| *** ykarel__ is now known as ykarel | 04:10 | |
| ttx | #startmeeting releaseteam | 14:00 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Fri Jul 4 14:00:32 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'releaseteam' | 14:00 |
| ttx | Ping list: release-team elod | 14:01 |
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible 2024.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/954132 | 14:03 |
| ttx | Anyone else here for the release team meeting? | 14:03 |
| frickler | \o | 14:04 |
| ttx | o/ | 14:04 |
| ttx | OK let's get started | 14:04 |
| ttx | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/flamingo-relmgt-tracking#L183 | 14:04 |
| ttx | Our agenda for today ^ | 14:04 |
| ttx | #topic Review task completion | 14:05 |
| ttx | - Generate release requests for all cycle-with-intermediary libraries which had changes, but did not release since milestone-1 (elod) | 14:05 |
| ttx | This was done | 14:05 |
| ttx | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:flamingo-milestone-2 | 14:05 |
| ttx | A bunch are waiting for a second review, we can clear out the exceptions next week | 14:06 |
| ttx | - Catch if there are acl issues in newly created repositories (ttx) | 14:06 |
| ttx | Done, no issue reported | 14:07 |
| ttx | - Propose convenience releases for 2024.1 Caracal (elod) | 14:07 |
| ttx | Not sure about the status of that one.. checking... | 14:07 |
| frickler | I don't remember seeing those | 14:08 |
| ttx | me neither | 14:08 |
| ttx | I'll push it back to next week | 14:08 |
| ttx | - Send emails to Cinder, Glance, Telemetry and Barbican teams about deliverables defined in governance but not in deliverable files (ttx) | 14:09 |
| ttx | This was done.. only the Telemetry team replied. | 14:09 |
| ttx | for the others it's not their first time on the list, so I assume we can ignore them | 14:09 |
| ttx | - Open up discussion with TC about why is Monasca still being listed with deliverables in governance (elod) | 14:10 |
| ttx | This was mentioned on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/governance/+/953671 | 14:10 |
| ttx | One issue here is that our scripts do not read off the inactive list | 14:11 |
| ttx | (to be fair it's not very machine-readable) | 14:11 |
| ttx | so I guess we'll continue to wait for that inconsistency to be resolved | 14:12 |
| ttx | - Send weekly email (ttx) | 14:12 |
| ttx | I'll do that shortly after this meeting | 14:12 |
| ttx | #topic Assign R-12 week tasks | 14:12 |
| ttx | all assigned | 14:14 |
| ttx | #topic Review weekly countdown email | 14:14 |
| ttx | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/relmgmt-weekly-emails | 14:14 |
| frickler | there's a stray word in L9 (applied strikethrough) | 14:16 |
| ttx | nice catch! | 14:16 |
| ttx | Will send in a minute | 14:17 |
| ttx | #topic Open Discussion | 14:17 |
| ttx | Anything else? | 14:17 |
| frickler | the issue we had with oslo.utils for 2024.2 now also affects an 2024.1 release (oslo.messaging I think) | 14:18 |
| frickler | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/953420 | 14:18 |
| frickler | one possible workaround that was mentioned would be to change references from e.g. oslo.utils to oslo_utils in constraints and maybe consuming projects' requirements | 14:19 |
| frickler | I'm not sure whether that's a valid move for stable branches, but it might be that we have no other choice | 14:20 |
| ttx | that might be worth a try | 14:20 |
| ttx | I think it's OK on stable branches, as it is a move to keep them working | 14:20 |
| ttx | I would love to have fungi 's eyes on that workaround but he is on holiday today | 14:23 |
| ttx | so probably a discussion to continue next week | 14:23 |
| ttx | anything else? | 14:23 |
| frickler | not from me I think | 14:24 |
| ttx | alright let's close this then | 14:24 |
| ttx | thanks frickler ! | 14:24 |
| ttx | #endmeeting | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Fri Jul 4 14:24:52 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-07-04-14.00.html | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-07-04-14.00.txt | 14:24 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/releaseteam/2025/releaseteam.2025-07-04-14.00.log.html | 14:24 |
| fungi | i can take a look | 14:24 |
| fungi | adjusting the package names in a stable branch constraints file doesn't seem like it should cause any problems, as long as they normalize to the same string | 14:25 |
| fungi | sadly we can't easily pin setuptools in these cases (not until everyone's relying on build-system.requires in pyproject.toml) so have to make adjustments as its behavior changes | 14:27 |
| frickler | will an "oslo_utils==7.4.0" entry in upper-constraints.txt take effect if a project has "oslo.utils" in its requirements.txt? or will the latter suddenly be unconstrained? something to test for I guess | 14:29 |
| fungi | yes, they'll be treated the same by pip | 14:29 |
| fungi | so it should work as intended still | 14:30 |
| fungi | pip normalizes all package names before performing comparisons | 14:30 |
| fungi | the problem we're running into is that we're querying metadata ourselves in some places and then not performing normalized matches | 14:30 |
| fungi | and tooling has decided to change whether it returns normized forms | 14:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!