| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release senlin-tempest-plugin for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895568 | 13:00 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Nova 2023.2 Bobcat cycle highlights https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/894213 | 13:00 |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: Castellan 4.3.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896237 | 13:28 |
| hberaud | frickler: FYI ^ | 13:29 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: ironic 22.0.0 + stable/2023.2 branch for Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896156 | 13:44 |
| opendevreview | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/releases master: add release notes links for bobcat 2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896240 | 13:45 |
| hberaud | meeting in ~8 min | 13:53 |
| elodilles | ACK | 13:53 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release Horizon 23.3.0 as the final tag for 2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895823 | 13:56 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [horizon] Create stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895577 | 13:57 |
| hberaud | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Sep 22 14:00:03 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hberaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| hberaud | Ping list: elodilles armstrong | 14:00 |
| hberaud | See you at line 441 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/bobcat-relmgt-tracking | 14:00 |
| elodilles | o/ | 14:00 |
| opendevreview | Carlos Eduardo proposed openstack/releases master: Release manila-tempest-plugin for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895561 | 14:02 |
| hberaud | ok, let's go! | 14:02 |
| hberaud | #topic Review task completion | 14:02 |
| hberaud | 1) Process any standing RC1 deadline exceptions | 14:02 |
| hberaud | everything is done \o/ => https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bobcat-rc1-deadline+is:open | 14:02 |
| elodilles | \o/ | 14:02 |
| hberaud | 2) oslo.db + castellan release issues (hberaud) | 14:02 |
| hberaud | so | 14:02 |
| hberaud | oslo.db seems almost fixed | 14:02 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/896053 | 14:03 |
| hberaud | we just have a post job failure on keystone but I don't think this is related to the sqla migration | 14:03 |
| frickler | someone needs to talk to masakari or propose a patch for them | 14:03 |
| hberaud | frickler: you mean release patches? | 14:04 |
| frickler | to add sqla-migrate to their requirements | 14:04 |
| frickler | in order for 896053 to pass | 14:04 |
| frickler | no, patch for masakari reqs.txt | 14:04 |
| elodilles | hberaud: you mean s/keystone/masakari/ right? | 14:04 |
| frickler | there was an unstable keystone failure, too, but that can be ignored | 14:05 |
| hberaud | frickler: what if we relocate sqlamigrate on oslo.db's requirements? | 14:05 |
| hberaud | instead of fight with masakari | 14:05 |
| hberaud | moving sqla-migrate from test-req to reqs should solve the issue, isn't? | 14:06 |
| frickler | that might also work, but will require yet another release | 14:06 |
| ttx | o/ | 14:06 |
| hberaud | I think this patch would be more short | 14:06 |
| ttx | sorry I'm late | 14:06 |
| hberaud | s/patch/path | 14:06 |
| frickler | 3rd option is to just make the job on reqs n-v | 14:06 |
| frickler | stephenfin: ^^ want to share your opinion on this? | 14:07 |
| hberaud | personally I prefer the oslo.db solution, hence we don't have surprise again with missing reqs | 14:07 |
| frickler | I guess you can propose a patch for that and then have the possible discussion continue there | 14:09 |
| hberaud | concerning castellan I proposed a new release ~ 1h ago => https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896237 | 14:09 |
| elodilles | if i understand correctly sqla-migrate is not a direct dependency of oslo.db, is it? | 14:09 |
| hberaud | yeah, I'll submit the patch after the meeting | 14:09 |
| frickler | elodilles: it was earlier, now it no longer is | 14:09 |
| hberaud | elodilles: the problem come from this move https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.db/commit/caebf7620e94999ee6cfb5bcfad1db50572008bf | 14:10 |
| hberaud | we just have a to move this reqs back as it was before | 14:10 |
| frickler | yes, and we did that patch because release automation was complaining | 14:10 |
| stephenfin | hberaud: the problem came from masakari being an effectively dead project that isn't merging patches | 14:11 |
| frickler | but we later resolved that that only affected a patch release | 14:11 |
| hberaud | yeah too | 14:11 |
| elodilles | hberaud: oh, so this is a new patch already on stable/2023.2 | 14:11 |
| hberaud | elodilles: yeah | 14:11 |
| stephenfin | sqlalchemy-migrate is a direct dependency of masakari. They should include it in their requirements.txt | 14:11 |
| hberaud | stephenfin: I totally agree with you | 14:11 |
| ttx | tempted to revert that change yes | 14:11 |
| elodilles | hberaud: then "it's too late", +1 for adding back to oslo.db | 14:11 |
| elodilles | ttx: +1 | 14:12 |
| stephenfin | the addition of sqlalchemy-migrate was also a new patch on stable/2023.2 | 14:12 |
| ttx | but we can also push that patch in masakari, so that it's fixed (one day) | 14:12 |
| frickler | stephenfin: well it was the revert of removing it, so not new compared to 2023.1, right? | 14:13 |
| stephenfin | yes, true | 14:13 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.db/+/896214 | 14:13 |
| hberaud | ttx, elodilles please have a look to the castellan patch | 14:15 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896237 | 14:15 |
| frickler | hberaud: btw. thanks for https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-September/035183.html , I hope we can make something happen on the TC side | 14:16 |
| hberaud | stephenfin: this patch is dedicated to C? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/879743 | 14:16 |
| * elodilles looking | 14:16 | |
| stephenfin | yup, for C | 14:16 |
| hberaud | frickler: np | 14:16 |
| ttx | +2 | 14:17 |
| hberaud | and as said frickler on my side I opened a thread more dedicated to open a discussion on how to manage this kind of issue on the long terms https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-September/035183.html | 14:17 |
| hberaud | ttx: thx | 14:18 |
| elodilles | +2+W | 14:18 |
| hberaud | and I think that's all for now concerning this topic | 14:18 |
| fungi | the tc does have authority to request core reviewer permission to any openstack project and approve changes | 14:18 |
| hberaud | then this is a good news | 14:19 |
| fungi | though i think they should consider any need to exercise that a strong signal of abandonment | 14:19 |
| hberaud | agree | 14:19 |
| ttx | they should more actively retire inactive projects while we still can (start of cycle rather than end of cycle) | 14:19 |
| elodilles | ttx: ++ | 14:19 |
| hberaud | ++ | 14:19 |
| ttx | but for now, masakari is in | 14:19 |
| elodilles | somewhat related: now i looked at not merged upper constraints bumping patches: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:new-release+branch:master+is:open | 14:21 |
| elodilles | is there any critical among them? ^^^ | 14:21 |
| elodilles | similar like oslo.db / castellan were? | 14:21 |
| frickler | there is oslo.messaging, but I'm unsure about the details | 14:22 |
| frickler | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/892919 | 14:22 |
| hberaud | will check this oslo.messaging bump after the meeting | 14:23 |
| elodilles | hberaud: thanks! | 14:24 |
| fungi | as long as oslo.messaging 14.4.0 made it in, that fixes a security vulnerability | 14:24 |
| frickler | fungi: that's exactly the issue, it is breaking some projects | 14:24 |
| frickler | but the failure is not always covered by testing from what I've heard | 14:25 |
| hberaud | yeah this security fix is known to break some services | 14:25 |
| elodilles | :S | 14:25 |
| fungi | yeah, i still haven't requested a cve for it because it's been unclear if anyone was going to make oslo.messaging less breaky or try to merge fixes to the services being broken by it | 14:26 |
| fungi | granted, i was on the fence about whether we'd issue an advisory at all, it seems fairly low-risk but we don't have earlier precedent for treating notifications as sensitive data | 14:27 |
| fungi | so i guess if we issue an advisory for it after 2023.2 that's probably not the end of the world | 14:27 |
| hberaud | yeah | 14:27 |
| * fungi makes a note to add a comment on the bug saying this is the current hold-up | 14:28 | |
| hberaud | thanks I'd suggest to continue the discussion directly on the patch | 14:29 |
| elodilles | ++ | 14:29 |
| fungi | yes, or in the bug report | 14:29 |
| hberaud | yup | 14:29 |
| hberaud | anything else concerning this topic? | 14:29 |
| hberaud | ok next task | 14:30 |
| hberaud | 3) Gracefully release tempest plugins with latest changes available (elod) | 14:30 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bobcat-tp-latest | 14:30 |
| elodilles | half of them have merged | 14:30 |
| elodilles | we have some where we have -1s from team | 14:30 |
| elodilles | and i've +2+PTL-Approved+1'd those where we can continue with merging if everything is OK | 14:31 |
| frickler | and we've had a team wondering where their patch was ;) | 14:31 |
| hberaud | ack | 14:31 |
| hberaud | some gates seems broken | 14:32 |
| elodilles | frickler: yepp, we only release IFF there were newly merged patches ;) | 14:32 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895567 | 14:32 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895562 | 14:32 |
| elodilles | OR there's no release at all :X | 14:32 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895563 | 14:33 |
| elodilles | hberaud: right, yes, there are those where gate is broken | 14:33 |
| hberaud | but gmann said that he is ok to merge them | 14:33 |
| elodilles | i guess we should release anyway and hope the best they fix their gates | 14:34 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Castellan 4.3.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896237 | 14:34 |
| hberaud | wfm | 14:34 |
| ttx | +1 | 14:34 |
| frickler | at least some of these are on my list to discuss as questionable for the next cycle | 14:34 |
| elodilles | we had this (unfortunately) in the past... | 14:34 |
| elodilles | frickler: +1 | 14:34 |
| hberaud | I just approved those without replies | 14:35 |
| hberaud | anything else concerning this task? | 14:36 |
| hberaud | 4) On Monday, generate stable branches for all cycle deliverables that are still missing one (elod) | 14:36 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bobcat-missing-stable-branches | 14:37 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/894778 | 14:37 |
| elodilles | yepp, we have those 2 ^^^ horizon + python-barbicanclient | 14:37 |
| hberaud | I see the horizon patch is now ok | 14:37 |
| elodilles | yepp | 14:37 |
| elodilles | i was hesitant to update python-barbicanclient, as we are way over client-lib deadline, but maybe it's better to release | 14:38 |
| elodilles | to have the gate fix in the final release | 14:38 |
| elodilles | what do you think? | 14:38 |
| ttx | yeah it's not a functional change | 14:39 |
| hberaud | concerning barbican I agree with you, fix could be released through a RC2 | 14:39 |
| elodilles | ACK, then i'll update the patch ASAP | 14:39 |
| hberaud | ok | 14:39 |
| ttx | standing by for +2 | 14:39 |
| hberaud | +1 | 14:39 |
| ttx | release like it's Friday | 14:39 |
| hberaud | :) | 14:40 |
| hberaud | 5) After all the projects enabled in devstack by default have been branched, we can engage with the (elod) | 14:40 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [barbican] Create 2023.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/894778 | 14:40 |
| elodilles | there you go ^^^ | 14:41 |
| hberaud | yep | 14:41 |
| elodilles | PATCH version bump should be OK i hope | 14:41 |
| frickler | is horizon enabled by default in devstack? I need to check | 14:41 |
| elodilles | s/i hope/i think/ | 14:42 |
| hberaud | lgtm | 14:42 |
| ttx | +3 | 14:42 |
| hberaud | so, if I'm right, we still miss this one to engage with QA, etc... | 14:42 |
| elodilles | if we release horizon, then it's not a question anymore :) | 14:43 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release magnum-tempest-plugin for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895560 | 14:43 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release barbican-tempest-plugin for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895548 | 14:44 |
| elodilles | do we want to wait for PTL-Approved on horizon branch cut patch? | 14:44 |
| frickler | it is indeed, so go, go, go, release ;) | 14:44 |
| hberaud | horizon just need a second review | 14:44 |
| elodilles | (well, the release is already happened, we just need the branch cut there) | 14:44 |
| hberaud | I think we can go | 14:45 |
| * elodilles agrees | 14:45 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release kuryr-tempest-plugin for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895559 | 14:45 |
| elodilles | i've +2+W'd | 14:45 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release zun-tempest-plugin for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895575 | 14:45 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release freezer-tempest-plugin for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895556 | 14:45 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release octavia-tempest-plugin for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895566 | 14:45 |
| ttx | boo you beat me to it | 14:45 |
| elodilles | :) | 14:45 |
| elodilles | double-approved :) | 14:46 |
| hberaud | elodilles: so I suppose you will engage discussion after the meeting? | 14:46 |
| elodilles | yepp, i'll start the QA/I18N/Req task after the meeting | 14:46 |
| elodilles | right | 14:46 |
| hberaud | ack | 14:46 |
| hberaud | thanks | 14:46 |
| hberaud | then move on | 14:47 |
| hberaud | 6) Ensure that all projects that are publishing release notes have the notes link included in their deliverable file (hberaud) | 14:47 |
| hberaud | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896240 | 14:47 |
| hberaud | as always I think we will have PTL who will say that they are not listed there, I think we could add their links in a follow-up patch | 14:48 |
| elodilles | note: we don't need to wait for PTLs to approve the patch ^^^ if it looks right (generated patch) we can merge it | 14:48 |
| hberaud | wfm | 14:48 |
| elodilles | hberaud: ++ | 14:48 |
| ttx | Yeah, how about we wait Monday to give them a chance to review it? | 14:48 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release sahara-tests for 2023.2 Bobcat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895567 | 14:48 |
| ttx | then we just +2 it | 14:48 |
| hberaud | but I think we can wait early monday to catch issues | 14:48 |
| hberaud | agree with thierry | 14:49 |
| hberaud | this kind of update is quickly generated | 14:49 |
| hberaud | 7) Let cycle-with-rc projects iterate on RCs as needed. The final release candidate for each project needs to be prepared at least one week before the final release date | 14:50 |
| elodilles | this is more like a guideline ^^^ | 14:50 |
| elodilles | i haven't seen any rc2 yet | 14:51 |
| hberaud | so I don't think we things to do there, I see that the nova team already proposed a RC2 | 14:51 |
| ttx | ack | 14:51 |
| elodilles | oh :-o | 14:51 |
| elodilles | did they? :-o | 14:51 |
| elodilles | ACK, I'll review it | 14:51 |
| hberaud | ah I surely confused with a RC1 update | 14:51 |
| hberaud | I see sylvain pushed a PS2 somewhere | 14:52 |
| hberaud | so ignore my comment | 14:52 |
| elodilles | OK, so no rc2 yet :) | 14:52 |
| hberaud | ok move on | 14:52 |
| hberaud | #topic Assign next week tasks | 14:52 |
| hberaud | everything isnnow assigned | 14:53 |
| hberaud | thanks elodilles | 14:53 |
| elodilles | \o/ | 14:53 |
| hberaud | and I see elodilles is our next chair, thanks | 14:53 |
| elodilles | np :) | 14:53 |
| hberaud | #topic Review countdown email | 14:54 |
| hberaud | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:54 |
| ttx | lgtm | 14:55 |
| frickler | do you want to include an update on last weeks warning section? | 14:55 |
| elodilles | LGTM, too | 14:55 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [horizon] Create stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/895577 | 14:55 |
| hberaud | frickler: which warning? | 14:56 |
| frickler | the one that was added about oslo.db and things | 14:56 |
| hberaud | this topic already have its own thread, not sure that will be really useful there | 14:57 |
| hberaud | any opinion? | 14:57 |
| ttx | yeah, probably good as its own thread | 14:58 |
| elodilles | +1 | 14:59 |
| hberaud | ack | 14:59 |
| ttx | need to jump to my next meeting | 14:59 |
| hberaud | sent | 14:59 |
| hberaud | #topic Open Discussion | 14:59 |
| elodilles | ttx: o/ | 14:59 |
| hberaud | Anything else that you want to discuss today? | 14:59 |
| elodilles | i don't have any topic | 15:00 |
| ttx | nothing from me | 15:00 |
| hberaud | ttx: np, thanks | 15:00 |
| hberaud | We fulfiled our time slot :) | 15:00 |
| hberaud | thanks everyone! | 15:01 |
| elodilles | thanks hberaud o/ | 15:01 |
| hberaud | #endmeeting | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Sep 22 15:01:26 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2023/releaseteam.2023-09-22-14.00.html | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2023/releaseteam.2023-09-22-14.00.txt | 15:01 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2023/releaseteam.2023-09-22-14.00.log.html | 15:01 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [barbican] Create 2023.2 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/894778 | 15:03 |
| elodilles | now we have all branched \o/ ^^^ | 15:03 |
| elodilles | and this can be merged too i think: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896240 | 15:08 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: Create stable/2023.2 for devstack https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896295 | 20:12 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: Create stable/2023.2 for grenade https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/896296 | 20:16 |
| gmann | elodilles: hberaud: ^^ QA tasks | 20:16 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!