Wednesday, 2024-02-21

*** haleyb is now known as haleyb|out00:38
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final debcollctor for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90950402:05
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final etcd3gw for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90950302:06
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final tooz for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90958802:07
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final tooz for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90958802:08
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final futurist for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90963302:11
fricklerlist of branches that were deleted yesterday https://paste.opendev.org/show/bDlFtIFeWnQwJl4MbdfU/08:45
fricklerthe train deletions didn't work at first because the series was already marked as eol, so I had to run from an older repo state, which didn't include the timestamp patch. need to remember next time to first delete branches08:46
fricklerelodilles: this is the list of branches with open reviews, maybe you can run the abandon script on them later? https://paste.opendev.org/show/bFMruBniFEI40rcegwoJ/08:50
fricklerthen there was this:08:55
frickleropenstack/openstack-ansible-ops contains eol stale branch (train)08:55
fricklerNo train-eol tag found! Branch cannot be deleted. Skipping.08:55
fricklerand somehow murano team has been ignored by the delete script for stable/train08:56
frickleroh wait, maybe I went too far back in the repo? QA repos also weren't deleted. /me tries again with just reverting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909508 locally08:58
elodillesfrickler: ack, thanks, will run the abandon script against them o/09:15
elodillesfrickler: also thanks for the branch deletions, many branches disappeared \o/ how lovely :)09:15
fricklero.k., getting new branches to delete for train now, will proceed with those09:16
elodillesfrickler: yepp, i forgot that the delete scripts runs only against non-eol branches :S and yepp, the easiest workaround is just to set it something else than eol locally09:17
elodillesfrickler: ACK, tahnks!09:17
elodillesfrickler: done >>> https://paste.opendev.org/show/bjPV8y4UTVi0AiY850bu/09:23
frickler15 more branches deleted: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bJWmO7zeWL5cxgH85CK6/09:28
fricklerelodilles: thx, so I'll rerun eom deletions now, too09:29
elodillesthx o/09:30
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final openstacksdk for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90939909:39
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.middleware for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90941910:23
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.utils for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90942710:24
fricklerand the final set https://paste.opendev.org/show/bNiXbwLS7QAaV5eQeMvg/10:24
elodilles\o/ looks good, thanks!10:27
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.middleware for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90941910:34
elodillesfrickler: btw, i think we can proceed with this patch, see my comment there: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90658610:34
fricklerelodilles: I tend to agree, we were also discussing this in the TC meeting yesterday and JayF asked whether a TC chair approval would be helpful, but I don't mind simply proceeding like this. same thing for mistral I guess?10:43
fricklerregarding openstack-ansible-ops, there was a failure in the tag-releases job, but sadly the logs are gone. is there any way to reprocess the tagging? https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/024e29e93367458793943505b29a2a6210:44
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final os-ken for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90940110:50
opendevreviewPranali Deore proposed openstack/releases master: Release final glance_store for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90943611:49
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.middleware for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90941912:02
opendevreviewDaniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.middleware for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90941912:05
elodillesfrickler: ah i see, train-eol is missing: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops#12:48
frickleryes, but it was part of https://opendev.org/openstack/releases/commit/724afb1076eb3ea2bf0c15df544d0ba8947f591c12:49
elodillesfrickler: i guess the same happened like with stein: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/90360012:49
fricklerelodilles: oh, that seems plausible, yes12:50
elodilleslet me cherry pick the patch to train12:51
elodillesfrickler: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-ops/+/90965512:54
elodillesso we probably need to alter a bit the history of openstack-ansible-ops :/12:54
fricklerelodilles: you mean because of the test failure? I would suggest to instead force-merge the change if noonedeadpunk gives a +213:02
noonedeadpunk++13:10
elodillesthanks o/13:13
elodillesi mean we have to update the train-eol hash of openstack-ansible-opsin the releases repo13:14
elodilleswait. i remember something, that though we updated it the same way for stein, the tagging after the merge still went against the old hash... or something like that...13:15
elodillesnope. the hash is the one where the tagging was done13:17
elodillessorry, my bad13:17
elodillesanyway, let's do that and we'll see13:17
elodilles(at least as i see ussuri does not have (did not have) this issue anymore)13:21
fricklerelodilles: done13:49
fricklertkajinam: any progress on puppet yoga-eom? seems that that is the only remaining project now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90657113:50
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [murano] Transition Yoga to Unmaintained  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90658614:03
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final stevedore for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90943114:04
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.service for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90942514:08
tkajinamfrickler, CentOS introduced another regression and still c9s jobs in stable branches are blocked. I don't want to backport the workaround assuming these branches may no longer be updated, so it may be a deadline14:46
tkajinamI can move it forward, knowing the job definition in stable branches will be broken once we retire some inactive modules such as puppet-qdr. I myself have no interest to fix it but someone from unmaintained core would take care of it...14:47
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: [Puppet OpenStack] Transition Yoga to Unmaintained  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90657114:49
tkajinamlet's merge it now. it may cause messy config error but we can just abandon these...14:51
opendevreviewElod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Fix openstack-ansible-ops train-eol hash  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90968315:08
elodillesfrickler: i'm not sure this will trigger the tagging now that we have set train as EOL ^^^ :/15:09
fricklerelodilles: I guess we'll find out as soon as noonedeadpunk has had time to take another look. if not we'll have to set a tag manually I guess? running out of options and I'm not sure how much further effort we'd want to invest16:18
noonedeadpunkvoted on it16:21
elodillesthanks o/16:23
elodillesyepp, if it won't succeed then manual tagging is the option :/16:23
fricklertkajinam: thanks, approved16:23
elodilles(fortunately, a fix had merged ages ago to not re-open EOL'd branches in a similar case, as we had it in the past and reopening a tons of openstack-ansible roles repos acidentally and deleting them again wasn't really fun :S)16:24
elodilles(fingers crossed)16:25
opendevreviewTakashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: Release final oslo.log for 2024.1 Caracal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90941616:31
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: [Puppet OpenStack] Transition Yoga to Unmaintained  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90657116:35
fricklerelodilles: want to approve your train fix yourself? or should we ask some other core to crosscheck?16:43
fricklernevermind, I'm too curious now to see if this works and single-approving as bug fix17:43
opendevreviewMerged openstack/releases master: Fix openstack-ansible-ops train-eol hash  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/90968317:53
fricklermeh :( 2024-02-21 17:54:58.582559 | ubuntu-jammy |   /home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/releases/deliverables/train/openstack-ansible-roles.yaml skipping closed series17:58
elodillesyepp, that's what i thought :/18:35

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!