*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 05:01 | |
opendevreview | Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/releases master: Add Skyline Zed highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856599 | 05:20 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Boxiang Zhu proposed openstack/releases master: Add Skyline Zed highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856599 | 05:42 |
frickler | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856557 releases recent CVE fixes in kolla stable branches, timely reviews would be nice | 06:01 |
opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/releases master: [venus] Create zed branch for client https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856381 | 07:09 |
opendevreview | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/releases master: [venus] Release 1.0.1 for python-venusclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856381 | 07:27 |
brinzhang | frickler: the venus api task was added, but https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/log-management/ also return 404 | 08:00 |
brinzhang | Do we need to wait some time? | 08:00 |
frickler | brinzhang: the publish jobs are only triggered when a new patch is merged to venus. maybe try adding some actual content to the api-ref there | 08:03 |
brinzhang | frickler: ack, I will try | 08:03 |
frickler | brinzhang: ah, also the deploy pipeline for the project-config change seems a bit stuck, so that chance isn't active yet | 08:13 |
frickler | I'll check and let you know once that is done | 08:14 |
brinzhang | frickler: yeah, thanks, awaiting your good news | 08:15 |
frickler | brinzhang: actually the zuul config seems to be updated, you should be able to verify by pushing a new change to venus updating the api-ref | 08:19 |
brinzhang | frickler: yeah, will done | 08:35 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release Kolla security fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856557 | 08:52 |
brinzhang | frickler: the task of build-openstack-api-ref runs successful, but the venus api-ref page cannot open too https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/log-management/ | 08:52 |
brinzhang | frickler: can you give some guide? | 08:53 |
brinzhang | https://60b694a5d64202b1898d-7363a31a9bfd26aa77ca998af3343ff8.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/856383/1/check/build-openstack-api-ref/f9ae303/docs/index.html | 08:53 |
brinzhang | zuul task looks good | 08:53 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [oslo] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855893 | 09:06 |
frickler | brinzhang: the promote job failed https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9f692a40c44e4d81a5cfcbdc492b8f58 , it seems like that's the missing service type mapping for which I think you have already created a patch | 09:20 |
brinzhang | frickler: yeah, I have changed the service_type for venus, in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/venus/+/856372 | 09:22 |
frickler | no, I was referring to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856373/1/os_service_types/data/service-types.json but that was for cyborg. I think venus needs to be added there, too | 09:23 |
brinzhang | frickler: or should I do sth. in os-service-types? but I dont know how to change | 09:23 |
brinzhang | ok. let me try to add that for venus | 09:24 |
brinzhang | frickler: see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-service-types/+/856384 | 09:29 |
brinzhang | please review, thanks | 09:30 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Add Zeda cycle highlights for horizon. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856268 | 10:16 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release IPA-Builder for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856551 | 10:21 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Ironic-ui Zed release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856530 | 10:23 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [swift] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855933 | 10:23 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cinder] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855915 | 10:23 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release sushy-tools 0.21.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856554 | 10:24 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [OpenStackSDK] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855902 | 11:17 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cloudkitty] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855918 | 11:41 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [neutron] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855907 | 11:43 |
opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: cycle-highlights: Ironic Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856761 | 13:12 |
opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: Release Ironic Prometheus Exporter for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856762 | 13:21 |
elodilles | reminder: meeting will start in less than 7 mins :S | 13:53 |
hberaud | ack | 13:54 |
ttx | ackack | 13:55 |
iurygregory | dtantsur, if possible can you check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856761 o/ | 13:57 |
ttx | o/ | 14:00 |
elodilles | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:01 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Sep 9 14:01:11 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is elodilles. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:01 |
elodilles | Ping list: armstrong ttx hberaud diablo_rojo_phone | 14:01 |
hberaud | o/ | 14:01 |
ttx | o/ | 14:01 |
elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zed-relmgt-tracking | 14:01 |
elodilles | (sorry, i've lost my windows meanwhile :S) | 14:01 |
elodilles | (browser window :D) | 14:01 |
elodilles | we are waaay down @ L341 | 14:02 |
elodilles | o/ | 14:02 |
elodilles | #topic Review task completion | 14:02 |
elodilles | 1st task: 'Process any remaining client library freeze exception. (all)' | 14:03 |
elodilles | we actually did not have exception, and still we had some :/ | 14:03 |
elodilles | due to the broken gates | 14:03 |
elodilles | as deliverables with broken gates probably need another release | 14:03 |
elodilles | and they are: | 14:04 |
ttx | yeah would be a good thing | 14:04 |
elodilles | python-adjutantclient (not released yet in zed!) | 14:04 |
elodilles | python-magnumclient | 14:04 |
elodilles | python-mistralclient | 14:04 |
elodilles | python-saharaclient | 14:04 |
elodilles | python-watcherclient (not released yet in zed!) | 14:04 |
elodilles | python-zaqarclient (not released yet in zed!) | 14:04 |
ttx | Ideally we'd branch on a working point | 14:05 |
elodilles | what I see is that python-magnumclient and python-saharaclient gates are unblocked now | 14:05 |
elodilles | ttx: yepp | 14:05 |
elodilles | so those looks promising | 14:05 |
elodilles | but still need releases | 14:05 |
elodilles | the rest are the interesting ones | 14:05 |
ttx | I don;t think we *have to* but that would be nice, if only so that we can merge the first stable/zed patches | 14:05 |
elodilles | so what should be the way forward with them? | 14:06 |
ttx | elodilles: I think we should look into the failure and see if we can fix it | 14:06 |
ttx | It's a bit late to remove it | 14:07 |
ttx | Maybe we should run those tests also ahead of the membership freeze | 14:07 |
elodilles | ttx: for us the minimum is that the packages can be built i guess | 14:07 |
elodilles | ttx: so, ok, let's try to fix them | 14:08 |
ttx | do you have links to those DNM patches? | 14:08 |
ttx | I'll have a quick look | 14:08 |
elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:release-health-check+is:open | 14:08 |
ttx | ok I'll copy the links in the meeting notes and start looking | 14:08 |
elodilles | thanks! | 14:09 |
ttx | we can go back to it at end of meeting | 14:09 |
ttx | during open discussion | 14:09 |
elodilles | ttx: ack | 14:09 |
elodilles | let's continue then | 14:09 |
ttx | Also we should push a release request for the two that are fixed | 14:09 |
elodilles | ttx: i can take that action | 14:09 |
elodilles | will do it after the meeting | 14:09 |
elodilles | 2nd task was: ' Freeze all cycle-based library releases except for release-critical bugs. Independently-released libraries may still be released, but constraint or requirement changes will be held until after the freeze period. (elod)' | 14:10 |
elodilles | this is actually more like a reminder, not a task, if i remember correctly o:) | 14:11 |
ttx | yep | 14:11 |
elodilles | should have been 'all' :) | 14:11 |
elodilles | anyway | 14:11 |
ttx | it's about remembering to not process release requests all over | 14:11 |
elodilles | next task | 14:11 |
elodilles | 3rd task: 'Propose stable/zed branch creation for all client and non-client libraries that had not requested it at freeze time. (hberaud)' | 14:12 |
elodilles | patches were proposed: https://review.opendev.org/q/zed-stable-branches | 14:12 |
elodilles | most of them have been merged | 14:13 |
elodilles | some are without response -> i'll +W them after the meeting | 14:13 |
elodilles | except the ones from the 1st task | 14:13 |
ttx | ++ | 14:13 |
elodilles | 4th task: ' List cycle-with-intermediary deliverables that have not been refreshed in the last 2 months and send a separate email targeted to teams with such old deliverables to remind them to release (if needed) otherwise a probably outdated version will be used for the final release. (elod)' | 14:14 |
elodilles | mail was sent: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030384.html | 14:14 |
elodilles | unreleased deliverables were filtered as they got a mail last week ( https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-August/030253.html ) | 14:15 |
elodilles | so this task should be covered too i think | 14:15 |
elodilles | as horizon team replied | 14:15 |
elodilles | maybe QA team needs to be pinged as they haven't responded yet | 14:16 |
elodilles | i'll do that | 14:17 |
elodilles | and this was the last task | 14:17 |
elodilles | #topic Assign R-3 tasks | 14:17 |
elodilles | please add your name for those you can cover | 14:18 |
elodilles | i mean... | 14:18 |
elodilles | i've added mine to all o:) | 14:18 |
elodilles | well, again, | 14:19 |
elodilles | i've added 'all' to the 'branching exception' task | 14:19 |
elodilles | and then only one big relevant task was, so that one took | 14:20 |
elodilles | #topic Review countdown email contents | 14:20 |
elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:20 |
elodilles | please review ^^^ | 14:20 |
hberaud | LGTM | 14:22 |
armstrong | +1 | 14:22 |
elodilles | thanks! will send it after the meeting | 14:22 |
ttx | Fixed stable/Zed -> stable/zed | 14:22 |
ttx | lgtm now | 14:23 |
elodilles | ttx: thx! | 14:23 |
elodilles | #topic Open Discussion | 14:23 |
ttx | ok so one of the remaining ones had a patch posted (Adjutant) | 14:23 |
elodilles | any topic to raise? | 14:23 |
hberaud | nope | 14:23 |
ttx | I posted a patch for watcherclient since it seemed trivial | 14:23 |
ttx | The other two might need a slightly deeper investigation | 14:24 |
elodilles | ttx: cool \o/ | 14:24 |
ttx | Did those have a PTL candidate? | 14:24 |
ttx | zaqar and mistral | 14:24 |
elodilles | mistral, i'm not sure, | 14:24 |
ttx | https://governance.openstack.org/election/ | 14:25 |
hberaud | apparently not for watcher | 14:25 |
ttx | Zaqar has Hao Wang | 14:25 |
ttx | Mistral, no candidate | 14:26 |
ttx | So I'd reach out through personal email to Hao Wang | 14:26 |
hberaud | well watcher has chen ke | 14:26 |
ttx | so that he looks into the test fail and proposes a patch | 14:26 |
ttx | watcher I think I fixed it | 14:26 |
elodilles | ttx: ++ | 14:26 |
hberaud | ok | 14:26 |
ttx | I'll let one of you do the reachout as I won;t have much time to follow up next week | 14:27 |
elodilles | ttx: ++, i'll do that | 14:27 |
ttx | Re:mistral I might just update the python version and see if there is any remaining issue | 14:28 |
elodilles | ttx: ack, thanks! | 14:28 |
ttx | but I fear there is more to it | 14:28 |
elodilles | to tell you the truth i did not started to fix them because we discussed that project teams should do that o:) | 14:29 |
elodilles | but i can also have a look at them | 14:29 |
elodilles | and we will see | 14:29 |
ttx | yeah they should, and some did | 14:29 |
elodilles | ttx: yepp, fortunately sahara and magnum fixed their gates \o/ | 14:30 |
elodilles | (or at least unblocked) | 14:30 |
elodilles | if nothing more about this, then maybe worth to mention oslo.db 12.1.0 release | 14:32 |
elodilles | the visible things were fixed \o/ | 14:32 |
elodilles | and requirement constraint was bumped | 14:32 |
elodilles | thanks all who worked on it | 14:32 |
elodilles | though i heard rumors that some neutron stadium still seem to be impacted | 14:33 |
ttx | yes thanks for sfinucane for saving the day | 14:33 |
elodilles | yepp \o/ | 14:33 |
elodilles | so just wanted to warn you that unfortunately the issue is still might be around | 14:34 |
ttx | ok I updated the ACTION list for the broken zed gates | 14:35 |
elodilles | i'm planning to propose DNM patches for cycle-with-rc project next Friday to see gate health for them | 14:35 |
ttx | elodilles: maybe we should only do that for those who haven't been refreshed recently | 14:36 |
elodilles | ttx: yepp, you are right. I'll update the script with that, thanks! | 14:37 |
elodilles | ttx: plus thanks for the ACTION list | 14:38 |
elodilles | anything else to discuss? | 14:38 |
ttx | nothing from me | 14:38 |
ttx | gate health should probably be a topic for our ptg | 14:39 |
ttx | not sure DNM patches are a great way of monitoring it | 14:39 |
elodilles | ttx: definitely | 14:39 |
ttx | we could track when was the last commit for all things in the release for example | 14:39 |
elodilles | yepp, that's one thing | 14:40 |
ttx | a leat this time we spotted it earlier | 14:40 |
ttx | least* | 14:40 |
elodilles | though in that case we would miss last minute breaks | 14:40 |
ttx | sure but those breaks were probably there forever | 14:40 |
ttx | like the py36 ones | 14:40 |
ttx | maybe we should push a DNM patch at every milestone if there was no other commit | 14:41 |
elodilles | yepp, those projects that haven't merged any patch since 2021.... probably broken for a long time... | 14:41 |
elodilles | ttx: that's a good idea | 14:42 |
fungi | also good feedback for the tc | 14:43 |
elodilles | fungi: yepp, i did send that time to time :) | 14:44 |
elodilles | i've added the 'Gate Health checks' topic to 'Things to change' section (line 448) | 14:44 |
elodilles | let's collect ideas / topics / things there for the PTG | 14:45 |
elodilles | and we can move them to RelMgmt's PTG etherpad if those will be generated | 14:46 |
ttx | ++ | 14:47 |
ttx | That's all for me. I'm traveling next week so will have limited availability | 14:47 |
ttx | I'll in flight on a flight without wifi at meeting hour next week | 14:47 |
elodilles | ttx: ack, thanks for the heads up, safe travels for you! | 14:47 |
elodilles | okay, if nothing else, then we can close the meeting | 14:48 |
elodilles | thanks everyone for participating! o/ | 14:48 |
hberaud | elodilles: thanks | 14:49 |
elodilles | #endmeeting | 14:49 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Sep 9 14:49:03 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:49 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2022/releaseteam.2022-09-09-14.01.html | 14:49 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2022/releaseteam.2022-09-09-14.01.txt | 14:49 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2022/releaseteam.2022-09-09-14.01.log.html | 14:49 |
elodilles | hberaud: thanks too! | 14:49 |
opendevreview | Yasufumi Ogawa proposed openstack/releases master: Add Tacker Zed highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856778 | 14:52 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 14:52 | |
opendevreview | Yasufumi Ogawa proposed openstack/releases master: Add Tacker Zed highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856778 | 14:54 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [nova] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855911 | 14:59 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [kuryr] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855910 | 15:04 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [barbican] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855917 | 15:05 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [murano] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855928 | 15:05 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [solum] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855932 | 15:05 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [senlin] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855930 | 15:05 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [trove] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855936 | 15:05 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [keystone] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855904 | 15:06 |
opendevreview | Jake Yip proposed openstack/releases master: [magnum] Fixes gate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856792 | 15:11 |
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 15:53 | |
*** marios is now known as marios|out | 15:59 | |
opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: cycle-highlights: Ironic Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856761 | 17:14 |
opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: Release networking-baremetal for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856843 | 17:29 |
opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/releases master: Add zed cycle highlights for cinder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856849 | 18:12 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [magnum] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855924 | 19:12 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-magnumclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856853 | 19:12 |
opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/releases master: Add zed cycle highlights for cinder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856849 | 19:56 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out | 20:02 | |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release python-saharaclient for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856858 | 20:07 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [sahara] Create zed branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/855929 | 20:08 |
opendevreview | Wenping Song proposed openstack/releases master: Zed Cycle Highlights for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/856863 | 22:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!