*** tosky has quit IRC | 00:26 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 03:25 | |
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 03:48 | |
*** armstrong has quit IRC | 04:04 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 04:12 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 04:12 | |
*** evrardjp has quit IRC | 05:33 | |
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-release | 05:33 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 06:24 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 06:24 | |
*** sboyron has joined #openstack-release | 07:07 | |
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-release | 07:13 | |
*** eolivare has joined #openstack-release | 07:34 | |
yoctozepto | hello dears, I have a question regarding openstacksdk release; I have just noticed it is not treated as "client library" and had its "final release" on Mar 03; the issue is masakariclient has code that depends on unreleased openstacksdk features; please let me know if openstacksdk may release again for wallaby or masakari is doomed (/me | 07:35 |
---|---|---|
yoctozepto | cross-posting this message on #openstack-release and #openstack-sdks) | 07:35 |
*** tosky has joined #openstack-release | 08:33 | |
yoctozepto | specifically I am about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299 | 08:49 |
*** tosky_ has joined #openstack-release | 08:52 | |
*** tosky is now known as Guest86814 | 08:53 | |
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky | 08:53 | |
*** Guest86814 has quit IRC | 08:55 | |
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-release | 09:11 | |
openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Adding the date of Xena's PTG https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779944 | 09:11 |
ttx | yoctozepto: we can still do bugfix releases | 09:39 |
ttx | and exceptionally consider feature releases | 09:39 |
ttx | the earlier the better :) | 09:40 |
hberaud | clarkb: o/ If it's really need we could grant an exception and wait until early next week. | 09:43 |
yoctozepto | ttx: like, today with masakariclient? | 09:44 |
ttx | yoctozepto: yeah | 09:46 |
ttx | maybe start a thread on openstack-discuss to document the exception | 09:47 |
ttx | But if the added features are specific to masakari I don't think that would impact anyone | 09:47 |
ttx | Also it's questionable that openstacksdk should follow the early library deadline, for that precise reason | 09:48 |
hberaud | What's missing? the microversion sync? | 09:48 |
ttx | we release python-*client the same time as parent projects so that late features can be taken into account | 09:48 |
ttx | it seems appropriate that openstacksdk is in the same bucket | 09:48 |
hberaud | agree | 09:49 |
ttx | also more generally, all those safeguards are a lot less needed now that we move slower and break less things | 09:49 |
ttx | so exceptions can be considered liberally | 09:49 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Adding the date of Xena's PTG https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779944 | 09:55 |
yoctozepto | ttx, hberaud: thanks, I will handle this | 09:56 |
hberaud | thanks | 09:56 |
hberaud | yoctozepto: Do you plan to start the ML thread? | 09:57 |
yoctozepto | hberaud: yes, but later; in a meeting right now; it would be cool if you started it as well | 09:59 |
hberaud | hm ok... then I'll bring that on the angle of the issue and on the angle of openstackSDK status compared to other clients. I'll ignore the FFE part. | 10:03 |
hberaud | yoctozepto: ^ | 10:03 |
hberaud | ttx: any reason to not +W'd? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779205 | 10:05 |
ttx | was wondering he we should not give a heads-up to the list before W+1ing those | 10:07 |
ttx | Was there a thread about those yet? | 10:07 |
hberaud | yoctozepto: well, finally, I'll bring the FFE too | 10:07 |
hberaud | ttx: | 10:07 |
hberaud | ttx: yes | 10:07 |
hberaud | lemme grab the link | 10:08 |
hberaud | I opened a related threads few months ago | 10:08 |
hberaud | ttx: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018527.html | 10:08 |
hberaud | ttx: the thread is only related to the oslo scope | 10:09 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release monasca-grafana-datasource 1.3.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779454 | 10:09 |
ttx | OK.. I wanted to complete the discussion on pycadf and have us post some sort of conclusion to that thread before pushing the button... | 10:09 |
ttx | but feel free to if you;re comfortable with it :) | 10:09 |
hberaud | Do you want to start the thread? | 10:09 |
ttx | still waiting for feedback on that pycadf review | 10:10 |
hberaud | I'm confortable with oslo | 10:10 |
ttx | then we can reply to the old thread saying what we ended up doing | 10:10 |
hberaud | Ok I'll send a last reply to give a last chance to raise hands | 10:11 |
hberaud | (on my original thread about oslo) | 10:11 |
ttx | maybe say ok we are about to move X and Y. For pycadf the jury is still out | 10:12 |
hberaud | I think pycaf and monasca should be handled separatelly | 10:12 |
hberaud | I see | 10:12 |
hberaud | ok | 10:12 |
hberaud | I'll submit a all in one email and put the reference about the previous discussion on oslo | 10:13 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release python-swiftclient 3.9.1 for Ussuri https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778438 | 10:14 |
ttx | hberaud: regarding the python clients that did not have any significant change merged during wallaby... we should still do a wallaby release to support the branch, right | 10:14 |
hberaud | What do you suggest? | 10:15 |
hberaud | To cut the branch now? | 10:16 |
ttx | I'm not sure what's the process in that case. The safe bet is to make a release and branch | 10:16 |
ttx | as we are 100% sure that works | 10:16 |
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 10:17 | |
hberaud | ok | 10:17 |
ttx | unless we have examples of branches being created from previous release tags | 10:17 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Cinder team releases for stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779199 | 10:17 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-glanceclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779653 | 10:17 |
ttx | we had a discussion about that at some PTG I remember | 10:17 |
ttx | trying to find it | 10:18 |
yoctozepto | ttx, hberaud: what I noticed is that openstacksdk made a "final release" but did not branch | 10:21 |
yoctozepto | another reason for my confusion | 10:21 |
hberaud | I take note | 10:21 |
ttx | so on one hand process says "If it is not OK to transition them, create a new stable branch from the latest release from the previous series" | 10:22 |
ttx | on the other hand... let me see if I can find any example of that ever being attempted | 10:22 |
hberaud | ok | 10:23 |
hberaud | I'm on the emails stuff for now | 10:23 |
hberaud | If you find something useful do not hesitate to update our process | 10:24 |
ttx | hberaud: yeah, that was never done. We never created a stable branch from a tag in a previous release | 10:26 |
ttx | i don;t think we should start innovating, tags are cheap | 10:27 |
ttx | So I'll post a minor bump and branch for those | 10:27 |
ttx | and be on the safe side | 10:27 |
ttx | I'll add a patch to process to be more explicit | 10:28 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 10:30 | |
openstackgerrit | Yasufumi Ogawa proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-tackerclient for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778972 | 10:32 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Clarify process for libraries without changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779965 | 10:37 |
hberaud | ttx: excellent thanks | 10:37 |
hberaud | I agree tags are cheap and we don't need to enter in a danger zone now | 10:38 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release sushy-cli for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779970 | 10:48 |
ttx | this tool is fancy | 10:49 |
hberaud | Which? autorelease? | 10:49 |
ttx | yeah | 10:50 |
ttx | <grumpy_old_man/>back in my time we didn't have fancy tools</> | 10:50 |
hberaud | lol | 10:50 |
hberaud | One good improvement would be to retrieve similar batches from previous cycle | 10:50 |
hberaud | and to formalize batch naming | 10:51 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-ironic-inspector-client for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779971 | 10:51 |
hberaud | to get a linear history from one cycle to another | 10:51 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release blazar-nova for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779972 | 10:52 |
hberaud | I think that first I'll add this kind of formalization in our process | 10:52 |
hberaud | and after one cycle we'll be able to retrieve topics easily and so batches too | 10:52 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-aodhclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779974 | 10:53 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-barbicanclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779975 | 10:54 |
hberaud | Since we goes more and more in a maintenance mode, I don't expect that our process will disrupt from one day to another. | 10:54 |
hberaud | Also that could allow to generate related metrics | 10:55 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-adjutantclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779977 | 10:55 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-senlinclient for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778969 | 10:55 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Add Wallaby release highlights for Octavia https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779381 | 10:55 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Add wallaby release highlights for Designate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779385 | 10:56 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-zunclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779978 | 10:56 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-zaqarclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779979 | 10:57 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-monascaclient for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778966 | 10:58 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-octaviaclient for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778967 | 10:58 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-watcherclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779980 | 11:01 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-solumclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779981 | 11:01 |
openstackgerrit | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Release ceilometermiddleware for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779982 | 11:02 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
openstackgerrit | Maysa de Macedo Souza proposed openstack/releases master: Add Kuryr Wallaby highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779848 | 11:07 |
ttx | hberaud: I analyzed the recent job failure, weird yarn error | 11:39 |
ttx | posted to the ML for further discussion | 11:39 |
hberaud | ack | 11:49 |
hberaud | I didn't see the error yet | 11:49 |
hberaud | yoctozepto, ttx: The FFE and the debate about library vs client-library for openstacksdk => http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021004.html | 12:19 |
hberaud | ttx: What's about library with no tags? | 12:27 |
hberaud | oslo by example | 12:27 |
hberaud | this is the same use case | 12:27 |
hberaud | IIRC I ignored those without significant changes | 12:27 |
hberaud | lemme check first | 12:32 |
hberaud | ok... if I'm right only 4 oslo projects are missing | 12:34 |
hberaud | not 4 but 3 => oslo.(limit|middleware|privsep) | 12:34 |
ttx | ok probably won't have time to generate those today | 12:36 |
hberaud | all the rest seems either shifting to independent or already proposed but not yet merged (release patches (https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22wallaby-no-change-libs%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged))) | 12:36 |
hberaud | and https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22wallaby-cycle-highlights%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 12:36 |
hberaud | I'll generate them | 12:36 |
ttx | thanks! | 12:37 |
openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release oslo.limit for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779993 | 12:39 |
openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release oslo.middleware for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779994 | 12:42 |
openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release oslo.privsep for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779995 | 12:45 |
hberaud | Well, I think we're pretty good here. | 12:45 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Add Neutron Wallaby highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779487 | 12:56 |
*** openstack has joined #openstack-release | 13:16 | |
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack | 13:16 | |
openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-ironicclient for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778962 | 13:18 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Create ovb 2.0 release and cut stable/2.0 branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779282 | 13:23 |
*** nweinber has joined #openstack-release | 13:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: New bugfix release of oslo.messaging. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/780010 | 14:18 |
yoctozepto | hberaud: thanks, will check it out then | 15:00 |
openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: [FFE] OpenstackSDK 0.55.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/780013 | 15:10 |
hberaud | yoctozepto: the OpenstackSDK part ^ | 15:12 |
yoctozepto | hberaud: thanks, I have just finished reading mails :-) | 15:12 |
hberaud | :) | 15:13 |
yoctozepto | had a long meetings streak | 15:13 |
openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: [FFE] OpenstackSDK 0.55.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/780013 | 15:19 |
*** dirk2 is now known as dirk | 15:23 | |
*** nweinber has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
hberaud | dtantsur: o/ I updated to a bugfix version => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778962 let us know if that works for you | 15:57 |
dtantsur | thank you, I have it on the radar, just trying to finish something here | 15:57 |
hberaud | np thanks | 15:57 |
gmann | hberaud: ttx can you add wallaby release status for Zaqar in this etherpad https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-leaderless | 16:01 |
gmann | it is leader-less project in Xena | 16:01 |
clarkb | hberaud: the major reason for it is to ensure that a recent change that handles how git state is handled for a buildset is verified outside of the test suite | 16:02 |
hberaud | gmann: I'm not sure to see the link between release management and leader less project? | 16:02 |
clarkb | hberaud: maybe we still plan for friday as things tend to slow down by then? and if it has an impact we can extend? | 16:02 |
gmann | hberaud: i mean TC can judge if no release happening then it is time for retirement or so | 16:02 |
hberaud | Ah got it | 16:03 |
gmann | release status is one of the input for TC | 16:03 |
hberaud | You speak about other projects | 16:03 |
hberaud | s/projects/teams/ | 16:03 |
gmann | oh , sorry its Zaqar only | 16:03 |
yoctozepto | gmann, hberaud: fwiw, I "confirmed" it stalled with releases | 16:04 |
yoctozepto | but hberaud is welcome to confirm better than I can :D | 16:04 |
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-release | 16:07 | |
hberaud | gmann, yoctozepto: I commented all the given projects | 16:24 |
gmann | hberaud: thanks a lot, it is helpful | 16:25 |
hberaud | gmann: you're welcome :) | 16:25 |
yoctozepto | hberaud: yes, thanks! | 16:26 |
hberaud | clarkb: I think we can wait until early next week (monday). | 16:26 |
hberaud | yoctozepto: you're welcome ) | 16:26 |
*** nweinber has joined #openstack-release | 16:31 | |
*** prometheanfire has joined #openstack-release | 16:34 | |
openstackgerrit | Marios Andreou proposed openstack/releases master: Tag master/victoria/ussuri release for os-collect-config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/780034 | 16:35 |
prometheanfire | how is releases doing for the freeze? think reqs should expect stragglers? | 16:39 |
hberaud | prometheanfire: for now things are doing well, I think we will have few stragglers | 16:42 |
hberaud | prometheanfire: At least those with -1 https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22wallaby-no-change-libs%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 16:43 |
hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522cwi-client-final%2522+(status:open) | 16:43 |
hberaud | gibi, bauzas: o/ Please can you've a look? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778977 | 16:45 |
gibi | hberaud: I'm on it | 16:46 |
prometheanfire | cool, thanks | 16:46 |
hberaud | thanks | 16:46 |
prometheanfire | that's actually not TOOO bad | 16:46 |
hberaud | Yeah I think we'll have a better picture tomorrow morning | 16:47 |
hberaud | #startmeeting releaseteam | 17:00 |
openstack | Meeting started Thu Mar 11 17:00:13 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 17:00 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 17:00 |
hberaud | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/wallaby-relmgt-tracking Agenda | 17:00 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:00 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 17:00 |
hberaud | Ping list: ttx armstrong elod damani | 17:00 |
elod | o/ | 17:00 |
armstrong | o/ | 17:00 |
hberaud | We're way down on line 411 now. | 17:01 |
hberaud | Will just wait a couple minutes for folks. | 17:01 |
armstrong | ok | 17:01 |
hberaud | #topic Review task completion | 17:04 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Review task completion (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:04 | |
hberaud | Process any remaining library freeze exception => Done | 17:04 |
hberaud | Early in the week, email openstack-discuss list to remind PTLs that cycle-highlights are due this week => Done | 17:04 |
hberaud | Propose autoreleases for cycle-with-intermediary client libraries which had commits that have not been included in a release => Patches need validations | 17:04 |
hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522cwi-client-final%2522+(status:open) | 17:04 |
hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22wallaby-no-change-libs%22+(status:open) | 17:04 |
hberaud | elod, ttx: feel free to validate those accepted by PTLs and that needs a final +2 ^ | 17:06 |
ttx | o/ | 17:06 |
hberaud | o/ | 17:06 |
elod | hberaud: ack | 17:06 |
hberaud | concerning those we missed ( https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22wallaby-no-change-libs%22+(status:open) ) do we want to wait for PTLs/liaisons? | 17:07 |
hberaud | Since no significant changes have been merged yet maybe we could simply force them | 17:07 |
hberaud | Any opinion? | 17:07 |
ttx | I'd wait until Monday yes | 17:08 |
hberaud | elod: it would be nice to merge those who have been approved today | 17:08 |
hberaud | ttx: it's okay with me | 17:09 |
armstrong | @ttx +1 | 17:09 |
hberaud | prometheanfire: FYI ^ | 17:09 |
elod | hberaud: ack, too :) | 17:09 |
hberaud | we will wait until monday for a couple of patches | 17:09 |
hberaud | prometheanfire: I think that if requirements updates aren't in these lists who should refuse them | 17:10 |
hberaud | s/who/we | 17:11 |
*** fnordahl has joined #openstack-release | 17:11 | |
hberaud | ok next task from last week | 17:11 |
hberaud | Evaluate any libraries that did not have any change merged over the cycle => partially done, @ttx: do you want to add something? | 17:12 |
hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22move-to-independent%22+(status:open) | 17:12 |
ttx | no that's under control I think | 17:12 |
hberaud | I think we can approve the oslo part | 17:13 |
hberaud | any volunteer to push the final button? | 17:13 |
hberaud | Ok I'll approve oslo | 17:14 |
hberaud | I don't expect that the oslo part will receive new comments as it have been already discussed previously this cycle | 17:15 |
hberaud | Ok next task from last week | 17:17 |
hberaud | List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been released yet => Done thanks armstrong | 17:17 |
armstrong | np | 17:17 |
hberaud | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/020989.html | 17:17 |
hberaud | AFAIK we didn't get any feedback apart from requirements team | 17:18 |
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-release | 17:20 | |
* diablo_rojo joins late | 17:20 | |
hberaud | o/ | 17:20 |
prometheanfire | ack | 17:21 |
hberaud | next task was "On Friday, remind the requirements team to freeze changes to openstack/requirements" => already started | 17:21 |
hberaud | that point depends on the previous ones | 17:21 |
hberaud | ok next topic | 17:22 |
hberaud | #topic Assign R-4 tasks | 17:22 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Assign R-4 tasks (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:22 | |
hberaud | thanks armstrong for taking this on | 17:22 |
hberaud | one | 17:22 |
hberaud | well, everything seems more or less already distribued | 17:22 |
hberaud | armstrong: yours is more or less similar to your previous one | 17:23 |
armstrong | ok | 17:23 |
hberaud | Anything else to add for next week tasks? | 17:24 |
hberaud | Ok move on | 17:25 |
hberaud | #topic Review countdown email contents | 17:25 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Review countdown email contents (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:25 | |
hberaud | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 17:25 |
diablo_rojo | Looks all correct to me. | 17:28 |
hberaud | \o/ | 17:28 |
diablo_rojo | I am only one set of eyes though :) | 17:28 |
diablo_rojo | Hopefully others can check it too. | 17:28 |
hberaud | rotfl | 17:28 |
ttx | +1 | 17:29 |
diablo_rojo | I guess, as a one off we could add one final call for cycle highlights | 17:29 |
diablo_rojo | but I can do that in a separate email | 17:29 |
diablo_rojo | in hopes that more people actually see it lol | 17:29 |
hberaud | Can't hurt | 17:30 |
diablo_rojo | so, coming full circle, lol, it looks good to me. | 17:30 |
hberaud | ok thanks | 17:30 |
armstrong | LGTM | 17:30 |
diablo_rojo | Thank you hberaud :) And congrats on being our fearless leader for another cycle. | 17:30 |
hberaud | My pleasure! This is a fearless team so it's not complicated for me | 17:31 |
hberaud | Ok move on | 17:31 |
hberaud | #topic Releasing requirements - Tagless project | 17:31 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Releasing requirements - Tagless project (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:31 | |
hberaud | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779832 | 17:32 |
hberaud | Just a minor heads up about this patch | 17:32 |
hberaud | As said in my latest comment I think we need to hold this one until our batches of patches are fully merged. | 17:33 |
hberaud | Any opinion? | 17:33 |
ttx | I'm wondering why we need to release this | 17:33 |
ttx | digging in | 17:33 |
hberaud | Also reqs is tagless so I don't think we need a version | 17:34 |
hberaud | I think we only need to cut the branch that's all | 17:34 |
ttx | right | 17:34 |
ttx | you just need a location | 17:34 |
hberaud | Already discussed about this with prometheanfire (FYI ^) | 17:34 |
fungi | yes, requirements branches but it doesn't release | 17:34 |
ttx | ok | 17:35 |
ttx | https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/deliverables/victoria/requirements.yaml | 17:35 |
hberaud | Thanks for your confirmation | 17:35 |
prometheanfire | ya, once we freeze and get those last client releases into reqs we can branch | 17:35 |
ttx | then yes it should match req freeze | 17:35 |
hberaud | yeah and ussuri did the same | 17:35 |
hberaud | thanks prometheanfire | 17:35 |
ttx | last time we waited until Oct 4 | 17:36 |
ttx | that's R-2 | 17:36 |
openstackgerrit | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/releases master: Release Octavia 6.2.0 for stable/ussuri https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779503 | 17:36 |
hberaud | yeah final RC | 17:36 |
hberaud | that's not too late? | 17:37 |
prometheanfire | there are some projects that are used as libs (horizon and neutron mainly), not sure if we need to wait for something there | 17:37 |
ttx | It's in the process | 17:37 |
hberaud | however it's just one more weeks | 17:37 |
hberaud | ok sold | 17:38 |
ttx | Pretty sure we should wait until R-2 to make sure we have all the exceptions in | 17:38 |
hberaud | Sold | 17:38 |
ttx | even if in theory it should not move | 17:38 |
hberaud | make sense | 17:38 |
hberaud | prometheanfire: WFY? | 17:38 |
prometheanfire | WFY? | 17:40 |
hberaud | that works for you? (freezing on R-2) | 17:40 |
prometheanfire | yes | 17:41 |
hberaud | I just left a related comment directly on the patch | 17:41 |
fungi | the way zuul jobs integrate branches of required projects, if no matching branch name exists master is used, so that means projects should be able to branch ahead of requirements | 17:41 |
hberaud | ok cool | 17:41 |
fungi | but requirements will still have to remain frozen until it branches | 17:41 |
hberaud | I see | 17:42 |
hberaud | thanks for details | 17:42 |
prometheanfire | yep, last time it was just a couple of weeks, 1-2, I'm trying to reduce the time | 17:42 |
hberaud | Maybe we could discuss this point on PTG? | 17:43 |
hberaud | (reducing the time) | 17:43 |
hberaud | OK, we can discuss this point after the meeting. | 17:44 |
hberaud | #topic Governance oversight - Freshly added projects not present in release | 17:44 |
prometheanfire | ya | 17:44 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Governance oversight - Freshly added projects not present in release (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:44 | |
ttx | must be very fresh | 17:45 |
hberaud | I made another round of vigilance | 17:45 |
ttx | werent around at m-2 for sure | 17:45 |
hberaud | ok so I think we should ignore them | 17:45 |
ttx | which is theoretically when we freeze (so that we do not have to do a last round of vigilance :) ) | 17:45 |
hberaud | I prefered to ask first | 17:45 |
hberaud | ok :) | 17:46 |
hberaud | next topic | 17:46 |
hberaud | #topic Tag and create missing ussuri branch os-refresh-config | 17:46 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Tag and create missing ussuri branch os-refresh-config (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:46 | |
hberaud | ttx and myself agreed about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/776636 | 17:47 |
hberaud | however I wanted to give a chance to react before pushing the buttons | 17:47 |
ttx | yeah I don;t care enough about the issue to spend more time on it | 17:47 |
hberaud | elod: FYI ^ | 17:48 |
ttx | both work | 17:48 |
ttx | (not doing it and doing it) so let's not spend too much time on it | 17:48 |
hberaud | Ok then I just +2'd | 17:48 |
elod | hberaud: I don't have hard feelings either, looks OK :) | 17:48 |
hberaud | ok thanks | 17:48 |
hberaud | feel free to close the debate | 17:49 |
hberaud | #topic OpenstackSDK transition to client-library? | 17:49 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenstackSDK transition to client-library? (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:49 | |
hberaud | so yoctozepto asked for a FFE on openstackSDK | 17:49 |
hberaud | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021004.html | 17:49 |
hberaud | everybody approved | 17:50 |
ttx | I think this is not urgent. That affects where the library appears on release page. And when the deadline is | 17:50 |
ttx | (the transition to client-lib) | 17:50 |
hberaud | ok | 17:50 |
ttx | So we can keep that thread open and push the patch if needed | 17:50 |
ttx | the urgent thing is the FFE | 17:50 |
hberaud | I see, that's point is done | 17:51 |
hberaud | Ok move on | 17:51 |
hberaud | #topic Feature branch for Helm | 17:51 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Feature branch for Helm (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:51 | |
ttx | Personally I would keep it the same and consider moving it for next cycle | 17:51 |
hberaud | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779583 | 17:52 |
hberaud | +1 | 17:52 |
ttx | So this one... basically helm is not using release management but wants a feature branch created | 17:52 |
hberaud | yes | 17:52 |
ttx | I don;t think they should create a deliverable file for that | 17:52 |
ttx | We can create the branch manually | 17:52 |
hberaud | AFAIK normally they have credential to create branches | 17:53 |
hberaud | no? | 17:53 |
ttx | checking | 17:53 |
hberaud | I think it's depends on if they are a SIG or not | 17:53 |
hberaud | I'm not sure on this point | 17:54 |
ttx | hmm newest gerrit does not display ACLs anymore | 17:54 |
hberaud | fungi: any idea? ^ | 17:55 |
ttx | checking config files | 17:55 |
fungi | they've already worked that out with the tact sig/opendev | 17:55 |
ttx | ah then just abandon | 17:55 |
fungi | we merged a change yesterday or today to allow them to create branches manually themselves | 17:55 |
ttx | https://review.opendev.org/admin/repos/openstack/openstack-helm,access is a bit dry | 17:55 |
hberaud | ok so let's just abandon the patch | 17:56 |
ttx | fungi: if you have a ref we can close https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779583 referencing it | 17:56 |
fungi | gerrit hides acl entries from you if you're not authorized to do those things described by the acl | 17:56 |
ttx | fungi: even on repos I have large rights on it looks very dry. But off topic | 17:56 |
hberaud | ah I missed that it was already abandonned | 17:56 |
ttx | ah ENOTAPROBLEM -- next topic! | 17:57 |
hberaud | Ok next topic | 17:57 |
fungi | #link https://review.opendev.org/779872 Add create ref acl for osh release groups | 17:57 |
hberaud | #topic Release errors | 17:57 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Release errors (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 17:57 | |
hberaud | Tripleo-ipsec tagging issue | 17:57 |
ttx | I have not caught up on that thread | 17:57 |
ttx | checking now | 17:58 |
fungi | that's the one where it looks like their .gitreview file may not have ever been updated to the new review.opendev.org hostname, and we may not be preinstalling a known_hosts entry for the old name | 17:58 |
fungi | specifically on the stable/rocky branch they' | 17:58 |
fungi | re trying to eol | 17:58 |
ttx | ok let's do (2) as suggested | 17:59 |
hberaud | +1 | 17:59 |
ttx | next! | 17:59 |
elod | +1 | 17:59 |
ttx | we can still make it | 17:59 |
hberaud | yarn fail http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021002.html | 17:59 |
elod | :D | 17:59 |
ttx | 15 seconds left | 17:59 |
hberaud | I think we need a js expert here | 17:59 |
ttx | wtf yarn! | 18:00 |
hberaud | surely a package manager | 18:00 |
ttx | yeah it's athe NPM upload thing iirc | 18:00 |
ttx | let's wait for someone to chime in | 18:00 |
hberaud | I propose to continue this topic directly on the ML | 18:00 |
fungi | does that job fail consistently for all projects using it, or only that repo? | 18:00 |
hberaud | I'll add a note for next weel | 18:01 |
hberaud | week | 18:01 |
fungi | but yeah, ml makes more sense | 18:01 |
hberaud | ok next point | 18:01 |
hberaud | #topic PTG reminder | 18:01 |
*** openstack changes topic to "PTG reminder (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 18:01 | |
hberaud | Don't forget to vote | 18:01 |
ttx | fungi: last time it worked was in 2017 | 18:01 |
ttx | last time it ran was in 2017 too. | 18:02 |
fungi | wow | 18:02 |
hberaud | #link https://doodle.com/poll/8d8n2picqnhchhsv | 18:02 |
ttx | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=release-openstack-javascript&project=openstack/monasca-grafana-datasource | 18:02 |
ttx | ah hm | 18:02 |
ttx | too many filters | 18:02 |
hberaud | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/xena-ptg-os-relmgt | 18:02 |
hberaud | Feel free to add topics to our etherpad | 18:02 |
ttx | it actually ran successfully last time, but that was 18months ago | 18:03 |
fungi | 2019-09-26 yeah | 18:03 |
hberaud | #topic Quick Open Discussion | 18:03 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Quick Open Discussion (Meeting topic: releaseteam)" | 18:03 | |
ttx | It's independent so not really release-process-critical | 18:03 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Tag and create missing ussuri branch os-refresh-config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/776636 | 18:03 |
ttx | hberaud: thanks! | 18:03 |
hberaud | Anything else? | 18:03 |
hberaud | Sorry we overflowed a little | 18:04 |
ttx | np | 18:04 |
ttx | it's feature freeze after all | 18:04 |
hberaud | :) | 18:04 |
ttx | If we do not overflow today, when do we | 18:04 |
hberaud | champagne | 18:04 |
hberaud | +20 minutes | 18:04 |
hberaud | (free) | 18:05 |
ttx | https://stackoverflow.com/questions/64414716/unexpected-token-in-yarn-installation | 18:05 |
ttx | "The error is caused by the old version of nodejs (usually lower than v6)." | 18:05 |
ttx | yay backward compatibility | 18:06 |
hberaud | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/wallaby.html#node-js-runtime-for-wallaby | 18:06 |
hberaud | We use nodejs 10 | 18:06 |
ttx | not sure that's what is installed on the host tho | 18:07 |
hberaud | hm wait which branch it was? | 18:07 |
ttx | independent so master | 18:07 |
hberaud | ok | 18:08 |
hberaud | So I suppose it rely on the series supported runtimes | 18:08 |
ttx | I bet system-installed yarn is older than nodejs10 | 18:08 |
hberaud | could be | 18:09 |
ttx | but then I'm just speaking weird words | 18:09 |
ttx | yarn node node yarn | 18:09 |
hberaud | :) | 18:09 |
ttx | So let's wait for ML discussion with people who actually grok js | 18:09 |
hberaud | +1 | 18:09 |
hberaud | Anything else? | 18:09 |
ttx | maybe push it back to next week meet agenda so that it does not fall between the cracks | 18:10 |
hberaud | already done | 18:10 |
ttx | my man! | 18:10 |
hberaud | lol | 18:10 |
*** eolivare has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
hberaud | OK, thanks everyone. Let's wrap up! | 18:11 |
hberaud | #endmeeting | 18:11 |
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Release Managers office - Come here to discuss how to release OpenStack components - Logged at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-release/" | 18:11 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Thu Mar 11 18:11:20 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 18:11 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-03-11-17.00.html | 18:11 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-03-11-17.00.txt | 18:11 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/releaseteam/2021/releaseteam.2021-03-11-17.00.log.html | 18:11 |
elod | thanks o/ | 18:11 |
yoctozepto | qq - horizon plugins count as libraries / client libraries? | 18:31 |
hberaud | yoctozepto: horizon plugins count as horizon plugins :) https://releases.openstack.org/reference/deliverable_types.html#horizon-plugin https://releases.openstack.org/reference/process.html#r-4-week | 18:34 |
hberaud | yoctozepto: deadline for this kind of deliverable is next week ^ | 18:34 |
yoctozepto | hberaud: lovely, thanks | 18:35 |
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 18:39 | |
*** nweinber has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-novaclient for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778977 | 19:34 |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 19:45 | |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release final python-tackerclient for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/778972 | 19:45 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release python-zunclient for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779978 | 19:52 |
openstackgerrit | Ivan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/releases master: Release horizon v19.1.0 (wallaby-3) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/780099 | 19:58 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release oslo.privsep for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779995 | 20:15 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release oslo.limit for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779993 | 20:20 |
openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/releases master: Release oslo.middleware for wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/779994 | 20:28 |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 20:36 | |
*** armstrong has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
*** nweinber has joined #openstack-release | 20:38 | |
*** slaweq has quit IRC | 20:56 | |
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release | 21:06 | |
*** nweinber has quit IRC | 21:11 | |
openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/releases master: Release final python-masakariclient for Wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/780115 | 21:27 |
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
*** smcginnis has quit IRC | 23:04 | |
*** smcginnis has joined #openstack-release | 23:15 | |
*** e0ne has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
*** smcginnis has quit IRC | 23:28 | |
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-release | 23:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!