ralonsoh | elodilles, hi (I don't know if this is the correct channel). I have a question about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/887270 | 09:03 |
---|---|---|
ralonsoh | is passing the check CI but not the gate. I fixed the issue in the Neutron UTs but it is not released. I think we need to release a new Neutron version to pass the gate CI, right? | 09:04 |
elodilles | ralonsoh: looking | 09:08 |
elodilles | ralonsoh: the test is passing now, and the requirements patch is merging, so for this patch there's no need to release neutron | 09:11 |
ralonsoh | elodilles, it is failing again in the gate CI | 09:11 |
ralonsoh | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/stream/e22eb1699f524c3581b97b845a2e6209?logfile=console.log | 09:12 |
elodilles | oh, and why doesn't fail that on check queue? :-o | 09:13 |
ralonsoh | actually the neutron version has the fix, I've checked this now | 09:13 |
ralonsoh | elodilles, ok ok, this is failing in other part of the code, let me check that first | 09:14 |
ralonsoh | sorry for the noise | 09:15 |
elodilles | np | 09:15 |
elodilles | it's interesting though that the very same job passed on check queue and now failing on the gate queue | 09:15 |
ralonsoh | elodilles, ok, I've reproduced it locally. But it was not failing last week when I fixed the first issue | 09:18 |
ralonsoh | sorry for that, I'll fix it | 09:18 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for keystonemiddleware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887483 | 09:31 |
elodilles | np | 09:32 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for metalsmith https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887484 | 09:34 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for octavia-lib https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887485 | 09:36 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for os-vif https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887486 | 09:38 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for oslo.config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887488 | 09:44 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for oslo.metrics https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887489 | 09:47 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for oslo.middleware https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887490 | 09:48 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for oslo.utils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887491 | 09:55 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for ovsdbapp https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887492 | 09:56 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-cyborgclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887494 | 10:00 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-glanceclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887496 | 10:02 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-ironicclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887497 | 10:03 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-manilaclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887498 | 10:07 |
tonyb | What tool creates the doc/source/<series>/schedule,yaml? | 10:08 |
tonyb | I want to create a tool that modifies said file (for elections), but the file seems not to be created with yamlutils.dumps(). | 10:10 |
tonyb | You can verify for yourself by running (eg): format-yaml doc/source/bobcat/schedule.yaml | 10:11 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-neutronclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887499 | 10:11 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for python-troveclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887500 | 10:14 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Bobcat-2 release for tosca-parser https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887501 | 10:20 |
elodilles | tonyb: it is initially generated with this script for every cycle and that's it: https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/src/branch/master/tools/list_weeks.py | 10:35 |
elodilles | all the other details are added by hand when planning the cycle schedule | 10:36 |
tonyb | Ahh cool. | 10:38 |
tonyb | fix/patches incomming | 10:39 |
opendevreview | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Remove networking-odl from Bobcat release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887504 | 10:42 |
opendevreview | Thierry Carrez proposed openstack/releases master: Deprecate Tripleo independent deliverables https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887505 | 11:02 |
opendevreview | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Fix duplicate key in bobcat schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887355 | 11:08 |
opendevreview | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Update list_weeks to use the release yamlutils https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887506 | 11:08 |
opendevreview | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Run format-yaml over doc/source/bobcat/schedule.yaml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887507 | 11:08 |
opendevreview | Tony Breeds proposed openstack/releases master: Add 2024.1/"cantaloupe" election events to the 2023.2/bobcat schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887508 | 11:08 |
opendevreview | Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/releases master: [neutron] Transition networking-odl Ussuri release to EOL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887152 | 11:36 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Recommend to use format-yaml for schedule yaml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887519 | 13:54 |
ralonsoh | elodilles, hello! I have a question related to backports and config options. The patch is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/789648 | 16:04 |
ralonsoh | this is adding missing config options to the neutron.conf file. I know that we should not backport patches that modify any config option | 16:05 |
ralonsoh | but this patch in particular is adding the missing placement options entry_points to the neutron config | 16:06 |
ralonsoh | can I backport it? | 16:06 |
elodilles | ralonsoh: does it change default value? if there is a deployed environment where the new neutron stable release would be installed would it cause changed behaviour? | 16:33 |
ralonsoh | elodilles, no, it is adding the default value (if any) to the config file because these config knobs should be there | 16:33 |
ralonsoh | actually most of these config parameters don't have default value, but are missing in the config template | 16:34 |
elodilles | backporting a config option is not that bad IFF that does not cause issues during upgrading to the new package. on the other hand it's a bit like a feature, so best to avoid backporting them. (of course e.g. in nova we do backport config options for bug fixes - a knob that can be set to turn on new function that should not be backported otherwise...) | 16:38 |
elodilles | so as a summary: if it's not harmful and the team decides it's worth backporting then do it. (but be careful what to backport) | 16:40 |
ralonsoh | elodilles, perfect, thanks! | 16:41 |
gmann | elodilles: governance change is merged now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887238 | 19:24 |
elodilles | gmann: thanks, +W'd the patch! | 19:41 |
gmann | thanks | 19:41 |
elodilles | np | 19:41 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Mark winstacker project deliverables retired https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/887238 | 19:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!