*** haleyb is now known as haleyb|out | 00:38 | |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final debcollctor for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909504 | 02:05 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final etcd3gw for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909503 | 02:06 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final tooz for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909588 | 02:07 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final tooz for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909588 | 02:08 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final futurist for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909633 | 02:11 |
frickler | list of branches that were deleted yesterday https://paste.opendev.org/show/bDlFtIFeWnQwJl4MbdfU/ | 08:45 |
frickler | the train deletions didn't work at first because the series was already marked as eol, so I had to run from an older repo state, which didn't include the timestamp patch. need to remember next time to first delete branches | 08:46 |
frickler | elodilles: this is the list of branches with open reviews, maybe you can run the abandon script on them later? https://paste.opendev.org/show/bFMruBniFEI40rcegwoJ/ | 08:50 |
frickler | then there was this: | 08:55 |
frickler | openstack/openstack-ansible-ops contains eol stale branch (train) | 08:55 |
frickler | No train-eol tag found! Branch cannot be deleted. Skipping. | 08:55 |
frickler | and somehow murano team has been ignored by the delete script for stable/train | 08:56 |
frickler | oh wait, maybe I went too far back in the repo? QA repos also weren't deleted. /me tries again with just reverting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909508 locally | 08:58 |
elodilles | frickler: ack, thanks, will run the abandon script against them o/ | 09:15 |
elodilles | frickler: also thanks for the branch deletions, many branches disappeared \o/ how lovely :) | 09:15 |
frickler | o.k., getting new branches to delete for train now, will proceed with those | 09:16 |
elodilles | frickler: yepp, i forgot that the delete scripts runs only against non-eol branches :S and yepp, the easiest workaround is just to set it something else than eol locally | 09:17 |
elodilles | frickler: ACK, tahnks! | 09:17 |
elodilles | frickler: done >>> https://paste.opendev.org/show/bjPV8y4UTVi0AiY850bu/ | 09:23 |
frickler | 15 more branches deleted: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bJWmO7zeWL5cxgH85CK6/ | 09:28 |
frickler | elodilles: thx, so I'll rerun eom deletions now, too | 09:29 |
elodilles | thx o/ | 09:30 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final openstacksdk for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909399 | 09:39 |
opendevreview | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.middleware for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909419 | 10:23 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.utils for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909427 | 10:24 |
frickler | and the final set https://paste.opendev.org/show/bNiXbwLS7QAaV5eQeMvg/ | 10:24 |
elodilles | \o/ looks good, thanks! | 10:27 |
opendevreview | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.middleware for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909419 | 10:34 |
elodilles | frickler: btw, i think we can proceed with this patch, see my comment there: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/906586 | 10:34 |
frickler | elodilles: I tend to agree, we were also discussing this in the TC meeting yesterday and JayF asked whether a TC chair approval would be helpful, but I don't mind simply proceeding like this. same thing for mistral I guess? | 10:43 |
frickler | regarding openstack-ansible-ops, there was a failure in the tag-releases job, but sadly the logs are gone. is there any way to reprocess the tagging? https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/024e29e93367458793943505b29a2a62 | 10:44 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final os-ken for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909401 | 10:50 |
opendevreview | Pranali Deore proposed openstack/releases master: Release final glance_store for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909436 | 11:49 |
opendevreview | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.middleware for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909419 | 12:02 |
opendevreview | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.middleware for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909419 | 12:05 |
elodilles | frickler: ah i see, train-eol is missing: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops# | 12:48 |
frickler | yes, but it was part of https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/724afb1076eb3ea2bf0c15df544d0ba8947f591c | 12:49 |
elodilles | frickler: i guess the same happened like with stein: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/903600 | 12:49 |
frickler | elodilles: oh, that seems plausible, yes | 12:50 |
elodilles | let me cherry pick the patch to train | 12:51 |
elodilles | frickler: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/909655 | 12:54 |
elodilles | so we probably need to alter a bit the history of openstack-ansible-ops :/ | 12:54 |
frickler | elodilles: you mean because of the test failure? I would suggest to instead force-merge the change if noonedeadpunk gives a +2 | 13:02 |
noonedeadpunk | ++ | 13:10 |
elodilles | thanks o/ | 13:13 |
elodilles | i mean we have to update the train-eol hash of openstack-ansible-opsin the releases repo | 13:14 |
elodilles | wait. i remember something, that though we updated it the same way for stein, the tagging after the merge still went against the old hash... or something like that... | 13:15 |
elodilles | nope. the hash is the one where the tagging was done | 13:17 |
elodilles | sorry, my bad | 13:17 |
elodilles | anyway, let's do that and we'll see | 13:17 |
elodilles | (at least as i see ussuri does not have (did not have) this issue anymore) | 13:21 |
frickler | elodilles: done | 13:49 |
frickler | tkajinam: any progress on puppet yoga-eom? seems that that is the only remaining project now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/906571 | 13:50 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [murano] Transition Yoga to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/906586 | 14:03 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final stevedore for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909431 | 14:04 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.service for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909425 | 14:08 |
tkajinam | frickler, CentOS introduced another regression and still c9s jobs in stable branches are blocked. I don't want to backport the workaround assuming these branches may no longer be updated, so it may be a deadline | 14:46 |
tkajinam | I can move it forward, knowing the job definition in stable branches will be broken once we retire some inactive modules such as puppet-qdr. I myself have no interest to fix it but someone from unmaintained core would take care of it... | 14:47 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: [Puppet OpenStack] Transition Yoga to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/906571 | 14:49 |
tkajinam | let's merge it now. it may cause messy config error but we can just abandon these... | 14:51 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Fix openstack-ansible-ops train-eol hash https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909683 | 15:08 |
elodilles | frickler: i'm not sure this will trigger the tagging now that we have set train as EOL ^^^ :/ | 15:09 |
frickler | elodilles: I guess we'll find out as soon as noonedeadpunk has had time to take another look. if not we'll have to set a tag manually I guess? running out of options and I'm not sure how much further effort we'd want to invest | 16:18 |
noonedeadpunk | voted on it | 16:21 |
elodilles | thanks o/ | 16:23 |
elodilles | yepp, if it won't succeed then manual tagging is the option :/ | 16:23 |
frickler | tkajinam: thanks, approved | 16:23 |
elodilles | (fortunately, a fix had merged ages ago to not re-open EOL'd branches in a similar case, as we had it in the past and reopening a tons of openstack-ansible roles repos acidentally and deleting them again wasn't really fun :S) | 16:24 |
elodilles | (fingers crossed) | 16:25 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.log for 2024.1 Caracal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909416 | 16:31 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [Puppet OpenStack] Transition Yoga to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/906571 | 16:35 |
frickler | elodilles: want to approve your train fix yourself? or should we ask some other core to crosscheck? | 16:43 |
frickler | nevermind, I'm too curious now to see if this works and single-approving as bug fix | 17:43 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Fix openstack-ansible-ops train-eol hash https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909683 | 17:53 |
frickler | meh :( 2024-02-21 17:54:58.582559 | ubuntu-jammy | /home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/releases/deliverables/train/openstack-ansible-roles.yaml skipping closed series | 17:58 |
elodilles | yepp, that's what i thought :/ | 18:35 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!