| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: [OpenStackAnsible] Transition Train to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/904819 | 09:21 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: [OpenStackAnsible] Transition Ussuri to End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/904820 | 09:23 |
| noonedeadpunk | elodilles: fwiw, pushed T/U EOL for OSA ^ | 09:23 |
| noonedeadpunk | sorry for the delay | 09:24 |
| elodilles | noonedeadpunk: no problem, you are not late with them :] thank btw \o/ | 09:25 |
| elodilles | will review them | 09:25 |
| ttx | ohai | 14:00 |
| ttx | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Jan 5 14:00:59 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| elodilles | o/ | 14:01 |
| elodilles | happy new year o/ | 14:01 |
| ttx | Was about to ping you, I'll skip that. Happy new year! | 14:01 |
| ttx | Our agenda is at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/caracal-relmgt-tracking down to line ~168 | 14:01 |
| ttx | #topic Review task completion | 14:02 |
| ttx | * Ahead of MembershipFreeze, run governance_consistency.py (ttx) | 14:02 |
| ttx | So I did that and got a couple of hits | 14:02 |
| ttx | First, defined in governance but not in deliverable files: | 14:02 |
| ttx | magnum-capi-helm-charts: Added Aug 2023, never released yet, no activity... maybe we should ask the Magnum team what they want to do about it in Caracal | 14:03 |
| elodilles | yepp, this seems new | 14:03 |
| ttx | The other two have been around for a while without being released: barbican-ui (barbican) and rbd-iscsi-client (cinder) | 14:03 |
| ttx | I suspect those two are still not ready | 14:04 |
| elodilles | i have the same feeling | 14:04 |
| ttx | elodilles: could you follow up with Magnum on the first one? I'm off next week | 14:04 |
| elodilles | ttx: sure, will do | 14:04 |
| ttx | thanks! | 14:05 |
| elodilles | np | 14:05 |
| ttx | We also have things defined in deliverable files but not in (active) governance: | 14:05 |
| ttx | A lot of Tripleo deliverables are still defined in _independent | 14:05 |
| fungi | i've been meaning to ask the tc what the next steps are with those | 14:06 |
| ttx | if we don;t expect new releases there we should make them release-model: abandoned so they do not trigger in our tooling | 14:06 |
| fungi | people still report security bugs for them, but i have the impression there's nobody around to fix anything | 14:06 |
| ttx | fungi: that would be great | 14:06 |
| fungi | i think tonyb was also going to make inquiries inside rh | 14:07 |
| ttx | fungi: can I add a task for you regarding that? | 14:07 |
| fungi | please do | 14:07 |
| fungi | i'll get it on the tc's meeting agenda | 14:07 |
| ttx | The other one is cinderlib | 14:08 |
| ttx | which is now marked deprecated for 2024.1. | 14:08 |
| ttx | I suspect the caracal deliverable file should be removed? | 14:08 |
| fungi | i was just now reviewing the deprecation change for it in opendev systems | 14:08 |
| fungi | will probably merge in a few minutes | 14:08 |
| elodilles | i can propose the patch to remove the cinderlib deliverable, | 14:09 |
| elodilles | and we'll need PTL+1 for that anyway | 14:09 |
| ttx | ok and we can follow up on that | 14:09 |
| elodilles | ++ | 14:09 |
| fungi | probably don't need ptl +1 since there's a governance change which already merged | 14:09 |
| ttx | that was all the discrepancies that were found | 14:09 |
| fungi | but up to you | 14:09 |
| elodilles | fungi: oh, that's true :S | 14:09 |
| fungi | #link https://review.opendev.org/903259 Deprecate cinderlib | 14:10 |
| ttx | The other task was to send the email, which I'll do once we review it | 14:10 |
| ttx | #topic Assign R-12 tasks | 14:10 |
| elodilles | i'll ping the PTL/release liaison then simply via IRC | 14:10 |
| ttx | They are all assigned | 14:10 |
| ttx | Thanks elodilles for covering for us French vacationers | 14:11 |
| ttx | #topic Review email to send | 14:11 |
| ttx | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:11 |
| ttx | lgtm | 14:12 |
| elodilles | mail LGTM | 14:12 |
| elodilles | (maybe the 2024.1 in the 1st line is not needed... anyway, i've added it there) | 14:13 |
| ttx | ack | 14:13 |
| ttx | will send in a few | 14:13 |
| elodilles | (feel free to skip it if you don't like it there :)) | 14:13 |
| elodilles | +1 | 14:13 |
| ttx | #topic Open Discussion | 14:13 |
| ttx | Anything else? | 14:13 |
| elodilles | one thing from me: | 14:14 |
| elodilles | i've started to mess around with the new unmaintained/<seres> branching & <series>-eom tagging | 14:15 |
| elodilles | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:relmgt-unmaintained-state | 14:15 |
| elodilles | this should be more or less enough to make it work as a minimum, but i need reviews | 14:16 |
| elodilles | to catch if i've missed anything | 14:16 |
| ttx | ok will have a look today before I leave | 14:16 |
| elodilles | thanks in advance o/ | 14:16 |
| ttx | Anything else? | 14:17 |
| elodilles | then we definitely need some testing with release-test | 14:17 |
| elodilles | that's all from me | 14:17 |
| ttx | Alright then, let's close early... | 14:17 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 14:17 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Jan 5 14:17:45 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:17 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-01-05-14.00.html | 14:17 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-01-05-14.00.txt | 14:17 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-01-05-14.00.log.html | 14:17 |
| fungi | tripleo next steps now on the tc meeting agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee | 14:17 |
| ttx | thanks everyone! | 14:17 |
| elodilles | thanks ttx o/ | 14:17 |
| elodilles | fungi: cool, thanks! | 14:18 |
| fungi | hopefully we'll have some idea of what to do with them on tuesday | 14:18 |
| elodilles | fungi: btw, if i'm not mistaken we have a new batch of EOLd stable branches that need deletions, so I could run the branch clean up script if that's OK | 14:19 |
| fungi | elodilles: yep, go for it. we did a gitea upgrade yesterday but it looks like things are replicating correctly to it, nothing else planned that might disrupt branch deletions afaik | 14:20 |
| elodilles | \o/ will do it then | 14:21 |
| elodilles | ttx: oh, and this one could get a review, too: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/904742 | 14:21 |
| fungi | maybe we'll see another small drop in stable branch test failure reports | 14:21 |
| elodilles | fungi: oh, regarding that... it seems we have now another repos beside horizon that got deleted but somehow periodic stable jobs still run against them :S | 14:23 |
| elodilles | fungi: automaton castellan debtcollector futurist horizon oslotest osprofiler | 14:24 |
| elodilles | fungi: ^^^ train branch of these are deleted but they are still there in periodic-stable pipeline :S | 14:24 |
| fungi | is there a change open to clean those up? i can look into it | 14:25 |
| elodilles | (besides horizon... i could not figure out how, yet...) | 14:25 |
| elodilles | the EOL changes were merged, then I've run the clean up script without issue on december 21st | 14:26 |
| elodilles | no other change i'm aware of | 14:26 |
| elodilles | i guess these will disappear at least when we remove the train series from the periodic-stable pipeline, but it's strange how these are still in the queue every night... | 14:27 |
| fungi | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/project/opendev.org/openstack/automaton | 14:28 |
| fungi | says it still has the openstack-python3-train-jobs template | 14:29 |
| elodilles | hmmm. i remember we saw that with horizon, too. though the branch is deleted, so the template should disappear, right? | 14:30 |
| fungi | yeah, it's like zuul missed the branch deletion event. when was it deleted? | 14:31 |
| elodilles | on dec 21st iirc | 14:31 |
| elodilles | yepp, that day: https://meetings.opendev.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2023-12-21.log.html | 14:33 |
| fungi | i'll bring it up in #opendev and see if folks have ideas. it does seem like some gerrit events go missing or get skipped during these mass branch deletions, a zuul online reconfigure would likely clean that up but it would be good to know why it happens | 14:34 |
| elodilles | thanks o/ | 14:35 |
| elodilles | actually horizon was the 1st miss and it happened 1+ month ago, so zuul hasn't cleaned that up (yet?) | 14:36 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [cinder] Remove deprecated cinderlib deliverable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/904862 | 15:31 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Set Stein series state as End of Life https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/904742 | 15:58 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Update series statuses https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/904866 | 17:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!