| frickler | elodilles: do we want to do the osa release before or after the noble switch? I'm open to either option | 06:40 |
|---|---|---|
| noonedeadpunk | tthanks for fixing it btw | 07:57 |
| elodilles | frickler: let's release it before the noble switch | 09:54 |
| elodilles | frickler: and maybe we can do a test release after the noble switch with release-test | 10:00 |
| frickler | ok, approved, then I'll do the project-config change once the release is done, then prepare a release-test release, then we have some other small releases pending | 10:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release OpenStack-Ansible Flamingo RC1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/970005 | 10:29 |
| opendevreview | Elod Illes proposed openstack/releases master: release-test for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/970111 | 11:25 |
| elodilles | frickler: ^^^ here is the release-test test release :) | 11:25 |
| elodilles | maybe we can do a recheck first when the noble switch patch got merged | 11:26 |
| frickler | ok, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/963367 approved | 11:47 |
| elodilles | merged \o/ | 11:52 |
| elodilles | how long does it take for zuul to refresh its job configs? | 11:52 |
| elodilles | (btw, recheck is not needed as release-tox-{validate,list_changes} jobs are all running already under ubuntu-noble. i forgot that...) | 11:58 |
| frickler | zuul updates should be fast unless there is a long event queue. approved release-test now, worst case we need to do another one | 12:01 |
| elodilles | yepp | 12:04 |
| elodilles | let's see \o/ | 12:04 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: release-test for 2026.1 Gazpacho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/970111 | 12:12 |
| elodilles | okay, this one did not fail: https://zuul.openstack.org/build/dc969acb6a9544bb8529f27e133c0dc6 | 12:15 |
| frickler | hmm, I don't see it on https://tarballs.opendev.org/openstack/release-test/ yet ... maybe the AFS release still needs to run | 12:22 |
| elodilles | and neither this one: https://zuul.openstack.org/build/01eb5b99bf19476e8550b238a1ec637c | 12:24 |
| elodilles | openstack-release-test -- Mon, 08 Dec 2025 12:22:56 GMT -- 8.2.0 | 12:25 |
| elodilles | so at least this is on pypi | 12:26 |
| elodilles | https://pypi.org/project/openstack-release-test/#history | 12:26 |
| elodilles | now the tarball is there: https://tarballs.opendev.org/openstack/release-test/ | 12:27 |
| elodilles | so far so good | 12:28 |
| frickler | I agree, which one's next? sushy-tools? | 12:29 |
| elodilles | note that these are 2 out of the 6 job defs, and it seems that zuul does not even have any logs about the 4 other jobs... | 12:30 |
| elodilles | frickler: pick any you fancy | 12:30 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/releases master: Release sushy-tools 2.2.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/969806 | 12:38 |
| elodilles | sushy-tools is in place on pypi and tarballs.o.o | 12:51 |
| elodilles | so far it seems that release-openstack-python and publish-openstack-python-branch-tarball work as intended | 12:51 |
| elodilles | (the other 4 jobs are interesting though: stackviz merge and horizon release might trigger some, but it might be that not all 4 of them are used... or, even, none of them... O.o) | 12:53 |
| frickler | ah, yes, stackviz has a broken CI and I have it somewhere down on my todo list to look into that :( | 13:20 |
| frickler | I have no idea what eslint-config-openstack and karma-subunit-reporter but they seem to be QA projects, too. maybe we can ask gmaan whether we can do kind-of-dummy releases for (one of) them | 13:25 |
| elodilles | or just let things settle and if anything turn out to be broken, then for that specific job we can revert the change back to ubuntu-focal if needed. | 13:28 |
| fungi | okay, so the noble switch seems to have not created a problem with the test release, seems like? | 14:51 |
| fungi | i suppose the only other concern is whether it could impact a stable point release from our oldest maintained branch. unlikely but we've seen that before | 14:51 |
| elodilles | that's a good point. | 15:05 |
| elodilles | maybe we can wait for a release and see if things work properly and revert if not | 15:06 |
| *** jgwentworth is now known as melwitt | 19:01 | |
| *** melwitt is now known as jgwentworth | 22:31 | |
| *** jgwentworth is now known as melwitt | 22:32 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 4.0.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!