Monday, 2023-07-03

ralonsohelodilles, hi (I don't know if this is the correct channel). I have a question about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/88727009:03
ralonsohis passing the check CI but not the gate. I fixed the issue in the Neutron UTs but it is not released. I think we need to release a new Neutron version to pass the gate CI, right?09:04
elodillesralonsoh: looking09:08
elodillesralonsoh: the test is passing now, and the requirements patch is merging, so for this patch there's no need to release neutron09:11
ralonsohelodilles, it is failing again in the gate CI09:11
ralonsohhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/stream/e22eb1699f524c3581b97b845a2e6209?logfile=console.log09:12
elodillesoh, and why doesn't fail that on check queue? :-o09:13
ralonsohactually the neutron version has the fix, I've checked this now09:13
ralonsohelodilles, ok ok, this is failing in other part of the code, let me check that first09:14
ralonsohsorry for the noise09:15
elodillesnp09:15
elodillesit's interesting though that the very same job passed on check queue and now failing on the gate queue09:15
ralonsohelodilles, ok, I've reproduced it locally. But it was not failing last week when I fixed the first issue09:18
ralonsohsorry for that, I'll fix it 09:18
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for keystonemiddleware  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88748309:31
elodillesnp09:32
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for metalsmith  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88748409:34
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for octavia-lib  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88748509:36
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for os-vif  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88748609:38
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for oslo.config  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88748809:44
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for oslo.metrics  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88748909:47
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for oslo.middleware  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88749009:48
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for oslo.utils  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88749109:55
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for ovsdbapp  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88749209:56
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-cyborgclient  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88749410:00
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-glanceclient  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88749610:02
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-ironicclient  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88749710:03
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-manilaclient  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88749810:07
tonybWhat tool creates the doc/source/<series>/schedule,yaml?10:08
tonybI want to create a tool that modifies said file (for elections), but the file seems not to be created with yamlutils.dumps().10:10
tonybYou can verify for yourself by running (eg): format-yaml doc/source/bobcat/schedule.yaml10:11
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-neutronclient  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88749910:11
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-troveclient  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88750010:14
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for tosca-parser  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88750110:20
elodillestonyb: it is initially generated with this script for every cycle and that's it: https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/tools/list_weeks.py10:35
elodillesall the other details are added by hand when planning the cycle schedule10:36
tonybAhh cool.10:38
tonybfix/patches incomming10:39
opendevreviewThierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Remove networking-odl from Bobcat release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88750410:42
opendevreviewThierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Deprecate Tripleo independent deliverables  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88750511:02
opendevreviewTony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Fix duplicate key in bobcat schedule  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88735511:08
opendevreviewTony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Update list_weeks to use the release yamlutils  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88750611:08
opendevreviewTony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Run format-yaml over doc/source/bobcat/schedule.yaml  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88750711:08
opendevreviewTony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Add 2024.1/"cantaloupe" election events to the 2023.2/bobcat schedule  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88750811:08
opendevreviewRodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/releases master: [neutron] Transition networking-odl Ussuri release to EOL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88715211:36
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Recommend to use format-yaml for schedule yaml  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88751913:54
ralonsohelodilles, hello! I have a question related to backports and config options. The patch is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/78964816:04
ralonsohthis is adding missing config options to the neutron.conf file. I know that we should not backport patches that modify any config option16:05
ralonsohbut this patch in particular is adding the missing placement options entry_points to the neutron config16:06
ralonsohcan I backport it?16:06
elodillesralonsoh: does it change default value? if there is a deployed environment where the new neutron stable release would be installed would it cause changed behaviour?16:33
ralonsohelodilles, no, it is adding the default value (if any) to the config file because these config knobs should be there16:33
ralonsohactually most of these config parameters don't have default value, but are missing in the config template16:34
elodillesbackporting a config option is not that bad IFF that does not cause issues during upgrading to the new package. on the other hand it's a bit like a feature, so best to avoid backporting them. (of course e.g. in nova we do backport config options for bug fixes - a knob that can be set to turn on new function that should not be backported otherwise...)16:38
elodillesso as a summary: if it's not harmful and the team decides it's worth backporting then do it. (but be careful what to backport)16:40
ralonsohelodilles, perfect, thanks!16:41
gmannelodilles: governance change is merged now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88723819:24
elodillesgmann: thanks, +W'd the patch!19:41
gmannthanks19:41
elodillesnp19:41
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Mark winstacker project deliverables retired  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/88723819:52

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!