/releases: Neutron 7.0.3  https://review.openstack.org/27488017:32
mesterydhellmann: Regarding 274880, neutron-fwaas didn't have any changes merged since 7.0.2, so I left it out. Is that ok? The tools seem to not like tagging the same SHA with multiple versions as far as I can tell,.17:33
dhellmannmestery : let's see what the validate script says. I think it's probably ok.17:34
mesterydhellmann: Ack, thanks!17:34
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: release cliff 1.16.0  https://review.openstack.org/27797817:34
ttxdhellmann: I don't understand your comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27790217:34
dhellmannttx: if an independent project does a release from a stable branch, but the deliverable file doesn't indicate that, I don't know if we're generating release notes properly in those emails17:35
dhellmannthe way the release script detects the branch is the path to the deliverable file17:35
dhellmannwe might need to add a field in the file for a branch or something, to be safe17:36
dhellmannthe git-based notes should be fine, but the reno stuff will be broken17:36
ttxbut... they shouldn't do releases from a stable branch, right ?17:36
ttxwe have no way to specify that in openstack/releases at all ?17:37
dhellmannttx: I wouldn't be surprised if someone does want to, though17:40
dhellmanngnocchi, for example, has a bunch of stable branches17:40
ttxdhellmann: ok, we might want to dig a bit at that possibility at some point... but my patch is unrelated to that ?17:40
ttxi.e. currently we don't support tagging independent releases on branches other than master17:41
dhellmannttx: don't we?17:41
dhellmannthe tagging part works fine, it's just the announcement that I think we have an issue with17:41
dhellmannand the bug is there now, regardless of your change17:42
dhellmannI guess throwing away the series info doesn't make it any worse17:42
ttxdhellmann: you would likely set series: my-funny-series in the tag metadata and be done17:42
dhellmannah, yeah, and then something other than "independent" would be passed to the announce script17:43
dhellmannok, +217:43
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: add a flag for whether to report the PyPI link for releases  https://review.openstack.org/27646717:44
dhellmanndims : there are a few individual oslo releases in the queue, do you want help with those?17:46
dhellmanntaskflow, config, etc.17:46
dhellmanndavid-lyle: can you ack this release request for manila-ui, please: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275310/17:51
david-lyledhellmann: +117:52
dimsdhellmann : yep, will take care of them17:58
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-release18:02
openstackgerritSteve Martinelli proposed openstack/releases: release cliff 1.16.0  https://review.openstack.org/27797818:15
dhellmanndavid-lyle : thanks18:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Add monasca-ceilometer deliverable to Mitake release  https://review.openstack.org/27593118:34
*** jgriffith_away is now known as jgriffith18:34
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: oslo.config 3.6.0 release  https://review.openstack.org/27782018:44
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Bump oslo.privsep to 1.0.0  https://review.openstack.org/27720318:44
dimsdhellmann : took care of oslo.config and oslo.privsep. the mega review needs a look over from you / mriedem - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277212/18:48
*** mriedem has quit IRC18:49
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-release18:51
*** amrith has left #openstack-release19:07
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk19:09
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-release19:17
*** dims has quit IRC19:17
*** dims_ has quit IRC19:27
*** dims has joined #openstack-release19:30
*** dims has quit IRC19:41
*** dims has joined #openstack-release19:42
dhellmanndims : ack19:45
*** mriedem has quit IRC19:45
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-release19:46
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-release19:47
*** dims has quit IRC19:49
*** dims_ has quit IRC19:57
*** jgriffith has quit IRC20:05
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-release20:06
*** jgriffith is now known as Guest5542120:06
*** Guest55421 is now known as jgriffith20:24
smcginnisIs there a manual process that needs to happen after a global requirements merge?20:47
smcginnisOr will that automatically update projects at some point?20:47
*** deva_ has joined #openstack-release20:49
*** deva_ has quit IRC20:54
*** nikhil_k is now known as nikhil_21:01
*** nikhil_ is now known as nikhil_k21:02
dhellmannsmcginnis : there's a periodic job to update projects, but you can also submit a patch manually as long as your change is compatible with the global list21:02
openstackgerritLingxian Kong proposed openstack/releases: Release Mistral 1.0.1 for Liberty  https://review.openstack.org/27322321:02
smcginnisdhellmann: Cool, thanks. I had just questioned that enough that I figured I should finally ask. ;)21:03
dhellmannttx: it looks like announcement emails are going through \o/21:03
dhellmannsmcginnis : yeah, it's a good question, we should probably write the answer down somewhere :-)21:03
*** dims has joined #openstack-release21:03
*** krotscheck is now known as krotscheck_dcm21:03
ttxdhellmann: \o/21:04
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: process pypi flag for release announcements  https://review.openstack.org/27646921:21
*** jgriffith is now known as jgriffith_away21:31
*** nikhil_k is now known as nikhil21:45
openstackgerritDavanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/releases: oslo.db 4.4.0 release  https://review.openstack.org/27722221:58
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: reno 1.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/27810921:59
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/releases: script to make it simple to add a new deliverable correctly  https://review.openstack.org/27811021:59
openstackgerritDavanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/releases: oslo.db 4.4.0 release  https://review.openstack.org/27722222:03
dhellmanndims : you might like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/278110/22:10
openstackgerritMerged openstack-infra/release-tools: Do not mention "independent" in announcements  https://review.openstack.org/27790222:11
dimsdhellmann : very very handy :)22:12
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: release cliff 1.16.0  https://review.openstack.org/27797822:12
dimsdhellmann : optimization would be to let it run against my local directory :)22:12
dhellmanndims : it uses zuul-cloner, so it should if you have the version that honors the environment variable. I'm not sure that's been released, so you might have to install from source22:18
dimsdhellmann : ah i see22:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Release OpenStackClient 2.1.0  https://review.openstack.org/27625122:25
fungidhellmann: Subject: [openstack-announce] [release][openstack] cliff-announce-release 1.16.0 release (mitaka)22:28
fungidhellmann: should it be using the project name instead of the job name in the subject line?22:29
fungisorry if this has already been spotted22:29
fungialso in the message body, looks like22:29
dimsfungi : hmm, i thought i saw a fix in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276847/22:30
dimsfungi : guess that was not enough22:32
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-release22:39
*** dims has quit IRC22:40
dhellmannfungi : oh, yeah, I thought I fixed that...22:43
dhellmannbah, it's recomputed in the python code22:47
mordreddhellmann: do you have +2 on this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274054/22:55
mordreddhellmann: oslo.version isn't a thing anymore - so its existence in the modules list makes it impossible to do git submodule update in that repo22:55
mordredI think only release managers can land patches in there though22:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases: Oslo Releases for Week of Feb 8th  https://review.openstack.org/27721223:10
dhellmannmordred : approved23:11
openstackgerritDavanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/releases: oslo.db 4.4.0 release  https://review.openstack.org/27722223:11
mordreddhellmann: woot - thanks!23:12
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack-infra/release-tools: use the name we derive from the project instead of the path  https://review.openstack.org/27814323:17
dhellmanndims_ , fungi : are you still around to look at ^^ for me?23:17
dims_dhellmann : +223:18
dhellmanndims_ : thanks!23:18
fungiand approved23:18
dhellmannfungi : thanks!23:18
* dhellmann waits patiently before processing any more releases23:19
*** mriedem has quit IRC23:22
*** gordc has quit IRC23:39
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa23:51

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!