| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 02:33 | |
| frickler | ttx: if your travels would allow a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/924954 that'd be nice | 06:10 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release Horizon for Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/924247 | 06:18 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release manila-tempest-plugin 2.4.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/924545 | 06:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release os-traits-3.1.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/924492 | 06:26 |
| frickler | lajoskatona: I would finally go ahead and tackle https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-November/031276.html now, first push eol tags and then delete the branches. can you confirm that this should affect all branches up to and including stable/xena by now? | 08:42 |
| lajoskatona | frickler: this was for tap-as-a-service am I right? | 09:08 |
| lajoskatona | frickler: Yes the mail opened now, let me check | 09:09 |
| lajoskatona | frickler: yes stable/xena is also included | 09:11 |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 09:14 | |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: Proposed 2025.1 Epoxy release schedule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/924671 | 09:57 |
| frickler | just ftr horizon dropping py3.8 support does cause extra work in reqs (because it is listed there as a dependency for plugins), we should be careful if more projects start doing the same | 10:45 |
| frickler | lajoskatona: FYI all done | 10:52 |
| lajoskatona | frickler: thanks | 11:28 |
| elodilles_ooo | reminder: meeting will start in less than half an hour | 12:32 |
| *** elodilles_ooo is now known as elodilles | 12:32 | |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 12:40 | |
| elodilles | frickler: yepp, (early) dropping py38 as supported version from setup.cfg (from oslo libraries) caused issues some cycles ago and we had to revert them afair | 12:55 |
| elodilles | #startmeeting releaseteam | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Jul 26 13:00:00 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is elodilles. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 13:00 |
| elodilles | Ping list: release-team elod | 13:00 |
| frickler | \o | 13:00 |
| elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/dalmatian-relmgt-tracking | 13:00 |
| elodilles | o/ | 13:00 |
| elodilles | we are way down at line 239 | 13:00 |
| elodilles | let's go through quickly on the agenda | 13:01 |
| elodilles | #topic Review R-12 and R-10 week task completion | 13:01 |
| elodilles | R-12 week's tasks are @ L223 | 13:02 |
| elodilles | 1st task: ' Review any remaining milestone-2 exceptions. (all)' | 13:02 |
| elodilles | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:dalmatian-milestone-2 | 13:02 |
| elodilles | no open patches, so this looks OK te me \o/ | 13:03 |
| frickler | ack | 13:03 |
| elodilles | 2nd task: ' Plan the next release cycle schedule. (elod) | 13:03 |
| elodilles | ' | 13:03 |
| elodilles | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/924671 | 13:04 |
| elodilles | sorry for proposing this quite late :S | 13:04 |
| frickler | I saw that you updated it, but will need to look again | 13:04 |
| elodilles | yepp, according to your comments | 13:04 |
| elodilles | nothing else | 13:04 |
| elodilles | anyway, it's a 26 weeks long schedule, | 13:05 |
| elodilles | release day at April 2nd | 13:05 |
| elodilles | Wednesday as usual | 13:05 |
| frickler | sounds fine in general | 13:05 |
| elodilles | the generated page from the patch: https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_efa/924671/2/check/openstack-tox-docs/efad2f3/docs/epoxy/schedule.html | 13:06 |
| elodilles | it's way before Easter | 13:06 |
| elodilles | one day after fools day :) | 13:06 |
| frickler | yes, I saw that easter is late next year | 13:06 |
| elodilles | the only concern maybe CubeCon Europe 2025 is just at that week as far as i saw, but i don't know how problematic that is | 13:07 |
| frickler | doesn't matter to me, and I don't think we can avoid conflicts with everything | 13:08 |
| elodilles | it would be good to get feedback from ttx from foundation point of view before we advertise this to PTLs/teams/community | 13:08 |
| fungi | i can also ask | 13:09 |
| fungi | (ttx is often quite busy these days) | 13:09 |
| elodilles | fungi: ACK, thanks in advance | 13:09 |
| frickler | we'll need more reviews anyway before we can announce this | 13:09 |
| elodilles | he is travelling this week i know, | 13:09 |
| elodilles | but one or two days delay shouldn't be a problem | 13:10 |
| elodilles | so yes, reviews are welcome :) | 13:11 |
| elodilles | okay, let's move on with the tasks for now | 13:12 |
| elodilles | these two were the tasks of R-12 | 13:12 |
| elodilles | now comes R-10 week's tasks: | 13:12 |
| elodilles | L243 | 13:12 |
| elodilles | 1st task: ' Generate a list of intermediary-released service deliverables that have not done a release in this cycle yet and propose release model change for them if applicable. (elod) | 13:13 |
| elodilles | the list of deliverables without any release: | 13:13 |
| elodilles | bifrost, ironic-prometheus-exporter, ironic-python-agent-builder, ironic-ui, networking-baremetal, networking-generic-switch, python-openstackclient, swift | 13:14 |
| elodilles | (elod) these are the usual ones. and we haven't suggested release model change for these over the past cycles, so i guess we can skip now as well | 13:14 |
| elodilles | let me know if you think differently | 13:14 |
| frickler | osc has at least proposed a release, though it is not quite ready for it yet | 13:15 |
| elodilles | frickler: +1 | 13:15 |
| frickler | but I'm fine with keeping things as they were | 13:15 |
| elodilles | +1 | 13:15 |
| elodilles | yepp. so, anyway, nothing new that would worth a release model change. moving on. | 13:16 |
| elodilles | 2nd task: ' Propose convenience releases for 2023.1 Antelope to ease the transition of Antelope to Unmaintained and avoid rush and broken releases when the transition deadline is coming. (elod)' | 13:17 |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 13:17 | |
| elodilles | i didn't get there to propose these releases this week, but planning to do that next week, when i'll be back in (home) office | 13:18 |
| elodilles | so this is still pending, i'm adding a reminder to next meeting's agenda | 13:18 |
| frickler | ack, doesn't seem to be too urgent and ptls will mostly take their time to respond anyway | 13:18 |
| elodilles | exactly o:) | 13:19 |
| elodilles | so these were the tasks from R-12 and R-10 weeks, moving on to next topic: | 13:19 |
| elodilles | #topic Assign R-8 week tasks | 13:20 |
| elodilles | well, that's a calm week, too, only 1 task (beyond the weekly mail) | 13:20 |
| elodilles | and i can handle that | 13:20 |
| elodilles | so 'all' tasks taken :) | 13:21 |
| elodilles | #topic Review countdown email for week R-9 | 13:21 |
| elodilles | ok, this will be tricky | 13:21 |
| elodilles | so here we have the template: | 13:22 |
| elodilles | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 13:22 |
| elodilles | and I've crossed out the non-relevant parts | 13:22 |
| elodilles | and actually i think this time we can skip to send this mail | 13:22 |
| elodilles | the only content will be the proposed 2025.1 Epoxy schedule | 13:23 |
| frickler | yes, I would have suggested not to include the build link that will soon expire | 13:23 |
| elodilles | afair we skipped this last cycle, too | 13:23 |
| frickler | but omitting the mail completely is likely the better solution | 13:23 |
| elodilles | frickler: yes, it really depends if the schedule is in a mostly-final state or still evolving :) | 13:24 |
| elodilles | i think we can skip the mail for now and early next week, when we have more feedback from foundation and release team, i can send a mail to advertise the proposed schedule to PTLs/community | 13:25 |
| frickler | +1 | 13:26 |
| elodilles | ACK, move on to next topic then! | 13:27 |
| elodilles | #topic Open Discussion | 13:27 |
| elodilles | anything to discuss? | 13:27 |
| fungi | sorry if it came up already, but is there anything specific the skyline team needs to do to be officially included in 2024.2/dalmatian now that the tc has graduated them out of emerging/tech preview state? or will they need to wait for 2025.1/epoxy since this happened after the membership freeze deadline? | 13:28 |
| frickler | afaict they already did get "official" releases before | 13:28 |
| frickler | so nothing will have to change? | 13:29 |
| fungi | they're official releases, just not clear whether they were considered part of the coordinated release or merely an official project making releases at the same time | 13:29 |
| elodilles | skyline-apiserver and skyline-console is listed under deliverables/dalmatian/ | 13:30 |
| ttx | Hi! sorry I just got back | 13:30 |
| fungi | though i guess they're included in https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/ for example, so maybe it's just the openstack-map that needs them added | 13:30 |
| fungi | and nothing for the release team to worry about | 13:30 |
| frickler | +1 | 13:30 |
| elodilles | fungi: yepp, they are considered to be part of the coordinated release of 2024.2 Dalmatian :) | 13:31 |
| frickler | I have just one review request that I mentioned earlier https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/924954 | 13:31 |
| ttx | will review the release schedule but I suspect it will be fine. | 13:31 |
| elodilles | ttx: thanks in advance! \o/ | 13:31 |
| fungi | oh, skyline did get added to the map too looking at https://www.openstack.org/software/ | 13:31 |
| elodilles | cool \o/ | 13:31 |
| elodilles | frickler: i commented on the patch | 13:35 |
| elodilles | 'requests' is a new (direct) dependency there, so probably we should bump MINOR version (6.7.0) | 13:36 |
| frickler | hmm, I'm pretty sure that it is an indirect dependency already, but 6.7.0 should be fine anyway | 13:36 |
| frickler | waiting for gtema and stephenfin to respond | 13:37 |
| elodilles | frickler: yepp, i have the same feeling | 13:37 |
| elodilles | (we should avoid new dependencies (at least beyond openstack libraries) on stable branches anyway, but 'requests' seems fine to me) | 13:38 |
| gtema | damn, I am getting insane from all those direct and indirect upgrades | 13:39 |
| elodilles | (and 2.14.2 as a lower req is well beyond stable/2024.1's upper constraint: 2.31.0, so should be fine) | 13:40 |
| elodilles | (s/well beyond/well under/) | 13:41 |
| elodilles | anything else to discuss? | 13:41 |
| frickler | just a matter of perspective ;) | 13:41 |
| elodilles | :] | 13:42 |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 13:42 | |
| frickler | seems like that's it o/ | 13:44 |
| elodilles | #info next weekly meeting is in 2 weeks - Aug 9th | 13:44 |
| elodilles | thanks ttx for chairing that one o/ | 13:44 |
| elodilles | Okay, if nothing else to discuss, then thanks everyone for participating and see you next week o/ | 13:45 |
| elodilles | #endmeeting | 13:45 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Jul 26 13:45:12 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 13:45 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-07-26-13.00.html | 13:45 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-07-26-13.00.txt | 13:45 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2024/releaseteam.2024-07-26-13.00.log.html | 13:45 |
| elodilles | gtema frickler: ping me when python-openstackclient is ready to be released and i'll +2+W the patch | 13:49 |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 14:15 | |
| clarkb | elodilles: frickler re dropping python versions one of the problems with oslo dropping older python first is that is an out of order sequence. You really need the applications to drop support first then the libraries. In this case it sounds like horizon may be treated as a library in some cases? | 15:41 |
| opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/releases master: Create release for oslo.policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/925032 | 17:03 |
| *** bauzas_ is now known as bauzas | 21:11 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!