| opendevreview | Ziyu Bai proposed openstack/releases master: Add Highlights Venus-Dashboard RC1 for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/859011 | 02:47 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Iury Gregory Melo Ferreira proposed openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858285 | 03:53 |
| iurygregory | elodilles, hberaud ironic is ready ^ | 03:53 |
| opendevreview | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for requirements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858294 | 05:27 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:34 | |
| priteau | Good morning. I have a couple of release management questions. | 07:40 |
| priteau | 1) Are you planning to approve the cloudkitty RC2 today? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857733 | 07:40 |
| priteau | 2) Is it expected that https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858866 is missing some deliverables, like blazar for example? | 07:42 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release networking-odl RC1 for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857143 | 07:46 |
| elodilles | priteau: 1, yepp it's time to merge it | 08:18 |
| elodilles | priteau: 2, it's a bit tricky: as our script only adds release note links for *existing* release notes pages. for that a project needs to merge their 'reno-zed' patch: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:reno-zed | 08:20 |
| elodilles | priteau: so for the 2nd question, it is possible that not all reno page link is added | 08:24 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858285 | 08:36 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for ironic-python-agent https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858281 | 08:37 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release designate-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858404 | 08:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release bifrost for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857223 | 08:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Proposes Nova RC2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858509 | 08:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release sahara-image-elements RC1 for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857156 | 08:38 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release sahara-extra RC1 for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857155 | 08:38 |
| priteau | elodilles: Indeed, we are missing the zed release note page. That is strange because we merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/blazar/+/858028 on September 16 | 08:40 |
| priteau | When I build locally the release notes are there. | 08:41 |
| priteau | Our release notes say they have been updated at 2019-09-20 12:03:51: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/blazar/ | 08:41 |
| priteau | But we didn't merge anything that day | 08:42 |
| priteau | Eh, sorry, that's 2019, not 2022 | 08:43 |
| priteau | I only looked at the month and day | 08:43 |
| priteau | elodilles: promote log is here: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/e11787211e644c38ad536962b2ded4f5/console | 08:46 |
| priteau | <<CHANGED>>>f+++++++++ zed.html | 08:46 |
| priteau | OK, I found the issue | 08:48 |
| priteau | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/1e58e9fdd9a74d9d956b04b632aa99d9 ran next and deleted zed.html | 08:48 |
| priteau | <<CHANGED>>*deleting zed.html | 08:48 |
| priteau | <<CHANGED>>*deleting _sources/zed.rst.txt | 08:48 |
| priteau | Seen at https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/1e58e9fdd9a74d9d956b04b632aa99d9/console | 08:48 |
| priteau | Is this expected? | 08:49 |
| elodilles | i see, it's in 'upload-afs-roots: Synchronize files to AFS' task | 08:52 |
| elodilles | to tell you the truth, i don't know | 08:53 |
| priteau | I am pushing a dummy change to master to force refresh | 08:53 |
| elodilles | first of all i thought publish-openstack-releasenotes-python3 job publishes the renos | 08:53 |
| elodilles | like this one: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/535356f8b23a4917a39b080357e4ce46 | 08:54 |
| priteau | It's only used when tagging? https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/zuul.d/project-templates.yaml#L304-L330 | 08:56 |
| priteau | But every commit changing releasenotes can promote | 08:58 |
| elodilles | true, you are right | 09:00 |
| elodilles | priteau: it worked: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/blazar/zed.html | 10:18 |
| priteau | Yes. Do you prefer to update your release reno patch or do a follow-up? | 10:24 |
| priteau | I think other projects are missing too | 10:24 |
| priteau | Sorry, not your patch, hberaud's | 10:25 |
| elodilles | well, since every PTL and release liaison are added to the patch, it probably would spam them every update with mails, so the best is to not update the patch one-by-one, rather when multiple new release notes page appears :) i guess there will be an update for this patch, and later on there will be separate patches, i'm sure | 10:39 |
| hberaud | yeah lets update the missing releases notes with a follow up patch | 11:35 |
| elodilles | hberaud: ++ | 11:47 |
| opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/releases master: Release cinder-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858401 | 11:59 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:30 | |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:18 | |
| elodilles | reminder: we'll have a meeting in ~15 minutes | 13:44 |
| elodilles | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Sep 23 14:00:56 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is elodilles. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| hberaud | o/ | 14:00 |
| armstrong | o/ | 14:01 |
| elodilles | hello all o/ | 14:01 |
| ttx | o/ | 14:01 |
| elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/zed-relmgt-tracking | 14:01 |
| elodilles | we are at L408 | 14:01 |
| elodilles | almost at the bottom :-o | 14:02 |
| elodilles | let's start with the topics | 14:02 |
| elodilles | #topic Review task completion | 14:02 |
| elodilles | 1st task was: | 14:03 |
| elodilles | #info Process any standing RC1 deadline exceptions. | 14:03 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:zed-rc1-deadline+is:open | 14:03 |
| elodilles | these were mostly the ones that had broken gates | 14:04 |
| elodilles | during the week we agreed that we should continue with a 'formal' release from this | 14:04 |
| elodilles | * these | 14:05 |
| elodilles | I'll merge them after the meeting if no objection | 14:05 |
| ttx | The barbican one whould wait | 14:06 |
| elodilles | except barbican, as it has still -1 on it | 14:06 |
| elodilles | yepp | 14:06 |
| ttx | that would be the last standing one, unless dmendiza[m] has an update | 14:06 |
| elodilles | yepp | 14:06 |
| ttx | We are super late for this one so if we don;t hear on Monday I'd consider bypassing it | 14:07 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for swift https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858301 | 14:07 |
| elodilles | ttx: ack, i'll reach out to the team and inform them about it | 14:08 |
| elodilles | so that's about this task | 14:08 |
| elodilles | 2nd task was: | 14:08 |
| elodilles | #info Gracefully release tempest plugins with latest changes available. (elod) | 14:08 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:zed-tp-latest | 14:08 |
| elodilles | we have two -1s | 14:09 |
| elodilles | ~half were accepted and merged | 14:09 |
| elodilles | i'll merge the ones without response after the meeting | 14:10 |
| ttx | +1 | 14:10 |
| elodilles | 3rd task | 14:10 |
| elodilles | #info On Monday, generate stable branches for all cycle deliverables that are still missing one. (hberaud) | 14:11 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:zed-missing-stable-branches (some deliverables are listed in deliverables that are still missing stable branches, however, those have also RC1 pending patches, so I ignored them) | 14:11 |
| hberaud | I think we can now ignore my comment | 14:11 |
| elodilles | hberaud: ack | 14:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for python-openstackclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858291 | 14:11 |
| elodilles | but then I'll propose the stable-branch cutting patches as well | 14:11 |
| elodilles | i guess we'll need some | 14:12 |
| hberaud | ack | 14:12 |
| elodilles | (the rest of the sub-points were only instructions for this task) | 14:12 |
| elodilles | info After all the projects enabled in devstack by default have been branched, we can engage with the QA, I18n and Requirements PTLs to finalize the stable branch setup. (elod) | 14:13 |
| elodilles | i haven't processed this one as we still have some unbranched projects | 14:13 |
| elodilles | which will be branched after the above task is finished | 14:14 |
| elodilles | so i copy this task to next week as well | 14:14 |
| elodilles | otherwise, should be OK | 14:15 |
| elodilles | next task: | 14:15 |
| elodilles | #info Ensure that all projects that are publishing release notes have the notes link included in their deliverable file. (hberaud) | 14:15 |
| elodilles | the patch was proposed: | 14:15 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858866 | 14:15 |
| elodilles | this is usually not complete for some time after RC1 | 14:16 |
| elodilles | as this needs all the reno-$series patches to get merged | 14:16 |
| elodilles | i see some -1s on the patch already from PTLs | 14:17 |
| elodilles | should we wait for an update for the patch? | 14:17 |
| elodilles | or merge this today and propose a follow up later on? | 14:18 |
| ttx | checking what the -1s are for | 14:18 |
| elodilles | missing reno links basically | 14:18 |
| ttx | ah so we should regenerate the patch right | 14:19 |
| elodilles | yes, maybe that's the easiest | 14:19 |
| hberaud | we could add the missing links through a follow up | 14:19 |
| elodilles | and i'm sure we can re-iterate this task some time later (as i did in last cycle) | 14:19 |
| hberaud | as we did with prvious series | 14:19 |
| elodilles | what about regenerating the links as a 2nd PS for this one, and we merge it ASAP? | 14:20 |
| hberaud | as you want | 14:21 |
| hberaud | both wfm | 14:21 |
| elodilles | and later on creating a follow-up | 14:21 |
| elodilles | if needed | 14:21 |
| hberaud | ok I'll update the patch | 14:21 |
| elodilles | (just to not merge with lots of -1 on it ;)) | 14:21 |
| elodilles | hberaud: sorry, and thanks! o:) | 14:21 |
| hberaud | np | 14:21 |
| elodilles | the last task is again, not a task, but a note: Let cycle-with-rc projects iterate on RCs as needed. The final release candidate for each project needs to be prepared at least one week before the final release date. | 14:22 |
| elodilles | so this means the final RC iterations (if needed) needs to be proposed next week | 14:24 |
| elodilles | ok, let's move to the next topic: | 14:24 |
| elodilles | #topic Assign R-1 tasks | 14:25 |
| elodilles | please add your name if you want to work with any of the tasks | 14:25 |
| elodilles | Ok, as I see, all taken | 14:27 |
| elodilles | thanks :) | 14:27 |
| * ttx looks up what he signed up for | 14:27 | |
| elodilles | :] | 14:27 |
| elodilles | #topic Review countdown email contents | 14:28 |
| ttx | looks like the deadline is Friday, so "day before deadline" is Thursday | 14:28 |
| elodilles | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:28 |
| elodilles | please review ^^^ | 14:28 |
| elodilles | ttx: yepp | 14:28 |
| ttx | ah no the deadline is Sep 29 on the email | 14:29 |
| ttx | so I'll propose last-minute ones on the 28th | 14:29 |
| elodilles | yes, just wanted to correct, | 14:29 |
| elodilles | that we discussed this some time ago that it should be 29th September O.o | 14:30 |
| ttx | ack | 14:30 |
| ttx | email lgtm | 14:31 |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Add release note links for zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858866 | 14:31 |
| hberaud | release notes links updated ^ | 14:31 |
| elodilles | ttx hberaud : ack, thanks! | 14:31 |
| elodilles | will send + will review :) | 14:32 |
| hberaud | mail LGTM | 14:32 |
| elodilles | ++ | 14:32 |
| elodilles | #topic Open Discussion | 14:32 |
| elodilles | anything to mention here? | 14:32 |
| ttx | do we think we captured all the oslo.db issues? | 14:33 |
| ttx | I saw a few late mentions pass by while I was traveling | 14:33 |
| elodilles | good question | 14:34 |
| elodilles | at least we know about some | 14:34 |
| elodilles | watcher and ec2-api were mentioned in the last mails: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-September/030493.html | 14:35 |
| ttx | we might want to chase a fix -- although I'll admit I'll have trouble to have cycles to do that next week | 14:36 |
| elodilles | for watcher i see a patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/858032 | 14:36 |
| elodilles | but it seems zuul ignores that patch :-o | 14:36 |
| ttx | hmm | 14:37 |
| elodilles | ah, broken gate: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/watcher/+/857393 | 14:37 |
| elodilles | strange that on master it seems fine | 14:38 |
| elodilles | and its already branched | 14:39 |
| ttx | and the failures look functional | 14:39 |
| elodilles | yes | 14:40 |
| ttx | I guess it could all be linked to DB access failures | 14:40 |
| elodilles | ec2-api, the same, here is the fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ec2-api/+/857880 | 14:40 |
| elodilles | but the gate is broken | 14:40 |
| ttx | more data for our "abandoned" report | 14:41 |
| ttx | At least ec2api fails in a clearer manner | 14:42 |
| elodilles | exactly.. | 14:42 |
| ttx | TypeError: missing a required argument: 'public_key' | 14:42 |
| ttx | File "/home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/ec2-api/ec2api/api/key_pair.py", line 88, in create_key_pair | 14:43 |
| ttx | I'll have a quick look in meeting in case I can fix it quick | 14:43 |
| ttx | 17 min | 14:43 |
| iurygregory | hberaud, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858866 is missing ironic-inspector (or at least I couldn't find) | 14:44 |
| elodilles | ttx: there is a patch that tried already to fix the key issue i think: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ec2-api/+/858143 | 14:44 |
| ttx | stephenfin to the rescue again | 14:45 |
| elodilles | anyway, i've added it on our tasks list for R-1 | 14:47 |
| elodilles | i'll try to follow up on them, but any help is appreciated | 14:47 |
| stephenfin | That needs tests. The issue is that nova no longer generates keypairs for you so we need to do it ourselves, client-side. I've yet to verify that the SSH keys I'm generating there match the format of what nova was generating (since nova was using paramiko but we're using the lower-level cryptography lib) | 14:47 |
| elodilles | i really hope these are all that is related to oslo.db 12.1.0 for now :) | 14:48 |
| stephenfin | Also, some missing imports, clearly (I was testing in the terminal and copy/pasting) | 14:48 |
| ttx | yeah this is non-trivial really | 14:48 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: indeed, I just regenerated it with our script, so, something else is at work, which prevent the generation of this link. | 14:48 |
| stephenfin | elodilles: Sorry oslo.db 12.1.0 has been such a pain. It'll be less painful that SQLAlchemy 2.0 landing on with no warning though. At least not we know where all the tech debt is :) | 14:49 |
| stephenfin | s/not/now/ | 14:49 |
| hberaud | iurygregory: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/ironic-inspector/zed.html => 404 | 14:49 |
| ttx | if all the codebases were functional it would not have been that much of an issue | 14:49 |
| iurygregory | =O | 14:49 |
| iurygregory | let me check things in inspector | 14:49 |
| ttx | its just that it woke up areas of the code that were happily sleeping | 14:49 |
| elodilles | stephenfin: fingers crossed :) and thanks for all the work you done to fix all the found issues!!! | 14:49 |
| hberaud | I think its why the links is not added | 14:50 |
| hberaud | /link/ | 14:50 |
| fungi | iurygregory: hberaud: someone brought one up yesterday where the release notes promote job hit a failure during rsync, probably intersected with a change for another branch trying to lock the same tree for writing | 14:51 |
| hberaud | I see | 14:51 |
| fungi | in that case we simply reenqueued the change into the promote pipeline | 14:51 |
| iurygregory | fungi, ohhh | 14:51 |
| elodilles | and today we were informed with the same issue | 14:51 |
| fungi | if someone can put together a list of which builds failed, i'm happy to do the reenqueuing (but be mindful that doing so may roll back documentation if a later change published newer documentation and didn't update the release notes) | 14:52 |
| elodilles | and i saw that the reno-zed patch was merged later than the reno updating job ran | 14:52 |
| iurygregory | https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/ironic-inspector/ | 14:52 |
| iurygregory | yeah I don't see Zed .-. | 14:53 |
| elodilles | so after triggering the promote job with a patch, it got updated | 14:53 |
| iurygregory | https://opendev.org/openstack/ironic-inspector/commit/64c881b20fdf694a719e0c7793e72f0345679623 so this one failed to promote I think | 14:53 |
| fungi | yeah, the options are to either reenqueue the change into promote if there wasn't any newer change which did docs builds for that branch, or merge another change to the branch which triggers a release notes build | 14:55 |
| iurygregory | I don't think we have any changes we can merge in inspector atm, let me check | 14:56 |
| iurygregory | ok, there is one, let's see :D | 14:56 |
| fungi | this was the promote buildset for the commit you linked: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/buildset/3cf3c8863f0e45ba9370609ac2c4c2b5 | 14:57 |
| fungi | and it ran promote-openstack-releasenotes | 14:57 |
| fungi | successfully | 14:57 |
| iurygregory | O.o | 14:57 |
| fungi | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/edd6954962d646a39836faeddb3ade6f/console#1/0/28/localhost | 14:58 |
| fungi | <<CHANGED>>>f+++++++++ zed.html | 14:58 |
| iurygregory | enr .-. (no idea why it doesn't show...) | 14:58 |
| fungi | there are a couple of possibilities i can look into. either another build later un-published that file, or our afs vos release cron is failing to publish that update to the read-only replicas | 14:59 |
| ttx | posted a new patch fixing the imports for ec2api -- no idea if it actually works though | 14:59 |
| ttx | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ec2-api/+/858143 | 14:59 |
| iurygregory | I'm merging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ironic-inspector/+/859016 | 15:00 |
| iurygregory | let's see if with the new build it will show-up | 15:00 |
| elodilles | meanwhile, we've run out of meeting time, so let's close the meeting, but please continue the debugging if needed o:) | 15:01 |
| elodilles | thanks everyone for joining o/ | 15:01 |
| fungi | /afs/.openstack.org/docs/releasenotes/ironic-inspector/ (the writeable volume) does not include a zed.html, so i think it got unpublished | 15:01 |
| elodilles | #endmeeting | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Sep 23 15:01:29 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2022/releaseteam.2022-09-23-14.00.html | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2022/releaseteam.2022-09-23-14.00.txt | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2022/releaseteam.2022-09-23-14.00.log.html | 15:01 |
| hberaud | elodilles: thx | 15:01 |
| elodilles | thanks, too! | 15:01 |
| armstrong | Thanks elodilles | 15:01 |
| elodilles | ++ | 15:01 |
| hberaud | I've to disappear early today, see you MOnday | 15:01 |
| elodilles | hberaud: see you!! o/ | 15:02 |
| elodilles | fungi: in earlier case today we saw that 'zed.html' was deleted during the rsync, but i don't see that in this case | 15:02 |
| fungi | iurygregory: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7c3a7bedb2c3489e842dab0094c369c6/console#1/0/28/localhost | 15:03 |
| elodilles | so it's really weird | 15:03 |
| elodilles | oh, so here, too! | 15:03 |
| fungi | that build ran later, and removed the file because its change's tarball didn't include it | 15:03 |
| fungi | <<CHANGED>>*deleting zed.html | 15:03 |
| iurygregory | WOOT?! | 15:04 |
| iurygregory | this would be expected? | 15:04 |
| fungi | well, the one which created the zed.html was a change for the master branch, while the one which was missing zed.html and ran later was for the stable/zed branch | 15:04 |
| fungi | the one missing zed.html was https://review.opendev.org/858870 | 15:05 |
| fungi | 858871 which had a zed.html was enqueued into the gate at 09:22, merged at 09:38 and its promote builds completed at 09:39... 858870 which didn't have a zed.html was enqueued in the gate at 09:21, merged at 09:38, and completed its promote at 09:40 | 15:09 |
| fungi | so basically two changes approved at the same time for different branches. if we look into the timestamps inside the logs for their gate and promote builds i expect what we'll find is that 858870 built its release notes before 858871 but then the release notes for 858871 were published before 858870 | 15:12 |
| elodilles | so as soon as another patch gets merged, the proper release notes will be present | 15:16 |
| elodilles | if i understand correctly | 15:17 |
| elodilles | meanwhile, i fast-approved the generated reno-link patch, we'll run the script to generate all the missing reno links later on and propose a follow-up patch some time next week | 15:20 |
| fungi | elodilles: sounds probable, yes. basically they built in one order but got published in reverse sequence, i think because we don't have strict ordering control between different branches in promote. clarkb does that match your understanding of supercedent pipelines? | 15:30 |
| clarkb | I thought we did | 15:31 |
| clarkb | if you have change A and B from different branches for the same project in a supercedent pipeline I thought they would still run oen at at time | 15:32 |
| clarkb | the order is determined by the order events are received | 15:33 |
| clarkb | but https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/latest/config/pipeline.html#value-pipeline.manager.supercedent says they are grouped by project,ref and maybe that means branches in which case I'd be wrong | 15:33 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Add release note links for zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858866 | 15:36 |
| clarkb | Even if we could solve this with the pipeline config what prevents the next zed patch from landing and overwriting things again? | 15:37 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 15:37 | |
| clarkb | Seems like fixing this from a publication standpoint is probably preferable to avoid that problem? | 15:38 |
| *** marios is now known as marios|out | 15:46 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release monasca-events-api RC1 for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857131 | 15:51 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release adjutant-ui RC1 for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857048 | 15:51 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release adjutant RC1 for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857049 | 15:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release mistral-dashboard RC1 for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857126 | 15:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release magnum-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858414 | 15:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release cinder-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858401 | 15:59 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release zaqar-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858431 | 15:59 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release kuryr-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858413 | 16:05 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release barbican-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858399 | 16:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release heat-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858409 | 16:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release octavia-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858421 | 16:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release senlin-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858424 | 16:06 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release solum-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858425 | 16:11 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release monasca-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858417 | 16:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release murano-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858418 | 16:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release mistral-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858416 | 16:14 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release manila-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858415 | 16:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release ec2api-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858405 | 16:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release freezer-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858407 | 16:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release cloudkitty-tempest-plugin for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858402 | 16:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for mistral-extra https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858286 | 16:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for python-mistralclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858290 | 16:23 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Creating stable zed for mistral-lib https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/858287 | 16:25 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release networking-generic-switch for Zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/857224 | 16:32 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!