Friday, 2023-01-20

*** blarnath is now known as d34dh0r5307:00
*** blarnath is now known as d34dh0r5307:09
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej07:52
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [mistral] Release beta version for Antelope  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/86944809:12
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [mistral] Release for Antelope-2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/86947009:15
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [mistral] Release for Antelope-2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/86947009:50
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel10:41
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Fix validator for std-with-versions  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/87122910:46
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch13:24
ttxo/14:00
elodilleso/14:01
ttx#startmeeting releaseteam14:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Fri Jan 20 14:01:52 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam'14:01
hberaudo/14:02
ttxLooks like the lag is larger today14:02
ttxAlright, let's get going14:02
ttxPing list: hberaud armstrong elodilles14:02
elodilles~o~14:02
ttx#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/antelope-relmgt-tracking14:02
armstrongo/14:03
ttxdown to line...25214:03
ttx#topic Review task completion14:03
ttxGenerate a list of intermediary-released service deliverables that have not done a release in this cycle yet and propose release model change for them (ttx)14:03
elodillesR-9. scary14:03
ttxI did find a bunch but most of them have already responded in previous years14:03
ttxvitrage however looked like a good candidate14:04
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Zed  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/87128014:04
ttx#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/87053914:04
ttxwaiting for a second +214:04
elodillesPTL approved, so I guess we can proceed14:05
ttxPropose convenience releases for Xena to ease the transition of Xena to Extended Maintenance and avoid rush and broken releases when the transition deadline is coming (hberaud)14:05
elodilleswith the merge14:05
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Yoga  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/87128114:05
hberaudhttps://review.opendev.org/q/topic:xena-stable14:06
ttxanything to add?14:06
elodillesthere have been many releases \o/ thanks hberaud for proposing these14:06
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/87128214:06
hberaudnope14:06
ttxand... I'll send the countdown email after this meeting14:06
elodillesgood to see that some projects are active on their stable branches14:06
ttx#topic Review countdown email14:07
elodilleswill it be the 'Between Milestone-2 and Milestone-3' one?14:07
ttxNeed to copy it over, sorry14:07
ttxactually14:08
ttxI did cover those in separate emails14:08
ttxnot sure it's worth sending one for this week14:08
ttxonly vitrage got flagged and that was +1ed already14:08
ttxthoughts?14:09
elodillesif those were all covered, then let's skip the mail14:09
hberaud+114:09
ttxok14:10
ttx#topic Assign next week tasks14:10
ttxall set14:10
elodillesi've already took all14:10
elodillestaken14:11
ttx#topic Assign the next Chair14:11
ttxdone too14:11
elodillesthat too o:)14:11
ttx#topic Discuss about zaqar's inclusion14:11
elodilles(as I had to skip last meeting at the last minute, sorry for that)14:11
hberaudgmann: FYI ^14:12
hberaudelodilles: np14:13
ttxwho can summarize the issue?14:13
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej14:14
elodilleswell, i just read the new (?) info on the tracking page14:14
hberaudzaqar is not in good fit and possible it could be a good candidate for inactive project14:14
elodillesthe last sentence is: "as zaqar team knows the issue and not sure when they will fix it. I think you can take decision on skipping its release and send on ML. After that if no release happening, gate is broken then TC can mark it as Inactive project."14:15
fungithe most i know is that zaqar's testing relies on mongodb, which is no longer open source and so has disappeared form the supported platforms for our upcoming release. the attempts to rsolve that have been ongoing since days after the zed release, and at present the project is still unable to merge any new changes, though they're working on dropping mongodb testing aiui14:15
ttxI'd rather not be the one deciding to not include it.. ideally that would be a TC decision14:15
ttxwe are not empowered to make that type of decision14:15
ttx(dropping a deliverable from the next release)14:16
elodilleson the other hand we are quite late14:16
hberaudelodilles: +114:16
elodillesso a decision should be made very quickly i guess14:16
fungiit was brought to the tc's attention as a risk over winter holidays, but didn't get much traction at the time (mostly due to everyone being away or preoccupied, i think)14:17
fungiyear-end holidays i mean14:17
fungi(northern-hemisphere winter)14:17
fungiit initially came to my attention when another project reported having to drop zaqar integration testing in order to be able to continue merging changes14:18
ttxfungi: was a patch proposed to mark it inactive?14:19
ttxMayIf not maybe we should push that14:19
hberaudhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/87009814:19
ttx*If14:19
elodilles16:36:29 <gmann> for zaqar decision, I will propose 25 Jan which is next TC meeting to check and decide.14:19
ttxOK how about we track status there14:20
elodillesi see this in tc meeting log ^^^14:20
ttxand wait until next week14:20
elodillesyes, let's track the status14:20
ttxOK anything else on that topic?14:21
elodillesdid PTLs respond to Bobcat Schedule?14:21
ttxlimited response, some did +114:22
ttxnot ready to be approved yet14:22
ttx#topic Open discussion14:22
elodillesack, thanks14:22
ttxI guess we moved to open discussion :)14:22
elodilles:]14:22
elodillessorry o:)14:22
ttxFair warning that my February is pretty busy travel-wise14:22
hberaudack14:23
ttxI put me name to chair one of the only meetings I'll be attending14:23
elodillesack14:23
ttxanything else to discuss?14:23
elodillesmaybe worth to mention:14:24
elodilles#link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:inactive-release-test14:24
elodillesso,  14:24
elodillesadjutant deliverables were released14:24
elodillesand mistral gates are also fixed14:25
elodillesso I think the mistral release patches can be merged, too14:25
ttx\o/14:25
elodillesi've updated them today14:25
elodillesam i right that the new PTL is not added to governance repo?14:26
elodilles(mistral)14:26
elodillesjust because in that case we won't get PTL-Approved triggered14:26
ttxok... if nothing else we can close the meeting early14:26
ttxah hm14:27
fungihttps://opendev.org/openstack/governance/src/branch/master/reference/projects.yaml#L73214:27
fungimistral is dpl14:27
fungiaccording to the current data anyway14:27
ttxwe might want to add their release liaison for sure14:27
fungithey have two release liaisons listed14:27
elodillesi can prepare the governance patch if that doesn't exist14:28
avanzaghimistral is still DPL for this cycle I can confirm14:28
fungiwhat needs patching in governance?14:28
elodillesfungi: those are former liaisons and quite inactive :/14:28
fungioh14:28
elodilles* they14:29
elodillesavanzaghi: i'll prepare a patch to add you as release liaison if taht's OK14:29
fungihttps://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-December/031417.html14:30
fungilinked from comments in proposed governance change https://review.opendev.org/86656214:30
elodillesand thanks for your efforts & fixing the gates :)14:30
fungiso yes, probably worth getting gmann to revisit since that comment was from 2022-12-0714:30
elodillesavanzaghi: if you could review the mistral release patches that would be awesome: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:inactive-release-test14:31
avanzaghiright I'll look at it14:32
elodillesand if everything is OK then I think we should release them. ttx hberaud : is that OK?14:32
hberaudWFM14:32
ttxyes14:32
elodilles\o/14:33
elodillesthanks14:33
ttxAlright, anything else to discuss?14:33
elodillesnothing else from me for now14:33
hberaudnope14:34
ttxok then14:34
ttx#endmeeting14:34
opendevmeetMeeting ended Fri Jan 20 14:34:14 2023 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:34
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2023/releaseteam.2023-01-20-14.01.html14:34
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2023/releaseteam.2023-01-20-14.01.txt14:34
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2023/releaseteam.2023-01-20-14.01.log.html14:34
ttxHave a great weekend!14:34
elodillesthanks ttx o/14:34
elodillessame to you14:34
hberaudthanks ttx 14:34
armstrongthanks ttx14:34
elodillesone more thing outside from the meeting: i was thinking and realized that the validator would fail on ironic's stable/2023.1 branch cut, so I've prepared a fix for it, please review when you'll have time: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/87122914:36
elodilles(so far only the 'std' branch mode is fixed, this will make the validator pass for 'std-with-versions' branch mode, too)14:38
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Release octavia-dashboard for stable/xena  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/87063015:35
gmannelodilles: ttx: hi, yes for zaqar, as PTL is trying to fix the issue, TC would like to check with release team if 25th as deadline to decide on Zaqar inclusion in release? if that is not too late for release team15:45
gmannelodilles: updaets on other two projects which you might know: 1. Adjutant:  it is all good and also it is removed from inactive status https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/86966515:46
ttxgmann: 25th should be fine15:47
gmannelodilles: Mistral: also all good as python-mistralclient gate is also green and all good to go https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-mistralclient/+/869607/15:47
gmannttx: thanks15:47
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch15:49
elodillesgmann: thanks for the info! I've updated the mistral release patches already, so we are good to go with that as well :)15:59
opendevreviewAxel Vanzaghi proposed openstack/releases master: [mistral] Release beta version for Antelope  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/86944816:00
gmannyeah, just saw those. thanks 16:00
elodillesnp16:01
avanzaghiwe have another commit made by Tobias in mistral, I've changed the hash, otherwise seems good16:01
elodillesavanzaghi: thanks, will check as soon as the zuul jobs finish16:02
*** marios is now known as marios|out16:43
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel16:46
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off17:29
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out21:22

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!