opendevreview | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/releases master: Add a release highlight for Designate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/911012 | 00:12 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/releases master: Add a release highlight for Octavia SR-IOV https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/911013 | 00:13 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: [heat] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910931 | 04:49 |
opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/releases master: [tacker] Create 2024.1 branch for client and non-client libs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910935 | 04:49 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Release horizon for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/906842 | 08:53 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release horizon for stable/zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/906842 | 09:37 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Create new castellan with major bump https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910883 | 09:43 |
elodilles | frickler: now that reno release is out and OSA gate is fixed i guess we can move on with the vwx-unmaintained patches, right? if yes, then when i'll get there i'll start reviewing those patches | 10:02 |
frickler | elodilles: I've been thinking about that, too, and I'm not sure. on one hand I'd really like to get over with this, on the other hand I don't want to be responsible for even more gate issues at this time in the cycle. also the rate of ptl acks seems to be still quite low, but maybe a few pings could improve that | 10:09 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: fix R-5 template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910710 | 10:10 |
elodilles | frickler: yes, the best should have been to set everything to unmaintained in November, but we were still figuring out things around that time... we have still some time until RC1 and final RC, timing is not fortunate, but let's do it ASAP, IMO :/ | 10:22 |
elodilles | i'll ping PTLs where needed | 10:22 |
frickler | elodilles: ok, I'll join you in reviewing later today, then | 10:23 |
elodilles | ACK, thanks! | 10:24 |
elodilles | +2+W'd one of the vwx-unmaintained patches to see things are working correctly. if they are, then i'll continue with the +2'ing | 14:47 |
frickler | elodilles: oh, I approved one, too. also please see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910406 , I think that is a "missed repo for eol" case | 14:49 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cloudkitty] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910390 | 14:49 |
elodilles | frickler: wow. that is strange. let me look around what happened with magnum :-o | 14:52 |
elodilles | wow. interesting: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/897744 | 14:55 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [ec2-api] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910391 | 14:56 |
clarkb | elodilles: that actually calls out one of my major concerns with magnum from an end user perspective. I want to be able to manage kubernetes (within reason) and upgrade it regardless of how old magnum is on the cloud side | 14:56 |
clarkb | but everything is so tightly coupled together there which means if the cloud doesn't do regular upgrades your clusters are unlikely to get updated too without manual interventions | 14:57 |
clarkb | I wonder if the new drivers improve that | 14:57 |
frickler | tag-releases for cloudkitty went well https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/b6d5573a17eb489ba07702a93338e6df also we managed to approve the same patch twice ;) | 14:58 |
frickler | elodilles: that tagged victoria-em twice https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/897744/2/deliverables/victoria/python-magnumclient.yaml | 14:59 |
frickler | I wonder why no check job complained | 14:59 |
frickler | clarkb: that may be part of the reason why so many people use other tools to manage their k8s cluster | 15:01 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [magnum] Transition python-magnumclient to EOL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910406 | 15:05 |
opendevreview | Michael Johnson proposed openstack/releases master: Add a release highlight for Designate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/911012 | 15:10 |
elodilles | frickler: the check job simply ignored the 2nd victoria-em tagging as there was already a victoria-em tag. and probably we don't have a check in the validator for double *-e[ol,m,om] tags... :S | 15:11 |
elodilles | frickler: i think, again, we have to process 1st requirements eom transition (but WITHOUT deleting its stable branches), otherwise unit test jobs on the .gitreview patches will fail :/ | 15:31 |
frickler | elodilles: ah, we can do that, yes, I'm willing to override ptl-ack in that case | 15:34 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [requirements] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910433 | 15:37 |
elodilles | i've updated the hashes as meanwhile clarkb's patches have merged ^^^ | 15:37 |
elodilles | +2+W'd the patch ^^^ | 16:04 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [requirements] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910433 | 16:11 |
elodilles | and merged ^^^ | 16:11 |
elodilles | btw, we had a release job failure, for ec2-api, but tags and branch cuts are there. (and it's actually a POST_FAILURE): https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/release-job-failures@lists.openstack.org/thread/URR25BMHJ2TXTWP2OVBXVITATVIFLKRM/ | 16:12 |
frickler | elodilles: weird, seems the zuul console log broke off but then log collection still worked | 16:32 |
elodilles | :-o | 16:33 |
elodilles | maybe only part of the logs are missing | 16:33 |
frickler | clarkb: fungi: ^^ nothing too serious I guess, I just don't think I've seen that happen in this combination | 16:33 |
clarkb | the console and log collections are largely independent | 16:35 |
clarkb | they only intersect with the upload of the job-output.txt | 16:35 |
clarkb | looks likethere was an ssh timeout which would alignwith console going away | 16:36 |
clarkb | then ya may not have gotten all the log files off hteh ost that had network trouble | 16:36 |
frickler | elodilles: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ec2-api/+/911135 is still failing after a recheck. do you want to investigate further before proceeding? | 17:35 |
elodilles | frickler: well, py36 started to pass, the py38 probably is a valid gate issue. it will either be fixed by an unmaintainer, or i'll look into it when i'll have time, but currently the important thing is that requirement branching solved the main issue | 17:53 |
frickler | elodilles: well from the error for py38 it wasn't clear to me whether it might also be reqs related. so you are ok with moving on? | 18:01 |
elodilles | frickler: yepp, i think it is OK. i've started to approve some patches | 18:11 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [zaqar] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910401 | 18:16 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [masakari] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910417 | 18:19 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [blazar] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910431 | 18:23 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [magnum] Transition python-magnumclient to EOL https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910406 | 18:25 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [designate] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910416 | 18:31 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [tacker] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910429 | 18:33 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [nova] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910385 | 18:34 |
opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: [neutron] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910402 | 18:48 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [octavia] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910387 | 18:48 |
elodilles | i think that's all from me for today. will continue tomorrow o/ | 18:51 |
elodilles | anyway, i'll run the abandon script now for the merged patches | 18:51 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [cinder] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910409 | 19:17 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: [watcher] Transition EM branches to Unmaintained https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/910412 | 20:09 |
opendevreview | Brian Haley proposed openstack/releases master: Add Neutron cycle highlights (Caracal release) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/911379 | 21:29 |
JayF | Just a heads up; this just merged > Resolution: Remove Murano from 2024.1 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/910434 | 22:21 |
JayF | It doesn't look like they have any open PRs to create RCs. If there's any action we need to take in automation to reflect this, please do so or let me know what needs doing and I will. | 22:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!