Friday, 2021-03-26

*** tosky has quit IRC00:26
*** armax has quit IRC00:52
rosmaitaprometheanfire: i'm expecting to apply for a RFE on Monday to release a new wallaby os-brick to address a potential data loss issue: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/78299200:58
prometheanfirerosmaita: ah, kk00:59
*** armax has joined #openstack-release01:59
*** evrardjp has quit IRC03:40
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-release03:41
*** brinzhang has joined #openstack-release03:52
*** ykarel has joined #openstack-release03:59
*** armax has quit IRC03:59
*** tkajinam has quit IRC04:01
*** tkajinam has joined #openstack-release04:01
*** hberaud has joined #openstack-release06:08
openstackgerritBalazs Gibizer proposed openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for nova  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78172606:09
*** sboyron has joined #openstack-release06:35
*** elod is now known as elod_afk06:45
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for nova  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78172606:57
*** rpittau|afk has quit IRC07:05
*** vdrok has quit IRC07:05
*** masayukig has quit IRC07:05
*** masayukig has joined #openstack-release07:06
*** rpittau|afk has joined #openstack-release07:06
*** vdrok has joined #openstack-release07:06
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-release07:09
*** ricolin has quit IRC07:14
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-release07:17
*** eolivare has joined #openstack-release07:43
*** jbadiapa has joined #openstack-release07:48
gibihberaud: hi! the bot proposed xena unit test setup but that failes in zuul as the referenced openstack-python3-xena-jobs-arm64 job is missing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/78321808:01
gibielod_afk: ^^08:02
gibiis there any job patch that is needed to be merged first?08:04
hberaudgibi: AFAIK jobs have been merged => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/77086208:08
hberaudHowever I didn't see this arm64 job08:08
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch08:09
*** rpittau|afk is now known as rpittau08:09
hberaudfungi, gmann: Any idea about? ^08:10
hberaudeven zuul said that => The project template "openstack-python3-xena-jobs-arm64" was not found08:11
hberaudeither it should be added in https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/ or removed in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/78321808:13
hberaudlet's wait for more feedback08:13
gibiOK08:15
gibithaks08:15
*** bauzas has quit IRC08:45
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-release08:46
*** elod_afk is now known as elod08:52
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel09:02
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur09:17
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for placement  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78173309:28
*** tosky has joined #openstack-release09:30
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-release09:44
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release09:53
*** ykarel_ has joined #openstack-release09:54
*** ykarel has quit IRC09:57
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for barbican  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78163310:06
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for cinder  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78164010:07
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for magnum  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78167010:19
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for designate  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78164910:20
*** e0ne has quit IRC10:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for monasca-thresh  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78169310:36
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for monasca-agent  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78168710:40
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Wallaby Release Highlights for Zun  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78300510:42
ttxhberaud: release team meeting next week will be at 7pm, which is a bit late for me and conflicts with other things. Should we consider moving it back one hour? i.e. 16utc./6pm CET10:45
hberaudttx: +1 for move the meeting, however the previous schedule was mostly to allow to elod to assist our meetings so that mostly depends on him10:47
hberaudelod: any opinion/objetions?10:48
hberaud*objections10:48
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for monasca-notification  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78169010:58
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for monasca-ui  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78169810:59
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for monasca-persister  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78169111:05
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Ignore trailing projects from RC1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78325711:06
elodttx hberaud : well, unfortunately it would conflict with the nova meeting for me :/ ... I would appreciate some other solution :S11:08
ttxargh yes11:08
hberaudor more early than 16utc11:09
elodthe situation is the same for me btw, as I'm in CET timezone11:09
ttxcould move at 15utc I guess, given the current group membership11:09
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for monasca-api  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78168811:09
elodworks for me11:09
elodI fear that it's too early though to folks from USA timezones11:10
ttxnot perfact as that would conflict with the TC meeting so might distract fungi11:10
ttxOur current US-based folks are pretty eastern US otherwise11:10
hberaud15utc WFM11:10
elodanyway, if that's not feasible then maybe we can try the 16 UTC :S11:11
ttxhberaud: maybe you can propose the change to irc-meetings and copy our usual membership for opinions11:11
ttxWhen consensus is reached I'll +2a it11:12
ttxPlan B would be to move to another day, but the process is pretty aligned with meeting happening on Thursdays.11:13
elodI see, sorry :S11:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for monasca-events-api  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78168911:14
ttxPlan C would be 14utc, but that would lose potential PT participants (7am there)11:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for senlin-dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78175111:19
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for zaqar-ui  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78176711:20
fungiyeah, not doing the same times as the tc would be nice, but i'm flexible11:20
fungii'm used to being double-booked in meeting times anyway11:21
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: New ovn-octavia-provider release 1.0.0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78067311:26
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-release11:57
hberaudI'll propose a doodle12:05
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC12:14
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel12:28
*** nweinber has joined #openstack-release12:32
hberaudHowever I wonder if it's a good idea to ground break all our schedule so close to the Wallaby deadline. For the sake of reachability and for the sake of properly managing last minutes Wallaby's unforseen topics , can't we wait 2 more weeks before moving our meetings?12:32
hberaudAnyway, the poll will be open at least during 1 week12:33
hberaudand the final release is on Wednesday 14, so I don't expect meeting on Thursday if everything is fine12:33
hberaudand PTG is from April 19 to 23 so no "meeting" either12:35
hberaudPlan D would be don't change the meeting time until Xena12:39
ttxMy motivation was that the last meetings can be busy, and I probably can't commit to attending the full hour12:41
hberaudI understand, however I don't think we'll find a solution that will satisfy everyone12:47
hberaudI opened a poll http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/021344.html12:48
hberaudIf a consensus is reached early next week then I'll propose an update.12:52
*** jbadiapa has joined #openstack-release12:53
openstackgerritSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for neutron  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78172313:15
hberaudsigh... new pip resolver issue13:30
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release13:32
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC13:32
*** jbadiapa has joined #openstack-release13:34
*** rpittau is now known as rpittau|afk13:50
elodhberaud: where? O.o13:51
hberaudelod: it was a false positive13:51
hberaud"recheck" fixed the problem13:51
elodthe best kind of problem :S13:55
rosmaitaanybody else seeing the "The project template "openstack-python3-xena-jobs-arm64" was not found." zuul config error on the auto-generated "Add Python3 xena unit tests" patch?13:57
rosmaitahttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/78324513:57
rosmaita(i'm assuming the release team generates those patches)13:58
gmannrosmaita: same in nova also as gibi reported13:58
gibiyepp13:59
rosmaitaok, i missed that13:59
gmannhberaud: gibi rosmaita i am not aware of that and this is not part of xena tetsing runtime13:59
gmanntesting13:59
rosmaitasomeone added the wallaby arm64 template recently13:59
gibigmann: can it be that the bot propose patches based on search and replace?13:59
rosmaitagibi: my thought exactly13:59
hberaudrosmaita: yeah gibi reported a similar case this morning13:59
gibiso can we agree that we drop the arm64 job from the patch now14:00
gmannhttps://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html14:00
gibi?14:00
rosmaitaok, if that template is not a real thing, i will just remove it and repost the patch14:00
hberaud+114:00
rosmaitacool, works for me14:00
gibiOK, let's do that. I will fix the nova patch14:00
gmannthis is what I added Xena template as per testing runtime https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/zuul.d/project-templates.yaml#L48014:01
hberaudI don't know where come from these arm64 jobs14:01
gmannhberaud: is this something from release script coming from?14:01
gmanni know ricolin was working on arm64 testing but that was devstack job14:02
gmannhberaud: and this is not for all, for example this is good https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/designate/+/78325214:03
rosmaitathis is where the arm64 template in cinder came from: https://opendev.org/openstack/cinder/commit/514ae30403a459181a4e95db329afc9e1ea977da14:05
gmannrosmaita: ah, this answer. and release script replace 'wallaby' to 'xena'14:06
rosmaitaok, figured it was something like that14:06
rosmaitai revised the patch, ricolin can add it back when he gets the xena template defined14:06
gibiI did the same ^^14:06
gmannrosmaita: hberaud gibi let me add the template in openstack-zuul-jobs so that we continue it for xena cycle also as n-v job14:07
gibior similar14:07
rosmaitaas long as it's nv and only unit tests, that's ok with me14:07
gibigmann: that also works for me14:07
gmannhberaud: gibi rosmaita https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/78331014:11
rosmaitagmann: ack14:11
*** armax has joined #openstack-release14:11
gibigmann: couple of doc nit but the content look good14:12
rosmaitasame here, i think i was in a race condition with gibi14:13
gmannack14:13
gibirosmaita: :)14:13
*** brinzhang has quit IRC14:14
gmanngibi: rosmaita I think we do not need to name this template as cycle name which will cause issue every time14:15
gibigmann: why we name the unit test job per cycle?14:15
gmannhow about removing the cycle-name from here and we can update the template when we bump the pythion version in unit testing14:15
gmanngibi: other jobs because of python version bump, like we might test 3.9 as voting for Y cydle14:16
rosmaitafor now, let's go with removing it, and once you figure out a good way to do it, we can add it back14:16
rosmaitai like the idea of not causing issues every time, though!14:17
gibigmann: I guess arm64 wants to follow the same python versioning than the normal unit test job14:17
gmanngibi: yeah, if we want to run on stable branch also then yes14:18
gibiI think we shold involve ricolin to this discussion14:19
gibiif the intention is to have the arm64 job a some first class citizen then we might want to keep the release cycle naming14:19
gmanngibi: rosmaita done https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/+/78331014:20
gmannyeah, let's define this template and make current patches work and then we can discuss with ricolin14:20
gibiack14:21
gibigmann: looks good14:21
gmannbut let me see how we can fix release script also otherwise it can cause issue for any templated named after cycle14:22
*** smcginnis has quit IRC14:24
*** smcginnis has joined #openstack-release14:26
hberaudgmann: ack14:26
openstackgerritSlawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for neutron  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78172314:32
slaweqhberaud: I just updated neutron patch ^^ once again14:35
hberaudI seen14:35
slaweqsorry for doing it so late but it's for sure last time14:35
slaweq:)14:35
hberaudnp :)14:35
hberaudwaiting for gates14:35
slaweqthx a lot14:35
hberaudu're welcome14:36
gouthamrhberaud o/ hello there, a couple of changes are going through the gate for manila as well14:36
gouthamrhberaud: that should be it, i'll refresh the manila rc1 patch right after :)14:37
hberaudgouthamr: ack14:38
hberaudthanks for heads up14:39
*** e0ne_ has joined #openstack-release14:43
*** e0ne has quit IRC14:46
ykarelhberaud, hi14:58
hberaudykarel: o/14:58
ykarelhberaud, do you know when will tempest plugins will get released for wallaby14:58
hberaudykarel: normally they have been released last week https://releases.openstack.org/reference/process.html#r-3-week-rc1-deadline15:01
hberaud(R-3 March 22-26)15:01
ykarelhberaud, so now when it will happen?15:03
ykareli was discussing with kopecmartin and he said release team does it15:04
hberaudlemme check15:04
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for neutron  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78172315:09
hberaudykarel: AFAIK all tempest plugin have been released previously. Our commands didn't reports unreleased changes on tempest-plugin (`tox -e venv -- list-deliverables --unreleased --type tempest-plugin`)15:10
hberaudlemme check if changes aren't released15:10
ykarelhberaud, ohhk, i had checked some and those were 2 months back so i thought at release time there will be last release15:12
hberaudIf I'll find unreleased changes then I think we could propose a last round15:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for heat  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78165615:14
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for heat-dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78165415:18
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-release15:21
openstackgerritIldiko Vancsa proposed openstack/releases master: Fix Open Infrastructure Foundation reference in release highlights  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78332215:26
hberaudttx: I've some doubts concerning tempest plugins, I didn't find trace of them in our process apart during R-3, however when I list unreleased changes for them I can find lot of project that could be released, do you remember how we handled this point during the previous cycles?15:30
hberaudI think I will propose a round of patches for them15:30
toskyhberaud: iirc aren't they released with tempest?15:33
toskyhberaud: the QA team is trying to merge the last relevant bits to release tempest15:33
toskyuhm, ok, Martin said something different, so ignore me15:34
hberaudtosky, ttx, ykarel: I think that they will be released by/with => https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/QA/releases15:37
hberaudok so for victoria they was released by us => https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22victoria-c-a%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)15:40
openstackgerritMichael Johnson proposed openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for octavia  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78333815:41
hberaudAt R-215:41
johnsomhberaud I updated the Octavia release patch. Sadly zuul issues over the past few days has blocked the one patch we hoped to get in, so we will just have to do an RC2 later.15:42
gmannbauzas: tempest plugins needs to be released  from project side release15:42
gmannbauzas: sorry, please ignore15:42
gmannhberaud: ^^15:42
hberaudHowever this isn't referenced in our process, I think that Sean gracefully released them15:42
gmannhberaud: we are planning to release Tempest today, I can push for tempest plugins also?15:43
gmannhberaud: basically at the same time when Tempest final release happen so I can do same for plugins also15:43
hberaudI already mostly started to release the plugins15:43
hberaudgmann: I'll handle the plugins patches part, but thank you15:44
gmannhberaud: cool. let me know if any help required15:44
hberaudack thanks15:45
hberaudgmann: However I'll let you handle your inital duties15:45
gmannhberaud: +1, thanks.15:46
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Wallaby RC1 for Masakari project deliverables  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78308815:49
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release barbican-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78334115:49
*** dulek has quit IRC15:51
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release blazar-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78334315:52
openstackgerritGhanshyam Mann proposed openstack/releases master: Release Tempest 27.0.0 as Wallanby final release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78334915:54
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release cinder-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78335115:54
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release cloudkitty-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78335515:55
*** dulek has joined #openstack-release15:56
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release designate-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78336215:56
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Release Patrole 0.12.0 for Wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78311515:57
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release ec2api-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78336315:57
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release ironic-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78336416:00
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release keystone-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78336516:00
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release kuryr-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78336616:04
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release magnum-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78336716:04
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release manila-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78336816:05
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release monasca-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78336916:06
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release neutron-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78337016:08
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release octavia-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78337216:09
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release sahara-tests for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78337316:10
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release senlin-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78337416:11
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release telemetry-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78337516:12
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release vitrage-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78337716:14
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release zaqar-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78337916:15
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Release zun-tempest-plugin for wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78338016:16
hberaudtosky, ykarel, gmann: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22wallaby-c-a%2216:18
gmannhberaud: thanks,16:18
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC16:21
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release16:23
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:23
ykarelhberaud, Thanks16:23
hberaudjohnsom: ack16:26
hberaudthanks for heads up16:27
*** ykarel has quit IRC17:00
*** iurygregory has quit IRC17:12
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-release17:13
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk17:28
*** eolivare has quit IRC17:39
*** yoctozepto has quit IRC17:41
*** yoctozepto has joined #openstack-release17:50
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Clarifying how deal with tempest-plugin during series  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78341017:55
openstackgerritHervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Clarifying how to deal with tempest-plugin during series  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78341017:56
hberaudgmann, tosky FYI ^17:57
*** slaweq has quit IRC17:58
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-release18:03
openstackgerritGoutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for manila  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78167318:06
*** slaweq has quit IRC18:09
gouthamrhberaud tbarron ^ thanks for your patience!18:17
hberaudgouthamr: thanks +2'd18:17
gouthamrthat's super fast :D18:17
gouthamrhberaud: do we need another +2/+W? who can i ask?18:19
hberaudelod: ^18:21
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for senlin  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78175318:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for murano  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78170718:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for solum-dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78175418:25
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for solum  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78175518:25
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for networking-baremetal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78170918:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for networking-generic-switch  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78171118:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for murano-agent  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78170518:26
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for murano-dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78170618:26
elodhberaud gouthamr : looking18:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for keystone  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78165918:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for mistral-dashboard  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78168118:29
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for mistral  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78168518:29
elodgouthamr: +2+W'd18:32
gouthamrthanks elod hberaud :) Happy Friday!18:33
*** diablo_rojo_phon has joined #openstack-release18:33
elodsame to you :)18:33
hberaudthanks elod18:33
elodhberaud: np :)18:33
hberaudthanks gouthamr18:33
openstackgerritYasufumi Ogawa proposed openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for tacker  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78176218:41
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for manila  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78167318:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/releases master: Proposing Wallaby RC1 for octavia  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/78333819:02
*** tkajinam_ has joined #openstack-release19:40
*** tkajinam has quit IRC19:41
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-release19:43
*** rosmaita has left #openstack-release19:59
*** nweinber has quit IRC20:13
rpiosoiurygregory, smcginnis, TheJulia: I could use some semver assistance. I'm preparing to cut a new release of sushy-oem-idrac based on https://opendev.org/x/sushy-oem-idrac/commit/83b7eb0de79c10ca045adf2154cba3f310ef5900. The current version is 2.0.0. Is the change to sushy_oem_idrac/constants.py -- https://opendev.org/x/sushy-oem-idrac/src/branch/master/sushy_oem_idrac/constants.py -- considered a breaking20:37
rpiosochange? They are not published by the package's __init__.py. AFAIA, they are only used internally, but ...20:37
iurygregoryrpioso, looking20:41
rpiosoiurygregory, smcginnis, TheJulia: The change to constants.py was introduced by https://opendev.org/x/sushy-oem-idrac/commit/ae279799fdd453ca060ee1e1cf56ecc41c8ca0bd.20:42
iurygregoryI presume the removal of "IDRAC.1.6.R" in the constants are to avoid trying to match this part (since it can be different across different Dell HW models) ?20:42
rpiosoiurygregory: It can vary across iDRAC firmware releases.20:42
iurygregoryok, the workflow mentioned in https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008708 makes sense?20:43
rpiosoiurygregory: The "IDRAC.1.6." at the beginning identifies the message version.20:44
iurygregoryto me this commit is not a breaking change20:45
iurygregorynot sure about the others in the release20:45
rpiosoiurygregory: Yes, that story identifies a workflow which could expose the too specific message ID which has been in constants.py.20:47
iurygregoryone thing would be good is to probably add support for releasenotes I think =)20:49
rpiosoiurygregory: I believe the other changes represent new backwards compatible functionality which was added to a class's public API.20:57
iurygregorysince it wasn't a breaking change it can be a 2.1.0 I would say20:58
rpiosoiurygregory: The value of another internal-ish constant, RETRY_COUNT, was increased from 10 to 35. _RETRY_COUNT would be a better name to indicate it is private.21:00
rpiosoiurygregory: There are no public method parameters associated with that constant.21:01
rpiosoiurygregory: I agree it would be good to add support for release notes :-)21:02
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release21:06
iurygregorygotcha21:14
iurygregorysince people can't really change the values it's a bit complicated since there was a huge increase in the retry21:15
iurygregorymaybe this can cause performance issues I don't know =)21:15
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:15
rpiosoiurygregory: So, go with 2.1.0?21:17
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-release21:26
*** e0ne has quit IRC21:26
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC21:30
iurygregoryrpioso, for me it makes sense =)21:34
rpiosoiurygregory: Thank you so much!21:37
iurygregoryrpioso, yw =)21:37
*** sboyron has quit IRC21:59
TheJulia++ 2.1.0, at least glancing at the discussion and the change22:14
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC22:59
rpiosoTheJulia: Thank you! :)23:28
*** tosky has quit IRC23:39

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!