| *** tetsuro has joined #openstack-release | 00:33 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 00:55 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 01:06 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 01:10 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 01:16 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 01:20 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 01:25 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 01:30 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-release | 01:31 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 01:35 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 01:40 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 01:45 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 01:50 | |
| *** tetsuro has quit IRC | 01:50 | |
| *** elod has quit IRC | 01:50 | |
| *** tetsuro has joined #openstack-release | 01:50 | |
| *** elod has joined #openstack-release | 01:52 | |
| *** tetsuro has quit IRC | 01:55 | |
| *** tetsuro has joined #openstack-release | 02:41 | |
| *** tetsuro has quit IRC | 02:59 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 03:55 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 04:16 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 04:21 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 04:26 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 04:30 | |
| *** evrardjp has quit IRC | 04:33 | |
| *** evrardjp has joined #openstack-release | 04:33 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 04:36 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 04:36 | |
| *** ykarel has joined #openstack-release | 04:40 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-release | 04:40 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 04:40 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 04:44 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 04:46 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 04:51 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 05:06 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 05:11 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 05:16 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 05:21 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 05:36 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 05:41 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 05:46 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
| *** sboyron has joined #openstack-release | 05:59 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 06:06 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 06:10 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-release | 06:16 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 06:26 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 06:31 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 06:37 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 06:41 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 06:47 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 06:51 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 06:57 | |
| *** slaweq_ has joined #openstack-release | 06:59 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
| openstackgerrit | Marios Andreou proposed openstack/releases master: TripleO Victoria rc1 release https://review.opendev.org/754346 | 07:15 |
|---|---|---|
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 07:16 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 07:21 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-release | 07:23 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 07:36 | |
| *** jtomasek has joined #openstack-release | 07:41 | |
| *** sboyron_ has joined #openstack-release | 08:20 | |
| *** sboyron has quit IRC | 08:23 | |
| *** slaweq_ is now known as slaweq | 08:32 | |
| *** ttx has quit IRC | 08:41 | |
| *** ttx has joined #openstack-release | 08:41 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for heat-dashboard https://review.opendev.org/752990 | 09:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Propose Victoria release for heat-agents https://review.opendev.org/752960 | 09:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for cinder https://review.opendev.org/752978 | 09:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for placement https://review.opendev.org/753049 | 09:21 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Add Oslo Feature Freeze to Wallaby release schedule https://review.opendev.org/754477 | 09:23 |
| *** tkajinam has quit IRC | 09:42 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 10:05 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-release | 10:11 | |
| openstackgerrit | Michał Dulko proposed openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for kuryr-kubernetes https://review.opendev.org/752998 | 10:26 |
| hberaud | ttx, smcginnis: this one can be +2 +W'ed => https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752962/1 | 10:40 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Puppet OpenStack Victoria Milestone RC1 https://review.opendev.org/754594 | 10:49 |
| *** armstrong_ has joined #openstack-release | 11:50 | |
| *** armstrong_ is now known as armstrong | 11:55 | |
| armstrong | hberaud Hello | 11:55 |
| armstrong | hberaud: are you available now? | 11:56 |
| hberaud | armstrong: hello | 12:21 |
| armstrong | sorry I am way too early than we schedule | 12:22 |
| hberaud | armstrong: I need to ping sboyron_ too, he is also interested by this session | 12:22 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: are you available? | 12:23 |
| sboyron_ | yep | 12:23 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_: so lets go | 12:24 |
| armstrong | ok cool | 12:24 |
| sboyron_ | great | 12:26 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/victoria-relmgt-tracking/timeslider#4587 | 12:27 |
| hberaud | smcginnis, ttx, FYI, apparently I made a mistake last week with https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/victoria-relmgt-tracking the majority of the lines are underlined with my color, so I suppose I did something wrong, however we can rewind on the latest right version by using https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/victoria-relmgt-tracking/timeslider#4587 | 12:30 |
| armstrong | hberaud: the etherpad doesn't show line number here? | 12:31 |
| hberaud | armstrong: yes exact | 12:31 |
| hberaud | armstrong: go to R-2 | 12:31 |
| hberaud | tasks | 12:31 |
| armstrong | ok | 12:31 |
| sboyron_ | done ;) | 12:34 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ so we will use a tmate | 12:34 |
| hberaud | armstrong: please tell me when you are connect | 12:35 |
| armstrong | hberaud: on the ssh? | 12:35 |
| sboyron_ | armstrong yes | 12:36 |
| armstrong | hberaud: if so then I am connected | 12:36 |
| hberaud | nice | 12:36 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ : have you already cloned release repo? | 12:37 |
| armstrong | hberaud: on our local workspace? | 12:38 |
| hberaud | nope | 12:38 |
| armstrong | hberaud: i have the release repo cloned locally | 12:38 |
| hberaud | on your machine | 12:38 |
| hberaud | the tmate is more to give an example | 12:38 |
| armstrong | hberaud: yes, I did already | 12:38 |
| hberaud | nice | 12:38 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ so the goal here is to identify which deliverables doesn't have stable branch and then create one if needed | 12:40 |
| sboyron_ | yes I did it too | 12:40 |
| hberaud | sboyron_, armstrong you can repeat these actions on your laptop too | 12:40 |
| armstrong | hberaud: ok | 12:41 |
| hberaud | armstrong: so here we get a list | 12:41 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ here is the list of open reviews => https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/releases+branch:master+status:open | 12:42 |
| armstrong | hberaud: I have a longer list than what is shown on tmate | 12:42 |
| hberaud | are you up to date? | 12:43 |
| hberaud | armstrong: ^^ | 12:43 |
| armstrong | hberaud: ok find, I figured it out | 12:44 |
| hberaud | armstrong: git fetch origin & git checkout -b stable_branches origin/master & tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --model cycle-with-rc --no-stable-branch | 12:44 |
| hberaud | sboyron_, armstrong: so we can compare this list with the list of opened reviews | 12:45 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud: got the same list ;) | 12:45 |
| hberaud | sboyron_, armstrong: especially https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/releases+branch:master+topic:victoria-rc1 | 12:45 |
| ykarel | seems like tarballs are not being published for rc bits, can anyone check, some examples like cinder,placement,heat-dashboard | 12:46 |
| ykarel | heat-agents etc | 12:46 |
| armstrong | hberaud: I am good | 12:46 |
| hberaud | armstrong: ok | 12:47 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, armstrong this one : https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:victoria-rc1+status:open ? | 12:47 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ yes | 12:47 |
| ykarel | noticed while building package in RDO https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/topic:victoria-update+(status:open)+owner:%22rdo-trunk+%253Cjavier.pena%2540redhat.com%253E%22 | 12:47 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ apparently kolla is missing | 12:47 |
| armstrong | hberaud: just a sec, what are we checking on the URL? | 12:48 |
| ykarel | the release jobs is green for all these https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=release-openstack-python | 12:48 |
| hberaud | armstrong: on the project name | 12:48 |
| ykarel | if possible good to check and fix these before releasing more projects | 12:48 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ concerning kolla these patches have been abandonned => https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752995/ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752997/ | 12:49 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ kolla is cycle-trailing https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#trailing | 12:50 |
| sboyron_ | what does "tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --model cycle-with-rc --no-stable-branch" list exactly ? | 12:51 |
| armstrong | hberaud: do we have to click on every link under the project to verify? | 12:51 |
| hberaud | armstrong: it could be worth | 12:51 |
| hberaud | armstrong: just to ensure that everything is under control | 12:52 |
| armstrong | hberaud: becasuee I am trying to figure out hoe you got the Kolla | 12:52 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ : https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/victoria/kolla.yaml#L3 | 12:53 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud: your tox command is listing all deliverables with a model cycle-with-rc, but what is doing the --no-stable-branch ? | 12:53 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ I just seen comments on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752995/ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752997/ | 12:53 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: it check if a project have something like => https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/victoria/keystone.yaml#L13,L14 | 12:54 |
| ykarel | hberaud, smcginnis can u check issue with tarballs for rc bits ^? | 12:54 |
| hberaud | ykarel: I'll try to take a look soon | 12:55 |
| ykarel | hberaud, Thanks | 12:55 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ so it could be worth if this command could ignore trailing project https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/deliverables/victoria/kolla.yaml#L5 | 12:56 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, ok got it | 12:58 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ FYI information the deadline for this type of deliverable is => https://releases.openstack.org/wallaby/schedule.html#w-cycle-trail | 12:58 |
| armstrong | hberaud: so the command we executed on our terminals should not have included kolla? | 12:59 |
| sboyron_ | armstrong, that's my understanding; waiting for hberaud ^^ | 12:59 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ yes, or kolla project could be ignored due to the type of delivrable | 13:00 |
| armstrong | hberaud: ok | 13:00 |
| hberaud | also I can observe that kayobe and openstack-ansible are missing | 13:00 |
| hberaud | so lets take a look to them | 13:00 |
| hberaud | same thing for these project, they are trailing => https://review.opendev.org/#/c/753046/ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752993/ | 13:01 |
| armstrong | hberaud: openstack-ansible and kayobe misssing where? On Gerrit? | 13:02 |
| hberaud | armstrong: they are in the result of the command | 13:03 |
| hberaud | armstrong: and they are not in the opened patch on gerrit | 13:03 |
| hberaud | armstrong: patches have been abandonned | 13:03 |
| hberaud | => https://review.opendev.org/#/c/753046/ https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752993/ | 13:03 |
| sboyron_ | there is no open review to propose a vicoria rc1 open | 13:03 |
| armstrong | hberaud: ok, I see. | 13:04 |
| sboyron_ | => kayobe is cycle-training too | 13:04 |
| armstrong | hberaud: so, based on the result of the command we executed, we have to verify each project manually under Gerrit ? | 13:05 |
| hberaud | sboyron_, armstrong: tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --model cycle-with-rc --no-stable-branch --cycle-based-no-trailing | 13:05 |
| hberaud | I think we can try something like ^^^ to ignore them | 13:05 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, nope it does not work, not allowed with arg model | 13:06 |
| hberaud | yep | 13:07 |
| armstrong | hberaud: command failed | 13:07 |
| hberaud | I think we need to intersect 2 commands output | 13:08 |
| hberaud | models can be merged apparently | 13:08 |
| hberaud | nope finally I don't think it will works | 13:09 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ so to summarize | 13:09 |
| hberaud | everything is ok here | 13:09 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, what about this one: tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --model cycle-with-rc --no-stable-branch --cycle-based-no-trailing | 13:09 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: it fail | 13:10 |
| sboyron_ | lol, wrong paste I pasted youre ;) tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --cycle-based-no-trailing --missing-rc | 13:10 |
| armstrong | hberaud: are you using BASh or ZSH? | 13:11 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ only the projects who are trailing remains without stable branch here but it's ok | 13:11 |
| hberaud | armstrong: zsh | 13:11 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ so they can be ignored | 13:11 |
| armstrong | hberaud: I had series of problems like this on my macos running ZSH | 13:11 |
| armstrong | try BASH | 13:11 |
| hberaud | armstrong: I never facing issues with zsh before | 13:12 |
| hberaud | s/facing/faced | 13:12 |
| hberaud | but we can rerun with bash if you want | 13:12 |
| armstrong | hberaud: ok | 13:12 |
| hberaud | armstrong: same output | 13:13 |
| armstrong | hberaud: I got same output like what you have on your terminal | 13:15 |
| hberaud | nice | 13:16 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_ : who run the last command on the tmate? | 13:17 |
| sboyron_ | me | 13:17 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: it seem the right ouput | 13:17 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, ;) | 13:17 |
| hberaud | so I think we can update the doc | 13:17 |
| hberaud | with this one | 13:17 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: I give you the honor to update the etherpad | 13:18 |
| hberaud | :) | 13:18 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: also I think something more official could be added here => https://github.com/openstack/releases/blob/master/doc/source/reference/process.rst | 13:19 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, with what ? ^^ My understanding is that there is not deliverables cycle-with-rc without V rc branch that don't have an on-coming review | 13:19 |
| sboyron_ | is it what we are really checking ? | 13:20 |
| hberaud | yes | 13:20 |
| hberaud | and which are not trailing projects | 13:20 |
| sboyron_ | yep | 13:21 |
| sboyron_ | for my personnal understanding, if someone abandon one of these precious review, we will lost something ? | 13:21 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: so this is why your latest command seems more legit than the one given in the etherpad | 13:21 |
| sboyron_ | Who can abandon or reject a review ? the owner and cores ? | 13:21 |
| hberaud | yep | 13:22 |
| hberaud | we don't lost things by abandonning them | 13:22 |
| sboyron_ | so this is relying on ttx to not abandon these ? | 13:22 |
| sboyron_ | otherwhise we can forgot to merge one ? | 13:23 |
| hberaud | still opened reviews need to remain opened, they are legit | 13:24 |
| hberaud | this is your question? | 13:24 |
| armstrong | hberaud: with this new output can we go on Gerrit and look for open-patches ? | 13:24 |
| hberaud | yep | 13:24 |
| hberaud | armstrong: normally it should reflect https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/releases+branch:master+topic:victoria-rc1 | 13:25 |
| hberaud | these list are identical | 13:25 |
| hberaud | s/list/lists | 13:26 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, armstrong:: it is reflecting it; what were we supposed to if it was not that? Creating some new reviews ? | 13:27 |
| hberaud | yep with the missing project | 13:28 |
| sboyron_ | got it | 13:28 |
| sboyron_ | ths hberaud | 13:28 |
| sboyron_ | s/ths/thx | 13:28 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: if a legit project is listed in the command output and patch is missing on gerrit then we should create a new patch to create a stable branch for this project | 13:29 |
| armstrong | hberaud: ok, so we are not creating any new branch right? | 13:29 |
| hberaud | armstrong: everything is ok | 13:29 |
| hberaud | we don't need to do something | 13:29 |
| sboyron_ | when will these open review be merged ? | 13:29 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: deadline is today if no feedback is given until tonight then we will force the merge of these patches | 13:30 |
| sboyron_ | ok | 13:31 |
| armstrong | hberaud: is there a way to verify the opened reviews with scripts/automatically? instead of manually? | 13:31 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: c.f the first task line 424 | 13:31 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/victoria-relmgt-tracking | 13:31 |
| sboyron_ | should we double check if additionnal commits have been pushed on the projects ? | 13:31 |
| hberaud | sboyron_: you can check and ask to the team if they want to land missed patches | 13:32 |
| sboyron_ | o | 13:32 |
| sboyron_ | ok | 13:32 |
| hberaud | else pointed sha will be used | 13:33 |
| hberaud | that's all for this task | 13:34 |
| armstrong | hberaud: ok | 13:34 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_: do you want to discuss about something else? | 13:34 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, | 13:35 |
| armstrong | I think I asked a question ^^ | 13:35 |
| hberaud | armstrong: oh sorry | 13:35 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, yes; barbican is waiting for this review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/752974/ | 13:35 |
| sboyron_ | sry : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754481/ | 13:35 |
| hberaud | armstrong: manual check are worth, it can help to see weird things or discuss about specific points with teams | 13:37 |
| armstrong | hberaud: ok thanks | 13:37 |
| hberaud | armstrong: also it could help to improve our commands and docs | 13:37 |
| hberaud | armstrong: like our discussion about trailing | 13:37 |
| armstrong | hberaud: yea | 13:38 |
| sboyron_ | armstrong, you can perform a "git review -l" | 13:38 |
| sboyron_ | but there is no option to filter on a topic | 13:39 |
| armstrong | hberaud: concerning the opened review for barbican? | 13:39 |
| hberaud | armstrong: normally we don't spend so much time on this kind of check, and for now human eyes are more able to detect tricky things than an automated script | 13:39 |
| * hberaud kill the tmate | 13:39 | |
| hberaud | armstrong: barbican ask to wait a bit | 13:40 |
| armstrong | hberaud: sounds good to know | 13:40 |
| hberaud | armstrong: but if the deadline is reached and the patch not yet merged then we will force the merge | 13:41 |
| hberaud | armstrong, sboyron_: have you other questions? | 13:41 |
| sboyron_ | hberaud, nope | 13:42 |
| armstrong | yes | 13:42 |
| hberaud | armstrong: the floor is yours | 13:42 |
| armstrong | hberaud: I executed the git review -l command and have list of projects awaiting reviews | 13:43 |
| armstrong | hberaud: what is the next step with these reviews? | 13:43 |
| hberaud | armstrong: it's depends on topics | 13:44 |
| hberaud | armstrong: our priority is RC1 for now | 13:44 |
| hberaud | this one is interesting : Add Cinder-specific dates for Wallaby schedule | 13:45 |
| armstrong | hberaud: it means we should look at all the RC1 reviews? | 13:45 |
| hberaud | armstrong: you can | 13:45 |
| hberaud | for now we mainly waiting for PTL feedback | 13:46 |
| armstrong | ok | 13:46 |
| hberaud | armstrong: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754484/ | 13:46 |
| hberaud | on this one cinder plan is specific date for W | 13:47 |
| hberaud | armstrong: https://releases.openstack.org/wallaby/schedule.html | 13:47 |
| TheJulia | so out of curiosity, what is it going to take to get ironic-stable-maint to just include ironic-core? | 13:47 |
| hberaud | armstrong: cinder team highlight its calendar | 13:48 |
| armstrong | ok for the cinder review, normally , who should insert the date, the cinder PTL or the release team? | 13:48 |
| hberaud | in this kind of patch it's more the project's team and PTL who propose dates | 13:49 |
| armstrong | ok | 13:50 |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-release | 13:54 | |
| armstrong | hberaud: also, suppose we want to look at any of the open reviews, we just copy the review ID on the left of the command output and search on Gerrit? | 13:55 |
| *** gmann_pto is now known as gmann | 13:55 | |
| smcginnis | TheJulia: When there was more of a stable team, the concern was that there are some stable-specific concerns that normal cores wouldn't necessarily know. | 13:55 |
| smcginnis | TheJulia: So they wanted an explicity ack that anyone included in stable-maint had at least actually read the stable policy docs and had shown in reviews that they understood the concerns. | 13:56 |
| TheJulia | smcginnis: yes. I'm aware of the history and reasoning and basically every ironic core is well aware of stable rules at this point. | 13:56 |
| smcginnis | TheJulia: I'm not sure if that matters quite as much today, mostly because we don't have enough people to really be able to focus on that. | 13:56 |
| TheJulia | I've also asked on the mailing list on the past and the discussion died. | 13:56 |
| smcginnis | TheJulia: I think I can add the core group. If it ends up being an issue, we can change it. But I'm sure it will be fine. | 13:57 |
| TheJulia | awesome, thanks! | 13:57 |
| smcginnis | TheJulia: And done. | 13:57 |
| TheJulia | I'll naturally make a point of making a meeting annoucement | 13:57 |
| TheJulia | smcginnis: Awesome! Thanks | 13:57 |
| smcginnis | TheJulia: That would be perfect! | 13:57 |
| hberaud | armstrong: Personnally I don't use this command, I simply use => https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/releases+branch:master+status:open | 13:58 |
| * TheJulia goes and updates the meeting agenda to again remind folks :) | 13:58 | |
| smcginnis | hberaud, ttx: Moving my mother turned out to be more of a nightmare than I had expected. Didn't get a chance to do anything late last week. | 13:58 |
| smcginnis | Will send the countdown email now. Better late than never. | 13:58 |
| hberaud | smcginnis: sorry I assigned you this email I was thinking you would be around friday, and I didn't want to bypass you on our communication | 14:00 |
| hberaud | s/you would be around/you would be here around/ | 14:01 |
| smcginnis | Yeah, I had fully planned on being around and getting that sent out on Friday. But I was busy non-stop until yesterday. | 14:02 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Add Cinder-specific dates for Wallaby schedule https://review.opendev.org/754484 | 14:02 |
| smcginnis | hberaud: Regarding membership freeze, that is normally added to the schedule by the election officials I believe. I can't recall right now. | 14:02 |
| hberaud | smcginnis: I hope that everything is ok for you and for your mother | 14:03 |
| smcginnis | Thanks. Yes, it all got taken care of. It just took a lot more work than I had expected. | 14:03 |
| smcginnis | Glad to be able to just sit at my desk today. :) | 14:03 |
| hberaud | :) | 14:03 |
| hberaud | smcginnis: ack thanks for the membership stuff | 14:04 |
| smcginnis | fungi: ykarel had commented earlier about some missing tarballs. Is that something you would have a little time to look into? | 14:06 |
| fungi | i can take a look sure | 14:12 |
| fungi | they're showing up on pypi... https://pypi.org/project/cinder/17.0.0.0rc1/ | 14:16 |
| fungi | but yeah not uploaded to https://tarballs.opendev.org/openstack/cinder/ | 14:17 |
| *** jbadiapa has joined #openstack-release | 14:26 | |
| fungi | looks like we don't run the release-openstack-python job in the pre-release pipeline, only in the release pipeline | 14:34 |
| fungi | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds/?project=openstack%2Fcinder&pipeline=pre-release | 14:34 |
| fungi | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds/?project=openstack%2Fpython-cinderclient&pipeline=release | 14:35 |
| fungi | i have no way of knowing whether that's intentional. i suppose we could add it if folks want that for pre-release tags | 14:35 |
| smcginnis | fungi: I see it in that pre-release pipeline. | 14:37 |
| smcginnis | LOOP [Collect tarball artifacts.] | 14:38 |
| smcginnis | ubuntu-bionic | changed: >f+++++++++ cinder-17.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz | 14:38 |
| smcginnis | localhost | Uploading cinder-17.0.0.0rc1.tar.gz | 14:39 |
| fungi | oh, yep, it's there. i clearly need more coffee | 14:39 |
| smcginnis | Looks lik eit was included in upload-afs-synchronize | 14:40 |
| fungi | yeah, double-checking whether it's just not been released to the read-only volume replica | 14:40 |
| fungi | yep, it's in the read/write volume. something's not releasing the replica | 14:42 |
| *** jtomasek has quit IRC | 14:42 | |
| smcginnis | Need to get out the mallet and give it a good whack? | 14:43 |
| clarkb | ianw has been trying to cleanup some broken tarball upload paths. Maybe alock is held for that? | 14:45 |
| fungi | it's definitely logging a failure to get the lockfile, but i see a vos release cronjob still running which started at 14:10 so possible it's a volume with lots of updates | 14:48 |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 14:48 | |
| smcginnis | So maybe just need to be patient and things will eventually sort itself out? | 14:49 |
| fungi | looks like it started releasing the tarballs volume a minute ago | 14:49 |
| fungi | 2020-09-28 14:48:36,642 release DEBUG Running: ssh -T -i /root/.ssh/id_vos_release vos_release@afs01.dfw.openstack.org -- vos release project.tarballs | 14:50 |
| fungi | so i think when that completes it should hopefully update on the tarballs site | 14:50 |
| smcginnis | fungi: Thanks for digging in. I'll check it a little later today and ping you (or infra) if there are still issues. | 14:51 |
| fungi | smcginnis: my pleasure. hopefully this will be done in minutes | 14:52 |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 14:53 | |
| *** bnemec has joined #openstack-release | 14:58 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Update SKS Keyserver URLs https://review.opendev.org/753788 | 15:03 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for kuryr-kubernetes https://review.opendev.org/752998 | 15:06 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for neutron https://review.opendev.org/753039 | 15:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Propose Victoria release for karbor-dashboard https://review.opendev.org/752961 | 15:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Propose Victoria release for karbor https://review.opendev.org/752962 | 15:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for monasca-api https://review.opendev.org/753012 | 15:24 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for monasca-thresh https://review.opendev.org/753017 | 15:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for monasca-ui https://review.opendev.org/753019 | 15:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for monasca-notification https://review.opendev.org/753014 | 15:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for monasca-persister https://review.opendev.org/753015 | 15:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for monasca-agent https://review.opendev.org/753010 | 15:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for monasca-events-api https://review.opendev.org/753013 | 15:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for monasca-transform https://review.opendev.org/753018 | 15:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for masakari https://review.opendev.org/753006 | 15:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for masakari-monitors https://review.opendev.org/753005 | 15:37 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for masakari-dashboard https://review.opendev.org/753004 | 15:37 |
| fungi | the vos release failed, but didn't report any useful errors in the log, so i'm running it by hand to see if i get more useful output | 15:39 |
| smcginnis | Release job failure was for monasca-transform. This was due to the project being deprecated, so when it tried to update the job template from victoria to wallaby it failed. Nothing to see here, move along. | 15:51 |
| *** ykarel|away has joined #openstack-release | 15:55 | |
| *** olivierbourdon38 has joined #openstack-release | 16:06 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 16:12 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for freezer-web-ui https://review.opendev.org/752987 | 16:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for freezer https://review.opendev.org/752988 | 16:15 |
| openstackgerrit | Douglas Mendizábal proposed openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for barbican https://review.opendev.org/752974 | 16:27 |
| fungi | smcginnis: looks like we've got tarballs showing up now, please double-check behind me but should be all clear now | 16:35 |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 16:59 | |
| smcginnis | fungi: Just a spot check, but I can confirm I see new tarballs showing up. Thanks! | 17:11 |
| fungi | no problem. once again the problem was clouds | 17:13 |
| fungi | yet another hung server | 17:13 |
| ykarel|away | fungi, smcginnis Thanks, will re check our jobs, i see tarballs are available now | 17:13 |
| smcginnis | fungi: Can't trust those cloud thingies. | 17:15 |
| fungi | indeed. especially ones we created | 17:16 |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposing victoria RC1 for barbican https://review.opendev.org/752974 | 17:28 |
| *** armstrong has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
| *** elod has quit IRC | 18:02 | |
| *** elod has joined #openstack-release | 18:04 | |
| *** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 18:57 | |
| *** smcginnis has quit IRC | 19:14 | |
| *** smcginnis has joined #openstack-release | 19:23 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-release | 19:27 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 19:29 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-release | 19:35 | |
| *** e0ne has quit IRC | 19:41 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 20:07 | |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-release | 20:21 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-release | 21:28 | |
| *** jbadiapa has quit IRC | 21:41 | |
| *** sboyron_ has quit IRC | 21:45 | |
| *** slaweq has joined #openstack-release | 21:48 | |
| *** slaweq has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| *** tkajinam has joined #openstack-release | 23:00 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-release | 23:09 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!