| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-release | 00:02 | |
| *** trident has joined #openstack-release | 00:03 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 00:11 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-release | 00:35 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 00:42 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-release | 00:45 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-release | 01:39 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 01:44 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-release | 01:53 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 01:54 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-release | 02:09 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 02:43 | |
| *** bobh has joined #openstack-release | 02:46 | |
| *** ykarel|away has joined #openstack-release | 02:50 | |
| *** bobh has quit IRC | 02:50 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-release | 03:49 | |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 04:06 | |
| *** ykarel|away has joined #openstack-release | 04:19 | |
| *** jtomasek has joined #openstack-release | 04:29 | |
| *** jtomasek has quit IRC | 04:40 | |
| *** raukadah is now known as chandankumar | 04:49 | |
| *** jtomasek has joined #openstack-release | 04:51 | |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-release | 05:02 | |
| *** adriant has quit IRC | 05:11 | |
| *** adriant has joined #openstack-release | 05:12 | |
| *** radeks has joined #openstack-release | 05:44 | |
| *** radeks has quit IRC | 05:49 | |
| *** radeks has joined #openstack-release | 05:52 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 06:51 | |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 06:56 | |
| *** hberaud|gone is now known as hberaud | 07:02 | |
| *** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 07:04 | |
| *** trident has quit IRC | 07:21 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-release | 07:23 | |
| *** trident has joined #openstack-release | 07:29 | |
| *** trident has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 07:34 | |
| *** trident has joined #openstack-release | 07:43 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-release | 08:21 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-release | 08:26 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release os-brick 2.10.0 https://review.opendev.org/679889 | 08:26 |
|---|---|---|
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release ironic-ui 3.5.1 for Train https://review.opendev.org/680003 | 08:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release ironic-tempest-plugin 1.5.0 https://review.opendev.org/679982 | 08:28 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release virtualbmc 1.6.0 https://review.opendev.org/679979 | 08:28 |
| *** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 08:28 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 08:31 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-release | 08:32 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release octavia-lib 1.4.0 for train https://review.opendev.org/680118 | 08:34 |
| *** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 08:38 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 08:41 | |
| *** trident has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
| *** trident has joined #openstack-release | 09:09 | |
| openstackgerrit | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/releases master: Stable branch releases for kolla and kolla-ansible https://review.opendev.org/680355 | 09:33 |
| *** hberaud is now known as hberaud|school-r | 09:57 | |
| *** hberaud|school-r is now known as hberaud|lunch | 10:04 | |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-release | 10:20 | |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 10:28 | |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-release | 10:29 | |
| *** hberaud|lunch is now known as hberaud | 11:13 | |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/releases master: Release ironic-lib 2.21.0 and create stable/train https://review.opendev.org/680380 | 11:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/releases master: Release sushy 2.0.0 and create stable/train https://review.opendev.org/680382 | 11:58 |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-release | 13:07 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 13:10 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-release | 13:39 | |
| *** bnemec has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
| *** bnemec has joined #openstack-release | 13:48 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
| *** hberaud is now known as hberaud|school-r | 14:30 | |
| *** armstrong has joined #openstack-release | 14:35 | |
| *** mlavalle has joined #openstack-release | 14:38 | |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|afk | 14:40 | |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 14:46 | |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-release | 14:47 | |
| *** hberaud|school-r is now known as hberaud | 14:53 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 14:56 | |
| *** cmurphy|afk is now known as cmurphy | 14:58 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| *** ykarel|afk is now known as ykarel|away | 15:25 | |
| openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/releases master: train: release osc-placement 1.7.0 https://review.opendev.org/680448 | 15:31 |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 15:35 | |
| *** ykarel|away has joined #openstack-release | 15:53 | |
| smcginnis | #startmeeting releaseteam | 16:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Thu Sep 5 16:00:02 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is smcginnis. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 16:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 16:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 16:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 16:00 |
| smcginnis | Ping ttx dhellmann diablo_rojo hberaud evrardjp armstrong tonyb | 16:00 |
| hberaud | o/ | 16:00 |
| dhellmann | o/ | 16:00 |
| smcginnis | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/train-relmgt-tracking Agenda | 16:00 |
| diablo_rojo | o/ | 16:00 |
| armstrong | o/ | 16:00 |
| evrardjp | o/ | 16:00 |
| ttx | o/ | 16:00 |
| smcginnis | We are currently on R-6, around line 434 in the etherpad. | 16:01 |
| * fungi is around for the moment | 16:01 | |
| ttx | not under water yet | 16:01 |
| *** altlogbot_1 has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| fungi | well, i relocated to the mountains for a few days. would take some mighty deep water | 16:01 |
| ttx | that is a mighty deep hurricane | 16:01 |
| smcginnis | fungi: How's the wifi on the mountain? :) | 16:02 |
| fungi | better than the cell signal at least | 16:02 |
| evrardjp | :) | 16:02 |
| smcginnis | #topic Review week tasks completion | 16:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Review week tasks completion (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 16:02 | |
| *** irclogbot_2 has quit IRC | 16:02 | |
| smcginnis | First up was the library releases. | 16:02 |
| ttx | I drafted email | 16:02 |
| *** altlogbot_3 has joined #openstack-release | 16:03 | |
| smcginnis | Thanks! | 16:03 |
| ttx | Not sure about the other ones as nobody stiked-out them | 16:03 |
| smcginnis | We can review the draft as the last topic. | 16:03 |
| smcginnis | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/releases+branch:master+topic:train-3 | 16:03 |
| smcginnis | Looks like we already got a few acks, so that's great to see. | 16:03 |
| smcginnis | Only one abandoned so far because the team is dropping one of the deliverables. | 16:04 |
| * diablo_rojo has all the tabs open to do reviews | 16:04 | |
| ttx | smcginnis: did you cover all the gaps, or is there more to generate ? | 16:04 |
| ttx | I find it relatively short | 16:05 |
| smcginnis | ttx: That was all that the script indicated, but I will take another look through to see if we need to update that script or the process to catch everything. | 16:05 |
| smcginnis | It was much shorter than I had expected. | 16:05 |
| *** irclogbot_1 has joined #openstack-release | 16:05 | |
| ttx | The Script Is Always Right | 16:05 |
| ttx | All hail the Script | 16:05 |
| smcginnis | list_library_unreleased_changes.sh didn't show much else, and most of those were client libs or things those teams were already aware of. | 16:06 |
| smcginnis | I'll take a look again later today. | 16:06 |
| ttx | so are we planning to force them Friday? | 16:07 |
| *** irclogbot_1 has quit IRC | 16:07 | |
| smcginnis | In the meantime, if we have acks from those teams, we should try to get them processed today. | 16:07 |
| ttx | or monday maybe? | 16:07 |
| *** hberaud is now known as hberaud|gone | 16:07 | |
| smcginnis | Hmm, I could see either. | 16:07 |
| ttx | or maybe warn Friday EOD that we'll process them Monday? | 16:07 |
| smcginnis | That seems fair. | 16:07 |
| ttx | ok writing that down | 16:07 |
| evrardjp | sounds reasonable... what about the teams that -1 but didn't propose something else yet? | 16:07 |
| evrardjp | by Friday* | 16:08 |
| smcginnis | #agreed Team will process un-ack'd releases on Monday | 16:08 |
| diablo_rojo | Sounds good to me. | 16:08 |
| *** irclogbot_2 has joined #openstack-release | 16:08 | |
| ttx | teams which -1 should also have something up | 16:08 |
| ttx | we have a deadline | 16:08 |
| ttx | but apply some case-by-case understanding | 16:09 |
| evrardjp | agreed, that's why I am saying this :) | 16:09 |
| smcginnis | evrardjp: We could also note a task for Monday to double check those. | 16:09 |
| evrardjp | ok | 16:09 |
| evrardjp | smcginnis: agreed | 16:09 |
| ttx | in some cases they have something blocked in Zuul, it's fine to wait a day | 16:09 |
| ttx | the reason why we do it one week before is to generally give time to catch issues before FF | 16:09 |
| evrardjp | yeah, but I think we should talk about it on Monday (long story short) | 16:10 |
| ttx | but if merging it would craete more problems... | 16:10 |
| evrardjp | ttx: indeed, my point is that we don't want to delay things either, and we don't want ffe all the way | 16:10 |
| smcginnis | Any remaining ones are probably lower risk. We've done all the oslo libs and major projects that would more likely have ripple effects on other projects. | 16:10 |
| ttx | any formal -1 yet? | 16:10 |
| smcginnis | I think there was just the one I abandoned because the team said they were going to retire the repo. | 16:11 |
| ttx | At this point the groups paying attention have answered and the others will get Monday-approved | 16:11 |
| evrardjp | my memory serves me wrong, sorry for that | 16:11 |
| ttx | so I don;t think we'll have any standing -1 to unblock | 16:11 |
| evrardjp | yeah my bad | 16:11 |
| smcginnis | I'll take a look on Monday just in case though. | 16:12 |
| * prometheanfire is waiting on https://review.opendev.org/679842 the team seems awol | 16:12 | |
| ttx | we might get a last minute one | 16:12 |
| ttx | prometheanfire: yes we might force that one today-ish | 16:12 |
| ttx | it's cheap and you gave them ample opportunity to block it | 16:12 |
| prometheanfire | thanks | 16:13 |
| smcginnis | Yeah, we can probably approve that now. If that team hasn't responded by this point, I don't think they will today. It's probably night for most of them. | 16:13 |
| ttx | ok, I think we are good on libs autoreleases | 16:13 |
| ttx | How about the "Update the feature list" task? | 16:13 |
| smcginnis | Next task was updating the feature list. | 16:13 |
| smcginnis | evrardjp: Did you get a chance to take a look at that? | 16:13 |
| evrardjp | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679610/ | 16:14 |
| evrardjp | I have no clue what I am doing but gmann said it was ok. | 16:14 |
| smcginnis | ;) | 16:14 |
| evrardjp | it's like the previous ones, just grepped a little more and changed a little more. | 16:15 |
| ttx | The Process is to be followed. | 16:15 |
| smcginnis | I do wonder if those could just be automated, but probably easy enough to just keep doing them. | 16:15 |
| evrardjp | ttx: the process was different because files changed, but exactly! | 16:15 |
| smcginnis | Thanks for taking care of that evrardjp | 16:15 |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-release | 16:15 | |
| ttx | yeah, once-per-cycle is not enough to justify automation | 16:15 |
| evrardjp | smcginnis: this will take more time to automate I think, because things change | 16:15 |
| ttx | https://xkcd.com/1205/ | 16:16 |
| smcginnis | Agreed | 16:16 |
| evrardjp | ttx: I have a xkcd for that somewhere, will find that eventually | 16:16 |
| evrardjp | hahaha | 16:16 |
| evrardjp | thanks! | 16:16 |
| smcginnis | :) | 16:16 |
| smcginnis | Last task is the new one for tomorrow. I can take that. | 16:16 |
| smcginnis | #topic How to handle branching with new runtimes | 16:17 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "How to handle branching with new runtimes (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 16:17 | |
| smcginnis | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673019/ | 16:17 |
| smcginnis | My second to last comment on there details some issues I see with this. | 16:17 |
| smcginnis | We have several external dependencies that I'm not sure we can automate gating on to do this right. | 16:18 |
| evrardjp | Agreed. this was by far the last element, because that was actionable :p | 16:18 |
| smcginnis | Yep! | 16:18 |
| dhellmann | one of the reasons for the release-test repo is to allow us to test changes to the tools like this one | 16:18 |
| * ttx catches up | 16:18 | |
| evrardjp | I pinged mugsie in the TC channel, and we might continue there on the tc related things | 16:18 |
| dhellmann | so we should get it to the point where we think it's right, then test branching the release-test repo | 16:19 |
| * mugsie is watching, but not fully engaged | 16:19 | |
| smcginnis | dhellmann: I don't think we can. | 16:19 |
| dhellmann | ? | 16:19 |
| smcginnis | mugsie: See my second to last comment on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/673019/ for the issues I see with doing this. | 16:20 |
| smcginnis | dhellmann: Maybe I'm missing something, but a few of those steps are definitely needed first. | 16:20 |
| mugsie | yea, 3+4 are only just underway - I assumed stable/train branches were a ways out | 16:21 |
| evrardjp | so there are patches for 1) and 3)4) AFAIK | 16:21 |
| *** njohnston has joined #openstack-release | 16:21 | |
| smcginnis | mugsie: The future is now. ;) | 16:21 |
| dhellmann | oh, I just mean don't stress about manually reviewing this to perfection because we have a way to test it once it merges | 16:21 |
| evrardjp | 1) need confirmation from foundation, no? | 16:21 |
| mugsie | I thought we got that | 16:21 |
| evrardjp | dhellmann: nice reminder :) | 16:21 |
| evrardjp | ok | 16:21 |
| smcginnis | evrardjp: I believe we've had that. It's official ussuri. | 16:21 |
| ttx | yes | 16:21 |
| ttx | ricolin announced it | 16:21 |
| evrardjp | I saw the announcement | 16:22 |
| dhellmann | smcginnis : your point about having the python versions selected makes sense | 16:22 |
| evrardjp | brainfart | 16:22 |
| ricolin | yep:) | 16:22 |
| evrardjp | it's been a long day. | 16:22 |
| fungi | right, ricolin waited to announce it until the trademark search was completed | 16:22 |
| dhellmann | maybe this is a thing to automate with a script after the fact, rather than as part of the branching process | 16:22 |
| evrardjp | I think what matters technically for this to be in is the point 5) | 16:22 |
| smcginnis | I suppose we could define the jobs ahead of time and change the content once the runtimes are finalized, but that could cause an issue. | 16:22 |
| evrardjp | and 2) but that should be relatively easy | 16:22 |
| smcginnis | dhellmann: I think that's what we are going to have to do. | 16:22 |
| dhellmann | yeah, that's the other approach | 16:22 |
| smcginnis | Too many external dependencies. | 16:23 |
| smcginnis | And we want the change to be self testing, not break everything after it's been merged. | 16:23 |
| dhellmann | plus that way someone will get the review stats ;-) | 16:23 |
| dhellmann | yes, that is also a plus, smcginnis | 16:23 |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 16:23 | |
| dhellmann | given how long it has taken to make some of those decisions lately, it seems like keeping the processes decoupled is wise | 16:24 |
| evrardjp | What is the deadline we are talking about? Can we use the review on 3) as basis for 5) ? | 16:24 |
| evrardjp | and maybe change if necessary? | 16:24 |
| dhellmann | although I suppose if the job template doesn't exist, the patch to add it would just fail, and then it would be there for someone to merge later when the jobs do exist | 16:25 |
| evrardjp | I am confused about the issue here (I understand we don't want to mess with the content of the job template after the fact though, but even that I don't consider a big deal) | 16:25 |
| smcginnis | We could define the job, then change it, but that risks the change passing, then we update the runtimes, now suddenly the entire project is blocked by the gate because of a bug with the new runtime. | 16:25 |
| evrardjp | dhellmann: yes but I am here assuming we have a basis for creating the template | 16:25 |
| dhellmann | smcginnis : what if we leave the template undefined, but generate the patch to add it anyway? then teams can merge it when the template is created | 16:26 |
| evrardjp | smcginnis: agreed on that too, but as said above, not a big deal for me, as projects would have to deal with it anyway | 16:26 |
| dhellmann | evrardjp : the only thing we need to know in the patch generating the change is the name of the template | 16:26 |
| smcginnis | evrardjp: We still need 2) in place, which I don't think we've always had done before it came time to branch. | 16:26 |
| evrardjp | smcginnis: now I start to understand :) | 16:26 |
| dhellmann | smcginnis : we know the name for the new series now, though | 16:27 |
| smcginnis | evrardjp: Yah, but dealing with a bug fix before adding new jobs is differnt than blocking the entire project until the bug if fixed. | 16:27 |
| evrardjp | dhellmann: what I meant is that, should we already create this template, as of today, with the _proposed_ jobs of the patch from mugsie? | 16:27 |
| smcginnis | #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679822/ Strawman for Ussuri schedule | 16:27 |
| evrardjp | assuming this, a depends-on would work and definition of the job would work | 16:27 |
| dhellmann | evrardjp : not until the TC approves that list | 16:27 |
| evrardjp | ok so it's a process thing. Got it. | 16:27 |
| evrardjp | thanks for clarifying! | 16:28 |
| mugsie | the python3 versions are not in debate, but from a process side the jobs should wait | 16:28 |
| dhellmann | depends-on will block the patch from merging, but won't allow the jobs to run because you can't do speculative testing against project-config | 16:28 |
| dhellmann | mugsie : right | 16:28 |
| smcginnis | I guess we could propose it before the job is defined. But I wonder if that would cause confusion. | 16:28 |
| evrardjp | dhellmann: oh true. | 16:28 |
| dhellmann | smcginnis : we could handle that with the commit message, like we used to have to do for the requirements URL update | 16:29 |
| smcginnis | We would still need to update our process to ensure we have the next cycle added to the releases repo before anyone requests a stable branch. | 16:29 |
| dhellmann | yes, that's true | 16:29 |
| dhellmann | although we could enforce that with validation in the releases repo | 16:29 |
| evrardjp | that doesn't sound a big patch, but I am not sure what it really entails | 16:30 |
| smcginnis | If we commit to always having 6 months cycles, and we get a list of cycle names ahead of time, we could probably do that safely. For now, it would be on us as reviewers to have to know everything is in place so the tagging and branching job doesn't fail. | 16:30 |
| dhellmann | smcginnis : we could also loosen the validation on the series status file so that it doesn't require dates | 16:30 |
| smcginnis | Oh true, we could have validation that looks for new stable branch creation and make sure there is a next series defined. | 16:31 |
| dhellmann | right | 16:31 |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 16:31 | |
| smcginnis | I am concerned about getting any of this in place yet for stable/train branches. | 16:31 |
| evrardjp | smcginnis: though that seem to be a problem that can repeat itself | 16:32 |
| dhellmann | yeah, it's a lot to get done in a short amount of time | 16:32 |
| evrardjp | is there something we should change in the agenda ? | 16:32 |
| dhellmann | it might be better to write up a more detailed plan to implement this next cycle, and deal with things by hand this cycle | 16:32 |
| evrardjp | (for next time) | 16:32 |
| *** chandankumar is now known as raukadah | 16:33 | |
| smcginnis | I'm also concerned that if we aren't able to agree to a next cycle name or something like that, doing final releases could be held up until we get these things in place. | 16:33 |
| smcginnis | I don't want to risk the unified release to try to make the next cycle one step easier. | 16:33 |
| smcginnis | But I agree with dhellmann - lets get this written up in more detail so we make sure we have all issues understood and handled. | 16:34 |
| dhellmann | having a list of things to do, and information we must have in order to progress, would make the work and blockers a lot clearer | 16:35 |
| smcginnis | ++ | 16:35 |
| smcginnis | So let's kick that can a little further down the road for now and move on. | 16:35 |
| smcginnis | #topic R-5 email content final review | 16:35 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "R-5 email content final review (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 16:35 | |
| smcginnis | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 16:36 |
| smcginnis | Line 391-ish. | 16:36 |
| smcginnis | ttx: "This coming week is the deadline for client libraries (except client libraries):" | 16:36 |
| ttx | ah | 16:37 |
| ttx | I tried to simplify it, and moved the mention of prelude to next week email to keep this one digestable | 16:37 |
| smcginnis | Just finished reading through again. This looks good to me. | 16:38 |
| ttx | Focus on the critical bits | 16:38 |
| smcginnis | If anyone else has any edits or comments, feel free to raise them or edit the draft. I will send that out later today. | 16:39 |
| evrardjp | It looks good | 16:40 |
| smcginnis | #topic Review/assign next week tasks | 16:40 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Review/assign next week tasks (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 16:40 | |
| evrardjp | I haven't found mistakes so far | 16:40 |
| evrardjp | :p | 16:40 |
| smcginnis | :) | 16:40 |
| ttx | OK, so I win the right to do it again next week! | 16:40 |
| smcginnis | First, approve all train-3 libs. | 16:40 |
| smcginnis | I'll put my name down for that, but anyone feel free to do that Monday morning. Especially any of you that live in the future. | 16:41 |
| evrardjp | :) | 16:41 |
| ttx | ok might beat you to it | 16:41 |
| ttx | or not | 16:41 |
| evrardjp | I have planned to clear my morning agenda for helping there | 16:41 |
| smcginnis | Layers of backup redudancy. | 16:41 |
| evrardjp | will see at that time :) | 16:42 |
| smcginnis | That might be good just in case we run in to any issues. Not that I think we should at this point. | 16:42 |
| ttx | Milestone-3 client library autoreleases... anyone interested ? Should also happen early in the week | 16:42 |
| evrardjp | diablo_rojo: want to do it with me? | 16:42 |
| ttx | I'll take the "Evaluate any libraries" step | 16:42 |
| diablo_rojo | evrardjp, sure :) | 16:43 |
| diablo_rojo | #teamworkmakesthedreamwork | 16:43 |
| *** zigo has quit IRC | 16:43 | |
| evrardjp | :) | 16:43 |
| evrardjp | cool! | 16:43 |
| smcginnis | Thanks! | 16:43 |
| evrardjp | who is pinging prometheanfire :p | 16:43 |
| smcginnis | And remind the requirements team - I've kind of done that already, so I know prometheanfire is aware on planning for it. | 16:43 |
| ttx | we can do that during the meeting next week | 16:44 |
| ttx | let me move that one off | 16:44 |
| smcginnis | And he's been reminded of his sad lack of batman quotes last time around. | 16:44 |
| smcginnis | ttx: ++ | 16:44 |
| smcginnis | Looks like that's it for the task list. | 16:44 |
| ttx | ++ | 16:45 |
| diablo_rojo | Should I send out the cycle highlights email? | 16:45 |
| diablo_rojo | We have the deadline coming up and I dont think i have seen any come in. | 16:45 |
| smcginnis | diablo_rojo: That would be good to have its own email to try to get more awareness/visibility. | 16:45 |
| diablo_rojo | Even though it was in the release email last week | 16:45 |
| ttx | diablo_rojo: hmm maybe the Monday ? It's mentioned in the weekly email that should go out today/tomorrow already | 16:45 |
| smcginnis | I have seen zero activity there. | 16:46 |
| diablo_rojo | I'll get that out today then. | 16:46 |
| *** spsurya has quit IRC | 16:48 | |
| ttx | alright, anything else to discuss? | 16:48 |
| smcginnis | #topic Open floor | 16:48 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open floor (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 16:48 | |
| evrardjp | nothing | 16:48 |
| diablo_rojo | I got nothing else | 16:48 |
| evrardjp | except thanks everyone! | 16:48 |
| ttx | i don't have anything. Except a blood sample test tomorrow morning, so no drink tonight | 16:48 |
| smcginnis | Please take a look at the proposed scheduele I put up and see if you notice any issues with where milestones land or anything else like that. | 16:48 |
| smcginnis | ttx: Our condolenses on your suffering. :D | 16:49 |
| evrardjp | (mostly dhellmann smcginnis and ttx for their patience to explain to a newcomer like me!) | 16:49 |
| ttx | willdo | 16:49 |
| smcginnis | evrardjp: Thanks for all the help! | 16:49 |
| smcginnis | And thanks everyone for participating. Really appreciated! | 16:49 |
| smcginnis | #endmeeting | 16:49 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Release Managers office - Come here to discuss how to release OpenStack components - Logged at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-release/" | 16:50 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Thu Sep 5 16:49:59 2019 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:50 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2019/releaseteam.2019-09-05-16.00.html | 16:50 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2019/releaseteam.2019-09-05-16.00.txt | 16:50 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2019/releaseteam.2019-09-05-16.00.log.html | 16:50 |
| * ttx disappears | 16:50 | |
| ttx | thanks smcginnis ! | 16:50 |
| smcginnis | Salut | 16:50 |
| fungi | thanks smcginnis! | 16:51 |
| diablo_rojo | Thanks smcginnis! | 16:54 |
| *** zigo has joined #openstack-release | 17:11 | |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 17:18 | |
| *** armax has quit IRC | 17:20 | |
| *** ricolin has quit IRC | 17:35 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 17:50 | |
| *** armax has joined #openstack-release | 18:04 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-release | 18:33 | |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 18:36 | |
| *** efried is now known as efried_afk | 18:52 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 18:54 | |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 18:56 | |
| *** armstrong has quit IRC | 19:04 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:07 | |
| *** trident has quit IRC | 19:09 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 19:12 | |
| *** efried_afk is now known as efried | 19:13 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:14 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 19:16 | |
| *** e0ne_ has joined #openstack-release | 19:18 | |
| *** trident has joined #openstack-release | 19:20 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:21 | |
| *** e0ne_ has quit IRC | 19:49 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 19:54 | |
| *** e0ne_ has joined #openstack-release | 19:59 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:00 | |
| *** efried is now known as efried_afk | 20:16 | |
| *** e0ne_ has quit IRC | 20:19 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release new zaqarclient with jsonschema uncovered https://review.opendev.org/679842 | 20:40 |
| clarkb | hello release team. Do you have any releases in flight other than zaqarclient? | 21:04 |
| smcginnis | clarkb: That should be it. | 21:04 |
| clarkb | I'd like to restart gerrit quickly to pick up some configuration changes that we learned about from the gerrit user summit | 21:05 |
| clarkb | k I'll wait for that one to flush out before doing the restart then | 21:05 |
| smcginnis | Should be a good time to do it. | 21:05 |
| smcginnis | Once that's done... | 21:05 |
| clarkb | yup will wait | 21:05 |
| smcginnis | Doesn't look like it should be much longer. | 21:05 |
| smcginnis | clarkb: Any exciting new changes from the user summit? | 21:06 |
| *** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| clarkb | smcginnis: mostly tweaks to improve operational experience as well as detailed info on how to safely upgrade past 2.13 | 21:06 |
| clarkb | these items are the operational improvements | 21:06 |
| clarkb | includes not replicating on restart | 21:07 |
| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-release | 21:07 | |
| clarkb | so that we can do restarts without falling behind on replication | 21:07 |
| smcginnis | Easier operation is a great thing. | 21:07 |
| clarkb | we learned for example that we should upgrade all the way to 2.16 before enabling notedb | 21:07 |
| clarkb | and that the notedb migration can be done in the background if done that way | 21:07 |
| smcginnis | Nice. | 21:08 |
| smcginnis | Did they add back the "t" shortcut in 2.16? :D | 21:08 |
| smcginnis | Release patch is done BTW. | 21:08 |
| clarkb | well they completely replaced the UI so who knows | 21:08 |
| clarkb | it is organized a lot more like the old old UI | 21:08 |
| clarkb | which is good because i prefered that one | 21:08 |
| smcginnis | Me too, that should be nice. | 21:09 |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Gerrit is being restarted to pick up configuration changes. Should be quick. Sorry for the interruption. | 21:14 | |
| clarkb | smcginnis: I think we are done. The bits that don't take an hour of gerrit being idle to verify have been verified as happy | 21:19 |
| clarkb | and we verified the idle bits on review-dev so are pretty confident that if prod gerrit somehow goes idle for an hour then ssh connections will timeout :) | 21:19 |
| smcginnis | clarkb: Great, thanks. | 21:19 |
| *** radeks has quit IRC | 21:54 | |
| *** efried_afk is now known as efried | 21:58 | |
| *** prometheanfire has quit IRC | 22:25 | |
| *** prometheanfire has joined #openstack-release | 22:26 | |
| openstackgerrit | Lingxian Kong proposed openstack/releases master: Trove train cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/680532 | 22:29 |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
| cmurphy | we're hoping to get a ci fix in for keystoneauth before proposing a final release https://review.opendev.org/680515 any chance if i propose that later tonight it won't be too late? | 23:09 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release os-ken 0.4.1 https://review.opendev.org/680093 | 23:31 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release sushy 2.0.0 and create stable/train https://review.opendev.org/680382 | 23:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: train: release osc-placement 1.7.0 https://review.opendev.org/680448 | 23:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release ceilometermiddleware 1.5.0 https://review.opendev.org/680082 | 23:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release monasca-statsd 1.12.0 for train https://review.opendev.org/680090 | 23:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release os-win 4.3.1 for train https://review.opendev.org/680098 | 23:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release ironic-lib 2.21.0 and create stable/train https://review.opendev.org/680380 | 23:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!